* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download 05_chapter 1
Anoxic event wikipedia , lookup
Indian Ocean wikipedia , lookup
Ocean acidification wikipedia , lookup
Raised beach wikipedia , lookup
Physical oceanography wikipedia , lookup
Demersal fish wikipedia , lookup
Marine microorganism wikipedia , lookup
Deep sea fish wikipedia , lookup
Effects of global warming on oceans wikipedia , lookup
Marine debris wikipedia , lookup
Marine larval ecology wikipedia , lookup
Marine life wikipedia , lookup
The Marine Mammal Center wikipedia , lookup
Marine biology wikipedia , lookup
Marine habitats wikipedia , lookup
Marine pollution wikipedia , lookup
Ecosystem of the North Pacific Subtropical Gyre wikipedia , lookup
1. General introduction Gelatinous zooplankton are fragile animals that live in the water column of the ocean. They have very delicate often transparent bodies that are easily damaged or destroyed (Lalli & Parsons, 2001). All jellyfish are gelatinous zooplankton, but not all gelatinous zooplankton are jellyfish. The most commonly encountered organisms include ctenophores, medusae, salps and chaetognaths in coastal waters. However, almost all marine phyla, including Annelida, Mollusca and Arthropoda, contain gelatinous species, but many of those odd species live in the open ocean and the deep sea and are less available to the casual ocean observer (Nouvian, 2007). The gelatinous zooplankton has also been called "Gelata". The carnivorous gelatinous zooplankton is defined as scyphomedusae, cubomedusae, siphonophores and ctenophores are important representatives of coastal and marine ecosystems. Some early records on the occurrence of jellyfishes in Indian waters date from the beginning of the last century (Annandale, 1915; Menon, 1930; Daniel and Daniel, 1963.) In recent years, various authors have suggested that they are heading towards a more gelatinous future (Mills, 2001; Purcell et al., 2007). Some authors, however, claim that gelatinous zooplankton blooms have ancient origins and are not a new phenomenon (Condon et al., 2012). Others argued that due to lack of sufficient long term jellyfish data sets, trends in population increase are not yet clear (Purcell, 2012). Hydromedusae, in both their hydroid and medusa stages, occur commonly in all oceans and seas but a synthesis of their world distribution has never been attempted (Kramp, 1959, 1961, 1968 for the medusa stage only). They are important carnivorous predators and they are structurally inconspicuous to understand taxonomy and their main structure is umbrella (Buillon et al., 2004). 1|P age General introduction The marine and coastal ecosystems are considered as physical environment and interaction between species and their environment are correlated in complex food webs. So, density and number of gelatinous zooplankton are most important to know the distributional range, status of the ecosystem and their community structure. However, the apparent simple body plan of jellyfish often disguises sophisticated interactions with their biological, chemical and physical environment that contribute to patchy distribution of jellyfish throughout the marine environment (Hamner, 1985). Salps are common gelatinous holoplankters in shelf and oceanic waters. Like other tunicates, salps are fine mucous filter to remove a wide range of particles, including bacteria and phytoplankton, from the water column. About 20% of the known species are benthic, that is belonging to the lowest zone of the ocean, or benthic zone, and can attach to algae and rocks. They are found in all marine waters, from surface tropical waters and shallow tide pools to the deep sea and Polar Regions. The salps therefore play a key part in pelagic ecosystem, particularly when they form dense swarm (Alldredge and Madin, 1982). They swim by jet propulsion, drawing water through in current siphons at opposite end of the body. Due to their efficient removal of small particles from surface waters, salps are capable of packaging and exporting primary production to deeper waters, thus influencing biogeochemical cycling (Madin et al., 2006). The Phylum Chaetognatha commonly called “arrow worm”, exclusively marine organisms and majority of them are planktonic. Chaetognatha, meaning hairjaws, which belongs to phylum of Predatory marine worms that are a major component of plankton worldwide. They can be found in all oceans from the surface to great depths and are often second or third in abundance after copepods. 2|P age General introduction Chaetognaths are also known as excellent indicator of water masses because of their close relationships with certain environmental variables (e.g. salinity, temperature and dissolved oxygen) as well as their species-specific horizontal and vertical distribution. The impact of chaetognaths predation on fish larvae may be exaggerated due to the relative scarcity of fish larvae in the plankton. They nevertheless contribute to the reduction of larval abundance during periods of fish production (Casanova, 1999). They also prey on other small crustaceans, larval fish and other chaetognaths and play an important role in the transfer of energy from copepods to higher tropic levels (Bone et al., 1991). The gelatinous zooplankton which in turn may change predation on or competition with other components of the food web (Mills, 2001; Parsons and Lalli, 2002). Recent research shows that increase in biomass, shifts in distribution and unusually dense aggregations of large medusa in various coastal environments. Because of the paucity of data, highly productive fisheries and the adjective nature of the ecosystem, it is sometimes assumed that gelatinous zooplankton have not historically formed a major component of the food web in coastal upwelling areas (Mills, 2001; Parsons and Lalli, 2002). There is intense interest in how the biological structure of the oceans may be changing as a result of climate change, eutrophication and overfishing (Halpern et al., 2008). It has been suggested that targeted removal of the larger fish remaining in ecosystems may cause a progressive pattern of fishing down the food chain until systems are dominated by invertebrates, such as jellyfish (Hay 2006; Daskalov et al., 2007). The distribution of jellyfish populations is sporadic and seemingly unpredictable in nature. Meteorological conditions, currents, water temperature, 3|P age General introduction pressure, salinity and predation may play a significant role in determining the population size. The most abundant and important species in the Asian jellyfish fishery which represents a multimillion dollar seafood business in Asia (Omori & Nakano, 2001). China is the first country to process jellyfish for human consumption (Morikawa, 1984). Although the Chinese have been eating jellyfish for more than a thousand years, the jellyfish industry only recently has become a commercial fishery. Other jellyfish producing countries learned the traditional processing techniques from the northern China with slight modification. Processing jellyfish in Asia is a low-cost operation that requires little capital but is labour intensive. The investigation of hydrographical parameters between the gelatinous zooplankton population is a pattern to comprehend and even predicting the gelatinous outbreaks. The changes in climatological factor are related to variety of processes viz: air temperature, ocean temperature, air pressure, wind and currents and have a potentially significant influence the pelagic environment. The temperature, salinity, light availability and current strength have indirect effects on jellyfish by altering the phytoplankton bloom leading to increased secondary production, or by increasing the abundance of zooplankton and ichthyoplankton in the water column both factors which lead to increased food availability for gelatinous zooplankton (Lynam et al., 2004) also increases in primary productivity are indirectly related to gelatinous zooplankton population (Loeb et al., 1997). The long-term trend in global temperature is slowly increasing has also highlighted the trend in the world oceans showing a substantial increase in sea temperature (0-3000m depth). Temperature gradually increases with profound effects on marine ecosystems and the changes directly affect metabolism, growth and 4|P age General introduction development rates of many organism. It can also alter the seasonality and length of the reproductive active period for a number of species in addition to have greater effects on the characteristics and timing of gelatinous zooplankton blooms (Purcell, 2007). The major change in abundance of gelatinous zooplankton in Indian waters is very essential to assess the ecosystem approach. Indian seas have less documented areas of gelatinous zooplankton in the world. In contrast, considerable amount of work has been done to understand the zooplankton populations in Indian waters tend to focus mainly on copepods, the major zooplankton component. Other groups of gelatinous zooplankton were studied some time only quantitative analysis along with zooplankton studies hence not treated in detail as distributional pattern and their seasonal variation and influence of environmental parameters. As discussed above, the ecologically importance of gelatinous zooplankton have been attracted considerably by the scientists. The vast majority of studies, however, have been carried out almost in all aspects of these groups in and around the world. In contrast, the Southeast Asia has almost nothing is known about the ecology of gelatinous zooplankton (Omori and Nakano, 2001). Most of the gelatinous zooplankton are very difficult to identify. So, the molecular are useful and identify at the species level. Molecular data continue to enhance our understanding of the evolutionary history of life at all hierarchical levels. Nevertheless, many questions about cnidarian phylogenetic relationships remain unanswered (Daly et al., 2007). The considerable morphological disparity present within cnidaria is evidenced by delicate siphonophores, massive medusae and corals, feathery hydroids, interstitial polyps and box jellies possessing complex eyes. Despite this diversity, these relatively simple metazoans are united in possessing nematocysts, 5|P age General introduction most probably as a result of common ancestry. Agree with evidence that cnidarians are monophyletic within Metazoa comes from molecular sequence data of the small subunit (SSU) of the ribosome (Kim et al., 2011; Collins, 2000), as well as the large subunit (LSU) of the ribosome (Medina et al., 2001). Most phylogenetic analyses of Cnidaria have focused on determining the relationships among the four main taxa that compose it – Anthozoa, Cubozoa, Hydrozoa, and Scyphozoa (Salvini-Plawen, 1987; Brusca & Brusca, 1990; Bridge et al., 1995). From this work, a consensus has emerged that Anthozoa is the sister group of the remaining cnidarians, which are collectively referred to as Medusozoa (Petersen, 1979), or less often as Tesserazoa (Salvini- Plawen, 1987). Particularly convincing evidence for the monophyly of medusozoans is their shared possession of linear mitochondrial genomes and medusae. However, relationships among the major medusozoan groups remain contentious (Collins, 2000). Studies on the biochemical composition and energy content of zooplankton is important to have a better understanding of organic production, productivity and cycling of biogeochemical elements in the marine environment. Such information is of much importance in estimating the energy available to higher trophic levels, which in turn, can be used to estimate harvestable fishery resources. Much of the available information pertaining to biochemical composition and nutritive value of zooplankton is from estuarine, coastal, inshore and offshore waters of India (Goswamy et al., 1981; Goswamy, 1993). Zooplankton constitutes the largest ecological group of organisms in the sea and play an important role in marine food chain. They feed on phytoplankton and in turn form the food for animals at higher trophic level (Chandramohan et al., 1972). Information on biochemical composition of zooplankton in general and gelatinous zooplankton in particular especially from 6|P age General introduction Indian waters is meagre. Estimation of biochemical constituents of zooplankton is important in understanding their physiological functions, metabolism and nutritive value which are relevant to the marine ecosystem, in its energy transfer and secondary production. Although the distribution, molecular taxonomy and biochemical composition of gelatinous zooplankton have been studied very little in various parts of the world and particularly in India. Hence, the present study was intended to know the distribution of gelatinous zooplankton along the Bay of Bengal and Arabian Sea and its relationship with physical features. From the above facts, present study was framed with the following goals. To understand status of hydrobiological parameters in Arabian Sea and Bay of Bengal during the Cruises. To study the diversity and taxonomical position of gelatinous zooplankton. To study the molecular taxonomy of the dominant gelatinous zooplankton. To study the seasonal abundance of gelatinous zooplankton in Parangipettai coastal waters. To study the biochemical composition of a dominant Anthomedusae, Porpita porpita. 7|P age