Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
12-Hydroxyeicosatetraenoic acid wikipedia , lookup
Immune system wikipedia , lookup
Adaptive immune system wikipedia , lookup
Polyclonal B cell response wikipedia , lookup
Psychoneuroimmunology wikipedia , lookup
Adoptive cell transfer wikipedia , lookup
Cancer immunotherapy wikipedia , lookup
Immunosuppressive drug wikipedia , lookup
Molecular mimicry wikipedia , lookup
DNA vaccination wikipedia , lookup
REVIEWS Plasmacytoid dendritic cells: sensing nucleic acids in viral infection and autoimmune diseases Michel Gilliet*, Wei Cao* and Yong-Jun Liu Abstract | Plasmacytoid dendritic cells (pDCs) are important mediators of antiviral immunity through their ability to produce large amounts of type I interferons (IFNs) on viral infection. This function of pDCs is linked to their expression of Toll-like receptor 7 (TLR7) and TLR9, which sense viral nucleic acids within the early endosomes. Exclusion of self nucleic acids from TLR-containing early endosomes normally prevents pDC responses to them. However, in some autoimmune diseases, self nucleic acids can be modified by host factors and gain entrance to pDC endosomes, where they activate TLR signalling. Several pDC receptors negatively regulate type I IFN responses by pDCs during viral infection and for normal homeostasis. Type I interferons Molecules produced by cells of the immune system that are rapidly induced by infection with viruses and bacteria. They immediately limit viral replication and increase subsequent antigen-specific immune responses. CpG-containing DNA DNA oligodeoxynucleotide sequences that include a cytidine–guanosine sequence and certain flanking nucleotides. These sequences have been found to induce innate immune responses through interaction with Toll-like receptor 9. Department of Immunology and Center of Cancer Immunology Research, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas 77030, USA. Correspondence to Y.-J.L. e-mail: [email protected] *These authors contributed equally to this manuscript. doi:10.1038/nri2358 Published online 18 July 2008 Plasmacytoid dendritic cells (pDCs) were first described by pathologists in the 1950s as plasmacytoid T cells or plasmacytoid monocytes on the basis of their plasma-cell morphology and expression of the T‑cell marker CD4 or the myeloid-cell markers MHC class II, CD36 and CD68 (Ref. 1). In the 1980s, virologists and immunologists were intrigued by an ill-defined human blood cell type, which was referred to as a natural type-I-interferon-producing cell (IPC) owing to its capacity to produce large amounts of type I interferons (IFNs) following culture with viruses2. This mysterious cell type was found to correspond to pDCs3–9; therefore, in this Review, we use the term pDCs to refer to this cell population. One important question raised following the identification of pDCs was how they sense viral infection to rapidly produce a large amount of type I IFNs. At that time, it was known that two classes of nucleic acids, namely microbial-derived oligonucleotides containing unmethylated CpG dinucleotides10 and double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) synthesized by various viruses, could strongly induce type I IFN production by mammalian cells11. In 2001, Kadowaki et al. reported that pDCs produced type I IFNs in response to CpG-containing DNA (as found in DNA viruses and bacteria) but not to the viral dsRNA mimic polyinosinic–polycytidylic acid (polyI:C). By contrast, myeloid DCs (mDCs) produced type I IFNs and interleukin‑12 (IL‑12) in response to polyI:C but not to CpG-containing DNA12. Although the receptors for CpG-containing DNA and polyI:C were unknown at the time of these observations, the different responses of pDCs and mDCs to these microbial-associated nucleic acids suggested that pDCs and mDCs may express different pattern-recognition receptors and that pDCs may detect viral infection by recognizing viral nucleic acids12. A second intriguing observation in this study was that not all of the known CpG-containing oligodeoxynucleotides (CpG ODNs) could induce pDCs to produce type I IFNs12. Interestingly, at the same time, Klinman and colleagues classified CpG ODNs into two main groups: D‑type (now known as A‑type) CpG ODNs, which stimulate IFNγ production by natural killer (NK) cells, and K‑type (now known as B‑type) CpG ODNs, which stimulate B-cell proliferation and B-cell IL‑6 and antibody production13,14. It is now clearly established that the A‑type CpG ODNs can efficiently stimulate IFNα production by pDCs that then activate NK cells15–17, whereas the B‑type CpG ODNs do not12,14,18. Instead, B‑type CpG ODNs stimulate pDCs to produce IL‑6 and tumournecrosis factor (TNF) and induce B‑cell proliferation and antibody production12,14. These studies suggest that pDCs may have developed two different signalling mechanisms to respond to different types of CpG ODN. In this article, we review the remarkable progress made over the past 7 years in understanding the molecular mechanisms by which the innate immune system, in particular pDCs, sense and respond to microbial nucleic acids during infection. Furthermore, we discuss the mechanism by which pDCs sense and respond to self nucleic acids — a mechanism that can potentially trigger autoimmune diseases — and the way that these responses might be regulated. 594 | august 2008 | volume 8 www.nature.com/reviews/immunol © 2008 Macmillan Publishers Limited. All rights reserved. REVIEWS Pattern-recognition receptors Host receptors that can sense pathogen-associated molecular patterns and initiate signalling cascades that lead to an innate immune response. These can be membrane bound (for example, Toll-like receptors) or soluble cytoplasmic receptors (for example, RIG‑I, MDA5 and NLRs). A-type CpG ODNs (Also known as D‑type CpG ODNs). Synthetic oligodeoxynucleotides (ODNs) with the following three features: polyG sequences at the 3′ end; a central palindromic sequence; and cytosineguanine dinucleotides within the palindrome. The polyG tails on A‑type CpG ODNs can interact with each other, resulting in the formation of guanine tetrads and clusters. B-type CpG ODNs (Also known as K‑type CpG ODNs). Synthetic oligodeoxynucleotides that contain a CpG motif(s) on a phosphorothioate backbone. Nucleic-acid sensing by the immune system Multiple receptors have evolved in mammals for detecting non-self nucleic acids during microbial infection, with several receptor systems often existing within a single cell. Interestingly, however, pDCs are unique in that they only use one such receptor system to sense nucleic acids and produce type I IFNs. Toll-like receptors. Toll-like receptors (TLRs) are a family of conserved membrane-spanning molecules that contain an ectodomain of leucine-rich repeats, a transmembrane domain and a cytoplasmic domain known as the TIR (Toll/IL‑1 receptor) domain. In Drosophila melanogaster, the Toll receptor controls a main pathway that is triggered in response to bacterial and fungal infections, induces strong and rapid expression of genes, such as the nuclear factor-κB (NF-κB) family of transcription factors, and ultimately induces antimicrobial peptide production19. Since the first mammalian TLR (now known as TLR4) was identified by Janeway, Medzhitov and Preston-Hurlburt20, 10 TLRs have been identified in humans (FIG. 1) and 12 in mice. The leucine-rich repeats of the TLR ectodomains bind to pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs), such as the bacterial cell-wall component lipopolysaccharide (a ligand of TLR4)20,21, bacterial flagellin (a ligand of TLR5)22, and lipoprotein and peptidoglycan (which are recognized by TLR2 complexed with TLR1 or TLR6)23–25. Therefore, these TLRs, which are expressed on the surface of host cells, facilitate the immediate detection of and response to microorganisms in their environment26. Other TLRs, including TLR3 (ref. 27), TLR7 (refs 28–31), TLR8 (refs 29,30) and TLR9 (ref. 32), are located in intracellular endosomal-lysosomal compartments26,33,34, where they are involved in the detection of microbial nucleic acids. Nucleic acid TLR7 (ssRNA) TLR8 (ssRNA) Lipid TLR9 (CpG-containing DNA) TLR4 (LPS) TLR2 (Lipoprotein or PGN) TLR3 (dsRNA) TLR10 (?) TLR6 (Lipoprotein) TLR1 (Lipoprotein) TLR5 (Flagellin) Protein Figure 1 | Overview of the human TLR family. The molecular tree of the human Toll‑like receptors (TLRs) is grouped based on the sequence homology and specificity Reviews | Immunology for certain pathogen-associated molecular patterns. dsDNA,Nature double-stranded DNA; LPS, lipopolysaccharide; PGN, peptidoglycan; ssRNA, single-stranded RNA. TLR activation by their cognate agonists leads to the recruitment of cellular adaptor molecules that contain TIR domains and the formation of multi-component signal transduction complexes in the cytoplasm. Four key adaptor proteins, namely, myeloid differentiation primary-response gene 88 (MyD88), TIR-domaincontaining adaptor protein (TIRAP; also known as MAL), TIRAP inducing IFNβ (TRIF) and TRIF-related adaptor molecule (TRAM), directly bind to TLRs in various combinations (reviewed in refs 26,35 ). Adaptor‑molecule binding to TLRs then activates multiple signalling pathways, such as those involving NF‑κB, mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPKs) and IFNregulatory factors (IRFs), and initiates the transcription of genes encoding cytokines, chemokines and co-stimulatory molecules. The endosomal TLR7/TLR8/TLR9–MyD88 signalling pathway. Following the discovery by Akira and colleagues that DNA from bacteria has stimulatory effects on cells of the mammalian immune system through TLR9 (ref. 32), the function of a group of closely related endosomal TLRs has been revealed. TLR7, TLR8 and TLR9, which have high sequence homology36,37, recognize a range of RNA and DNA molecules. TLR7 and TLR8 respond to guanosine- or uridine-rich singlestranded RNA (ssRNA) from viruses and the synthetic imidazoquinoline compounds imiquimod and R‑848, as well as guanosine analogues28,29,38. TLR9 seems to detect ssDNA molecules that contain unmethylated CpG-containing motifs, which are commonly found in the genomes of viruses and bacteria32,39. Synthetic ODNs containing CpG dinucleotides can interact directly with the ectodomain of TLR9 and induce conformational changes 40 that lead to downstream signalling activation. After ligand engagement, activated TLR7, TLR8 and TLR9 interact with MyD88, which contains a TIR domain and a death domain (FIG. 2a). MyD88 serves as a key adaptor molecule that functions to recruit IL‑1-receptorassociated kinases (IRAKs) to almost all TLRs (except TLR3) and to the IL‑1 receptor26,41. MyD88‑deficient mice therefore fail to produce TNF or IL‑6 when exposed to IL‑1 or microbial components that are recognized by TLR2, TLR4, TLR5, TLR7 or TLR9 (refs 26,42). Among the TLRs that associate with MyD88, TLR7 and TLR9 strictly depend on the function of MyD88; TLR4 signals through MyD88, TIRAP, TRIF and TRAM; and TLR2 uses both MyD88 and TIRAP26,41. The endosomal TLR3–TRIF signalling pathway. TLR3, which is localized in endosomes, recognizes viral dsRNA and its synthetic mimic polyI:C. However, unlike the other endosomal TLRs (TLR7, TLR8 and TLR9), TLR3 seems to transduce its signals mainly through an MyD88-independent pathway, as stimulation with polyI:C in MyD88-deficient cells does not affect the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines and co‑ stimulatory molecules26,43. Indeed, TLR3 was shown to associate with TRIF and signal through IRF3, a key factor involved in IFNβ production43,44 (FIG. 2b). nature reviews | immunology volume 8 | august 2008 | 595 © 2008 Macmillan Publishers Limited. All rights reserved. REVIEWS a TLR7/TLR8/TLR9–MyD88 signalling pathway c RLR signalling pathway b TLR3–TRIF signalling pathway MDA5 Endosome TLR7 or TLR8 RIG-I Endosome TLR9 TLR3 TRIF TRAF6 p50 p65 MAPKKs IRF7 p50 p65 MAPKs IκB Nucleus (PAMPs). Molecular patterns that are found in pathogens but not mammalian cells. Examples include terminally mannosylated and polymannosylated compounds (which bind the mannose receptor) and various microbial components, such as bacterial lipopolysaccharide, hypomethylated DNA, flagellin and double-stranded RNA (all of which bind Toll-like receptors). Death domain A protein–protein interaction domain found in many proteins that are involved in signalling and apoptosis. DExD/H box RNA helicases A group of enzymes that can unwind double-stranded RNA using energy derived from ATP hydrolysis. The DExD/H box is a characteristic amino‑acid signature motif of many RNA-binding proteins. Caspase-recruitment domain (CARD). A protein domain that is found in certain initiator caspases (for example, mammalian caspase‑9) and their adaptor proteins (for example, apoptotic-proteaseactivating factor 1, APAF1). This domain mediates protein–protein interactions. Mitochondrion TRAF3 P IRAK1 IRAK4 TRAF3 TBK1 FADD Caspases IKKε IRF3 TBK1 IKKε IRF3 p50 p65 IRF7 NF-κB Cytosol Pathogen-associated molecular patterns IPS1? MyD88 BTK IPS1 dsDNA sensor ? TIR domain MyD88 LGP2 IFNα, IFNβ, IFNλ, IFNω IL-6, TNF CD80, CD86 IFNβ IL-6, TNF IFNα, IFNβ Figure 2 | Intracellular nucleic-acid sensors and signalling pathways. a | Endosomal Toll-like receptor 7 (TLR7), TLR8 and TLR9 recognize RNA and DNA ligands, and signal through a key adaptor MyD88 (myeloid differentiation primary-response gene 88) in the cytosol. MyD88 in turn associates with a signal complex comprised of TRAF6 Nature Reviews | Immunology (tumour-necrosis factor (TNF)-receptor-associated factor 6), BTK (Bruton’s tyrosine kinase), IRAK4 (interleukin‑1receptor (IL-1R)-associated kinase 4) and IRAK1, which leads to the activation of IRF7 (interferon-regulatory factor 7), NF‑κB (nuclear factor‑κB) and MAPKs (mitogen-activated protein kinases). Overall, this pathway potently induces the production of high levels of type I IFNs (such as IFNα, IFNβ, IFNλ and IFNω), pro-inflammatory cytokines and expression of co-stimulatory molecules. b | Alternatively, the binding of double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) to endosomal TLR3 triggers a signalling pathway mediated by TRIF (Toll/IL-1R (TIR) domain-containing adaptor protein inducing IFNβ), which involves TRAF3, TBK1 (TANK-binding kinase 1) and IKKε (inhibitor of NF‑κB kinase ε). Subsequent IRF3 activation leads to IFNβ production. The TLR3–TRIF signalling pathway also activates NF‑κB and MAPKs and results in the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines and the expression of co-stimulatory molecules (CD80 and CD86). c | The dsRNA receptors RIG‑I (retinoic-acid-inducible gene I), MDA5 (melanoma differentiation-associated gene 5) and LGP2 (laboratory of genetics and physiology 2) constitute the third nucleic-acid sensor system, exclusively located in the cytoplasm of most cells. RIG‑I, MDA5 and LGP2 signal through a common adaptor molecule IPS1 (IFNB-promoter stimulator 1), which is associated with the mitochondria. By coupling with TRAF3, TBK1 and IKKε, IPS1 directly activates IRF3 and NF‑κB through FADD (FAS-associated via death domain), caspase‑8 and caspase‑10. This pathway induces the production of type I IFNs and other cytokines. dsDNA-induced IFN production involves a yet-to-be defined sensor that signals through certain components of the RLR (RIG-I-like receptor) pathway, such as TBK1 and IRF3. IkB, inhibitor of NF-kB; MAPKK, MAPK kinase. The RIG‑I-like-receptor signalling pathway. The observation that nearly all nucleated cells can produce type I IFNs after viral infection or in response to dsRNA in the cytosol, even in the absence of endosomal TLRs and their adaptors, suggested that there is an independent sensory system that detects nucleic acids in the cytosol (FIG. 2c) . Indeed, three genes have been identified in humans and mice that encode a group of proteins known as the RIG‑I-like receptors (RLRs) — retinoic-acid-inducible gene I (RIG‑I), melanoma differentiation-associated antigen 5 (MDA5) and laboratory of genetics and physio logy 2 (LGP2) 45,46. The RLRs are DExD/H box RNA helicases , and RIG‑I and MDA5 also contain an N‑terminal caspase-recruitment domain (CARD). These receptors bind to dsRNA poly(rI:rC), poly(rA:rU)47 and, in the case of RIG‑I, 5′-triphosphate RNA48,49, which are present in viral genomes or replication intermediates. RLRs interact with a central adaptor IFNBpromoter stimulator 1 (IPS1; also known as MAVS, VISA or CARDIF)50–52, which assembles a signalling complex that contains TNF-receptor-associated factor 3 (TRAF3), TRAF-family-member-associated NF-κB activator-binding kinase 1 (TBK1) and inhibitor of NF‑κB kinase ε (IKKε; also known as ΙΚΚi), and signals through IRF3 to induce IFN production45,53. 596 | august 2008 | volume 8 www.nature.com/reviews/immunol © 2008 Macmillan Publishers Limited. All rights reserved. REVIEWS Other nucleic-acid sensors. Nucleic acids are also able to engage several other intracellular components. First, a recently described molecule termed DNA-dependent activator of IRFs (DAI) has been shown in vitro to act as a cytosolic DNA sensor by binding dsDNA and signalling through TBK1 and IRF3 to activate NF‑κB and induce type I IFN production54. However, the role of DAI in sensing dsDNA in vivo has been questioned in a study using DAI-deficient mice55. Second, in macrophages, cytoplasmic DNA has been shown to trigger pro-inflammatory responses through components of the inflammasome, a process that is independent of TLRs and IRFs56. Third, type I IFNs induce the expression of a variety of genes with antiviral functions57,58, and several such molecules seem able to sense certain nucleic‑acid structures. For example, RNAs with short stem-loops can activate IFNinducible dsRNA-dependent protein kinase R (PKR) in a 5′‑triphosphate-dependent manner, independent of RIG‑I (REF. 59). In addition, activation of the ribonuclease L by 2′,5′-linked oligoadenylate leads to the production of small RNA cleavage products from self RNA, which then function to amplify antiviral IFN responses54. Inflammasome A molecular complex of several proteins that, on assembly, cleaves pro-interleukin‑1, thereby producing active interleukin‑1. Ubiquitin E3 ligase An enzyme that is required to attach the molecular tag ubiquitin to proteins. Depending on the position and number of ubiquitin molecules that are attached, the ubiquitin tag can target proteins for degradation in the proteasomal complex, sort them to specific subcellular compartments or modify their biological activity. Osteopontin An extracellular matrix protein that supports adhesion and migration of inflammatory cells. It has recently been recognized as an immunoregulatory T‑helper‑1-type cytokine. Nucleic-acid sensing by pDCs pDCs sense nucleic acids through TLR7 and TLR9. In humans, pDCs selectively express TLR7 and TLR9, but not other TLRs. This is in contrast to mDCs, which preferentially express TLR1, TLR2, TLR3 and TLR8, and monocytes, which express TLR1, TLR2, TLR4, TLR5 and TLR8 (refs 8,9,60,61). Mouse pDCs that lack MyD88 or TLR9 completely lose their ability to produce IFNα when challenged with the TLR9 ligand CpG ODNs62. Importantly, TLR9 was found to be required for pDCs to respond to DNA viruses, such as herpes simplex virus 1 (HSV‑1), HSV‑2 and murine cytomegalovirus63–66. In addition, TLR7 is required by pDCs to respond to ssRNA viruses, such as influenza virus, respiratory syncytial virus, Sendai virus and vesicular stomatitis virus (VSV)28,29,38,67. Given that MyD88 functions as an adaptor protein for both TLR7 and TLR9, MyD88-deficient pDCs have defective responses to a wide range of viruses9,29,68,69. However, several recent studies have suggested that pDCs from certain tissues70,71 or in response to particular viral infections68 might activate MyD88-dependent pathways independently of TLR7 and TLR9, but the molecular components of these pathways are currently unclear. Consistent with a lack of TLR3 expression by pDCs60,61,72, pDCs from Tlr3–/– mice were found to secrete normal levels of IFNα in response to polyI:C, whereas Tlr3–/– conventional DCs and B cells had defective responses to the TLR3 ligand polyI:C28,29. In fibroblasts and conventional DCs, RLRs and their adaptor IPS1 are essential for the induction of IFNs after infection with RNA viruses45,46,69. By contrast, RIG‑Ideficient or IPS1-deficient pDCs retain the ability to produce large amounts of IFNα in response to the RNA viruses Newcastle disease virus and Sendai virus, by using the TLR–MyD88 pathway69,73. Consistent with these findings, TBK1 and IKKε, two essential components of the RLR signalling pathway, are dispensable in pDCs during antiviral responses53. However, it is clear that pDCs also respond to viruses that enter the cytoplasm. Recently, autophagy — a conserved cell-autonomous process involving lysosomal degradation of cellular organelles74,75 — has been implicated in the innate type I IFN responses of pDCs to RNA viruses67 (FIG. 3). Autophagy may facilitate the delivery of cytoplasmic viral RNA to TLR7-containing endosomal compartments, thereby bypassing a need for cytoplasmic sensors. In summary, the exclusive dependence on the endosomal TLR–MyD88 pathway for nucleic-acid sensing and activation by pDCs implies a unique function of these cells and probably a non-redundant role of these cells in the immune system. TLR-mediated activation of pDCs. In pDCs, the engagement between TLR and MyD88 leads to the assembly of a multiprotein signal-transducing complex in the cytoplasm, which contains IRAK4 (Refs 76–78), TRAF6 (refs 79,80), Bruton’s tyrosine kinase (BTK)81–83 and IRF7 (refs 84,85) (FIG. 3). IRF7 is activated through ubiquitylation by the ubiquitin E3 ligase activity of TRAF6 (ref. 86) and phosphorylation by IRAK4. Activated IRF7 interacts with TRAF3, IKKα, IRAK1, osteopontin and probably phosphatidylinositide 3‑kinase (PI3K), and then translocates to the nucleus where it has a central role in initiating type I IFN gene transcription53,84,86–89. Simultaneously, TRAF6 in the signal-transducing complex ubiquitylates the protein kinase transforming growth factor-β (TGFβ)-activated kinase 1 (TAK1), a signal transducer that activates NF‑κB and MAPKs90,91 for the induction of transcription of pro-inflammatory cytokines, chemokines and co-stimulatory molecules92. In most cells, the production of IFNα depends on type I IFN receptor (IFNAR) triggering by IFNβ, which results in IRF7 induction93. Remarkably, however, pDCs constitutively express high levels of IRF4, IRF7 and IRF8 (ref. 18), and the high levels of endogenous IRF7 facilitate a rapid type I IFN response that is independent of IFNARmediated feedback signalling94. The recent observation that pDCs express low levels of the translational repressors, known as 4E-BPs, that are responsible for regulating IRF7 translation, might explain the constitutive expression of IRF7 in these cells95. IRF8 can further amplify the IFN response during the second phase of type I IFN gene transcription in pDCs96,97. Aside from IRF7, IRF5 directly interacts with MyD88 and mediates the TLR-dependent induction of type I IFNs and pro-inflammatory cytokines, including IL‑6 and TNF98–100. However, IRF4 competes with IRF5, but not IRF7, to interact with MyD88, thereby negatively regulating cytokine production induced by TLR stimulation100. Additional cellular factors involved in TLR-mediated activation of pDCs. In the absence of PAMPs, TLR9 resides in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) of resting pDCs, and only translocates to the endosomal compartment on exposure to TLR agonists 101. The delivery of TLRs to endolysosomes and their subsequent proper activation requires UNC93B, an ER‑resident transmembrane protein that can specifically interact with TLR3, nature reviews | immunology volume 8 | august 2008 | 597 © 2008 Macmillan Publishers Limited. All rights reserved. REVIEWS TLR7 and TLR9 (refs 102,103). The ER chaperone gp96 can also interact with TLR3, TLR7, TLR9 and several other TLRs, and is also thought to be involved in TLR function104. The transcription factor X‑box-binding protein 1 (XBP1), which is highly expressed by pDCs, is Virus or self nucleic acid Plasmacytoid DC Plasma membrane Endosome DNA RNA ATG5 TLR9 Autophagosome TLR7 MyD88 UNC93B MyD88 TLR7 or TLR9 gp96 TRAF3 XBP1 TRAF6 IRAK1 IKKα OPN PI3K BTK IRAK4 ER IRF7 TAK1 IRF5 IRF8 P P p50 p65 IRF7 IRF4 MAPKs NF-κB Cytosol Nucleus IFNα, IFNβ, IFNλ, IFNω IL-6, TNF CD80, CD86, CD40 Reviews | Immunology Figure 3 | Activation pathway in plasmacytoid dendriticNature cells responding to nucleic acids. Resting plasmacytoid dendritic cells (pDCs) predominantly express Toll-like receptor 7 (TLR7) and TLR9, which reside in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) in association with UNC93B and gp96. Following exposure to virus or nucleic acids, TLR7 and TLR9 relocate from the ER to the endosomes to engage with their RNA or DNA agonists. Conformational changes in the TLRs lead to the activation of MyD88 (myeloid differentiation primary-response gene 88) and its further association with TRAF6 (tumour-necrosis factor (TNF) receptor-associated factor 6), BTK (Bruton’s tyrosine kinase) and IRAK4 (interleukin‑1-receptor-associated kinase 4). The MyD88–TRAF6– IRAK4 complex then activates IRF7 (interferon-regulatory factor 7), TAK1 (transforming‑growth-factor-β-activated kinase 1), nuclear factor-kB (NF-kB) and IRF5 to propagate the downstream signals. Most importantly, IRF7 is activated through TRAF3, IRAK1, IKKα (inhibitor of NF-κB kinase α), osteopontin (OPN) and phosphoinositide 3‑kinase (PI3K). Following ubiquitylation and phosphorylation, IRF7 translocates to the nucleus and initiates the transcription of type I interferons (such as IFNα, IFNβ, IFNλ and IFNω). TAK1 triggers the activation of NF‑κB and MAPKs (mitogen-activated protein kinases) and, together with IRF5, leads to the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines and the expression of co-stimulatory molecules. IRF8, although not involved in the initial induction of IFN, magnifies IFN production through a feedback mechanism. By contrast, IRF4 inhibits the function of IRF5 through direct competition. Autophagosomes, which are constitutively formed in pDCs via ATG5 (autophagy-related gene 5), are probably involved in transferring the nucleic-acid agonists to endosomal TLRs for the production of IFNs. IL-6, interleukin-6; XBP1, X‑box-binding protein 1. involved in maintaining normal IFN production through its role in maintaining ER homeostasis105. So, the unique ability of pDCs to mount a rigorous type I IFN response relies on the function of a range of other cellular factors that are now being revealed. pDC responses to nucleic acids pDCs are professional type I IFN-producing cells in viral infections. Within 6 hours of activation by a virus, human pDCs dedicate 60% of the newly induced transcriptome to type I IFN genes18, producing a large amount of type I IFNs (1–2 units per cell or 3–10 pg per cell) within 24 hours, which is 200 to 1,000 times more than the amount produced by any other blood cell type7. Human pDCs express all the subtypes of type I IFNs, namely IFNα, IFNβ, IFNλ, IFNω and IFNτ (ref. 18). In mice, pDCs are mainly responsible for type I IFN production in vivo during infection with murine cytomegalovirus and VSV, as depletion of pDCs abrogates the systemic production of IFN94,106,107. pDC-derived type I IFNs link innate and adaptive antiviral immunity. Type I IFNs derived from pDCs not only directly inhibit viral infection, but also activate the antiviral functions of NK cells, mDCs, B cells and T cells, and therefore initiate and orchestrate innate and adaptive antiviral immunity. In response to HIV infection, human pDCs induce type I IFN‑dependent maturation of mDCs into potent antigen-presenting cells108. During HSV infection, pDC-derived type I IFNs and CD40 ligand induce maturation of bystander mDCs to potently stimulate antiviral T‑cell-mediated immunity109. Type I IFNs derived from pDCs have been shown to trigger IL‑12, IL‑15, IL‑18 and IL‑23 production by mDCs, and to induce monocytes to differentiate into DCs110,111. They also increase the ability of mDCs to cross-present exogenous antigens to CD8+ T cells and promote their clonal expansion112,113 and their ability to induce the differentiation of naive T cells into T helper 1 (TH1) cells114. Type I IFNs derived from pDCs also stimulate NK cells16 and, in conjunction with IL‑6, drive B cells to differentiate into mature antibody-secreting plasma cells115. These findings point to a crucial role for innate pDC activation in the initiation of a network of cellular and molecular events that lead to protective immune responses against viruses. Furthermore, a recent study suggests that pDCs are specialized to crosspresent viral antigens to memory CD8+ T cells, owing to their unique ability to rapidly load viral peptides onto pre-synthesized MHC class I molecules in recycling early endocytic compartments116. Two classes of CpG-containing DNA sequences induce distinct responses in pDCs. pDCs and, to a lesser extent, B cells express TLR9, the sensor for DNA. However, pDCs mount distinctive responses to at least two classes of synthetic ODNs with hypomethylated CpG motifs117. On the one hand, A‑type CpG ODNs do not activate B cells but induce robust production of type I IFNs by pDCs. On the other hand, B‑type CpG ODNs can activate B cells but only trigger pDCs to produce the 598 | august 2008 | volume 8 www.nature.com/reviews/immunol © 2008 Macmillan Publishers Limited. All rights reserved. REVIEWS Plasmacytoid DC Cytosol Nucleus TfR Early endosome Type A ODN P TLR9 EEA1 TRAF6 MyD88 IRAK4 P IRF7 TRAF3 IRAK1 OPN IRF7 IFNα, IFNβ, IFNλ, IFNω Acidification LAMP1 Late endosome or lysosome p50 p65 NF-κB Type B ODN TLR9 LysoTracker MyD88 TRAF6 TAK1 MAPKs BTK IRAK4 IRF5 IL-6, TNF CD80, CD86, CD40 Chemokines Figure 4 | Signalling of CpG ODN classes in different endosomal compartments. In plasmacytoid dendritic cells (pDCs), the binding of aggregated A‑type CpG oligodeoxynucleotides (ODNs) to Toll-like receptor 9 (TLR9) occurs in the early endosomes, Nature Reviews | Immunology which express markers such as transferrin receptor (TfR) and early endosomal antigen 1 (EEA1). Prolonged TLR9 signalling from the early endosomes activates MyD88 (myeloid differentiation primary-response gene 88) and other signal mediators, importantly IRF7 (interferon-regulatory factor 7), which promote strong type I interferon (IFN) production. By contrast, monomeric B‑type CpG ODNs that bind to the TLR9 complex quickly traffic through the early endosomes and into the more acidic late endosomes or lysosomes, which are marked by the presence of LAMP1 (lysosomal-associated membrane protein 1) and LysoTracker. This presumably activates a different set of signal mediators, particularly NF‑κB (nuclear factor-κB) and probably MAPKs (mitogen-activated protein kinases) and IRF5, and thereby leads to distinct outcomes of pDC activation without high levels of IFN production. BTK, Bruton's tyrosine kinase; IRAK, interleukin-1-receptor-associated kinase; OPN, osteopontin; TAK1, transforming-growth-factor-β-activated kinase 1; TRAF, tumour-necrosis factor (TNF) receptor-associated factor. Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). An autoimmune disease in which autoantibodies specific for DNA, RNA or proteins associated with nucleic acids form immune complexes that damage small blood vessels, especially in the kidneys. Patients with SLE generally have abnormal B‑ and T‑cell function. CpG islands Sequences of 0.5–2 kilobases that are rich in CpG dinucleotides. They are mostly located upstream of housekeeping genes and are also present in some tissuespecific genes. They are constitutively non-methylated in all animal cell types. pro-inflammatory cytokines TNF and IL‑6, and small amounts of IFN, as well as inducing the upregulation of CD80, CD86 and the expression of MHC class II molecules12–14,60,61,118. Two important features distinguish A‑type versus B‑type CpG ODNs, and these account for their differing ability to trigger type I IFN production by pDCs. First, A‑type CpG ODNs are characterized by a polyG tail that mediates the spontaneous formation of large multimeric aggregates with a diameter of about 50 nm119. By contrast, B‑type CpG ODNs are monomeric and do not form such higher order structures. Second, monomeric B‑type CpG ODNs rapidly traffic through early endosomes into late endosomes or lysosomes, whereas multimeric A‑type CpG ODNs are retained for longer periods of time in the early endosomes of pDCs120,121 (FIG. 4). The prolonged retention of multimeric A‑type CpG ODNs provides a platform for extended activation of the signal-transducing complex, consisting of MyD88 and IRF7, which leads to robust type I IFN production120 (FIG. 4). Interestingly, when A‑type CpG ODNs are disrupted into monomeric structures, they fail to be retained in the early endosome and to induce high amounts of type I IFN production, but instead rapidly traffic to late endosomes and induce maturation and production of IL‑6 and TNF. Conversely, liposome or particle encapsidation of B-type CpG ODNs allows their retention in early endosomes and the subsequent induction of much higher levels of type I IFNs and lower levels of IL‑6 and TNF and impaired pDC maturation119–122, which supports the important link between the physical size of TLR9 ligands and their stimulatory capacity. Therefore, pDCs seem to detect aggregated DNA structures in the early endosomes through TLR9, and this is coupled with IRF7 activation and type I IFN responses. By contrast, pDCs sense linear DNA structures in the late endosomes through TLR9, and this seems to be coupled with NF‑κB activation, which leads to TNF and IL‑6 production and pDC maturation. pDCs sense self DNA in autoimmunity Mechanisms for innate tolerance to self DNA. The release of host-derived (self) DNA into the extracellular environment is a common feature of both necrotic and apoptotic cell death123. To preserve the integrity of the organism, it is of pivotal importance that the immune system avoids the recognition of extracellular self DNA, while retaining the ability to sense pathogen-derived nucleic acids. The discrimination between pathogenderived DNA and self DNA seems to be controlled at three distinct levels. First, the subcellular localization of TLR9 allows immune responses to DNA from pathogens that invade the cells by endocytosis, whereas self DNA fails to spontaneously access this compartment124,125. Second, the high concentration of DNases in the extracellular environment ensures a rapid degradation of self DNA that is released by dying cells but not DNA that is contained in viruses or microorganisms. The importance of this pathway in preventing autoimmune responses is shown by the fact that mice deficient in DNase 1 develop a systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE)-like syndrome126, and that some patients with SLE have mutations in DNase 1 (ref. 127). Finally, viral or bacterial DNA contains multiple unmethylated CpG motifs that can bind and activate TLR9 (ref. 128), whereas mammalian self DNA contains fewer such motifs and these are mostly masked by methylation129. However, hypomethylated CpG islands that show reactivity to TLR9 have also been found in mammalian DNA. These CpG islands are preferentially enriched in DNA fragments that are released by apoptotic or necrotic cells and are found in the DNA of immune complexes associated with SLE130. A recent study however challenges the concept of self versus non-self discrimination based on the presence of unmethylated CpG motifs131. Although synthetic phosphothioate DNA depends on unmethylated CpG motifs to induce TLR9 activation, phosphodiester DNA, which is commonly found in pathogen DNA and self DNA, depends on the 2′ deoxyribose backbone131. In addition, the ability of phosphodiester DNA to activate TLR9 depends on the formation of multimeric aggregates, nature reviews | immunology volume 8 | august 2008 | 599 © 2008 Macmillan Publishers Limited. All rights reserved. REVIEWS indicated by the findings that self DNA activates TLR9 following the formation of aggregates with the antimicrobial peptide LL37 (detailed in the next section), and synthetic phosphodiesteric DNA activates TLR9 through a 3′ polyG extension, which promotes DNA aggregation. These data suggest that activation of TLR9 by DNA depends on both the 2′ deoxyribose backbone for TLR9 binding and the aggregate forms for extended retention in the early endosomes. Immune complexes Complexes of antigen bound to antibody and, sometimes, components of the complement system. The levels of immune complexes are increased in many autoimmune disorders, in which they become deposited in tissues and cause tissue damage. Breakdown of innate tolerance to self DNA in autoimmunity. The barriers that prevent pDCs from sensing self DNA are not infallible, and responses to self DNA do occur in some autoimmune diseases. In patients with SLE, pDCs are continuously activated by circulating immune complexes comprising self DNA and antibodies to DNA or nucleoproteins132–134. The ongoing production Damaged epithelial cell Autoreactive B cell LL37 LL37 LL37 HMGB1 Self DNA DNA-specific IgG Neutrophil LL3 7 LL37 FcγRIIA Lipid raft ITAM Plasmacytoid DC RAGE TLR9 LL37 LL 37 Early endosome TLR9 Figure 5 | A model for sensing self DNA. The antimicrobial peptide LL37 is secreted by damaged epithelial cells or deposited by tissue-infiltrating neutrophils. It binds self-DNA fragments released by dying cells to form aggregated and condensed structures that are Nature Reviews | Immunology protected from extracellular nuclease degradation and delivered via lipid rafts from the extracellular environment into the early endosomes of plasmacytoid dendritic cells (pDCs). Dying cells also release high-mobility group box 1 protein (HMGB1), which binds aggregated self-DNA–LL37 complexes and promotes their association with Toll-like receptor 9 (TLR9) in early endosomes by binding to RAGE (receptor for advanced glycation end-products). In systemic lupus erythematosus, DNA-specific IgG autoantibodies produced by autoreactive B cells bind self-DNA–LL37–HMGB1 complexes and potently increase their translocation into TLR9-containing endosomes in pDCs through FcγRIIA (low-affinity Fc receptor for IgG). ITAM, immunoreceptor tyrosine-based activation motif. of type I IFNs by pDCs in these patients induces an unabated activation and maturation of mDCs that stimulate autoreactive T cells135. Furthermore, pDC-derived type I IFNs, together with IL‑6, stimulate the differentiation of autoreactive B cells into autoantibody-secreting plasma cells115. In psoriasis, a common autoimmune disease of the skin, pDCs sense self DNA that is released locally following skin injury136. The resulting activation of pDCs triggers autoreactive T‑cell activation and initiates the development of skin lesions through type I IFNs137. Several host factors have been implicated in converting self DNA into triggers of pDC activation — these are LL37 (also known as CAMP), autoantibodies and highmobility group box 1 protein (HMGB1) (FIG. 5). LL37 is an endogenous antimicrobial peptide that is produced by keratinocytes and neutrophils in wounded skin138 and has been found to be overexpressed in psoriatic skin136. A direct link between LL37 and pDC activation in psoriasis was recently revealed136: through its unique cationic and α‑helical properties, LL37 was found to bind self-DNA fragments released by dying cells, forming large aggregated structures that are resistant to extracellular nuclease degradation136. Moreover, self-DNA–LL37 complexes can enter pDCs, a process that seems to involve lipid-raftand proteoglycan-dependent endocytosis139. Aggregated self-DNA–LL37 complexes are retained in the early endosomes of pDCs, and, similar to A‑type CpG ODNs, they trigger the TLR9–MyD88–IRF7 pathway of type I IFN production without inducing pDC maturation. Therefore, LL37 overexpression in psoriasis might be responsible for breaking tolerance to self DNA in psoriatic skin, leading to a sustained activation of pDCs and type I IFN production (TABLE 1). In SLE, the breakdown of innate tolerance to self DNA has been classically attributed to complex formation between self DNA and DNA-specific antibodies140. DNA-containing immune complexes isolated from the sera of patients with SLE trigger type I IFN production by pDCs through the binding of the DNA-specific auto antibody to low-affinity Fc receptor for IgG (FcγRIIA; also known as CD32). Self-DNA-containing immune complexes can then be internalized by FcγRIIA and translocated to TLR9-containing endosomal compartments141. Interestingly, antibodies to DNA and nucleoprotein alone seem to be unable to protect extracellular DNA fragments from nuclease activity (TABLE 1). We found that immune complexes isolated from patients with SLE contained LL37 and that the presence of LL37 is a prerequisite for the ability of DNA-specific antibodies to promote an FcγRIIAmediated uptake of self DNA into pDCs to trigger an early endosomal TLR9 response (R. Lande et al., unpublished observations). In line with these findings, Pascual and colleagues have found that the gene encoding LL37 was among the most upregulated genes in blood cells from patients with SLE and correlated with high levels of expession of type I IFNs and IFN-induced genes (referred to as the ‘IFN signature’) and disease activity142. Although the exact origin of LL37 in SLE-associated immune complexes remains to be determined, LL37 expression was linked to the presence of immature granulocytes in the peripheral blood of patients with SLE142. 600 | august 2008 | volume 8 www.nature.com/reviews/immunol © 2008 Macmillan Publishers Limited. All rights reserved. REVIEWS Table 1 | Breaking innate tolerance to self DNA in plasmacytoid dendritic cells LL37 Antibody/autoantibody HMGB1 Aggregation and condensation of DNA ++ – – DNA protection from extracellular degradation ++ – – Intracellular uptake of DNA + (via lipid rafts) ++ (mediated by FcγRIIA) – Sustained TLR9 activation in early endosomes ++ – ++ (via RAGE) Role in SLE + + + Role in psoriasis + – ? FcγRIIA, low-affinity Fc receptor for IgG; HMGB1, high-mobility group box 1 protein; RAGE, receptor for advanced glycation endproducts; SLE, systemic lupus erythematosus; TLR9, Toll-like receptor 9. HMGB1 is a nuclear DNA-binding protein that is released by dying cells and has the ability to enhance type I IFN production by pDCs in response to DNA‑containing immune complexes143. Interestingly, in contrast to LL37, HMGB1 can only bind multimeric aggregated DNA structures, such as A‑type CpG ODNs, and not monomeric DNA sequences, such as B‑type CpG ODNs. The DNA–HMGB1 complex binds to a surface receptor on pDCs known as RAGE (receptor for advanced glycation end-products). The interaction between RAGE and the DNA–HMGB1 complex is not involved in the uptake of the complex, but potently enhances type I IFN production by facilitating the association of the DNA with TLR9 in early endosomes143 (TABLE 1). Based on the observation that LL37, DNA-specific antibodies and HMGB1 have a role in the breakdown of innate tolerance to self DNA in SLE, we propose the following model. LL37 initially binds to self-DNA fragments released by apoptotic cells and forms aggregated structures that are protected from nuclease degradation. The aggregated self-DNA–LL37 complexes are then bound by HMGB1. After internalization, the self-DNA– LL37–HMGB1 complex associates with TLR9 in early endosomes by engaging RAGE (FIG. 5). DNA‑specific IgG antibodies can bind self-DNA–LL37–HMGB1 complexes and potently enhance the internalization of the complex through FcγRIIA (FIG. 5). The hypothesis that TLR9 activation by self DNA may result in the development of autoimmunity has been further supported by an experimental arthritis model. More specifically, it was recently shown that cathepsin K, a potent collagenase expressed by osteoclasts, is required for TLR9 activation and the development of autoimmunity in an experimental arthritis model144. Although the mechanism involved has not been elucidated, this finding suggests that DNA-mediated TLR9 activation may be regulated by a variety of tissue- and/or disease-specific cofactors. pDCs sense self RNA in autoimmunity Similar to self DNA, host-derived self RNA that is released by damaged cells normally fails to activate pDCs, owing to its rapid extracellular degradation by abundant RNases, which thereby limits its accessibility to the TLR7‑containing endosomes. Furthermore, vertebrate-specific RNA modifications, including polyA tails145 and nucleotide methylation146, contribute to the low immunogenicity of self RNA. However, self-RNA molecules, in particular those rich in uridine or uridine and guanosine (U/UGRNA) and those in small nuclear ribonucleoprotein (snRNP), were shown to trigger pDCs to produce type I IFNs through TLR7 when delivered to endosomes by autoantibodies or liposomes147. These self-RNA and autoantibody complexes were also shown to activate autoreactive B cells through the B‑cell receptor (BCR) and endosomal TLR7 (refs 148,147). SLE is characterized by the presence of autoantibodies to both self DNA/ chromatin and snRNPs that contain U/UG-RNA140,149. The contribution of self-RNA‑triggered TLR7 signalling to the development of autoimmune diseases such as SLE is supported by the finding that Tlr7 gene duplication or multiplication can promote the development of an SLElike disease in mice, which was associated with increased production of autoantibodies and enhanced DC activation and type I IFN production81,150–153. Accordingly, TLR7deficient lupus-prone mice have ameliorated autoimmune diseases with decreased lymphocyte activation and serum autoantibodies, as well as reduced severity of nephritis154,155. Paradoxically, TLR9-deficient lupus-prone mice develop exacerbated diseases with increased levels of serum IgG and lymphocyte numbers in the skin and lymphoid tissues, enhanced pDC activation and IFNα production, and increased severity of nephritis. However, the level of autoantibody specific for DNA was lower in the TLR9-deficient than the wild-type lupus-prone mice. The underlying mechanism behind the opposing effects of TLR7 and TLR9 on the development of disease in this mouse model is not known. In addition, the relative contributions of TLR7 and TLR9 to the development of SLE in humans require further investigation. Negative regulation of pDC responses Given the significance of type I IFNs in activating a wide range of cells of the innate and adaptive immune system, the IFN response has to be under tight control to prevent aberrant immune responses that could harm the host. Indeed, pDCs have an array of surface receptors and use a novel signalling pathway to modulate their responses (FIG. 6). pDC regulatory receptors. BDCA2 (blood DC antigen 2) is a C‑type lectin that is uniquely expressed on the surface of human pDCs and was the first receptor shown to potently suppress the ability of pDCs to produce nature reviews | immunology volume 8 | august 2008 | 601 © 2008 Macmillan Publishers Limited. All rights reserved. REVIEWS type I IFNs in response to TLR ligands156. Recently, we discovered that another human pDC-specific receptor, immunoglobulin-like transcript 7 (ILT7; also known as LILRA4), inhibits type I IFN production by pDCs in response to both TLR7 and TLR9 agonists157. Both BDCA2 and ILT7 associate with the γ‑chain of the highaffinity Fc receptor for IgE (FcεRIγ) and activate pDCs through an immunoreceptor-based tyrosine activation motif (ITAM)-mediated signalling pathway157,158. IgE engagement with FcεRIγ also downregulates CpG-induced type I IFN production by human pDCs159,160. In addition, several other receptors that signal through ITAMs were found to inhibit IFNα responses by pDCs. IgG binding to FcγRIIA, a receptor that contains a cytoplasmic ITAM, decreases the level of IFNα produced by pDCs161,162. Crosslinking of NKp44, a receptor that signals through the ITAM-bearing adaptor DAP12, inhibits IFNα production induced by CpG ODNs163. In mice, antibody crosslinking of Siglec‑H (sialicacid-binding immunoglobulin-like lectin H), another DAP12‑associated receptor expressed by pDCs, reduces type I IFN production by pDCs in vitro and in vivo164. Moreover, pDCs from DAP12-deficient mice produce BDCA2 ILT7 increased levels of IFNα in response to TLR9 activation. These results support an emerging concept that signalling through ITAM-associated activating receptors inhibits innate immune responses. However, PDC-TREM (triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cells), a newly discovered pDC-specific transmembrane receptor that forms a complex with plexin A1, is activated by its endogenous ligand semaphorin 6D to induce DAP12-mediated activation of PI3K and extracellular-signal-regulated kinase 1 (ERK1) and ERK2, which leads to enhanced levels of type I IFN production165. The reasons behind the different effects of DAP12 signalling on the ability of pDCs to produce type I IFNs require further investigation. Last, P2Y receptors, a family of G‑protein-coupled receptors, downregulate IFNα secretion by human pDCs following stimulation by nucleotides such as ATP, ADP and UDP-glucose166. ITAM-mediated BCR-like signalling pathway suppresses TLR activation. Many receptors on haematopoietic cells, such as BCRs, T‑cell receptors, NK‑cell receptors and Fc receptors, respond to extracellular stimuli by signalling NKp44 FcεRIα Siglec-H C-type lectin domain FcγRIIA Immunoglobulin domain γ γ γ γ γ γ DAP12 DAP12 Plasma membrane ITAM SRC family PTKs Plasmacytoid DC SYK ITAM pathway BLNK BCAP Endosome DNA TLR7 IFNα, IFNβ, IFNγ, IFNω RNA TLR9 Immunoreceptor-based tyrosine activation motif (ITAM). A structural motif containing tyrosine residues, found in the cytoplasmic tails of several signalling molecules. The motif has the form Tyr-XaaXaa-Leu/Ile, and the tyrosine is a target for phosphorylation by SRC tyrosine kinases and subsequent binding of proteins containing SRC-homology-2 domains. TLR pathway IL-6, TNF Figure 6 | Dendritic-cell regulatory receptors and the ITAM pathway in the regulation of TLR responses. Three cell-surface receptors, BDCA2 (blood dendritic cell (DC) antigen 2), ILT7 (immunoglobulin-like transcript 7) Nature Reviews | Immunology and FcεRIα (high-affinity Fc receptor for IgE), associate with the γ‑chain of FcεRI, which contains an ITAM (immunoreceptor tyrosine-based activation motif), on human plasmacytoid DCs (pDCs). Human NKp44 and mouse Siglec‑H (sialic-acid-binding immunoglobulin-like lectin H) bind to another ITAM-containing adaptor protein, DAP12. These receptor complexes or receptors with intrinsic ITAMs, such as FcγRIIA, signal through their ITAMs and activate a B‑cell receptor (BCR)-like pathway that involves SRC family protein tyrosine kinases (PTKs), SYK (spleen tyrosine kinase) and the B‑cell-specific adaptors BLNK (B-cell linker) and BCAP (B-cell adaptor protein). This ITAM-mediated pathway potently inhibits type I interferon (IFN) and cytokine production by pDCs in response to Toll-like receptor (TLR) activation. IL-6, interleukin-6; TNF, tumour-necrosis factor. 602 | august 2008 | volume 8 www.nature.com/reviews/immunol © 2008 Macmillan Publishers Limited. All rights reserved. REVIEWS through a common signalling pathway that relies on the conserved ITAM sequence. Strikingly, most pDC regulatory receptor complexes signal through a BCR-like signalling cascade — that is, they signal through the SRC family protein tyrosine kinases, such as LYN and SYK (spleen tyrosine kinase), and two key B‑cell-specific signalling adaptors, B‑cell linker (BLNK) and B‑cell adaptor protein (BCAP)158,167 (FIG. 6). By contrast, ITAM-bearing receptors on mDCs or monocytes signal through a cascade involving non-BCR adaptors, such as SLP76 (SRChomology‑2-domain-containing leukocyte protein of 76 kDa)158.Activation of the BCR-like signalling pathway in pDCs potently suppresses the activation of both TLR7 and TLR9, inhibiting the production of all type I IFNs, as well as TNF and IL‑6 (refs 157,158) (FIG. 6). ITAMmediated signalling also suppresses the response to TLR ligands by mouse macrophages in vitro and in vivo168,169. So, pDCs use a powerful ITAM-mediated, BCR-like regulatory pathway to counter-regulate the prominent TLR signalling pathway. pDCs are constantly exposed to self DNA or self RNA in the process of normal tissue renewal or cell death following tissue injury. The nucleo tides that bind to P2Y receptors are also known to be released and to accumulate at sites of cell stress and tissue damage166. Therefore, the pDC regulatory receptors and the pathways they activate might function to maintain a normal threshold of TLR responsiveness; failure to do so might result in dysregulated type I IFN production, a state that might predispose individuals to autoimmune disease. Future perspectives Although the wealth of recent studies has greatly enhanced our understanding of how pDCs sense DNA and RNA in microbial infection and autoimmune diseases, several key questions remain to be further investigated. First, why are DNA aggregates, such as A‑type CpG ODNs and genomic DNA complexed with LL37, selectively retained in early endosomes and not in late endosomes in pDCs? 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. Facchetti, F. & Vergoni, F. The plasmacytoid monocyte: from morphology to function. Adv. Clin. Path. 4, 187–190 (2000). Fitzgerald-Bocarsly, P. Human natural interferon-α producing cells. Pharmacol. Ther. 60, 39–62 (1993). Grouard, G. et al. The enigmatic plasmacytoid T cells develop into dendritic cells with interleukin (IL)‑3 and CD40-ligand. J. Exp. Med. 185, 1101–1112 (1997). This paper describes the first purification and characterization of pDCs from human tonsils and blood. Rissoan, M. C. et al. Reciprocal control of T helper cell and dendritic cell differentiation. Science 283, 1183–1186 (1999). O’Doherty, U. et al. Human blood contains two subsets of dendritic cells, one immunologically mature and the other immature. Immunology 82, 487–493 (1994). Olweus, J. et al. Dendritic cell ontogeny: a human dendritic cell lineage of myeloid origin. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 94, 12551–12556 (1997). Siegal, F. P. et al. The nature of the principal type 1 interferon-producing cells in human blood. Science 284, 1835–1837 (1999). This paper was the first to show that pDCs correspond to the long-sought natural type-IIFN-producing cells. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. Second, the molecular mechanisms behind the IRF7-mediated IFN responses associated with TLR7 and TLR9 activation in early endosomes and the NF‑κB-mediated TNF and IL‑6 responses associated with TLR7 and TLR9 activation in late endosomes need to be identified. Also, why does phosphothioate DNA but not phosphodiester DNA require unmethylated CpG motifs to activate TLR9? And why does phosphothioate DNA without the unmethylated CpG motifs become an antagonist of TLR9 activation? Another question concerns relocalization of TLRs from the ER to the endosomal compartment, which occurs in pDCs shortly after exposure to TLR agonists101. This process is presumably facilitated by the ER protein UNC93B and also perhaps by the molecular chaperone gp96 through a novel process that bypasses the Golgi apparatus33,40,102,103. If this is indeed the case, how do pDCs detect DNA or RNA before TLR engagement with ligands? And how are the functional TLRs assembled and transported from one intracellular compartment to the other? Furthermore, the components of the TLR7- and TLR9-independent and MyD88-dependent pathway used by pDCs to respond to viral infection still need to be identified68,70,71. In addition, SLE and psoriasis are the best-studied autoimmune diseases with a known link with dysregulated pDC activation and IFNα production; however, various other autoimmune and inflammatory diseases are also associated with such dysregulation, including Sjögren’s syndrome, type 1 diabetes, Hashimoto’s disease and dermatomyositis170. Are there other host-derived factors that break innate tolerance to self nucleic acids in these autoimmune diseases? Finally, the natural ligands for the pDC-specific receptors, such as ILT7 and BDCA2, need to be identified. Are they the putative endogenous factors that negatively regulate the type I IFN responses when pDCs are exposed to DNA or RNA, in particular that of self-origin? Liu, Y. J. IPC: professional type 1 interferon-producing cells and plasmacytoid dendritic cell precursors. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 23, 275–306 (2005). Colonna, M., Trinchieri, G. & Liu, Y. J. Plasmacytoid dendritic cells in immunity. Nature Immunol. 5, 1219–1226 (2004). Krieg, A. M. The role of CpG motifs in innate immunity. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 12, 35–43 (2000). Jacobs, B. L. & Langland, J. O. When two strands are better than one: the mediators and modulators of the cellular responses to double-stranded RNA. Virology 219, 339–349 (1996). Kadowaki, N., Antonenko, S. & Liu, Y. J. Distinct CpG DNA and polyinosinic-polycytidylic acid doublestranded RNA, respectively, stimulate CD11c– type 2 dendritic cell precursors and CD11c+ dendritic cells to produce type I IFN. J. Immunol. 166, 2291–2295 (2001). Verthelyi, D., Ishii, K. J., Gursel, M., Takeshita, F. & Klinman, D. M. Human peripheral blood cells differentially recognize and respond to two distinct CpG motifs. J. Immunol. 166, 2372–2377 (2001). Vollmer, J. et al. Characterization of three CpG oligodeoxynucleotide classes with distinct immunostimulatory activities. Eur. J. Immunol. 34, 251–262 (2004). Hornung, V. et al. Quantitative expression of Toll-like receptor 1–10 mRNA in cellular subsets of human 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. peripheral blood mononuclear cells and sensitivity to CpG oligodeoxynucleotides. J. Immunol. 168, 4531–4537 (2002). Gerosa, F. et al. The reciprocal interaction of NK cells with plasmacytoid or myeloid dendritic cells profoundly affects innate resistance functions. J. Immunol. 174, 727–734 (2005). Hanabuchi, S. et al. Human plasmacytoid predendritic cells activate NK cells through glucocorticoid-induced tumor necrosis factor receptor-ligand (GITRL). Blood 107, 3617–3623 (2006). Ito, T., Kanzler, H., Duramad, O., Cao, W. & Liu, Y. J. Specialization, kinetics, and repertoire of type 1 interferon responses by human plasmacytoid predendritic cells. Blood 107, 2423–2431 (2006). Lemaitre, B., Nicolas, E., Michaut, L., Reichhart, J. M. & Hoffmann, J. A. The dorsoventral regulatory gene cassette spatzle/Toll/cactus controls the potent antifungal response in Drosophila adults. Cell 86, 973–983 (1996). Medzhitov, R., Preston-Hurlburt, P. & Janeway, C. A. A human homologue of the Drosophila Toll protein signals activation of adaptive immunity. Nature 388, 394–397 (1997). This paper was the first to describe a mammalian TLR. nature reviews | immunology volume 8 | august 2008 | 603 © 2008 Macmillan Publishers Limited. All rights reserved. REVIEWS 21. Poltorak, A. et al. Defective LPS signaling in C3H/HeJ and C57BL/10ScCr mice: mutations in Tlr4 gene. Science 282, 2085–2088 (1998). This paper shows that TLR4 recognizes lipopolysaccharide from Gram-negative bacteria. 22. Hayashi, F. et al. The innate immune response to bacterial flagellin is mediated by Toll-like receptor 5. Nature 410, 1099–1103 (2001). 23. Schwandner, R., Dziarski, R., Wesche, H., Rothe, M. & Kirschning, C. J. Peptidoglycan- and lipoteichoic acid-induced cell activation is mediated by Toll-like receptor 2. J. Biol. Chem. 274, 17406–17409 (1999). 24. Aliprantis, A. O. et al. Cell activation and apoptosis by bacterial lipoproteins through Toll-like receptor‑2. Science 285, 736–739 (1999). 25. Takeuchi, O. et al. Differential roles of TLR2 and TLR4 in recognition of Gram-negative and Grampositive bacterial cell wall components. Immunity 11, 443–451 (1999). 26. Akira, S. & Takeda, K. Toll-like receptor signalling. Nature Rev. Immunol. 4, 499–511 (2004). 27. Alexopoulou, L., Holt, A. C., Medzhitov, R. & Flavell, R. A. Recognition of double-stranded RNA and activation of NF‑κB by Toll-like receptor 3. Nature 413, 732–738 (2001). This paper shows that TLR3 recognizes viral dsRNA. 28. Lund, J. M. et al. Recognition of single-stranded RNA viruses by Toll-like receptor 7. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 101, 5598–5603 (2004). 29. Heil, F. et al. Species-specific recognition of single-stranded RNA via Toll-like receptor 7 and 8. Science 303, 1526–1529 (2004). 30. Jurk, M. et al. Human TLR7 or TLR8 independently confer responsiveness to the antiviral compound R‑848. Nature Immunol. 3, 499–499 (2002). 31. Heil, F. et al. The Toll-like receptor 7 (TLR7)-specific stimulus loxoribine uncovers a strong relationship within the TLR7, 8 and 9 subfamily. Eur. J. Immunol. 33, 2987–2997 (2003). 32. Hemmi, H. et al. A Toll-like receptor recognizes bacterial DNA. 408, 740–745 (2000). This paper shows that TLR9 recognizes DNA that contains CpG motifs. 33. Beutler, B. et al. Genetic analysis of resistance to viral infection. Nature Rev. Immunol. 7, 753–766 (2007). 34. Uematsu, S. & Akira, S. Toll-like receptors and type I interferons. J. Biol. Chem. 282, 15319–15323 (2007). 35. Kawai, T. & Akira, S. Innate immune recognition of viral infection. Nature Immunol. 7, 131–137 (2006). 36. Roach, J. C. et al. The evolution of vertebrate Toll-like receptors. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 102, 9577–9582 (2005). 37. Wagner, H. The immunobiology of the TLR9 subfamily. Trends Immunol. 25, 381–386 (2004). 38. Diebold, S. S., Kaisho, T., Hemmi, H., Akira, S. & Reis e Sousa, C. Innate antiviral responses by means of TLR7-mediated recognition of single-stranded RNA. Science 303, 1529–1531 (2004). This paper, along with references 28 and 29, shows that TLR7 and TLR8 recognize ssRNA. 39. Bauer, S. et al. Human TLR9 confers responsiveness to bacterial DNA via species-specific CpG motif recognition. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 98, 9237–9242 (2001). 40. Latz, E. et al. Ligand-induced conformational changes allosterically activate Toll-like receptor 9. Nature Immunol. 8, 772–779 (2007). 41. Kaisho, T. & Akira, S. Toll-like receptor function and signaling. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 117, 979–987 (2006). 42. Adachi, O. et al. Targeted disruption of the MyD88 gene results in loss of IL‑1‑ and IL‑18‑mediated function. Immunity 9, 143–150 (1998). 43. Yamamoto, M. et al. Cutting Edge: a novel Toll/IL‑1 receptor domain-containing adapter that preferentially activates the IFN‑β promoter in the Tolllike receptor signaling. J. Immunol. 169, 6668–6672 (2002). 44. Yamamoto, M. et al. Role of adaptor TRIF in the MyD88-independent Toll-like receptor signaling pathway. Science 301, 640–643 (2003). 45. Yoneyama, M. & Fujita, T. Function of RIG‑I‑like receptors in antiviral innate immunity. J. Biol. Chem. 282, 15315–15318 (2007). 46. Stetson, D. B. & Medzhitov, R. Antiviral defense: interferons and beyond. J. Exp. Med. 8, 1837–1841 (2006). 47. Yoneyama, M. et al. Shared and unique functions of the DExD/H-Box helicases RIG‑I, MDA5, and LGP2 in antiviral innate immunity. J. Immunol. 175, 2851–2858 (2005). 48. Hornung, V. et al. 5′-triphosphate RNA is the ligand for RIG‑I. Science 314, 994–997 (2006). 49. Pichlmair, A. et al. RIG‑I‑mediated antiviral responses to single-stranded RNA bearing 5’-phosphates. Science 314, 997–1001 (2006). 50. Meylan, E. et al. Cardif is an adaptor protein in the RIG‑I antiviral pathway and is targeted by hepatitis C virus. Nature 437, 1167–1172 (2005). 51. Kawai, T. et al. IPS‑1, an adaptor triggering RIG‑I‑ and Mda5-mediated type I interferon induction. Nature Immunol. 6, 981–988 (2005). 52. Seth, R. B., Sun, L., Ea, C. K. & Chen, Z. J. Identification and characterization of MAVS, a mitochondrial antiviral signaling protein that activates NF‑κB and IRF3. Cell 122, 669–682 (2005). 53. Matsui, K. et al. Cutting Edge: role of TANK-binding kinase 1 and inducible IκB kinase in IFN responses against viruses in innate immune cells. J. Immunol. 177, 5785–5789 (2006). 54. Malathi, K., Dong, B., Gale, M. & Silverman, R. H. Small self-RNA generated by RNase L amplifies antiviral innate immunity. Nature 448, 816–819 (2007). 55. Ishii, K. J. et al. TANK-binding kinase‑1 delineates innate and adaptive immune responses to DNA vaccines. Nature 451, 725–729 (2008). 56. Muruve, D. A. et al. The inflammasome recognizes cytosolic microbial and host DNA and triggers an innate immune response. Nature 452, 103–107 (2008). 57. Stetson, D. B. & Medzhitov, R. Type I interferons in host defense. Immunity 25, 373–381 (2006). 58. García-Sastre, A. & Biron, C. A. Type 1 interferons and the virus-host relationship: a lesson in détente. Science 312, 879–882 (2006). 59. Nallagatla, S. R. et al. 5′‑triphosphate‑dependent activation of PKR by RNAs with short stem-loops. Science 318, 1455–1458 (2007). 60. Kadowaki, N. et al. Subsets of human dendritic cell precursors express different Toll-like receptors and respond to different microbial antigens. J. Exp. Med. 194, 863–870 (2001). 61. Jarrossay, D., Napolitani, G., Colonna, M., Sallusto, F. & Lanzavecchia, A. Specialization and complementarity in microbial molecule recognition by human myeloid and plasmacytoid dendritic cells. Eur. J. Immunol. 31, 3388–3393 (2001). This paper, along with reference 15, defines the distinct expression of TLRs by human pDCs and mDCs and their functional specialization in innate immune defence. 62. Hemmi, H., Kaisho, T., Takeda, K. & Akira, S. The roles of Toll-like receptor 9, MyD88, and DNA-dependent protein kinase catalytic subunit in the effects of two distinct CpG DNAs on dendritic cell subsets. J. Immunol. 170, 3059–3064 (2003). 63. Krug, A. et al. Herpes simplex virus type 1 activates murine natural interferon-producing cells through toll-like receptor 9. Blood 103, 1433–1437 (2004). 64. Lund, J., Sato, A., Akira, S., Medzhitov, R. & Iwasaki, A. Toll-like receptor 9‑mediated recognition of herpes simplex virus‑2 by plasmacytoid dendritic cells. J. Exp. Med. 198, 513–520 (2003). 65. Krug, A. et al. TLR9-dependent recognition of MCMV by IPC and DC generates coordinated cytokine responses that activate antiviral NK cell function. Immunity 21, 107–119 (2004). 66. Tabeta, K. et al. Toll-like receptors 9 and 3 as essential components of innate immune defense against mouse cytomegalovirus infection. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 101, 3516–3521 (2004). 67. Lee, H. K., Lund, J. M., Ramanathan, B., Mizushima, N. & Iwasaki, A. Autophagy-dependent viral recognition by plasmacytoid dendritic cells. Science 315, 1398–1401 (2007). 68. Jung, A. et al. Lymphocytoid choriomeningitis virus activates plasmacytoid dendritic cells and induces cytotoxic T cell response via MyD88. J. Virol. 1, 196–206 (2007). 69. Kato, H. et al. Cell type-specific involvement of RIG‑I in antiviral response. Immunity 23, 19–28 (2005). 70. Hochrein, H. et al. Herpes simplex virus type‑1 induces IFN‑α production via Toll-like receptor 9‑dependent and -independent pathways. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 101, 11416–11421 (2004). 71. Hokeness-Antonelli, K. L., Crane, M. J., Dragoi, A. M., Chu, W. M. & Salazar-Mather, T. P. IFN‑αβ-mediated inflammatory responses and antiviral defense in liver is TLR9-independent but MyD88-dependent during murine cytomegalovirus infection. J. Immunol. 179, 6176–6183 (2007). 72. Edwards, A. D. et al. Toll-like receptor expression in murine DC subsets: lack of TLR7 expression by CD8α+ DC correlates with unresponsiveness to imidazoquinolines. Eur. J. Immunol. 33, 827–833 (2003). 73. Sun, Q. et al. The specific and essential role of MAVS in antiviral innate immune responses. Immunity 24, 633–642 (2006). 74. Levine, B. & Deretic, V. Unveiling the roles of autophagy in innate and adaptive immunity. Nature Rev. Immunol. 7, 767–777 (2007). 75. Schmid, D. & Munz, C. Innate and adaptive immunity through autophagy. Immunity 27, 11–21 (2007). 76. Kim, T. W. et al. A critical role for IRAK4 kinase activity in Toll-like receptor-mediated innate immunity. J. Exp. Med. 204, 1025–1036 (2007). 77. Yang, K. et al. Human TLR‑7‑, ‑8‑, and ‑9‑mediated induction of IFN-α/β and -λ is IRAK‑4 dependent and redundant for protective immunity to viruses. Immunity 23, 465–478 (2005). 78. Suzuki, N., Suzuki, S. & Yeh, W. C. IRAK‑4 as the central TIR signaling mediator in innate immunity. Trends Immunol. 23, 503–506 (2002). 79. Hacker, H. et al. Specificity in Toll-like receptor signalling through distinct effector functions of TRAF3 and TRAF6. Nature 439, 204–207 (2006). 80. Gohda, J., Matsumura, T. & Inoue, J. Cutting Edge: TNFR-associated factor (TRAF) 6 is essential for MyD88-dependent pathway but not Toll/IL‑1 receptor domain-containing adaptor-inducing IFN‑β (TRIF)dependent pathway in TLR signaling. J. Immunol. 173, 2913–2917 (2004). 81. Pisitkun, P. et al. Autoreactive B cell responses to RNA-related antigens due to TLR7 gene duplication. Science 312, 1669–1672 (2006). 82. Sochorova, K. et al. Impaired Toll-like receptor 8‑mediated IL‑6 and TNF‑α production in antigenpresenting cells from patients with X‑linked agammaglobulinemia. Blood 109, 2553–2556 (2007). 83. Jefferies, C. A. et al. Bruton’s tyrosine kinase is a Toll/ interleukin‑1 receptor domain-binding protein that participates in nuclear factor-κB activation by Toll-like receptor 4. J. Biol. Chem. 278, 26258–26264 (2003). 84. Honda, K. et al. Role of a transductionaltranscriptional processor complex involving MyD88 and IRF‑7 in Toll-like receptor signaling. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 101, 15416–15421 (2004). 85. Honda, K. et al. IRF‑7 is the master regulator of type‑I interferon-dependent immune responses. Nature 434, 772–777 (2005). 86. Kawai, T. et al. Interferon-α induction through Toll-like receptors involves a direct interaction of IRF7 with MyD88 and TRAF6. Nature Immunol. 5, 1061–1068 (2004). References 85 and 86 demonstrate that IRF7 is a master regulator of the type I IFN response by pDCs. 87. Uematsu, S. et al. Interleukin‑1 receptor-associated kinase‑1 plays an essential role for Toll-like receptor (TLR)7- and TLR9-mediated interferon‑α induction. J. Exp. Med. 201, 915–923 (2005). 88. Hoshino, K. et al. IκB kinase‑α is critical for interferon‑α production induced by Toll-like receptors 7 and 9. Nature 440, 949–953 (2006). 89. Guiducci, C. et al. PI3K is critical for the nuclear translocation of IRF‑7 and type I IFN production by human plasmacytoid predendritic cells in response to TLR activation. J. Exp. Med. 2, 315–322 (2008). 90. Deng, L. et al. Activation of the IκB kinase complex by TRAF6 requires a dimeric ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme complex and a unique polyubiquitin chain. Cell 103, 351–361 (2000). 91. Wang, C. et al. TAK1 is a ubiquitin-dependent kinase of MKK and IKK. Nature 412, 346–351 (2001). 92. Osawa, Y. et al. Collaborative action of NF‑κB and p38 MAPK is involved in CpG DNA-induced IFN‑α and chemokine production in human plasmacytoid dendritic cells. J. Immunol. 177, 4841–4852 (2006). 93. Taniguchi, T. & Takaoka, A. The interferon-α/β system in antiviral responses: a multimodal machinery of gene regulation by the IRF family of transcription factors. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 14, 111–116 (2002). 604 | august 2008 | volume 8 www.nature.com/reviews/immunol © 2008 Macmillan Publishers Limited. All rights reserved. REVIEWS 94. Barchet, W. et al. Virus-induced interferon-α production by a dendritic cell subset in the absence of feedback signaling in vivo. J. Exp. Med. 195, 507–516 (2002). 95. Colina, R. et al. Translational control of the innate immune response through IRF‑7. Nature 452, 323–328 (2008). 96. Tailor, P. et al. The feedback phase of type I interferon induction in dendritic cells requires interferon regulatory factor 8. Immunity 27, 228–239 (2007). 97. Tsujimura, H., Tamura, T. & Ozato, K. Cutting Edge: IFN consensus sequence binding protein/IFN regulatory factor 8 drives the development of type I IFN-producing plasmacytoid dendritic cells. J. Immunol. 170, 1131–1135 (2003). 98. Yanai, H. et al. Role of IFN regulatory factor 5 transcription factor in antiviral immunity and tumor suppression. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 104, 3402–3407 (2007). 99. Yasuda, K. et al. Murine dendritic cell type I IFN production induced by human IgG-RNA immune complexes is IFN regulatory factor (IRF)5 and IRF7 dependent and is required for IL‑6 production. J. Immunol. 178, 6876–6885 (2007). 100.Takaoka, A. et al. Integral role of IRF‑5 in the gene induction programme activated by Toll-like receptors. Nature 434, 243–249 (2005). 101. Latz, E. et al. TLR9 signals after translocating from the ER to CpG DNA in the lysosome. Nature Immunol. 5, 190–198 (2004). This paper shows that TLR9 is located in the ER of pDCs and translocates to endolysosomal compartments in response to activation by CpG ODNs. 102.Tabeta, K. et al. The Unc93b1 mutation 3d disrupts exogenous antigen presentation and signaling via Toll-like receptors 3, 7 and 9. Nature Immunol. 7, 156–164 (2006). 103.Brinkmann, M. M. et al. The interaction between the ER membrane protein UNC93B and TLR3, 7, and 9 is crucial for TLR signaling. J. Cell Biol. 177, 265–275 (2007). 104.Yang, Y. et al. Heat shock protein gp96 is a master chaperone for Toll-like receptors and is important in the innate function of macrophages. Immunity 26, 215–226 (2007). 105.Iwakoshi, N. N., Pypaert, M. & Glimcher, L. H. The transcription factor XBP‑1 is essential for the development and survival of dendritic cells. J. Exp. Med. 204, 2267–2275 (2007). 106.Asselin-Paturel, C. et al. Mouse type I IFN-producing cells are immature APCs with plasmacytoid morphology. Nature Immunol. 2, 1144–1150 (2001). 107. Dalod, M. et al. Interferon α/β and interleukin 12 responses to viral infections: pathways regulating dendritic cell cytokine expression in vivo. J. Exp. Med. 195, 517–528 (2002). 108.Fonteneau, J. F. et al. Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 activates plasmacytoid dendritic cells and concomitantly induces the bystander maturation of myeloid dendritic cells. J. Virol. 78, 5223–5232 (2004). 109.Yoneyama, H. et al. Plasmacytoid DCs help lymph node DCs to induce anti-HSV CTLs. J. Exp. Med. 202, 425–435 (2005). 110. Santini, S. M. Type I interferon as a powerful adjuvant for monocyte-derived dendritic cell development and activity in vitro and in Hu‑PBL‑SCID mice. J. Exp. Med. 191, 1777–1788 (2000). 111. Paquette, R. L. Interferon-α and granulocytemacrophage colony-stimulating factor differentiate peripheral blood monocytes into potent antigenpresenting cells. J. Leukoc. Biol. 64, 358–367 (1998). 112. Le Bon, A. et al. Cross-priming of CD8+ T cells stimulated by virus-induced type I interferon. Nature Immunol. 4, 1009–1015 (2003). 113. Kolumam, G. A., Thomas, S., Thompson, L. J., Sprent, J. & Murali-Krishna, K. Type I interferons act directly on CD8 T cells to allow clonal expansion and memory formation in response to viral infection. J. Exp. Med. 202, 637–650 (2005). 114. Hibbert, L., Pflanz, S., De Waal Malefyt, R. & Kastelein, R. A. IL‑27 and IFN-α signal via Stat1 and Stat3 and induce T‑Bet and IL‑12Rβ2 in naive T cells. J. Interferon Cytokine Res. 23, 513–522 (2003). 115. Jego, G. et al. Plasmacytoid dendritic cells induce plasma cell differentiation through type I interferon and interleukin 6. Immunity 19, 225–234 (2003). 116. Di Pucchio, T. et al. Direct proteasome-independent cross-presentation of viral antigen by plasmacytoid dendritic cells on major histocompatibility complex class I. Nature Immunol. 9, 551–557 (2008). 117. Gursel, M., Verthelyi, D., Gursel, I., Ishii, K. J. & Klinman, D. M. Differential and competitive activation of human immune cells by distinct classes of CpG oligodeoxynucleotide. J. Leukoc. Biol. 71, 813–820 (2002). 118. Krieg, A. M. et al. CpG motifs in bacterial DNA trigger direct B‑cell activation. Nature 374, 546–549 (1995). 119. Kerkmann, M. et al. Spontaneous formation of nucleic acid-based nanoparticles is responsible for high interferon‑α induction by CpG‑A in plasmacytoid dendritic cells. J. Biol. Chem. 280, 8086–8093 (2005). 120.Honda, K. et al. Spatiotemporal regulation of MyD88–IRF‑7 signalling for robust type‑I interferon induction. Nature 434, 1035–1040 (2005). 121.Guiducci, C. et al. Properties regulating the nature of the plasmacytoid dendritic cell response to Toll-like receptor 9 activation. J. Exp. Med. 8, 1999–2008 (2006). References 120 and 121 establish a spatiotemporal model to explain the differential ability of different classes of CpG ODNs to induce type I IFNs in mouse and human pDCs. 122.Kerkmann, M. et al. Immunostimulatory properties of CpG-oligonucleotides are enhanced by the use of protamine nanoparticles. Oligonucleotides 16, 313–322 (2006). 123.Pisetsky, D. S. & Fairhurst, A. M. The origin of extracellular DNA during the clearance of dead and dying cells. Autoimmunity 40, 281–284 (2007). 124.Yasuda, K. et al. Endosomal translocation of vertebrate DNA activates dendritic cells via TLR9-dependent and -independent pathways. J. Immunol. 174, 6129–6136 (2005). 125.Barton, G. M., Kagan, J. C. & Medzhitov, R. Intracellular localization of Toll-like receptor 9 prevents recognition of self DNA but facilitates access to viral DNA. Nature Immunol. 7, 49–56 (2006). 126.Napirei, M. et al. Features of systemic lupus erythematosus in Dnase1-deficient mice. Nature Genet. 25, 177–181 (2000). 127.Yasutomo, K. et al. Mutation of DNASE1 in people with systemic lupus erythematosus. Nature Genet. 28, 313–314 (2001). 128.Krieg, A. M. CpG motifs in bacterial DNA and their immune effects. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 20, 709–760 (2002). 129.Stacey, K. J. et al. The molecular basis for the lack of immunostimulatory activity of vertebrate DNA. J. Immunol. 170, 3614–3620 (2003). 130.Sano, H. & Morimoto, C. DNA isolated from DNA/anti-DNA antibody immune complexes in systemic lupus erythematosus is rich in guaninecytosine content. J. Immunol. 128, 1341–1345 (1982). 131. Haas, T. et al. The DNA sugar backbone 2′ deoxyribose determines Toll-like receptor 9 activation. Immunity 28, 315–323 (2008). 132.Ronnblom, L., Eloranta, M. L. & Alm, G. V. Role of natural interferon-α producing cells (plasmacytoid dendritic cells) in autoimmunity. Autoimmunity 36, 463–472 (2003). 133.Barrat, F. J. et al. Nucleic acids of mammalian origin can act as endogenous ligands for Toll-like receptors and may promote systemic lupus erythematosus. J. Exp. Med. 202, 1131–1139 (2005). 134.Means, T. K. et al. Human lupus autoantibody-DNA complexes activate DCs through cooperation of CD32 and TLR9. J. Clin. Invest. 115, 407–417 (2005). 135.Blanco, P., Palucka, A. K., Gill, M., Pascual, V. & Banchereau, J. Induction of dendritic cell differentiation by IFN-α in systemic lupus erythematosus. Science 294, 1540–1543 (2001). This paper shows that in SLE pDC-derived type I IFNs trigger autoimmunity through the activation of mDCs. 136.Lande, R. et al. Plasmacytoid dendritic cells sense self-DNA coupled with antimicrobial peptide. Nature 449, 564–569 (2007). This paper indicates that an antimicrobial peptide expressed in psoriatic skin breaks innate tolerance to self DNA and triggers type I IFN production by pDCs, leading to autoimmune skin inflammation. 137.Nestle, F. O. et al. Plasmacytoid predendritic cells initiate psoriasis through interferon‑α production. J. Exp. Med. 202, 135–143 (2005). 138.Zasloff, M. Antimicrobial peptides of multicellular organisms. Nature 415, 389–395 (2002). 139.Sandgren, S. et al. The human antimicrobial peptide LL‑37 transfers extracellular DNA plasmid to the nuclear compartment of mammalian cells via lipid rafts and proteoglycan-dependent endocytosis. J. Biol. Chem. 279, 17951–17956 (2004). 140.Marshak-Rothstein, A. Toll-like receptors in systemic autoimmune disease. Nature Rev. Immunol. 6, 823–835 (2006). 141.Lovgren, T., Eloranta, M. L., Bave, U., Alm, G. V. & Ronnblom, L. Induction of interferon-α production in plasmacytoid dendritic cells by immune complexes containing nucleic acid released by necrotic or late apoptotic cells and lupus IgG. Arthritis Rheum. 50, 1861–1872 (2004). 142.Bennett, L. et al. Interferon and granulopoiesis signatures in systemic lupus erythematosus blood. J. Exp. Med. 197, 711–723 (2003). 143.Tian, J. et al. Toll-like receptor 9‑dependent activation by DNA-containing immune complexes is mediated by HMGB1 and RAGE. Nature Immunol. 8, 487–496 (2007). 144.Asagiri, M. et al. Cathepsin K‑dependent Toll-like receptor 9 signaling revealed in experimental arthritis. Science 319, 624–627 (2008). 145.Koski, G. K. et al. Cutting Edge: innate immune system discriminates between RNA containing bacterial versus eukaryotic structural features that prime for high-level IL‑12 secretion by dendritic cells. J. Immunol. 172, 3989–3993 (2004). 146.Kariko, K., Buckstein, M., Ni, H. & Weissman, D. Suppression of RNA recognition by Toll-like receptors: the impact of nucleoside modification and the evolutionary origin of RNA. Immunity 23, 165–175 (2005). 147.Vollmer, J. et al. Immune stimulation mediated by autoantigen binding sites within small nuclear RNAs involves Toll-like receptors 7 and 8. J. Exp. Med. 202, 1575–1585 (2005). 148.Lau, C. M. et al. RNA-associated autoantigens activate B cells by combined B cell antigen receptor/ Toll-like receptor 7 engagement. J. Exp. Med. 202, 1171–1177 (2005). 149.Krieg, A. M. & Vollmer, J. Toll-like receptors 7, 8, and 9: linking innate immunity to autoimmunity. Immunol. Rev. 220, 251–269 (2007). 150.Deane, J. A. et al. Control of Toll-like receptor 7 expression is essential to restrict autoimmunity and dendritic cell proliferation. Immunity 27, 801–810 (2007). 151.Martin, D. A. & Elkon, K. B. Autoantibodies make a U‑turn: the toll hypothesis for autoantibody specificity. J. Exp. Med. 202, 1465–1469 (2005). 152.Goodnow, C. C. Immunology: discriminating microbe from self suffers a double Toll. Science 312, 1606–1608 (2006). 153.Krieg, A. M. The toll of too much TLR7. Immunity 27, 695–697 (2007). 154.Berland, R. et al. Toll-like receptor 7‑dependent loss of B cell tolerance in pathogenic autoantibody knockin mice. Immunity 25, 429–440 (2006). 155.Christensen, S. R. et al. Toll-like receptor 7 and TLR9 dictate autoantibody specificity and have opposing inflammatory and regulatory roles in a murine model of lupus. Immunity 25, 417–428 (2006). 156.Dzionek, A. et al. BDCA‑2, a novel plasmacytoid dendritic cell-specific type II C‑type lectin, mediates antigen capture and is a potent inhibitor of interferon α/β induction. J. Exp. Med. 194, 1823–1834 (2001). 157.Cao, W. et al. Plasmacytoid dendritic cell-specific receptor ILT7-FcεRIγ inhibits Toll-like receptor-induced interferon production. J. Exp. Med. 203, 1399–1405 (2006). 158.Cao, W. et al. BDCA2/FcεRIγ complex signals through a novel BCR-like pathway in human plasmacytoid dendritic cells. PLoS Biol. 5, e248 (2007). 159.Schroeder, J. T. et al. TLR9- and FcεRI-mediated responses oppose one another in plasmacytoid dendritic cells by down-regulating receptor expression. J. Immunol. 175, 5724–5731 (2005). 160.Novak, N. et al. Characterization of FcεRI-bearing CD123+ blood dendritic cell antigen‑2+ plasmacytoid dendritic cells in atopic dermatitis. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 114, 364–370 (2004). 161.Bave, U. et al. FcγRIIa is expressed on natural IFN‑α-producing cells (plasmacytoid dendritic cells) and is required for the IFN‑α production induced by apoptotic cells combined with lupus IgG. J. Immunol. 171, 3296–3302 (2003). 162.Green, D. S., Lum, T. & Green, J. A. IgG-derived Fc down-regulates virus-induced plasmacytoid dendritic cell (pDC) IFN‑α production. Cytokine 26, 209–216 (2004). nature reviews | immunology volume 8 | august 2008 | 605 © 2008 Macmillan Publishers Limited. All rights reserved. REVIEWS 163.Fuchs, A., Cella, M., Kondo, T. & Colonna, M. Paradoxic inhibition of human natural interferonproducing cells by the activating receptor NKp44. Blood 106, 2076–2082 (2005). 164.Blasius, A. L., Cella, M., Maldonado, J., Takai, T. & Colonna, M. Siglec‑H is an IPC-specific receptor that modulates type I IFN secretion through DAP12. Blood 107, 2474–2476 (2006). 165.Watarai, H. et al. PDC-TREM, a plasmacytoid dendritic cell-specific receptor, is responsible for augmented production of type I interferon. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 8, 2993–2998 (2008). 166.Shin, A. et al. P2Y receptor signaling regulates phenotype and IFN‑α secretion of human plasmacytoid dendritic cells. Blood 6, 3062–3069 (2007). 167.Röck, J. et al. CD303 (BDCA‑2) signals in plasmacytoid dendritic cells via a BCR-like signalosome involving Syk, Slp65 and PLCγ2. Eur. J. Immunol. 37, 3564–3575 (2007). References 158 and 167 depict a signalling pathway that is similar to the BCR signalling cascade and that mediates innate regulation by pDC receptors. 168.Hamerman, J. A., Tchao, N. K., Lowell, C. A. & Lanier, L. L. Enhanced Toll-like receptor responses in the absence of signaling adaptor DAP12. Nature Immunol. 6, 579–586 (2005). 169.Chu, C. L. et al. Increased TLR responses in dendritic cells lacking the ITAM-containing adapters DAP12 and FcRγ. Eur. J. Immunol. 38, 166–173 (2008). 170.Baccala, R., Kono, D. H. & Theofilopoulos, A. N. Interferons as pathogenic effectors in autoimmunity. Immunol. Rev. 204, 9–26 (2005). Acknowledgements We thank the former and current members of the laboratory for their critical contributions, the M.D. Anderson Cancer Foundation and The Dana Foundation for financial support, M. Haject for editorial assistance, T. Kim, M. Bao and K. Arima for critical reading of the manuscript. This Review is dedicated to Dr Ralph Steinman for his support and encouragement. DATABASES Entrez Gene: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=gene HMGB1 | IFNs | IL-6 | IRF7 | LL37 | MyD88 | NF-κB | TIRAP | TLR3 | TLR4 | TLR7 | TLR9 | TNF All links are active in the online pdf 606 | august 2008 | volume 8 www.nature.com/reviews/immunol © 2008 Macmillan Publishers Limited. All rights reserved.