* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Momentum
Coriolis force wikipedia , lookup
Hamiltonian mechanics wikipedia , lookup
Newton's theorem of revolving orbits wikipedia , lookup
Center of mass wikipedia , lookup
Monte Carlo methods for electron transport wikipedia , lookup
Routhian mechanics wikipedia , lookup
Fictitious force wikipedia , lookup
Velocity-addition formula wikipedia , lookup
Old quantum theory wikipedia , lookup
Renormalization group wikipedia , lookup
Symmetry in quantum mechanics wikipedia , lookup
Tensor operator wikipedia , lookup
Relativistic quantum mechanics wikipedia , lookup
Uncertainty principle wikipedia , lookup
Mass versus weight wikipedia , lookup
Rigid body dynamics wikipedia , lookup
Matter wave wikipedia , lookup
Laplace–Runge–Lenz vector wikipedia , lookup
Quantum vacuum thruster wikipedia , lookup
Specific impulse wikipedia , lookup
Classical mechanics wikipedia , lookup
Accretion disk wikipedia , lookup
Photon polarization wikipedia , lookup
Theoretical and experimental justification for the Schrödinger equation wikipedia , lookup
Centripetal force wikipedia , lookup
Work (physics) wikipedia , lookup
Equations of motion wikipedia , lookup
Angular momentum wikipedia , lookup
Angular momentum operator wikipedia , lookup
Classical central-force problem wikipedia , lookup
Relativistic mechanics wikipedia , lookup
Momentum Chapter 9 Impulse and Momentum Momentum p= mv Impulse Momentum Change Theorem The sports announcer says "Going into the allstar break, the Chicago White Sox have the momentum." The headlines declare "Chicago Bulls Gaining Momentum." The coach pumps up his team at half-time, saying "You have the momentum; the critical need is that you use that momentum and bury them in this third quarter." Sports vs. Physics Momentum is a commonly used term in sports. A team that has the momentum is on the move and is going to take some effort to stop. A team that has a lot of momentum is really on the move and is going to be hard to stop. Momentum is a physics term; it refers to the quantity of motion that an object has. A sports team which is "on the move" has the momentum. If an object is in motion ("on the move") then it has momentum. Defining Momentum Momentum can be defined as "mass in motion." All objects have mass; so if an object is moving, then it has momentum - it has its mass in motion. The amount of momentum which an object has is dependent upon two variables: how much stuff is moving and how fast the stuff is moving. Momentum depends upon the variables mass and velocity. In terms of an equation, the momentum of an object is equal to the mass of the object times the velocity of the object. The Equations Momentum = mass * velocity In physics, the symbol for the quantity momentum is the small case "p"; thus, the above equation can be rewritten as p = m * v where m = mass and v=velocity. The equation illustrates that momentum is directly proportional to an object's mass and directly proportional to the object's velocity Defining the Units of Measure The units for momentum would be mass units times velocity units. The standard metric unit of momentum is the kg*m/s. While the kg*m/s is the standard metric unit of momentum, there are a variety of other units which are acceptable (though not conventional) units of momentum; examples include kg*mi/hr, kg*km/hr, and g*cm/s. In each of these examples, a mass unit is multiplied by a velocity unit to provide a momentum unit. This is consistent with the equation for momentum. Vector or Scalar? Momentum is a vector quantity. As discussed in an earlier unit, a vector quantity is a quantity which is fully described by both magnitude and direction. To fully describe the momentum of a 5-kg bowling ball moving westward at 2 m/s, you must include information about both the magnitude and the direction of the bowling ball. It is not enough to say that the ball has 10 kg*m/s of momentum; the momentum of the ball is not fully described until information about its direction is given. Defining Direction The direction of the momentum vector is the same as the direction of the velocity of the ball. In a previous unit, it was said that the direction of the velocity vector is the same as the direction which an object is moving. If the bowling ball is moving westward, then its momentum can be fully described by saying that it is 10 kg*m/s, westward. As a vector quantity, the momentum of an object is fully described by both magnitude and direction. Which variable (mass or velocity) defines momentum? From the definition of momentum, it becomes obvious that an object has a large momentum if either its mass or its velocity is large. Both variables are of equal importance in determining the momentum of an object. Consider a Mack truck and a roller skate moving down the street at the same speed. The considerably greater mass of the Mack truck gives it a considerably greater momentum. Yet if the Mack truck were at rest, then the momentum of the least massive roller skate would be the greatest; for the momentum of any object which is at rest is 0. Objects at rest do not have momentum they do not have any "mass in motion." Both variables - mass and velocity - are important in comparing the momentum of two objects. Conceptualizing Momentum The momentum equation can help us to think about how a change in one of the two variables might effect the momentum of an object. Consider a 0.5-kg physics cart loaded with one 0.5-kg brick and moving with a speed of 2.0 m/s. The total mass of loaded cart is 1.0 kg and its momentum is 2.0 kg*m/s. If the cart was instead loaded with three 0.5-kg bricks, then the total mass of the loaded cart would be 2.0 kg and its momentum would be 4.0 kg*m/s. A doubling of the mass results in a doubling of the momentum. Problem Solving Momentum Similarly, if the 2.0-kg cart had a velocity of 8.0 m/s (instead of 2.0 m/s), then the cart would have a momentum of 16.0 kg*m/s (instead of 4.0 kg*m/s). A quadrupling in velocity results in a quadrupling of the momentum. These two examples illustrate how the equation p=m*v serves as a "guide to thinking" and not merely a "recipe for algebraic problem-solving." 1. Determine the momentum of a ... 60-kg halfback moving eastward at 9 m/s. 1000-kg car moving northward at 20 m/s. 40-kg freshman moving southward at 2 m/s. 1 Answers A) p = m * v (60 kg)(9m/s) = 540 kg * m /s B) p = m * v (1000 kg)(20 m/s) 20,000 kg* m/s C) p = m * v 40 kg * 2 m/s 80 kg * m/s 2. A car possesses 20 000 units of momentum. What would be the car's new momentum if ... its velocity were doubled. its velocity were tripled. its mass were doubled (by adding more passengers and a greater load) both its velocity were doubled and its mass were doubled. 2 answers A) 40, 000 units (doubling the velocity will double the momentum) B) 60, 000 units (tripling the velocity will triple the momentum C) 40, 000 units (doubling the mass will double the momentum) D) 80, 000 units (doubling the mass and doubling the velocity will quadruple the momentum) 3. A halfback (m = 60 kg), a tight end (m = 90 kg), and a lineman (m = 120 kg) are running down the football field. Consider their ticker tape patterns below. Compare the velocities of these three players. How many times greater is the velocity of the halfback and the velocity of the tight end than the velocity of the lineman? Connecting Momentum and Impulse As mentioned in the previous part of this lesson, momentum is a commonly used term in sports. When a sports announcer says that a team has the momentum they mean that the team is really on the move and is going to be hard to stop. An object with momentum is going to be hard to stop. To stop such an object, it is necessary to apply a force against its motion for a given period of time. The more momentum which an object has, the harder that it is to stop. Thus, it would require a greater amount of force or a longer amount of time (or both) to bring an object with more momentum to a halt. As the force acts upon the object for a given amount of time, the object's velocity is changed; and hence, the object's momentum is changed. Momentum in sports The concepts in the above paragraph should not seem like abstract information to you. You have observed this a number of times if you have watched the sport of football. In football, the defensive players apply a force for a given amount of time to stop the momentum of the offensive player who has the ball. You have also experienced this a multitude of times while driving. As you bring your car to a halt when approaching a stop sign or stoplight, the brakes serve to apply a force to the car for a given amount of time to stop the car's momentum. An object with momentum can be stopped if a force is applied against it for a given amount of time. Picture Illustration Revisiting Force Balance A force acting for a given amount of time will change an object's momentum. Put another way, an unbalanced force always accelerates an object - either speeding it up or slowing it down. If the force acts opposite the object's motion, it slows the object down. If a force acts in the same direction as the object's motion, then the force speeds the object up. Either way, a force will change the velocity of an object. And if the velocity of the object is changed, then the momentum of the object is changed. Back to Newton’s Second Law These concepts are merely an outgrowth of Newton's second law as discussed in an earlier unit. Newton's second law (Fnet=m*a) stated that the acceleration of an object is directly proportional to the net force acting upon the object and inversely proportional to the mass of the object. When combined with the definition of acceleration (a=change in velocity/time), the following equalities result. Formulas of Newton’s 2nd Law Multiply both sides by t Examining the Equation This equation is one of two primary equations to be used in this unit. To truly understand the equation, it is important to understand its meaning in words. In words, it could be said that the force times the time equals the mass times the change in velocity. In physics, the quantity Force*time is known as the impulse. And since the quantity m*v is the momentum, the quantity m*"Delta "v must be the change in momentum. The equation really says that the Impulse = Change in momentum Collisions One focus of this unit is to understand the physics of collisions. The physics of collisions are governed by the laws of momentum; and the first law which we discuss in this unit is expressed in the above equation. The equation is known as the impulse-momentum change equation. The law can be expressed this way: Expressions of collisions In a collision, an object experiences a force for a specific amount of time which results in a change in momentum (the object's mass either speeds up or slows down). The impulse experienced by the object equals the change in momentum of the object. In equation form, F * t = m * Delta v. Objects in collisions with impulse In a collision, objects experience an impulse; the impulse causes (and is equal to) the change in momentum. Consider a football halfback running down the football field and encountering a collision with a defensive back. The collision would change the halfback's speed (and thus his momentum). If the motion was represented by a ticker tape diagram, it might appear as follows: Putting numbers in… At approximately the tenth dot on the diagram, the collision occurs and lasts for a certain amount of time; in terms of dots, the collision lasts for approximately nine dots. In the halfback-defensive back collision, the halfback experiences a force which lasts for a certain amount of time to change his momentum. Since the collision causes the rightward-moving halfback to slow down, the force on the halfback must have been directed leftward. If the halfback experienced a force of 800 N for 0.9 seconds, then we could say that the impulse was 720 N*s. This impulse would cause a momentum change of 720 kg*m/s. In a collision, the impulse experienced by an object is always equal to the momentum change. Tennis Ball Collision Now consider a collision of a tennis ball with a wall. Depending on the physical properties of the wall (its elastic nature), the speed at which the ball rebounds from the wall upon colliding with it will vary. The diagrams below depict the changes in velocity of the same ball. For each representation (vector diagram, v-t graph, and ticker tape pattern), indicate which case (A or B) has the greatest change in velocity, greatest acceleration, greatest momentum change, and greatest impulse. Support each answer. Vector Diagrams Tabulate your Answers Greatest velocity change? Greatest acceleration? Greatest momentum change? Greatest Impulse? Answers Greatest velocity change? B (changes from +30 m/s to -28 m/s which is a change of 58 m/s and A only changes -15 m/s) Greatest acceleration? B, because it has the greatest velocity change and acceleration is dependent on velocity change. Greatest momentum change? B, because momentum is dependent on velocity and the change in velocity is greatest in B. Greatest Impulse? B, impulse is momentum change and the momentum change is greatest in B. Graphs Setting up your answers Greatest velocity change? Greatest acceleration? Greatest momentum change? Greatest Impulse? Answers Greatest velocity change? Greatest in A because it changes from +5 m/s to -3 m/s which is a change of 8 whereas B only changes 4 m/s Greatest A, acceleration is greatest because acceleration? velocity change is greatest in A Greatest momentum change? A, momentum is dependent on velocity change and that is greatest in A Greatest Impulse? A, Impulse equals the change in momentum Using Ticker Tape Diagrams Organizing the Answers Greatest velocity change? Greatest acceleration? Greatest momentum change? Greatest Impulse? Answers Greatest velocity change? B, vi is the same for both, but object B rebounds with a greater speed so it goes from -10 to +5 m/s whereas A goes from -10 m/s to +2 m/s. Greatest acceleration? B, acceleration is dependent on velocity change Greatest momentum change? B, Momentum is dependent on velocity Greatest Impulse? B, impulse is defined as the change in momentum Recapping the Examples Observe that each of the collisions above involved the rebound of a ball off a wall. Observe that the greater the rebound effect, the greater the acceleration, momentum change, and impulse. A rebound is a special type of collision involving a direction change; the result of the direction change is large velocity change. Elastic Collisions On occasions in a rebound collision, an object will maintain the same or nearly the same speed as it had before the collision. Collisions in which objects rebound with the same speed (and thus, the same momentum and kinetic energy) as they had prior to the collision are known as elastic collisions. In general, elastic collisions are characterized by a large velocity change, a large momentum change, a large impulse, and a large force. Momentum and collisions Use the impulse-momentum change principle to fill in the blanks in the following rows of the table. As you do, keep these three major truths in mind: the impulse experienced by an object is the force*time the momentum change of an object is the mass*velocity change the impulse equals the momentum change Create this Chart Force (N) time (s) 1. 0.010 2. 0.100 3. 0.010 4. -20 000 5. -200 Mom. Impuls Chg. e (kg*m (N*s) /s) -40 Mass (kg) Vel. Chg. (m/s) 10 -4 10 -200 50 -200 1.0 -8 50 Answers Force (N) time (s) Mom. Impuls Chg. Mass e (kg*m (kg) (N*s) /s) 1. -4000 N 0.010 -40 -40 10 -4 2. -400 N 0.100 -40 -40 10 -4 -200 -200 50 -4 4. -20 000 .010 s -200 -200 25 -8 5. 1.0 -200 50 -4 3. -20, 000 N 0.010 -200 -200 Vel. Chg. (m/s) Reflections on the Table There are a few observations which can be made in the above table which relate to the computational nature of the impulse-momentum change theorem. First, observe that the answers in the table above reveal that the third and fourth columns are always equal; that is, the impulse is always equal to the momentum change. Observe also that the if any two of the first three columns are known, then the remaining column can be computed; this is true because the impulse=force*time. Knowing two of these three quantities allows us to compute the third quantity. And finally, observe that knowing any two of the last three columns allows us to compute the remaining column; this is true since momentum change = mass*velocity change. Additional Thoughts There are also a few observations which can be made which relate to the qualitative nature of the impulsemomentum theorem. An examination of rows 1 and 2 show that force and time are inversely proportional; for the same mass and velocity change, a tenfold increase in the time of impact corresponds to a tenfold decrease in the force of impact. An examination of rows 1 and 3 show that mass and force are directly proportional; for the same time and velocity change, a fivefold increase in the mass corresponds to a fivefold increase in the force required to stop that mass. Finally, an examination of rows 3 and 4 illustrate that mass and velocity change are inversely proportional; for the same force and time, a twofold decrease in the mass corresponds to a twofold increase in the velocity change. Examples Express your understanding of the impulsemomentum change theorem by answering the following questions. Example 1 1. A 0.50-kg cart (#1) is pulled with a 1.0-N force for 1 second; another 0.50 kg cart (#2) is pulled with a 2.0 Nforce for 0.50 seconds. Which cart (#1 or #2) has the greatest acceleration? Explain. Answer 1 Cart 2 has the greatest acceleration. Recall that force is dependent on acceleration and mass. Both carts have the same mass but cart 2 has the greatest force. Example 2 Which cart (#1 or #2) has the greatest impulse? Explain. Answer 2 The impulse is the same for both carts. Impulse is force * time which calculates each cart to 1 N * s for each. Example 3 Which cart (#1 or #2) has the greatest change in momentum? Explain. Answer 3 The momentum change is the same for both carts. Momentum change equals the impulse. If both carts have the same impulse then they both have the same momentum change. Example 4 2. In a phun physics demo, two identical balloons (A and B) are propelled across the room on horizontal guide wires. The motion diagrams (depicting the relative position of the balloons at time intervals of 0.05 seconds) for these two balloons are shown below. Question 4a Which balloon (A or B) has the greatest acceleration? Explain. Answer 4a Balloon B has the greatest acceleration The rate at which the velocity changes is greatest for balloon B, this is shown by the fact that the speed (distance/time) changes most rapidly. Example 4B Which balloon (A or B) has the greatest final velocity? Explain. Answer 4B Balloon B has the greatest final velocity. At the end of the diagram, the distance traveled in the latest interval is greatest for Balloon B. Question 4C Which balloon (A or B) has the greatest momentum change? Explain. Answer 4C Balloon B has the greatest momentum change. The final velocity is greatest for Balloon B, its velocity change is also the greatest. Momentum change depends on velocity change. The balloon with the greatest velocity change will have the greatest momentum change. Question 4D Which balloon (A or B) experiences the greatest impulse? Explain. Answer 4D The impulse is the same for each car. The impulse equals the momentum change. If the momentum change is the same for each car, then so must be the impulse. Question 5 The diagram to the right depicts the before- and aftercollision speeds of a car which undergoes a head-on-collision with a wall. In Case A, the car bounces off the wall. In Case B, the car "sticks" to the wall. Question 5A In which case (A or B) is the change in velocity the greatest? Explain. Answer 5A Case A has the greatest velocity change. The velocity change is -9 m/s in case A and only -5 m/s in case B. Question 5B In which case (A or B) is the change in momentum the greatest? Explain. Answer 5B Case A has the greatest momentum change. The momentum change is dependent on the velocity change; the object with the greatest velocity change has the greatest momentum change. Question 5C In which case (A or B) is the impulse the greatest? Explain. Answer 5C The impulse is greatest for Car A. The impulse equals the momentum change. If the momentum change is greatest for car A then the impulse is greatest. Question 5D In which case (A or B) is the force which acts upon the car the greatest (assume contact times are the same in both cases)? Explain. Answer 5D The impulse is greatest for car A. The force is related to impulse (I = F * t). The bigger impulse for car A is attributed to the greatest force upon car A. Recall that the rebound effect is characterized by larger forces; car A is the car which rebounds. Question 6 Rhonda, who has a mass of 60.0 kg, is riding at 25.0 m/s in her sports car when she must suddenly slam on the brakes to avoid hitting a dog crossing the road. She strikes the air bag, which brings her body to a stop in 0.400 s. What average force does the seat belt exert on her? Answer 6 F = m x change in velocity)/time F = (60 kg x 25 m/s)/ 0.400 s F = 3750 N Question 6B If Rhonda had not been wearing her seat belt and not had an air bag, then the windshield would have stopped her head in 0.001 s. What average force would the windshield have exerted on her? Answer 6B F = (m x D v ) / t F = (60 kg x 25 m/s) / 0.001 s F = 1,500,000 N Question 7 A hockey player applies an average force of 80.0 N to a 0.25 kg hockey puck for a time of 0.10 seconds. Determine the impulse experienced by the hockey puck. Answer 7 Impulse = Force x time I = 80 N x 0.1 s I=8Nxs Ex. 8 If a 5-kg object experiences a 10-N force for a duration of 0.1 seconds, then what is the momentum change of the object? Question 8 Momentum change = 1.0 kg m/s The momentum change = mass x velocity change But since velocity change is unknown, another strategy must be used to find the momentum change. The strategy involves first finding the impulse (I = F x t). Since impulse = momentum change, the answer is 1 N x s. Angular Momentum Angular Momentum Defn. quantity of motion used with objects rotating about a fixed axis Changes when torque acts on the object Product of mass x displacement from center x velocity Ex. Orbiting planets have a constant angular momentum and a torque of zero because gravitational force is directly toward the sun The Conservation of Momentum Momentum and Isolated Systems The previous part of Lesson 2 focused on the Law of Conservation of Momentum. It was stated that ... For a collision occurring between object 1 and object 2 in an isolated system, the total momentum of the two objects before the collision is equal to the total momentum of the two objects after the collision. That is, the momentum lost by object 1 is equal to the momentum gained by object 2. Total system momentum is conserved for collisions occurring in isolated systems. But what makes a system of objects an isolated system? And is momentum conserved if the system is not isolated? This is the focus of this lesson. A system is a collection of two or more objects. An isolated system is a system which is free from the influence of a net external force. There are two criteria for the presence of a net external force; it must be... a force which originates from a source other than the two objects of the system a force that is not balanced by other forces Consider the collision of two balls on the billiards table. The collision occurs in an isolated system as long as friction is small enough that its influence upon the momentum of the billiard balls can be neglected. If so, then the only unbalanced forces acting upon the two balls are the contact forces which they apply to one another. These two forces are considered internal forces since they result from a source within the system - that source being the contact of the two balls. For such a collision, total system momentum is conserved. Read the following descriptions of a collision and evaluate whether or not the collision occurs in an isolated system. If it is not an isolated system, then identify the net external force. Collision Description 1 Two cars collide on a gravel roadway on which frictional forces are large. 2 Hans Full is doing the annual vacuuming. Hans is pushing the Hoover vacuum cleaner across the living room carpet. 3 Two air track gliders collide on a frictionfree air track. Isolated System? Yes or No If No, then the external force is... Collision Description 1 2 3 Isolated System? Yes or No Two cars collide on a gravel roadway on which frictional forces are large. No Hans Full is doing the annual vacuuming. Hans is pushing the Hoover vacuum cleaner across the living room carpet. No Two air track gliders collide on a friction-free air track. Yes If No, then the external force is... The friction between the cars and the road is an external force The friction between the cleaner and the floor and the applied force by Hans are external forces There are no external forces. The system is isolate If a system is not isolated, then the total system momentum is not conserved. To understand this concept, we will return to our original analogy. Suppose Jack and Jill (each with $100 in their pockets) undergo a financial interaction in which Jack hands Jill $50 for the purchase of some goods. If Jack and Jill were isolated from the influence of the rest of the world, then Jack would end up with $50 and Jill would end up with $150. The total money in the system would be $200 both before and after the transaction; total system money would be conserved. If however, a third influence enters from outside of the system to take away or (more fortunately) to add money to the system, then total system momentum would not be conserved. If a thief interfered with his filthy hands so as to steal $20, then perhaps Jack would finish with $40 and Jill would finish with $140. In the case of a non-isolated system, the total momentum is not conserved. Using Equations as a "Recipe" for Algebraic Problem-Solving As discussed in a previous part of Lesson 2, total system momentum is conserved for collisions between objects in an isolated system. The momentum lost by one object is equal to the momentum gained by another object. For collisions occurring in an isolated systems, there are no exceptions to this law. This law becomes a powerful law in physics because it allows for predictions of the before- and after-collision velocities (or mass) of an object. In this portion of Lesson 2, the law of momentum conservation will be used to make such predictions. The law of momentum conservation will be combined with the use of a "momentum table" and some algebra skills to solve problems involving collisions occurring in isolated systems. Concept Example A 15-kg medicine ball is thrown at a velocity of 20 km/hr to a 60-kg person who is at rest on ice. The person catches the ball and subsequently slides with the ball across the ice. Determine the velocity of the person and the ball after the collision. Beginning to form a solution Such a motion can be considered as a collision between a person and a medicine ball. Before the collision, the ball has momentum and the person does not. The collision causes the ball to lose momentum and the person to gain momentum. After the collision, the ball and the person travel with the same velocity ("v") across the ice. Draw a diagram! If it can be assumed that the effect of friction between the person and the ice is negligible, then the collision has occurred in an isolated system. Momentum should be conserved and the problem can be solved for v by use of a momentum table as shown below. Before Collision After Collision Person 0 60 * v Medicine ball 300 15 * v Total 300 300 Observe in the table above that the known information about the mass and velocity of the two objects was used to determine the before-collision momenta of the individual objects and the total momentum of the system. Since momentum is conserved, the total momentum after the collision is equal to the total momentum before the collision. Finally, the expression "60*v" and "15*v" was used for the after-collision momentum of the person and the medicine ball. To solve the problem for "v" (the velocity of both the objects after the collision), set the sum of the individual momentum of the two objects equal to the total momentum. The following equation results: Solution 60*v + 15*v = 300 75*v = 300 v = 4 km/hr Using algebra skills, it can be shown that v=4 km/hr. Both the person and the medicine ball move across the ice with a velocity of 4 km/hr after the collision. (NOTE: The unit km/hr is the unit on the answer since the original velocity as stated in the question had units of km/hr.) Granny (m=80 kg) whizzes around the rink with a velocity of 6 m/s. She suddenly collides with Ambrose (m=40 kg) who is at rest directly in her path. Rather than knock him over, she picks him up and continues in motion without "braking." Determine the velocity of Granny and Ambrose. Assume that no external forces act on the system so that it is an isolated system. Before the collision, Granny has momentum and Ambrose does not. The collision causes Granny to lose momentum and Ambrose to gain momentum. After the collision, the Granny and Ambrose move with the same velocity ("v") across the rink. Since the collision between Granny and Ambrose occurs in an isolated system, total system momentum is conserved. The total momentum before the collision (possessed solely by Granny) equals the total momentum after the collision (shared between Granny and Ambrose). The table below depicts this principle of momentum conservation. Before Collision After Collision Granny 80 * 6 = 480 80 * v Ambrose 0 40 * v Total 480 480 Observe in the table above that the known information about the mass and velocity of Granny and Ambrose was used to determine the before-collision momenta of the individual objects and the total momentum of the system. Since momentum is conserved, the total momentum after the collision is equal to the total momentum before the collision. Finally, the expression "80*v" and "40*v" was used for the after-collision momentum of the Granny and Ambrose. To solve the problem for "v" (the velocity of both persons after the collision), set the sum of the individual momentum of the two objects equal to the total momentum. The following equation results: 80*v + 40*v = 480 120*v = 480 v = 4 m/s Using algebra skills, it can be shown that v = 4 m/s. Both Granny and Ambrose move across the ice with a velocity of 4 m/s after the collision. (NOTE: The unit m/s is the unit on the answer since the original velocity as stated in the question had units of m/s.) The two collisions above are examples of inelastic collisions. Technically, an inelastic collision is a collision in which the kinetic energy of the system of objects is not conserved. In an inelastic collision, the kinetic energy of the colliding objects is transformed into other nonmechanical forms of energy such as heat energy and sound energy. The subject of energy will be treated in a later unit of The Physics Classroom. To simplify matters, we will consider any collisions in which the two colliding objects stick together and move with the same post-collision speed to be an extreme example of an inelastic collision. Now we will consider the analysis of a collision in which the two objects do not stick together. In this collision, the two objects will bounce off each other. While this is not technically an elastic collision, it is more elastic than collisions in which the two objects stick together A 3000-kg truck moving with a velocity of 10 m/s hits a 1000-kg parked car. The impact causes the 1000-kg car to be set in motion at 15 m/s. Assuming that momentum is conserved during the collision, determine the velocity of the truck after the collision. In this collision, the truck has a considerable amount of momentum before the collision and the car has no momentum (it is at rest). After the collision, the truck slows down (loses momentum) and the car speeds up (gains momentum). The collision can be analyzed using a momentum table similar to the above situations. Before Collision After Collision Truck 3000 * 10 = 30 000 3000 * v Car 0 1000 * 15 = 15 000 Total 30 000 30 000 Observe in the table above that the known information about the mass and velocity of the truck and car was used to determine the before-collision momenta of the individual objects and the total momentum of the system. Since momentum is conserved, the total momentum after the collision is equal to the total momentum before the collision. The after-collision velocity of the car is used (in conjunction with its mass) to determine its momentum after the collision. Finally, the expression "3000*v" was used for the after-collision momentum of the truck (v is the velocity of the truck after the collision). To solve the problem for "v" (the velocity of the truck), set the sum of the individual after-collision momentum of the two objects equal to the total momentum. The following equation results: 3000*v + 15 000 = 30 000 3000*v = 15 000 v = 5.0 m/s Using algebra skills, it can be shown that v = 5.0 m/s. The truck's velocity immediately after the collision is 5.0 m/s. As predicted, the truck has slowed down (lost momentum) and the car has gained momentum. The three problems above illustrate how the law of momentum conservation can be used to solve problems in which the after-collision velocity of an object is predicted based on mass-velocity information. There are additional practice problems (with accompanying solutions) later in this lesson which are worth the practice. However, be certain that you don't come to believe that physics is merely an applied mathematics course which is devoid of concepts. For certain, mathematics is applied in physics; however, physics is about concepts and the variety of means in which they are represented. Mathematical representations are just one of the many representations of physics concepts. Avoid merely treating these collision problems as mere mathematical exercises. Take the time to understand the concept of momentum conservation which provides the basis of their solution. Preview of What’s Ahead! The next section of this lesson involves examples of problems which provide a real test of your conceptual understanding of momentum conservation in collisions. Before proceeding with the practice problems, be sure to try a few of the more conceptual questions which follow. Using Equations as a Guide to Thinking The three problems on the previous page illustrate how the law of momentum conservation can be used to solve problems in which the after-collision velocity of an object is predicted based on mass-velocity information. There are similar practice problems (with accompanying solutions) lower on this page which are worth the practice. However, let's first take a more cognitive approach to some collision problems. The questions which follow provide a real test of your conceptual understanding of momentum conservation in collisions. A large fish is in motion at 2 m/s when it encounters a smaller fish which is at rest. The large fish swallows the smaller fish and continues in motion at a reduced speed. If the large fish has three times the mass of the smaller fish, then what is the speed of the large fish (and the smaller fish) after the collision? Depress mouse on "popup menu" to view answer Fishy Answer The amount of mass in motion increased from 3m to 4 m (3m + m). That is mass is increased by a factor of 4/3. To conserve momentum, an increase in mass by a factor of 1.333 must be accompanied by decrease in the velocity by a factor of 1.333. Divide the original velocity (2 m/s by 1.333). V = 1.5 m/s Conservation of Momentum The Law of Action-Reaction Revisited An Introduction A collision is an interaction between two objects which have made contact (usually) with each other. As in any interaction, a collision results in a force being applied to the two colliding objects. Such collisions are governed by Newton's laws of motion. In the past, Newton's third law of motion was introduced and discussed. It was said that... ... in every interaction, there is a pair of forces acting on the two interacting objects. The size of the force on the first object equals the size of the force on the second object. The direction of the force on the first object is opposite to the direction of the force on the second object. Forces always come in pairs - equal and opposite action-reaction force pairs. Newton's third law of motion is naturally applied to collisions between two objects. In a collision between two objects, both objects experience forces which are equal in magnitude and opposite in direction. Such forces cause one object to speed up (gain momentum) and the other object to slow down (lose momentum). According to Newton's third law, the forces on the two objects are equal in magnitude. While the forces are equal in magnitude and opposite in direction, the acceleration of the objects are not necessarily equal in magnitude. In accord with Newton's second law of motion, the acceleration of an object is dependent upon both force and mass. Thus, if the colliding objects have unequal mass, they will have unequal accelerations as a result of the contact force which results during the collision. Consider the collision between the club head and the golf ball in the sport of golf. When the club head of a moving golf club collides with a golf ball at rest upon a tee, the force experienced by the club head is equal to the force experienced by the golf ball. Most observers of this collision have difficulty with this concept because they perceive the high speed given to the ball as the result of the collision They are not observing unequal forces upon the ball and club head, but rather unequal accelerations. Both club head and ball experience equal forces, yet the ball experiences a greater acceleration due to its smaller mass. In a collision, there is a force on both objects which causes an acceleration of both objects; the forces are equal in magnitude and opposite in direction, yet the least massive object receives the greatest acceleration. Consider the collision between a moving seven-ball and an eight-ball that is at rest in the sport of billiards. When the seven-ball collides with the eight-ball, each ball experiences an equal force directed in opposite directions. The rightward moving seven-ball experiences a leftward force which causes it to slow down; the eightball experiences a rightward force which causes it to speed up Since the two balls have equal masses, they will also experience equal accelerations. In a collision, there is a force on both objects which causes an acceleration of both objects; the forces are equal in magnitude and opposite in direction. For collisions between equal-mass objects, each object experiences the same acceleration. Consider the interaction between a male and female figure skater in pair figure skating. A woman (m = 45 kg) is kneeling on the shoulders of a man (m = 70 kg); the pair is moving along the ice at 1.5 m/s. The man gracefully tosses the woman forward through the air and onto the ice. The woman receives the forward force and the man receives a backward force. The force on the man is equal in magnitude and opposite in direction to the force on the woman. Yet the acceleration of the woman is greater than the acceleration of the man due to the smaller mass of the woman. Many observers of this interaction have difficulty believing that the man experienced a backward force. "After all," they might argue, "the man did not move backward." Such observers are presuming that forces cause motion; that is a backward force would cause a backward motion. This is a common misconception that has been addressed before in our class. Forces cause acceleration, not motion. The male figure skater experiences a backwards (you might say "negative") force which causes his backwards (or "negative") acceleration; that is, the man slowed down while the woman sped up. In every interaction (with no exception), there are forces acting upon the two interacting objects which are equal in magnitude and opposite in direction. Collisions are governed by Newton's laws. The law of action-reaction (Newton's third law) explains the nature of the forces between the two interacting objects. According to the law, the force exerted by object 1 upon object 2 is equal in magnitude and opposite in direction to the force exerted by object 2 upon object 1. Examples for you to try Hint: Some of these questions could be seen again! 1. While driving down the road, Anna Litical observed a bug striking the windshield of her car. Quite obviously, a case of Newton's third law of motion. The bug hit the windshield and the windshield hit the bug. Which of the two forces is greater: the force on the bug or the force on the windshield? Answer 1 TRICK Question! Each force is the same size. For every action there is an equal (yes equal) reaction. The fact that the bug splatters only means that it has a smaller mass that was unable to withstand the larger acceleration resulting from the interaction. 2. Rockets are unable to accelerate in space because ... A. there is no air in space for the rockets to push off of. B. there is no gravity is in space. C. there is no air resistance in space. D. ...nonsense! Rockets do accelerate in space. Answer 2 Answer is D It is a common misconception that rockets are unable to accelerate in space. The fact is that rockets do accelerate. They are able to accelerate due to the fact that they burn fuel and push the exhaust in a direction opposite to the direction they wish to accelerate. 3. A gun recoils when it is fired. The recoil is the result of action-reaction force pairs. As the gases from the gunpowder explosion expand, the gun pushes the bullet forwards and the bullet pushes the gun backwards. The acceleration of the recoiling gun is ... A. greater than the acceleration of the bullet. B. smaller than the acceleration of the bullet. C. the same size as the acceleration of the bullet. Answer 3. The answer is B. The force on the gun equals the force on the bullet. Yet acceleration depends on both force and mass. The bullet has greater acceleration due to the fact that it has a smaller mass. Remember acceleration and mass are inversely proportional. 4. Why is it important that an airplane wing be designed so that it deflects oncoming air downward? Answer 4 This can be explained by Newton’s third law of motion. The more air that a wing can push down, the more that the air is able to push the wing up. If enough air is pushed downward, then the reaction to this will result in sufficient upward push on the wing and the plane to provide the lift necessary to elevate the plane off the ground. 5. Would it be a good idea to jump from a rowboat to a dock that seems within jumping distance? Explain. Answer 5 NO! Don’t do this at home (at least, not if you wish to dock the boat)! As you jump to reach the dock, the rowboat pushes you forward (action), and thus you push the rowboat backwards. You will indeed reach the dock; your rowboat will be several feet away! 6. If we throw a ball horizontally while standing on roller skates, we roll backward with a momentum that matches that of the ball. Will we roll backward if we go through the motion of throwing the ball without letting go of it? Explain. Answer 6 The overall motion of a person who merely goes through the motion of throwing the ball (without letting go) will be “null.” Such a person will roll backwards then forwards. Yet when finished the person will finish where she started. Recall the demonstration of this in class. Astronaut Description We’ll look at an explanation then one more example. Imagine that you are hovering next to the space shuttle in earth-orbit and your buddy of equal mass who is moving 4 m/s (with respect to the ship) bumps into you. If she holds onto you, then how fast do the two of you move after the collision? A question like this involves momentum principles. In any instance in which two objects collide and can be considered isolated from all other net forces, the conservation of momentum principle can be utilized to determine the post-collision velocities of the two objects. Collisions between objects are governed by laws of momentum and energy. When a collision occurs in an isolated system, the total momentum of the system of objects is conserved. Provided that there are no net external forces acting upon the two astronauts, the combined momentum of the two astronauts before the collision equals the combined momentum of the two astronauts after the collision. The mathematics of this problem is simplified by the fact that before the collision, there is only one object in motion and after the collision both objects have the same velocity. That is to say, a momentum analysis would show that all the momentum was concentrated in the moving astronaut before the collision. And after the collision, all the momentum was the result of a single object (the combination of the two astronauts) moving at an easily predictable velocity. Since there is twice as much mass in motion after the collision, it must be moving at one-half the velocity. Thus, the two astronauts move together with a velocity of 2 m/s after the collision. 7. Suppose there are three astronauts outside a spaceship and two of them decide to play catch with the other woman. All three astronauts weigh the same on Earth and are equally strong. The first astronaut throws the second astronaut towards the third astronaut and the game begins. Describe the motion of these women as the game proceeds. Assume each toss results from the same-sized "push." How long will the game last? Answer 7 The game will last two throws and one catch. When astronaut #1 throws astronaut #2, the two astronauts will travel opposite directions at the same speed (action-reaction). When astronaut #3 catches astronaut #2, astronaut #2 will slow to half of her speed and move together with astronaut #3. Now astronaut #1 is moving leftward with original speed of astronaut #2 and #3 are moving rightward at half of the original speed. When astronaut #3 pushes #2, the greatest speed which #2 can have is half of the original speed in the opposite direction. The game is now over for astronaut #2 can never catch up with astronaut #1. Conservation of Momentum Momentum Conservation Principle One of the most powerful laws in physics is the law of momentum conservation. The law of momentum conservation can be stated as follows. For a collision occurring between object 1 and object 2 in an isolated system, the total momentum of the two objects before the collision is equal to the total momentum of the two objects after the collision. That is, the momentum lost by object 1 is equal to the momentum gained by object 2. The above statement tells us that the total momentum of a collection of objects (a system) is conserved" - that is the total amount of momentum is a constant or unchanging value. This law of momentum conservation will be the focus of the remainder of Lesson 2. To understand the basis of momentum conservation, let's begin with a short logical proof. Consider a collision between two objects - object 1 and object 2. For such a collision, the forces acting between the two objects are equal in magnitude and opposite in direction (Newton's third law). This statement can be expressed in equation form as follows. The forces act between the two objects for a given amount of time. In some cases, the time is long; in other cases the time is short. Regardless of how long the time is, it can be said that the time that the force acts upon object 1 is equal to the time that the force acts upon object 2. This is merely logical; forces result from interactions (or touching) between two objects. If object 1 touches object 2 for 0.050 seconds, then object 2 must be touching object 1 for the same amount of time (0.050 seconds). As an equation, this can be stated as Since the forces between the two objects are equal in magnitude and opposite in direction, and since the times for which these forces act are equal in magnitude, it follows that the impulses experienced by the two objects are also equal in magnitude and opposite in direction. As an equation, this can be stated as But the impulse experienced by an object is equal to the change in momentum of that object (the impuslemomentum change theorem). Thus, since each object experiences equal and opposite impulses, it follows logically that they must also experience equal and opposite momentum changes. As an equation, this can be stated as The above equation is one statement of the law of momentum conservation. In a collision, the momentum change of object 1 is equal and opposite to the momentum change of object 2. That is, the momentum lost by object 1 is equal to the momentum gained by object 2. In a collision between two objects, one object slows down and loses momentum while the other object speeds up and gains momentum. If object 1 loses 75 units of momentum, then object 2 gains 75 units of momentum. Yet, the total momentum of the two objects (object 1 plus object 2) is the same before the collision as it is after the collision; the total momentum of the system (the collection of two objects) is conserved. A useful analogy for understanding momentum conservation involves a money transaction between two people. Let's refer to the two people as Jack and Jill. Suppose that we were to check the pockets of Jack and Jill before and after the money transaction in order to determine the amount of money which each possessed. Prior to the transaction, Jack possesses $100 and Jill possesses $100. The total amount of money of the two people before the transaction is $200. During the transaction, Jack pays Jill $50 for the given item being bought. There is a transfer of $50 from Jack's pocket to Jill's pocket. Jack has lost $50 and Jill has gained $50. The money lost by Jack is equal to the money gained by Jill. After the transaction, Jack now has $50 in his pocket and Jill has $150 in her pocket. Yet, the total amount of money of the two people after the transaction is $200. The total amount of money (Jack's money plus Jill's money) before the transaction is equal to the total amount of money after the transaction. It could be said that the total amount of money of the system (the collection of two people) is conserved; it is the same before as it is after the transaction. A useful means of depicting the transfer and the conservation of money between Jack and Jill is by means of a table. The table shows the amount of money possessed by the two individuals before and after the interaction. It also shows the total amount of money before and after the interaction. Note that the total amount of money ($200) is the same before and after the interaction - it is conserved. Finally, the table shows the change in the amount of money possessed by the two individuals. Note that the change in Jack's money account (-$50) is equal and opposite to the change in Jill's money account (+$50) . Virtual Lab Truck and Brick Lab Collisions between objects are governed by laws of momentum and energy. When a collision occurs in an isolated system, the total momentum of the system of objects is conserved. Provided that there are no net external forces acting upon the objects, the momentum of all objects before the collision equals the momentum of all objects after the collision. If there are only two objects involved in the collision, then the momentum lost by one object equals the momentum gained by the other object The animation below portrays the collision between a 3.0-kg loaded cart and a 2-kg dropped brick. It will be assumed that there are no net external forces acting upon the two objects involved in the collision. The only net force acting upon the two objects (loaded cart and dropped brick) are internal forces - the force of friction between the loaded cart and the droped brick. The before- and after-collision velocities and momentum are shown in the data tables. In the collision between the loaded cart and the dropped brick, total system momentum is conserved. Before the collision, the momentum of the loaded cart is 150 kg*cm/s and the momentum of the dropped brick is 0 kg*cm/s; the total system momentum is 150 kg*cm/s. After the collision, the momentum of the loaded cart is 90.0 kg*cm/s and the momentum of the dropped brick is 60.0 kg*cm/s; the total system momentum is 150 kg*cm/s. The momentum of the loaded cart-dropped brick system is conserved. The momentum lost by the loaded cart (60 kg*cm/s) is gained by the dropped brick 1 kg cart and 2 kg brick In the collision between the cart and the dropped brick, total system momentum is conserved. Before the collision, the momentum of the cart is 60 kg*cm/s and the momentum of the dropped brick is 0 kg*cm/s; the total system momentum is 60 kg*cm/s. After the collision, the momentum of the cart is 20.0 kg*cm/s and the momentum of the dropped brick is 40.0 kg*cm/s; the total system momentum is 60 kg*cm/s. The momentum of the loaded cart-dropped brick system is conserved. The momentum lost by the loaded cart (40 kg*cm/s) is gained by the dropped brick. For any collision occurring in an isolated system, momentum is conserved - the total amount of momentum of the collection of objects in the system is the same before the collision as after the collision. This is the very phenomenon which was observed in "The Cart and The Brick" lab. In this lab, a brick at rest was dropped upon a loaded cart which was in motion. Cart and Brick Lab Before the collision, the dropped brick had 0 units of momentum (it was at rest). The momentum of the loaded cart can be determined using the velocity (as determined by the ticker tape analysis) and the mass. The total amount of momentum was the sum of the dropped brick's momentum (0 units) and the loaded cart's momentum. After the collision, the momenta of the two separate objects (dropped brick and loaded cart) can be determined from their measured mass and their velocity (found from the ticker tape analysis). If momentum is conserved during the collision, then the sum of the dropped brick's and loaded cart's momentum after the collision should be the same as before the collision. The momentum lost by the loaded cart should equal (or approximately equal) the momentum gained by the dropped brick. Momentum data for the interaction between the dropped brick and the loaded cart could be depicted in a table similar to the money table above. Before Collision Momentum After Collision Momentum Change in Momentum Dropped Brick 0 units 14 units +14 units Loaded Cart 45 units 31 units -14 units Total 45 units 45 units Note that the loaded cart lost 14 units of momentum and the dropped brick gained 14 units of momentum. Note also that the total momentum of the system (45 units) was the same before the collision as it is after the collision. Collisions commonly occur in contact sports (such as football) and racket and bat sports (such as baseball, golf, tennis, etc.). Consider a collision in football between a fullback and a linebacker during a goal-line stand. The fullback plunges across the goal line and collides in midair with linebacker. The linebacker and fullback hold each other and travel together after the collision. The fullback possesses a momentum of 100 kg*m/s, East before the collision and the linebacker possesses a momentum of 120 kg*m/s, West before the collision. The total momentum of the system before the collision is 20 kg*m/s, West (review the section on adding vectors if necessary). Therefore, the total momentum of the system after the collision must also be 20 kg*m/s, West. The fullback and the linebacker move together as a single unit after the collision with a combined momentum of 20 kg*m/s. Momentum is conserved in the collision. A vector diagram can be used to represent this principle of momentum conservation; such a diagram uses an arrow to represent the magnitude and direction of the momentum vector for the individual objects before the collision and the combined momentum after the collision. Now suppose that a medicine ball is thrown to a clown who is at rest upon the ice; the clown catches the medicine ball and glides together with the ball across the ice. The momentum of the medicine ball is 80 kg*m/s before the collision. The momentum of the clown is 0 m/s before the collision. The total momentum of the system before the collision is 80 kg*m/s. Therefore, the total momentum of the system after the collision must also be 80 kg*m/s. The clown and the medicine ball move together as a single unit after the collision with a combined momentum of 80 kg*m/s. Momentum is conserved in the collision. Momentum is conserved for any interaction between two objects occurring in an isolated system. This conservation of momentum can be observed by a total system momentum analysis and by a momentum change analysis. Useful means of representing such analyses include a momentum table and a vector diagram. Later in Lesson 2, we will use the momentum conservation principle to solve problems in which the after-collision velocity of objects is predicted. Examples 1. Explain why it is difficult for a firefighter to hold a hose which ejects large amounts of high-speed water. Answer 1 The hose is pushing lots of water (large mass) forward at a high speed. This means that the water has a huge forward momentum. In turn, the hose must have an equally large backwards momentum, making it difficult for firefighters to manage. 2. A large truck and a Volkswagen have a headon collision. a. Which vehicle experiences the greatest force of impact? b. Which vehicle experiences the greatest impulse? c. Which vehicle experiences the greatest momentum change? d. Which vehicle experiences the greatest acceleration? Answer 2 A , b, c, same answer for all Both the Volkswagen and the large truck encounter the same force, the same impulse, and the same momentum change. D. Acceleration is greatest for the Volkswagen. While the two vehicles experience the same force, the acceleration is greatest for the Volkswagen which has the smaller mass. If you find this hard believe then read the next question and its accompanying explanation. 3. Miles Tugo and Ben Travlun are riding in a bus at highway speed on a nice summer day when an unlucky bug splatters onto the windshield. Miles and Ben begin discussing the physics of the situation. Miles suggests that the momentum change of the bug is much greater than that of the bus. After all, argues Miles, there was no noticeable change in the speed of the bus compared to the obvious change in the speed of the bug. Ben disagrees entirely, arguing that that both bug and bus encounter the same force, momentum change, and impulse. Who do you agree with? Support your answer Answer 3 Ben Travelun is correct. The bug and bus experience the same force, same impulse and the same momentum change. This is contrary to popular (but false) belief which matches Miles’ statement. The bug has less mass and therefore more acceleration; occupants of the very massive bus do not feel the extremely small acceleration. Furthermore, the bug is composed of a less hardy material and thus splatters all over the windshield. Yet the greater splatterability of the bug and the greater acceleration do not mean that the bug has a greater force, impulse, or momentum change. 4. If a ball is projected upward from the ground with ten units of momentum, what is the momentum of recoil of the Earth? ____________ Do we feel this? Explain. Answer 4 The earth recoils with 10 units of momentum. This is not felt by Earth’s occupants. Since the mass of the Earth is extremely large, the recoil velocity of the Earth is extremely small and therefore not felt 5. If a 5-kg bowling ball is projected upward with a velocity of 2.0 m/s, then what is the recoil velocity of the Earth (mass = 6.0 x 10^24 kg). Answer 5 Since the ball has an upward momentum of 10 kg m/s, the Earth must have a downward momentum of 10 kg m/s. To find the velocity of the Earth, use the momentum equation p = m * v. This equation rearranges to v = p/m. By substituting into this equation v = (10 kg m/s) / (6 x 10 24 kg). V = 1.67 * 10 -24 m/s (downward) 6. A 120 kg lineman moving west at 2 m/s tackles an 80 kg football fullback moving east at 8 m/s. After the collision, both players move east at 2 m/s. Draw a vector diagram in which the before- and after-collision momenta of each player is represented by a momentum vector. Label the magnitude of each momentum vector. Answer 6 7. Would you care to fire a rifle that has a bullet ten times as massive as the rifle? Explain. Answer 7 Absolutely not! In a situation like this, the target would be a safer place to stand than the rifle. The rifle would have recoil velocity that is ten times larger than the bullet’s velocity. This would produce the effect of “the rifle actually being the bullet.” 8. A baseball player holds a bat loosely and bunts a ball. Express your understanding of momentum conservation by filling in the tables below. Answer 8 A) + 40 (add momentum of ball and bat) C) + 40 (momentum must be conserved) B) + 30 (the bat must have 30 units of momentum in order in order for the total to be +40) 9. A Tomahawk cruise missile is launched from the barrel of a mobile missile launcher. Neglect friction. Express your understanding of momentum conservation by filling in the tables below. Answer 9 A) 0 (add the momentum of the missile and launcher) C) 0 (the momentum is the same after as it is before the collision) B) -5000 (the launcher must have -5000 units of momentum in order for the total to be zero) Momentum—Real World Looking Back In a previous part of Lesson 1, it was said that In a collision, an object experiences a force for a given amount of time which results in its mass undergoing a change in velocity (i.e., which results in a momentum change). What do we get from this? There are four physical quantities mentioned in the above statement - force, time, mass, and velocity change. The force multiplied by the time is known as the impulse and the mass multiplied by the velocity change is known as the change in momentum. The impulse experienced by an object is always equal to the change in its momentum. In terms of equations, this was expressed as (eqn on next slide) Equations This is known as the impulse-momentum change theorem. In this part of Lesson 1, we will examine some realworld applications of the impulse-momentum change theorem. We will examine some physics in action in the real world. In particular, we will focus upon 2 ideas…. Real World Applications the effect of collision time upon the amount of force an object experiences, and the effect of rebounding upon the velocity change and hence the amount of force an object experiences As an effort is made to apply the impulse-momentum change theorem to a variety of real-world situations, keep in mind that the attempt is to use the equation as a guide to thinking about how an alteration in the value of one variable might effect the value of another variable. Effect of Collision Time on Force As an effort is made to apply the impulse-momentum change theorem to a variety of real-world situations, keep in mind that the attempt is to use the equation as a guide to thinking about how an alteration in the value of one variable might effect the value of another variable. Combinations of Force and Time Required to Produce 100 units of Impulse Force Time Impulse 100 1 100 50 2 100 25 4 100 10 10 100 4 25 100 2 50 100 1 100 100 0.1 1000 100 Observe that the greater the time over which the collision occurs, the smaller the force acting upon the object. Thus, to minimize the effect of the force on an object involved in a collision, the time must be increased; and to maximize the effect of the force on an object involved in a collision, the time must be decreased. There are several real-world applications of this phenomena. One example is the use of air bags in automobiles. Air bags are used in automobiles because they are able to minimize the effect of the force on an object involved in a collision. Air bags accomplish this by extending the time required to stop the momentum of the driver and passenger. When encountering a car collision, the driver and passenger tend to keep moving in accord with Newton's first law. Their motion carries them towards a windshield which results in a large force exerted over a short time in order to stop their momentum. If instead of hitting the windshield, the driver and passenger hit an air bag, then the time duration of the impact is increased. When hitting an object with some give such as an air bag, the time duration might be increased by a factor of 100. Increasing the time by a factor of 100 will result in a decrease in force by a factor of 100. Now that's physics in action. There are several real-world applications of this phenomena. One example is the use of air bags in automobiles. Air bags are used in automobiles because they are able to minimize the effect of the force on an object involved in a collision. Air bags accomplish this by extending the time required to stop the momentum of the driver and passenger. When encountering a car collision, the driver and passenger tend to keep moving in accord with Newton's first law. Their motion carries them towards a windshield which results in a large force exerted over a short time in order to stop their momentum. If instead of hitting the windshield, the driver and passenger hit an air bag, then the time duration of the impact is increased. When hitting an object with some give such as an air bag, the time duration might be increased by a factor of 100. Increasing the time by a factor of 100 will result in a decrease in force by a factor of 100. Now that's physics in action. Fans of boxing frequently observe this same principle of minimizing the effect of a force by extending the time of collision. When a boxer recognizes that he will be hit in the head by his opponent, the boxer often relaxes his neck and allows his head to move backwards upon impact. In the boxing world, this is known as riding the punch. A boxer rides the punch in order to extend the time of impact of the glove with their head. Extending the time results in decreasing the force and thus minimizing the effect of the force in the collision. Merely increasing the collision time by a factor of ten would result in a tenfold decrease in the force. Now that's physics in action. Nylon ropes are used in the sport of rock-climbing for the same reason. Rock climbers attach themselves to the steep cliffs by means of nylon ropes. If a rock climber should lose her grip on the rock, she will begin to fall. In such a situation, her momentum will ultimately be halted by means of the rope, thus preventing a disastrous fall to the ground below. The ropes are made of nylon or similar material because of its ability to stretch. If the rope is capable of stretching upon being pulled taut by the falling climber's mass, then it will apply a force upon the climber over a longer time period. Extending the time over which the climber's momentum is broken results in reducing the force exerted on the falling climber. For certain, the rock climber can appreciate minimizing the effect of the force through the use of a longer time of impact. Now that's physics in action. In racket and bat sports, hitters are often encouraged to follow-through when striking a ball. High speed films of the collisions between bats/rackets and balls have shown that the act of following through serves to increase the time over which a collision occurs. This increase in time must result in a change in some other variable in the impulse-momentum change theorem. Surprisingly, the variable which is dependent upon the time in such a situation is not the force. The force in hitting is dependent upon how hard the hitter swings the bat or racket, not the time of impact. Instead, the follow-through increases the time of collision and subsequently contributes to an increase in the velocity change of the ball. By following through, a hitter can hit the ball in such a way that it leaves the bat or racket with more velocity (i.e., the ball is moving faster). In tennis, baseball, racket ball, etc., giving the ball a high velocity often leads to greater success. Now that's physics in action. A water balloon was thrown high into the air and successfully caught (i.e., caught without breaking). The key to the success of the demonstration was to contact the ball with outstretched arms and carry the ball for a meter or more before finally stopping its momentum. The effect of this strategy was to extend the time over which the collision occurred and so reduce the force. This same strategy is used by lacrosse players when catching the ball. The ball is "cradled" when caught; i.e., the lacrosse player reaches out for the ball and carries it inward toward her body as if she were cradling a baby. The effect of this strategy is to lengthen the time over which the collision occurs and so reduce the force on the lacrosse ball. Now that's physics in action. Another memorable in-class demonstration was the throwing of an egg into a bed sheet. The bed sheet was held by two trustworthy students and our best pitcher (so we thought) was used to toss the egg at full speed into the bed sheet. The collision between the egg and the bed sheet lasts over an extended period of time since the bed sheet has some give in it. By extending the time of the collision, the effect of the force is minimized. In all my years, the egg has never broken when hitting the bed sheet. On the other hand, it seems that every year there is a pitcher who is not as accurate as we expected. The pitcher misses the bed sheet and collides with the board. In these unexpected cases, the collision between whiteboard and egg lasts for a short period of time, thus maximizing the effect of the force on the egg. The egg brakes and leaves the whiteboard and floor in a considerable mess. And that's no yolk! Effect of Rebounding Occasionally when objects collide, they bounce off each other (as opposed to sticking to each other and traveling with the same speed after the collision). Bouncing off each other is known as rebounding. Rebounding involves a change in direction of an object; the before- and aftercollision direction is different. Rebounding was pictured and discussed earlier in Lesson 1. At that time, it was said that rebounding situations are characterized by a large velocity change and a large momentum change. From the impulse-momentum change theorem, we could deduce that a rebounding situation must also be accompanied by a large impulse. Since the impulse experienced by an object equals the momentum change of the object, a collision characterized by a large momentum change must also be characterized by a large impulse. The importance of rebounding is critical to the outcome of automobile accidents. In an automobile accident, two cars can either collide and bounce off each other or collide and crumple together and travel together with the same speed after the collision. But which would be more damaging to the occupants of the automobiles - the rebounding of the cars or the crumpling up of the cars? Contrary to popular opinion, the crumpling up of cars is the safest type of automobile collision. As mentioned above, if cars rebound upon collision, the momentum change will be larger and so will the impulse. A greater impulse will typically be associated with a bigger force. Occupants of automobiles would certainly prefer small forces upon their bodies during collisions. In fact, automobile designers and safety engineers have found ways to reduce the harm done to occupants of automobiles by designing cars which crumple upon impact. Automobiles are made with crumple zones. Crumple zones are sections in cars which are designed to crumple up when the car encounters a collision. Crumple zones minimize the effect of the force in an automobile collision in two ways. By crumpling, the car is less likely to rebound upon impact, thus minimizing the momentum change and the impulse. Finally, the crumpling of the car lengthens the time over which the car's momentum is changed; by increasing the time of the collision, the force of the collision is greatly reduced.