* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Proceeding - ETH Zürich
Implicit solvation wikipedia , lookup
Structural alignment wikipedia , lookup
Rosetta@home wikipedia , lookup
List of types of proteins wikipedia , lookup
Protein design wikipedia , lookup
Homology modeling wikipedia , lookup
Protein domain wikipedia , lookup
Circular dichroism wikipedia , lookup
Protein folding wikipedia , lookup
Bimolecular fluorescence complementation wikipedia , lookup
Protein moonlighting wikipedia , lookup
Intrinsically disordered proteins wikipedia , lookup
Protein mass spectrometry wikipedia , lookup
Protein structure prediction wikipedia , lookup
Western blot wikipedia , lookup
Protein purification wikipedia , lookup
Nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy of proteins wikipedia , lookup
Rheology of Concentrated Milk Protein Dispersions in the Presence of Lactose I. Marti*, P. Fischer, E. J. Windhab ETH Zürich, Institute of Food Science and Nutrition, Food Process Engineering Building LFO E12.1, Schmelzbergstrasse 9, 8092 Zürich, Switzerland *[email protected] INTRODUCTION Proteins are natural polymeric macromolecules. Their structure, conformation and physico-chemical properties are determined by the amino acid sequence (Fig. 1). O R2 C CH H2N CH NH R1 NH O Ri C CH C NH Concentrated milk protein dispersions exhibits shear dependent flow behaviour and pronounced viscoelastic properties as shown for the occurrence of rod climbing in Fig. 3. COOH O Figure 1. Schematic representation of a protein molecule; R1, R2 and Ri indicate the amino acid side chains [1] Depending on protein structure, environmental conditions and chemical nature of the side chains three-dimensional structures are built up and stabilised by means of intra- and/or intermolecular forces. Fig. 2 gives an overview of the governing interaction mechanisms. NH3 + O O _ O C CH2OH O H O C CH2OH Figure 2. Non-covalent forces stabilising structure of protein: 1: ionpair interaction; 2: hydrogen bond; 3: dipole-dipole interaction; 4: hydrophobic interaction [1] Milk protein can be considered as a complex mixture of proteins. It typically contains 80 % caseins and 20 % whey proteins. The caseins are amphiphilic and mostly random coil polypeptides with a molecular weight of 19’000 to 23’000. The whey proteins are with a molecular weight of 14’000 to 18’300 smaller in size and so called globular proteins. They have a more organised structure and are sensitive to heat and pH [1]. Although all proteins are built from amino acids, the flow properties of their dispersions differ greatly due to factors such as protein type, concentration, temperature, heat treatment, pH, and solvent environment. Rheological data of milk protein systems have been reviewed by Kinsella [2]. The majority of the studies, however, refer either to casein, caseinate or whey protein dispersions with low concentrations and focus on the impact of variation in pH, ionic environment and temperature. Figure 3. Rod climbing of a concentrated milk protein dispersion Protein dispersions relevant for the design and production of food products typically contain besides proteins other solutes such as sugars. Several researchers [3-5] have investigated the interactions between non-ionic solutes and ionic polymers, such as sugar and proteins. It was demonstrated that in the presence of sugars the proteins are preferentially hydrated. Consequently, sugars are preferentially excluded from contact with the surface of the proteins. The degree of preferential hydration was shown to be dependent on sugar concentration, and that physico-chemical properties such as partial specific volume of the proteins, structure, stability, and protein-protein interaction are altered in the presence of non-ionic solutes. As the flow properties are strongly related to these factors it is evident, that also the flow properties of protein dispersions is altered with the addition of sugars to the dispersion, in this case milk protein dispersion with the addition of the sugar lactose. Large deformation processes like spinning are sensitive to flow instabilities. Thus, the knowledge of the rheological behaviour of the processed milk protein dispersions is of practical significance for process design and quality control of both the manufacturing process and the final products. EXPERIMENTAL METHODS The experiments reported in this paper were performed using a Rheometric Scientific ARES rheometer equipped with cone-plate geometry of 50 mm diameter and a cone angle of 0.04 rad. A RESULTS Fig. 4 shows the shear stress and first normal stress difference at various milk protein concentrations measured at a temperature of 10 ˚C. The respective temperature dependencies for the milk protein dispersion with a concentration of 19.4 % by weight are depicted in Fig. 5. 104 τ N1 22.5 wt % τ [Pa], N1 [Pa] 103 19.4 wt % 17.0 wt % 15.3 wt % 102 1 101 2 1 1 100 10-3 10-2 10-1 100 101 102 103 γ [s-1] Figure 4. Shear stress and first normal stress difference as function of shear rate at various concentrations of milk protein (ϑ = 10 ˚C) At low shear rates a zero shear viscosity can be observed as shown by the slope of 1 in the shear stress curves. At higher shear rates the milk protein dispersions exhibit shear thinning behaviour. With decreasing concentration and increasing temperature the onset of shear thinning is shifted to higher shear rates. At the onset of shear thinning the first normal stress difference can be detected. Zero shear viscosity and shear thinning can be illustrated through microstructural aspects. At rest, protein molecules are randomly oriented and entangled. When this material is sheared, the asymmetric dispersed molecules tend to align themselves in flow direction so that frictional resistance is reduced. The random structure changes to a shear-oriented structure with progressively decreasing resistance to flow reflected in decreasing viscosity [2]. For all concentrations and temperatures the slope of the first normal stress difference curve is slightly steeper than the one of the stress curve leading to a cross-over at the highest measured shear rates for all concentrations and temperatures but the lowest. 104 τ 103 τ [Pa], N1 [Pa] waterbath was used to maintain temperature at the defined value. After loading, the samples were covered with mineral oil to prevent evaporation during measurements. The measurements were carried out in triplicates. Milk protein dispersions containing 15.3-22.4 % by weight of dry matter were prepared in a stirring apparatus at a temperature of 55 ˚C using commercially available milk protein powder AME100 from Emmi Milch AG, CH-Dagmersellen and tap water. Stirring was performed during 4 hours in a low-pressure environment (0.5 bar) to remove dispersed air. Lactose containing protein dispersions were all made from the same milk protein dispersion with 20 % by weight of dry matter and lactose monohydrate from DMV International, The Netherlands. Dispersions with lactose concentrations from 0-20 g anhydrous lactose per 100 g water were used. N1 10 °C 20 °C 30 °C 102 1 100 10-2 2 1 101 1 10-1 100 101 102 103 γ [s-1] Figure 5. Shear stress and first normal stress difference as function of shear rate at various temperatures (concentration = 19.4 % by weight) The flow behaviour of the examined milk protein dispersions shows a strong dependency on concentration and temperature. Elastic behaviour predominates over viscous behaviour at shear rates that are below processing conditions, which might lead to flow instabilities during processing. In the case of lactose containing milk protein dispersions the curves of shear stress and the first normal stress difference are shifted to higher values with increasing lactose concentration in the solvent. The increased stiffness and elasticity of the dispersions, which were also be detected in oscillatroy experiments, cannot solely be explained by the impact of solvent viscosity increase. The impact of changed protein-solvent interactions caused by the addition of the sugar lactose may, as discussed for other protein properties in [3-5], be the critical factor governing the flow behaviour of the dispersions. REFERENCES 1. Belitz H.-D., Grosch W., Lehrbuch der Lebensmittelchemie (1987) 3rd Ed. Springer 2. Kinsella J. E., CRC Critical Reviews in Food Sci. and Nutrition (1984) 21 197-262 3. Arakawa T., Timasheff S. N., Biochemistry (1982) 21 6536-6544 4. Mora-Gutierrez A., Farrell Jr. H. M., J. Agric. Food Chem. (2000) 48 3245-3255 5. Timasheff S. N., In Protein-Solvent Interactions; Gregory R. B. Eds.; Marcel Decker, Inc. (1995) 445-482