* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Lecture 2: Irrational numbers
Survey
Document related concepts
Foundations of mathematics wikipedia , lookup
Infinitesimal wikipedia , lookup
Mathematics of radio engineering wikipedia , lookup
Mathematical proof wikipedia , lookup
Wiles's proof of Fermat's Last Theorem wikipedia , lookup
Large numbers wikipedia , lookup
Fundamental theorem of calculus wikipedia , lookup
List of important publications in mathematics wikipedia , lookup
Four color theorem wikipedia , lookup
Fermat's Last Theorem wikipedia , lookup
Collatz conjecture wikipedia , lookup
Georg Cantor's first set theory article wikipedia , lookup
Positional notation wikipedia , lookup
Real number wikipedia , lookup
Fundamental theorem of algebra wikipedia , lookup
Transcript
E-320: Teaching Math with a Historical Perspective Oliver Knill, 2010 Problems Lecture 2: Irrational numbers a) Show that √ 6 is not rational. Objective We want to appreciate one of the great moments of mathematics: the insight that there are numbers which are irrational. It was the Pythagoreans, who realized this first and - according to legend - tried even to ”cover the discovery up” and kill Hippasus, one of the earlier discoverers. We have seen in the presentation the following two examples of irrationality proofs. We use the notation log10 for the logarithm with base 10. For example log10 (1000) = 3 because 103 = 1000. b) Assume you know x is an irrational number, can you conclude that Two prototype proofs √ Proof: assume the relation 2 is not rational. √ 2 = p/q holds. Squaring it gives 2 = p2 /q 2 or c) Is √ 2+ √ 3 irrational? 2q 2 = p2 . If we make a prime factorization, then on the left hand side contains an odd number of factors 2, while the right hand side contains an even number of factors 2. This is not possible and so, the original relation was impossible. Here is an other example: log10 (3) is irrational. d) Is the golden ratio √ 1+ 5 2 Proof. Exponentiating both sides of log10 (3) = p/q gives 3 = 10p/q . Taking the q’th power on both sides gives 3q = 10p . There are no integers p, q doing this (except p = q = 0) since the left hand side is odd and the right hand side is even. e) log10 (7) is irrational. Unsolved Math Problems While one knows from many numbers that they are irrational like π, e,eπ , e−π/2 , sin(p/q), cos(p/q), √ m for non-square m and integer n, there are many unsolved log(1 + p/q) for nonzero p/q, or n problems. One does not know for example, whether π + e, π − e, ee are rational. A general statement which would settle these three is called Shanuel’s conjecture. irrational? √ x is irrational? E-320: Teaching Math with a Historical Perspective Oliver Knill, 2010 a) Is the region convex and symmetric with respect to reflection at the origin? Lecture 2: rational approximation Objective We rewiew Minkowski’s theorem and apply it to approximate real numbers α by rational numbers: b) How large is the area of the region? Minkowski’s theorem reminder A convex, origin-symmetric region in the plane with area larger than 4 contains a lattice point different from the origin. c) Is there a lattice point (p, q) different from zero in that region? If yes, estimate αp − q. A theorem on approximation by fractions Dirichlet’s theorem: Given any real number α < 1. For any n, there exists a fraction p/q with 1 ≤ p, q ≤ n such that p 1 . |α − | ≤ q nq To see, why this result is true, we consider the region G = {−n ≤ x ≤ n, |y − αx| ≤ 1/n } . d) How does the theorem follow? Hp,qL -n n e) Can you deduce from the above theorem that there infinitely many fractions p/q such that p 1 |α − | ≤ 2 q q E-320: Teaching Math with a Historical Perspective Oliver Knill, 2010 3. Babylonian cuneiforms Lecture 2: writing numbers This notation was used by the Babylonians. The most important document is ”Plimpton 322”, a Clay tablet from 1800 BC. Numbers are represented to the base 60. Example: Objective In this worksheet, we look at some historical number systems and write concrete numbers in various systems. 1. The Roman system Problem: How would Euphrat-Tigris dwellers have written the number 1000 in this system? 4. The Egyptian system The letters I, V, X, L, C, D, M were of Etruscic origin. The subtractive writing principle like in 9 = IX, 90 = XC were hardly used by the romans. They would write V IIII, LIIII instead. The Egyptians had a similar system as the Romans but with fewer symbols. Problem: How would you write 129 in the roman system? Problem: The following stone carving was found at Karnak. What number does it represent? 2. The Greek system The Greeks used their alphabet with 24 letters with additional semitic letters (digamma or stigma, koppa and sampi) to represent numbers. A comma in front of a letter would mean it would be multiplied by 1000. A dot would mean that the number in front would be multiplied by 10’000. 4. Mayan System The Mayans had a base 20 which is natural too in some sense if you count with toes and fingers. For example, , θτ λη., δζιǫ = 93314715 Problem: How would you write the number 6432 in this system? Problem: How would the Mayan have written the number 441?