Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Immune system wikipedia , lookup
Epoxygenase wikipedia , lookup
Epoxyeicosatrienoic acid wikipedia , lookup
Adaptive immune system wikipedia , lookup
Hygiene hypothesis wikipedia , lookup
Polyclonal B cell response wikipedia , lookup
Innate immune system wikipedia , lookup
Atherosclerosis wikipedia , lookup
Adoptive cell transfer wikipedia , lookup
Cancer immunotherapy wikipedia , lookup
[CANCER RESEARCH 41 , 3706-371 0, September 1981) 0008-5472/81 /0041-0000$02.00 Lipids and Immune Function― JosephJ. Vitale2and SelwynA. Broitman Boston University School of Medicine, Mallory Institute of Pathology, Boston, Massachusetts 02118 Abstract effects on immune function and provide a cogent argument that altered or depressed immune function may act as a pro There is in vitro and in vivo evidence to suggest that dietary moter in or is causally related to carcinogenesis. To begin, we lipids play a role in modulating immune function. A review of must define the terms ‘ ‘promoter' ‘ and ‘ ‘initiator' ‘ as they relate the current literature on the interrelationships among dietary to carcinogenesis. Here, the word ‘ ‘initiator' ‘ is used to refer to lipids, blood cholesterol levels, immunosuppression, and any insult(addition or withdrawal of a substance, be it chemical, tumorigenesis makes for a very strong argument that (a) im viral, nutrient, etc.) which results in neoplasia, irrespective of munosuppression may be causally related to lymphoprolifera time. Nonnutrients or chemicals have been shown to initiate tive disorders, as well as to tumorigenesis and (b) diets high in cancer. On the other hand, anything that decreases the time at polyunsaturated fat, relative todietshighinsaturated fat, are which tumors appear or that increases numbers of tumors or more immunosuppressive and are better promotors of tumori enhances metastases is considered a promoter. There is no genesis. The effects of dietary fat on immune function seem to evidence that any nutrient, essential or nonessential, fed in be mediated through its component parts, the unsaturated fatty deficient or excess amounts has ever initiated cancer, although acids, specifically linoleic, linolenic, and arachidonic. It is not they have been shown to enhance or promote carcinogenesis clear how these components affect immune function. Several (62). The available evidence also indicates that dietary manip studies suggest that one effect is mediated by altering the lipid ulations that promote tumorigenesis are immunosuppressive. component of the cell membrane and thus its fluidity; the more All of this would suggest that immunosuppression may well be fluid the membrane, the less responsive it is. Thus, fluidity of causally related to neoplasia. For a recent review of this sub both immune cells and those to be destroyed or protected may ject, see a publication by Posner et a!. (51 ) and others (1 , 2, be affected. The effects of saturated as well as unsaturated 4—6,8—1 1, 62). fatty acids may be mediated by modulating serum lipoprotein It is our opinion that the current data on this subject indicate levels, prostaglandin metabolism, and cholesterol concentra that diets high in unsaturated fat have been shown to be good tions and metabolism. promoters of chemical carcinogenesis and are also immuno suppressive relative todietshighinsaturated fat(11,31,32, Of the several working groups at this Workshop, one deals 37, 38). Before discussing available data on lipid effects on with the relationship between lipids and the immune system. immune function, a review of some basic immunology, although There is in vitro and in vivo evidence to suggest that dietary brief, is in order. The immune system is composed of a variety of cells including T- and B-cells (cellular and humoral immu lipids play some role in regulating or modulating immune ftinc tion. This offers the promise that by changing dietary lipids one nity), subsets of these cells, lymphokines, serum factors, com plement, macrophages, and interactions of these various cell may be able to modulate immune function and thus alter an individual's susceptibility or resistance to diseases associated types. Subsets of T-cells function either as helper, suppressor, with altered immune competency; e.g. , immunosuppression or killer cells. Whether the killer cells kill directly, through interaction with macrophages, or in concert with macrophages and lymphoproliferative diseases. It is not yet generally ac which can also kill or lyse cells is not always clear. B-cells, the cepted that immunosuppression may be causally related to solid tumors as well. However, a review of the current literature antibody-producing cells, in some instances require the inter on the interrelationshipsamong dietary lipids, blood cholesterol action of T-helper cells or in other cases are inhibited by T levels, immunosuppression, and tumorigenesis makes for a suppressor cell activity, presumably by suppressing T-helper very strong argument that (a) immunosuppression may also be function. Other B-cells are independent of T-ceII influence; this depends upon the antigen which determinesT-cell intervention. causally related to tumorigenesis, as well as to lymphoprolif In recent years, another cell type has been described which erative disorders and (b) diets high in polyunsaturated fat, is capable of lysing hemopoietic and tumor cell lines in vitro. relative to diets high in saturated fat, are both immunosuppres sive and promoters of tumorigenesis. However, since neither These cells, which are called NK cells,3 are neither T-cells, nor the nutritionist nor the immunologist is certain as to what macrophages, nor B-cells. These cells have been categorized causes cancer or what cell types in the immune system or as M-cells or marrow-dependent cells and may simply repre sent one subset of the M-ceIl series. The NK cell seems to be within the nonimmune host defense system protect the individ ual from malignancy, this aspect will not be discussed in detail. responsible for the rejection of hemopoietic allografts, genetic It is our aim, however, to discuss briefly the subject of lipid resistance against certain oncogenic and nononcogenic vi ruses, and resistance against certain intracellular bacteria (33). For an excellent review of basic immunology, the reader is referred to a recent publication by Kumar (33) and a text by Bethesda, Md. Supported in part by grants-in-aid from the National Large Bowel Cancer Project; Grant CAl 6750 of the National Cancer Institute, NIH; The Roitt (54). 1 Presented at the Workshop on Fat and Cancer, December 1 0 to 1 2, 1979, American Egg Board, Park Ridge, Ill.; and The General Foods Fund, Inc., White Plains, N. Y. 2 To whom requests for reprints should be addressed, at Mallory Pathology, 784 Massachusetts Avenue, Boston, Mass. 02118. 3706 Institute of 3 The abbreviations used are: NK cells, natural killer cells; PUFA, polyunsat urated fatty acids; LDL, low-density lipoproteins; HDL, high-density proteins. CANCERRESEARCHVOL. 41 Downloaded from cancerres.aacrjournals.org on June 16, 2017. © 1981 American Association for Cancer Research. Lipids and Immunology A test commonly used to assess immune function in a number of research laboratories is the determination of lymphocyte blast transformation. One can measure the response of lym phocytes to certain mitogens. The subsequent synthesis of DNA can be followed by incubating isolated lymphocytes with tritiated thymidine. Two mitogens commonly used for assessing T-cell responsiveness are concanavalin A and phytohemagglu tinin, whereas lipopolysaccharide is used to assess B-cell responsiveness. The amount of tritiated thymidine taken up provides some assessment of the immune system. The T-cell responding in the in vitro system is predominantly a T-helper cell. Dietary Fat and Immune Responses Using similar techniques, a number of laboratories have demonstrated that diets relatively high in polyunsaturated fat inhibit T- but not B-cell responsiveness to mitogen stimulation (1 1, 37, 41 —43,45). Optimal blast transformation requires the presence and cooperation of macrophages for processing and presentation of antigen to the lymphocyte. Therefore, decrease in lymphocyte blast transformation as a result of some nutri tional alteration or insult may not be due to T- or B-cell defects but to aberrations within the macrophage. Several studies have shown that an increased concentration of cholesterol within the macrophage inhibits its phagocytic process (7, 24, 25) and therefore its ability to process and kill effectively or optimally. Other studies have shown that diets high in polyunsaturated fat or the administration of PUFA result in the loss of an animal's ability to reject skin allografts (41 , 52, 60). Also, PUFA have been used as adjuvants to immunosuppression in renal trans plant patients (37, 39, 40, 61) who are at high risk for neopla sia. Whether these effects of PUFA are mediated through metabolic or structural aberrations in T-, B-, or M-cells, in macrophages, or in other cell types (production of complement) is not clear. Thus, the changes in immune function that occur with changes in dietary fat (unsaturated versus saturated) may be mediated by changes in serum or cell cholesterol levels. Changes or reductions rather than absolute levels of serum or cell cholesterol may play the major role in modulating not only immune function but the rate, induction, or latency period of chemically induced carcinogenesis. In almost every animal study, diets high in PUFA are better promoters of tumors than are diets high in saturated fat (1 1, 15—1 7). Dietary regimens used to lower serum cholesterol level, such as diets high in unsaturated fat, appear to place the host at greater risk of cancer, an observation supported by some recent findings in humans (22, 50). In addition to other regulating mechanisms, there is evidence that fatty acids also influence cholesterol synthesis and catab olism and thereby affect total body cholesterol pools. Further, there is general agreement that the lowering of serum choles terol associated with polyunsaturated fat is attributed to the essential unsaturated fatty acids linoleic, linolenic, and arach idonic acids, the same acids which when fed or ingested have been shown to be immunosuppressive(30, 38, 41 , 45, 49), to result in defects in the rejection of skin allografts (41 , 44, 52, 60), and to be useful as adjuvants in the immunosuppression regimen of renal transplanted patients (37, 39, 40, 61). The point to be made is that the quantity of unsaturated fatty SEPTEMBER acids fed and not serum cholesterol levels per se, although they will be affected by the quality of fat, appear to correlate best with most of the observed effects on immune function, in the promotion of carcinogenesis in animal feeding experiments, and in human clinical trials (17, 50, 51). For example, Kos et a!. (32) found no effect of hypercholesterolemia on the re sponse of T- or B-cells to mitogen, no effect on the tumoricidal activity of peritoneal macrophages, and no effect on the survival of mice inoculated with cells of a syngeneic methylcholan threne-induced fibrosarcoma or the Lewis lung carcinoma. In addition, Kos et aI. (32) calculated the ratio of the number of regressions of tumor to the number of mice challenged and found 0/1 0 and 1/1 0 for the normocholesterolemic and hy percholesterolemic mice, respectively. The study by Kos et a!. (32) was poor in terms of nutritional design since one group of control mice was fed a commercial chow, which not only varies in composition from batch to batch but was, unfortunately, different in the content of fat, cholesterol, cholic acid, protein, vitamins, etc., from the quasipurified diet fed the experimental mice that had been made hypercholesterolemic. Nonetheless, Kos eta!. (32) did demonstrate that hypercholesterolemic mice were more susceptible to infectious disease which was asso ciated with a decreased antibody response to sheep erythro cytes in vivo. As in the case of the T-ceII, the B-cell response to mitogen was not affected by hypercholesterolemia, sug gesting that macrophages may have been affected rather than B-cells per Se. This observation is supported by several other studies suggesting that hyperlipidemia adversely affects mac rophage function (7, 24, 32). In any case, 2 observations should be noted in the study of Kos et a!. and from another similar in design (34, 35): (a) the fat fed was lard, a relatively highly saturated animal fat which was not immunosuppressive for T-cells and macrophages; and (b) hypercholesterolemia per se was not the major determinant in the immunosuppres sion seen in studies dealing with lipids and immune function. In most studies, marked hypercholesterolemia is induced by feeding diets high in fat with added and varying amounts of cholesterol and cholic acid, the hypercholesterolemic diet. When such diets are fed, regardless of the quality of dietary fat, hypercholesterolemia is produced (1 1). Rats, in which serum cholesterol levels are normally in the 90- to 100-mg/ 100 ml range on most commercial chows, develop serum cholesterol levels of 350 to 500 mg/i 00 ml when fed diets containing cholesterol and cholic acid. However, depending on the quality of fat and as Broitman et a!. (1 1) demonstrated, T cell responsiveness to mitogen may be significantly depressed by a factor of 10 or more in hypercholesterolemic rats fed unsaturated fat compared to equally hypercholesterolemic rats fed saturated fat. Omitting dietary cholesterol and cholic acid from the diet decreased the serum cholesterol levels to ap proximately 100 mg/i 00 ml in groups of rats fed either satu rated (20% coconut oil) or unsaturated fat (20% safflower oil), but the marked difference in T-ceII responsiveness was main tamed between the 2 dietary fat-fed groups (1 1). There appears to be a consensus among some of our col leagues in immunology that the NK cell is of prime importance in immunosurveillance and neoplasia, although the complexi ties of the immune surveillance system would suggest that other cell types may be involved. In any case, there is no evidence that either saturated fat, unsaturated fat, or hyper cholesterolemia affect NK cells. In our laboratory, NK cell 1981 Downloaded from cancerres.aacrjournals.org on June 16, 2017. © 1981 American Association for Cancer Research. 3707 J. J. Vitale and S. A. Broitman a In a a a 30 20@ 1@.../ a 10@ U 5. 2; ‘Diet II (Polyunsaturated Diet I (Polyunsaturated Fat) Fat & Cholesterol) :---:----@@ . 30 20@ 10• 5 2 Diet IV (Saturated Fat & Cholesterol) Diet III (Saturated Fat) 3.1 12.5 50 200 3.1 12.5 50 200 log e/t Chart 1. Effect of dietary saturated and unsaturated fat, with and with out added cholesterol (1%) and cholic acid (0.3%), NK cell activity. Data are presented as log percentage of specific release [(lysis in presence of effector cells —lysis in the absence of effector cells)/(total possible lysis —lysis in the absence of effector cells)) plotted against log of the effector cell/target cell ratio (e/t). activity in rats fed diets containing either 20% coconut oil or 20% safflower oil, with or without added cholesterol and cholic acid, was the same (Chart 1)•4 In addition, similarly treated animals do not lose their abilityto reject syngeneic or allogeneic bone marrow transplants,5 a function presently attributed to M cells or NK cells (33). There are nutritional manipulations which appear to affect M cells or NK cells such as iron deficiency which abrogates resistance to the growth of syngeneic bone marrow transplants (53) and which also suppresses T-ceIl function and promotes chemically induced carcinogenesis (65). Here, we would again remind the reader that every nutritional insult that promotes cancer has been shown to suppress some component of cell mediated immunity (62, 63). Dietary fat, like dietary protein, derives its biological value from its component parts. It seems reasonable and perhaps safe at this juncture to suggest that the effects of dietary fat on immune function are mediated through its component parts, the unsaturated fatty acids, specifically linoleic, linolenic, and arachidonic. One line of evidence suggests that cholesterol and unsaturated fatty acids exert their effect on immune cells by altering the lipid component of the cell membrane (i 8, 20, 38, 47, 56, 57). When lymphocytes are exposed to mitogen, there are marked alterations in the membrane phospholipid, fatty acid, and cholesterol composition (27—29,38, 57). The addition of substrates which inhibit cholesterol synthesis to in vitro systems results in a decreased response of T-Iymphocytes to mitogens (26, 38) and to decreased activity of cytolytic (killer) T-cells (26). Linoleic and arachidonic acids, as well as prostaglandins, inhibit T-celI responses to mitogen as does 25hydroxycholesterol(7, 38), the latter being a potent inhibitor of cholesterol synthesis. The addition of cholesterol to these in 4 L. J. Kraus, R. M. Williams, and S. A. Broitman. Relationship of dietary fat and cholesterol to T-cell mitogenesis and natural killer cell activity in rats given 1,2-dimethylhydrazine, manuscript in preparation. 5 P. Rodday 3708 and J. J. Vitale, unpublished observations. vitro systems reverses the effect of 25-hydroxycholesterol(26) and enhances the response of T-cells to mitogen (29). The effects of 25-hydroxycholesterol, unsaturated fatty acids or prostaglandins do not appear to be the result of toxicity to the lymphocyte (45). However, the exact mechanism by which these substrates affect T-ceII function is not clear, and several possibilities for the observed effects that have been discussed (12, i 4, 20, 21 , 27, 38) are: (a) an alteration in the fluidity of the membrane which may alter the configuration of receptor sites on the lymphocyte rendering it less competent or respon sive; (b) alterations in cyclic adenosine 3':5'-monophosphate concentrations or activation affecting antigen-lymphocyte in teraction; (c) decreased macrophage function which would also affect antigen-lymphocyte interaction; and (d) decreased cholesterol synthesis within the cell which appears to be a prerequisite for DNA synthesis and subsequent blastogenesis (i9). When the fluidity of lymphocyte membranes is decreased in the presence of cholesterol, enhanced responses of T-cells to mitogen (29, 38) and increased cytolytic (killer) T-cell activity (26) occur. Membranes having a lower ratio of polyunsaturated to saturated fatty acids are generally less fluid than those having a higher ratio (38), ratios which can be affected by the quality offatfed. There appears to be a dichotomy. On the one hand, in in vitro studies, the addition of liposomai cholesterolto the media enhances T-cell responsiveness and overcomes the depress ing effect of 7-ketocholesterol(29) and 25-hydroxycholesterol (26), both of which block cholesterol synthesis. Chen et a!. (19) have demonstrated that cholesterol synthesis, which must and does precede DNA synthesis, is required for the generation of new membranes during blastogenesis. However, the addition of cholesterol liposomes would be expected to turn off choles terol synthesis within the cell, according to feedback mecha nisms outlined by Brown and Goldstein (i 3, i 4), and therefore decrease T-cell responsiveness, which it does not in vitro. Obviously, membrane fluidity alone is not the controlling factor in blastogenesis nor are serum cholesterol levels or cholesterol synthesisperse. Rather, the gradients between medium, mem brane, and intracellular cholesterol content (and synthesis) appear to be important determinants for optimal blastogenesis as suggested by several studies (26, 29, 38, 59). Since the quality of fat influences serum and cellular cholesterol levels, the effects of fatty acid on immune function and on oncogenesis may be mediated through changes in cholesterol metabolism or vis a vis prostoglandins. Recently, Meade and Mertin (38) published an excellent review in which they concluded, ‘ ‘We have described the effects of fatty acids on immune cells in vitro and in vivo, but it is clear we are still largely at the stage of describing phenomena rather than understanding them. We may summarize by saying that a wide variety of fatty acids produce effects on both the lymphoid and the reticuloendothelialsystems, the actual effects produced depending on the method of administration as well as the chemical nature of the fatty acid. With regard to fatty acids, diet, and disease, we consider it too early yet to say whether a role for fatty acids in the biochemistry of immune cells, or effects of fatty acids in vivo, have any relevance to human disease.― We disagree with this conclusion. Most certainly dietary fat, and therefore fatty acids, plays some role in at least 2 major CANCERRESEARCHVOL. 41 Downloaded from cancerres.aacrjournals.org on June 16, 2017. © 1981 American Association for Cancer Research. Lipids and Immunology diseases, cancer and atherosclerosis. It may not be clear as to how fatty acids exert their effects on immune function or to what extent one can transfer in vitro data to in vivo happenings. One cannot, however, completely ignore the overwhelming data, both experimental and epidemiological, that equate (a) dietary unsaturated fats with immunosuppression and promo tion of various cancers, (b) increased dietary fat intake with an increased incidence of colon cancer and perhaps cancer at other sites, and (c) hypercholesterolemia and highly saturated fat dietswith cardiovasculardisease and atherosclerosis. Some readers may well ask about the intrusion of cardiovascular disease in this discussion on lipids and immunology. Several studies suggest an immune component in the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis(3, 27, 28). Alving et a!. (3) have demonstrated that human complement can be activated in the presence of high concentrations of membrane cholesterol resulting in mem brane change. These observations may have important impli cations clinically as well as in our understanding of the patho genesis of atherosclerosis. An association has been made between cardiovascular dis ease and colon cancer (56). Yet, there is no evidence from either experimental animals or from observations in humans that cardiovascular disease is associated with an increased risk of cancer or that the latter is associated with increased risk of the former. Both are associated with levels of dietary fat (1 1 ) or perhaps more importantly with the quality and quantity of fatty acids (i 1). Indeed, all availableexperimentaldata would suggest that diets high in saturated fats would favor atherosclerosiswhereas unsaturated fatty acid diets would favor neoplasia (2, i i ) and that both affect some component(s) of the immune system which in turn probably enhances or promotes the disease process. If fats or unsaturated fatty acids play a role in onco genesis and atherosclerosis, perhaps the roles are mediated through changes in or shifts between LDL and HDL. It is now generally accepted that high LDL levels, ratherthan cholesterol levels per se, are associated with an increased risk to athero sclerosis whereas high HDL levels are associated with a de creased risk to cardiovascular disease and that diet, smoking, alcohol, exercise, among other factors, can alter lipoprotein concentrations (64). What is of interest here is that serum lipoproteins have a regulatory role in immune responses pre sumably by regulating the expression of specific cell receptors (12, 14, 27, 28). Morse et a!. (46) have demonstrated that lipoproteins isolated from normal human plasma inhibited the proliferation of lymphocytes stimulated by allogeneic cells or lectins, but to varying degrees. Intermediate LDL was the most potent Inhibitor followed by very-low-density lipoprotein, LDL, and HDL. As is known, the binding of normal serum LDL by human fibroblast cells and lymphocytes influences the sterol content of these cells by modulating the rates of uptake, esterification, and synthesis of cholesterol (23, 27). At this juncture, it does not seem unreasonable to believe that lipopro teins play a role not only in the pa@thogenesis of atherosclerosis but also in at least some forms of cancer (48); that immune or host defense cells are affected in both diseases and that cholesterol concentrations per se may be uninformative about an individual's risk to c@ancer,atherosclerosis or perhaps to other diseases. After all, cholesterol is an essential component of every cell, and normally its concentration is regulated to some degree. Finally, we offer one plausible explanation for SEPTEMBER the association between lipids and cancer. If tumor cells transformed cells (premalignant) are no longer regulated terms of cholesterol uptake, esterification, and synthesis, has been shown (58), then changes in the concentration LDL or HDL may enhance either the growth or in as of or the transfor mation of aberrant cells to malignant cells by further deregu lating cholesterol metabolism. However, what seems like a ‘ ‘chicken and the egg' ‘situation is not in fact. Since all of the experimental data suggest that no dietary manipulation in the absence of a carcinogen initiates cancer, then one can only assume that alterations in lipid metabolism influenced by at least the quality and quantity of dietary fat further perpetuates the defect(s) initiated by the carcinogen. Those same factors which promote carcinogenesis may in addition suppress those systems that normally destroy or keep aberrant cells in check. The tumor cell itself may further perpetuate itself by influencing Iipid-cholesterol-regulatingmechanisms of the normal cell. Per haps it would be trite to state the obvious; more work must be done. George Mann may indeed be correct in his assessment (36); and possibly a new era is beginning with interest in the interactions of nutrition-immunology-heart-cancer. References 1. Abels, J. C., Gorham, A. T., Pach, G. T., and Rhoads, C. 0. Metabolic studies in patients with cancer of the gastrointestinaltract. I. Plasma vitamin A levels in patients with malignant neoplastic disease, particularly of the gastrointestinaltract. J. Clin. Invest., 20: 749—764,1971. 2. Alcantara, E. N., and Speckmann, E. W. Diet, nutrition, and cancer. Am. J. Clin. Nutr., 29: 1035-1047, 1976. 3. Alving, C. A., Richards, R. L., and Guirguls, A. A. Cholesterol-dependent hyman complement activation resulting in damage to liposomal model mem branes. J. Immunol., 118: 342—347,1977. 4. Basu, T. K. Significance of vitamins on cancer. Oncology (Basel), 33: 183— 187, 1976. 5. Basu, T. K., Donaldson, D., Jenner, M., Williams, D. C., and Sakula, A. Plasma vitamin A in patients with broncheal carcinoma. Br. J. Cancer, 33: 119—121,1976. 6. Basu, T. K., Raven, R. W., Dickerson, J. W. T., and Williams, D. C. Leukocyte ascorbic acid and urinary hydroxyproline levels in the patients bearing breast cancer with skeletal metastases. Eur. J. Cancer, 10: 507—51 1• 1974. 7. Berken, A., and Benacerraf, B. Depression of the reticuloendothellal system phagocytic function by injected lipids. Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol. Med., 128: 793-795, 1968. 8. Bodansky, 0., Wroblewski, F., and Markardt, B. Concentrations of ascorbic acid In plasma and white cells of patients with cancer and non-cancerous chronic disease. Cancer Res., 11: 238—244,19@1. 9. BoIlag, W. H. Prophylaxis of chemically Induced benign and malignant epithellal tumors by vitamin A (retinoic acid). Eur. J. Cancer, 8: 689—693, 1972. 10. Boutwell, R. K., Brush, M. K., and Rusch, H. P. The stimulating effect of dietary fat on carcinogenesis. Cancer Res., 9: 741 —746,1949. 11. Broitman, S. A., Vitale, J. J., Vavrousek-Jakuba, E., and Gottlieb, L. S. Polyunsaturated fat, cholesterol and large bowel tumorigenesis. Cancer (Phila.), 40: 2455—2463,1977. 12. Brown, M. S., Faust, J. A., and Goldstein, J. L. Role of the low density lipoprotein receptor in regulating the content of free and esterified choles terol In human fibroblasts. J. Clin. Invest., 55: 783, 1974. 13. Brown, M. S., and Goldstein, J. L. Familial hypercholesterolemia: a genetic defect in the low-density lipoprotein receptor. N. EngI. J. Med., 294: 1386— 1390, 1976. 14. Brown, M. S., and Goldstein, J. L. Receptor-mediated control of cholesterol metabolism. Study of human mutants has disclosed how cells regulate a substance that Is both vital and lethal. Science (Wash. D. C.), 19 1: 150— 152, 1976. 15. Carroll, K. K., Gammal, E. B., and Plunkett, E. R. Dietary fat and mammary cancer. Can. Med. Assoc. J., 98: 590-594, 1968. 16. Carroll, K. K., and Khor, H. T. Effects of dietary fat and dose level of 7, 12dimethylbenz(a)anthracene on mammary tumor incidence in rats. Cancer Res., 30: 2260-2264, 1970. 17. Carroll, K. K., and Khor, H. T. Dietary fat in relation to tumorigenesis. Prog. Biochem. Pharmacol., 10: 308—353,1975. 18. Chapman, D., and Wallach, D. F. H. Recent physical studies of phospholipid and natural membranes in biological membranes: physical facts and func tions. In: D. Chapman (ed), Biological Membranes, pp. 125—1 47. New York: 1981 Downloaded from cancerres.aacrjournals.org on June 16, 2017. © 1981 American Association for Cancer Research. 3709 J. J. Vitale and S. A. Broitman Academic Press, Inc., 1968. 19. Chen, H. W., Heiniger, H. J., and Kandutsch, A. A. Relationship between sterol synthesis and DNA synthesis in PHA stimulated mouse lymphocytes. Proc. NatI. Acad. 3d. U. 5. A., 72: 1950-1 954, 1975. 20. Chen, S. A., and Keenan, R. M. Effect of phosphatidylcholine Ilposomes on the mitogen-stimulatedlymphocyte activation. Blochem. Blophys. Res. Com mun., 79: 852—859,1977. 21 . Chisari, F. V., and Edgington, T. S. Lymphocyte E rosette inhibitory factor: a regulatory serum lipoprotein. J. Exp. Med., 142: 1092—1 098, 1975. 22. CommIttee of Principal Investigators. A cooperative trial In the primary prevention of lschaemlc heart disease using clofibrate. Br. Heart J., 40: 1069-1118,1978. 23. Curtlss, L. K., and Edglngton, T. S. Regulatory serum liproproteins: regula tion of lymphocyte stimulation by a species of low density lipoprotein. J. Immunol., 116: 1452-1457, 1976. 24. Dianzani, M. U., Torrielli, M. V., Canuto, A. A., Garcea, A., and Feo, F. The influence of enrichment with cholesterol on the phagocytic activity of rat macrophages. J. Pathol., 118: 193—199,1976. 25. DiLuzio, N. R., and Riggi, S. J. The development of a lipid emulsion for the measurement of reticuloendothelialfunction. Res. J. Reticuloendothel Soc., 1: 136—147,1964. 26. Helnlger, H.-J. , Brunner, K. T., and Cerottini, J.-C. Cholesterol is a critical cellular component for cytotoxiclty T-lymphocyte. Proc. NatI. Acad. Sd. U. S. A., 75: 5683-5687, 1978. 27. Ho, V. K., Brown, M. S., Bllheimer, D. W., and Goldstein, J. L. Regulation of low density lipoprotein receptor activity In freshly isolated human lympho cytes. J. Clin. Invest., 58: 1465—1468,1976. 28. Ho, V. K., Brown, M. S., Kayden, H. J., and Goldstein, J. L. Binding, Internalization, and hydrolysis of low density lipoprotein In long-term lymph old cell lines from a normal subject and a patient with homozygous familial hypercholesterolemla. J. Exp. Med., 144: 444—449,1976. 29. Ip, S. H. C., Abrahm, J., and Cooper, A. A. Enhancement of blastogenesis in cholesterol-enriched lymphocytes. J. Immunol., 124: 87—93,1980. 30. Hughes, 0., Caspary, E. A., and Wisniewski, H. M. Immunosuppresslon by linoleic acid. Lancet, 2: 501 —502,1975. 31 . Kollmorgen, G. M., Sansing, W. A., Lehman, A. A., Fischer, G., Longley, R. E., Alexander, S. S., Jr., King, M. M., and McCay, P. B. Inhibition of lymphocyte function in rats fed high-fat diets. Cancer Res., 39: 3458—3462, 1979. 32. Kos, W. L., Loria, R. M., Snodgrass, M. J., Cohen, D., Thorpe, T. G., and Kaplan, A. M. Inhibition of host resistance by nutritional hypercholesterol emla. Infect. Immun., 26: 658—667,1979. 33. Kumar, V. Diseases of immunity. In: S. L. Robbins and R. S. Cotran (eds.), Pathologic Basis of Disease, Ed. 2, pp. 262—278.Philadelphia: W. B. SaundersCo., 1979. 34. Loria, R. M., Kibrlck, 5., Downing, D., Madge, G. E., and Fllllos, L. C. Effects of prolonged hypercholesterolemia in the mouse. Nutr. Rep. Int., 13: 509— 518, 1976. 35. Lorla, A. M., Kibrlck, S., and Madge, G. E. Infection of hypercholesterolemic mice with coxsacklevlrus B. J. Infect. DIs., 133: 655—662,1976. 36. Mann. G. V. Diet-heart: end of an era. N. EngI. J. Med., 297: 644—650, 1977. 37. McHugh, M. I., Wilkinson, R., Elliott, A. W., Field, E. J., Dewar, P., Hall, A. A., Taylor, A. M. R., and Uldall, P. A. Immunosuppresslon with polyunsatu rated fatty acids in renal transplantation. Transplantation (Baltimore), 24: 263—267, 1977. 38. Meade, C. J., and Mertin, J. Fatty acids and immunity. Adv. Lipid Res., 16: 127—165,1978. 39. Mertin, J. Polyunsaturatedfatty acids and cancer. Br. Med. J., 4: 357, 1973. 40. Mertln, J. Unsaturated fatty acids and renal transplantation. Lancet, 2: 717, 1974. 41 . Mertln, J. Effect of polyunsaturated fatty acids on skin allograft survival and primary and secondary cytotoxic response in mice. Transplantation (Balti more), 21: 1—4,1976. 37i0 42. Mertin, J., and Hughes, D. Specific Inhibitory action of polyunsaturated fatty acids in lymphocyte transformation induced by PHA and PPD. Int. Arch. Allergy AppI. Immunol., 48: 203-21 0, 1975. 43. Mertin, J., Hughes, D., Shenton, B. K., and Dlckenson, J. P. In vitro InhIbition of unsaturated fatty acids of the PPD- and PHA-induced lymphocyte re sponse. KIln. Wochenschr., 52: 248-250, 1974. 44. Mertln, J., and Hunt, A. Influence of polyunsaturated fatty acids on survival of skin allografts and tumor Incidence in mice. Proc. NatI. Acad. Sal. U. 5. A., 73: 928—931 , 1976. 45. Mlhas, A. A., Gibson, A. G., and Hlrschowitz, B. I. Suppressionof lymphocyte transformation by 16, (16) dlmethyl prostaglandin E2and unsaturated fatty acids. Proc. Soc. Exp. Blol. Med., 149: 1026—1028,1975. 46. Morse, J. H., Witte, L. D., and Goodman, D. 5. InhibItion of lymphocyte proliferation stimulation by lectins and allogeneic cells by normal plasma lipoproteins. J. Exp. Med., 146: 1791-1803, 1977. 47. Nes, W. A. Role of sterols in membranes. Lipids, 9: 596-607, 1974. 48. Nydegger, U. E., and Butler, R. E. Serum Ilpoproteln levels in patients with cancer. Cancer Res., 32: 1756—1 760, 1972. 49. Offner, H., and Glausen, J. Inhibition of lymphocyte responses to stimulants induced by unsaturated fatty acids and prostaglandins. Lancet, 2: 400—401, 1974. 50. Pearce, M. L, and Dayton, 5. Incidence of cancer in men on a diet high In polyunsaturated fat. Lancet, 1: 464—467,1971. 51 . Posner, B. M., Broltman, S. A., and Vitale, J. J. Nutrition in neoplastlc disease. In: M. A. Mehlman (ed), Advances In Modern Human Nutrition. New York: Plenum Publishing Corp., Vol. 1, 1980. 52. Ring, J., Selfert, J., Mertln, J., and Brendel, W. Prolongatlonof skin allografts In rats by treatment with Ilnoleic acid. Lancet, 2: 1331 , 1974. 53. Rodday, P., Bennett, M., and Vitale, J. J. Delayed erythropoleslsln Irradiated rats grafted with syngeneic marrow: effects of cytotoxlc drugs and iron deficiency anemia. Blood, 48: 435—447,1976. 54. Roltt, I. M. EssentIal Immunology, Ed. 3. London: Blackwell Scientific Pub Ilcatlons, 1977. 55. Rose, G., Blackburn, H., Keys, A., Taylor, H. L., Kannell, W. B., Paul, 0., Reid, D. D.. and Stamler, J. Colon cancer and blood cholesterol. Lancet, 1: 181—183,1974. 56. Rothblat, G. H. Cellular sterol metabolism. In: G. H. Rothblat and V. J. Cristofalo (eds.), Growth, Nutrition and Metabolism In Cells in Culture, Vol. 1, pp. 297—306,New York: Academic Press, Inc., 1972. 57. Shinitzky, M., and Inbar, M. Differenceln microviscosityinduced by different cholesterol levels In the surface membrane lipid layer of normal lymphocytes and mallgnantlymphoma cells. J. Mol. Biol., 85: 603—606,1974. 58. Siperstein, M. D. Regulation of cholesterol biosynthesis in normal and malignant tissues. Curr. Top. Cell Regul., 2: 65-1 00, 1970. 59. Toyoshima, 5., and Osawa, T. Cholesterol InhIbition of the temporary In crease of membrane fluidity of lymphocytes Induced by mitogenic lectins. Exp. Cell Res., 102: 438-440, 1976. 60. UldaIl, P. R., Wilkinson, A., McHugh, M. I., Field, E. J., Shenton, B. K., Baxby, K., and Taylor, R. M. A. Linoleic acid and transplantation. Lancet, 2: 128—129, 1975. 61 . Uldall, P. R., Wilkinson, A., McHugh, M. I., Field, E. J., Shenton, B. K., Taylor, A. M. A., and 5wlnney, J. Unsaturated fatty acids and renal trans.. plantation. Lancet, 2: 514, 1974. 62. Vitale, J. J. Possible role of nutrients in neoplasia. Cancer Res., 35: 3320— 3325, 1975. 63. Vltale, J. J. Deficiency diseases. In: S. L. Robbins and A. S. Cotran (ads.) Pathologic Basis of Disease, Ed. 2, pp. 483—520.PhIladelphia: W. B. SaundersCo.,1979. 64. VItale, J. J., Broitman, 5. A., and Gottlieb, L. 5. Alcohol and carcinogenesis. In: G. R. Newell, and N. M. Ellison (ads.), Nutrition and Cancer, New York: Raven Press, Vol. 17. 1981. 65. Vitale, J. J., Broitman, S. A., Vavrousek-Jakuba, E., Rodday, P. W., and Gottlieb, L. S. The effects of Iron deficiency and the quality and quantity of fat on chemicallyinduced cancer. Adv. Exp. Med. Blol., 91: 229—242,1977. CANCERRESEARCHVOL. 41 Downloaded from cancerres.aacrjournals.org on June 16, 2017. © 1981 American Association for Cancer Research. Lipids and Immune Function Joseph J. Vitale and Selwyn A. Broitman Cancer Res 1981;41:3706-3710. Updated version E-mail alerts Reprints and Subscriptions Permissions Access the most recent version of this article at: http://cancerres.aacrjournals.org/content/41/9_Part_2/3706 Sign up to receive free email-alerts related to this article or journal. To order reprints of this article or to subscribe to the journal, contact the AACR Publications Department at [email protected]. To request permission to re-use all or part of this article, contact the AACR Publications Department at [email protected]. Downloaded from cancerres.aacrjournals.org on June 16, 2017. © 1981 American Association for Cancer Research.