Download Le Chatelier`s Principle Notes

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Nucleophilic acyl substitution wikipedia , lookup

Electrolysis of water wikipedia , lookup

PH wikipedia , lookup

Catalytic reforming wikipedia , lookup

Electrochemistry wikipedia , lookup

Asymmetric induction wikipedia , lookup

Multi-state modeling of biomolecules wikipedia , lookup

Marcus theory wikipedia , lookup

Hydrogen-bond catalysis wikipedia , lookup

Redox wikipedia , lookup

Thermomechanical analysis wikipedia , lookup

Thermodynamic equilibrium wikipedia , lookup

Photoredox catalysis wikipedia , lookup

Supramolecular catalysis wikipedia , lookup

Thermodynamics wikipedia , lookup

Ring-closing metathesis wikipedia , lookup

Process chemistry wikipedia , lookup

Physical organic chemistry wikipedia , lookup

Photosynthetic reaction centre wikipedia , lookup

Hydroformylation wikipedia , lookup

Chemical reaction wikipedia , lookup

George S. Hammond wikipedia , lookup

Strychnine total synthesis wikipedia , lookup

Chemical thermodynamics wikipedia , lookup

Lewis acid catalysis wikipedia , lookup

Catalysis wikipedia , lookup

Rate equation wikipedia , lookup

Reaction progress kinetic analysis wikipedia , lookup

Click chemistry wikipedia , lookup

Determination of equilibrium constants wikipedia , lookup

Bioorthogonal chemistry wikipedia , lookup

Stoichiometry wikipedia , lookup

Transition state theory wikipedia , lookup

Chemical equilibrium wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
Mr Chiasson
Advanced Chemistry 12
1
Unit C: Chemical Kinetics and Chemical Equilibrium
Le Châtelier's Principle
Think back to our escalator example, with you walking up a downward moving escalator.
With the rate of the moving stairs and your walking evenly matched, you appear to be at a
standstill. But what happens if the escalator begins moving just a little faster? If you want to
maintain the same position you had, at some specific point between the bottom and the top of
the stairs, you'll also need to make some adjustments.
Chemical systems at equilibrium tend to make these adjustments as well. A French chemist,
Henri Louis Le Châtelier, was the first to describe what we now call:
Le Châtelier's Principle
“If an external stress is applied to a system at equilibrium, the system will
adjust itself in such a way as to partially offset the stress as the system
reaches a new equilibrium position.”
(Chang, 2007)
Equilibrium is all about rates - the rate of the forward reaction is equal to the rate of the
reverse reaction. External stresses are factors that will cause the rate of either the forward or
reverse reaction to change, throwing the system out of balance. Le Châtelier's Principle
allows us to predict how this will affect our system.
In our unit on Kinetics we examined factors that influenced reaction rates. Recall these
factors:
1.
2.
3.
4.
concentration
pressure and volume
temperature, and
catalysts
We'll see how changing these factors affects a system at equilibrium.
3.2 Changes in Concentration
Consider
the
following
equilibrium
system:
Fe3+ (aq)
+
SCN- (aq)
(colourless)
FeSCN2+ (aq)
(red)
Mr Chiasson
Advanced Chemistry 12
2
If more Fe3+ is added to the reaction, what will happen?
According to Le Châtelier's Principle, the system will react to minimize the stress.
Since Fe3+ is on the reactant side of this reaction, the rate of the forward reaction will increase
in order to "use up" the additional reactant. This will cause the equilibrium to shift to the
right, producing more FeSCN2+. For this particular reaction we will be able to see that this as
happened, as the solution will become a darker red colour.
There are a few different ways we can say what happens here when we add more Fe3+; these
all mean the same thing:
§
§
§
equilibrium shifts to the right
equilibrium shifts to the product side
the forward reaction is favoured
How does this cause the concentrations of the reaction participants to change?
Fe
Since this is what was added to cause the stress, the concentration of
Fe3+ will increase.
(a shorthand way to indicate this: [Fe3+] ↑)
(Reminder: the square brackets represent "concentration")
3+
SCN
Equilibrium will shift to the right, which will use up the reactants. The
concentration of SCN- will decrease (or [SCN-] ↓) as the rate of the
forward reaction increases.
FeSCN2+
With the forward reaction rate increases, more products are produced,
and the concentration of FeSCN2+ will increase. ([FeSCN2+] ↑)
-
How about the value of Keq? Notice that the concentration of some reaction participants
have increased, while others have decreased. Once equilibrium has re-established itself, the
value of Keq will be unchanged.
The value of Keq does not change when changes in
concentration cause a shift in equilibrium.
What if we add more FeSCN2+?
Again, equilibrium will shift to use up the added substance. In this case, equilibrium will shift
to favour the reverse reaction, since the reverse reaction will use up the additional FeSCN2+.
§
§
§
equilibrium shifts to the left
equilibrium shifts to the reactant side
the reverse reaction is favoured
Mr Chiasson
Advanced Chemistry 12
3
How do the concentrations of reaction participants change?
Fe3+
[Fe3+] ↑ as the reverse reaction is favoured
SCN-
[SCN-] ↑ as the reverse reaction is favoured
FeSCN2+
[FeSCN2+] ↑ because this is the substance that was added
Concentration can also be changed by removing a substance from the reaction. This is often
accomplished by adding another substance that reacts (in a side reaction) with something
already in the reaction.
Let's remove SCN- from the system (perhaps by adding some Pb2+ ions - the lead(II) ions will
form a precipitate with SCN- , removing them from the solution). What will happen now?
Equilibrium will shift to replace SCN- - the reverse reaction will be favoured because that is
the direction that produces more SCN-.
§
§
§
equilibrium shifts to the left
equilibrium shifts to the reactant side
the reverse reaction is favoured
How do the concentrations of reaction participants change?
Fe3+
[Fe3+] ↑ as the reverse reaction is favoured
SCN-
[SCN-] ↑ as the reverse reaction is favoured
(but it also ↓ because it was removed)
FeSCN2+
[FeSCN2+] ↑ because this is the substance that was added
3.3 Changes in Volume & Pressure
Changing the pressure or volume of a container enclosing an equilibrium system will only
affect the reaction if gases are present.
You may remember from earlier chemistry classes that equal volumes of gases contain an
equal number of particles and, under standard conditions of temperature and pressure (STP),
one mole of gas occupies a volume of 22.4 L. This is known as the molar volume of gases.
So, two moles of any gas will occupy a volume of 44.8 L and one-half mole would occupy
11.2 L.
How does changing pressure and volume affect equilibrium systems?
§
If you increase the pressure of a system at equilibrium (typically by reducing the
volume of the container), the stress will best be reduced by reaction favouring the side
with the fewest moles of gas, since fewer moles will occupy the smallest volume.
Mr Chiasson
Advanced Chemistry 12
§
Conversely, if you decrease the pressure (by increasing the volume of the container),
equilibrium will shift to favour the side with the most moles of gas, since more moles
will occupy a greater volume.
§
If both sides of the equation have the same number of moles of gas, then there will be
no change in the position of equilibrium.
4
When considering the effect of changing volume or pressure on equilibrium systems, be sure
to only count the number of moles of GASES on each side of the equation. Solids, liquids,
and aqueous solutions will not be affected by changing pressure and volume.
Here's an example.
Predict the effect on equilibrium when the pressure is increased for the following reaction:
N2O4 (g )
2NO2 (g)
The reactant side of the equation has 1 mole of a gas; the product side has 2 moles.
Increasing the pressure favours the side with the fewest moles of gas, so the equilibrium will
shift to the left (the reverse reaction will be favoured).
3.4 Changes in Temperature
When temperature is the stress that affects a system at equilibrium, there are two important
consequences:
§
§
an increase in temperature will favour that reaction direction that absorbs heat (i.e. the
endothermic reaction)
the value of Keq will change
Consider the following equilibrium system
N2O4 (g )
2NO2 (g)
ΔH° = +58.0 kJ
We see by the sign of ΔH° that the forward reaction is endothermic. Heat is absorbed
(required as a reactant) when the reaction proceeds as
N2O4 (g )
→ 2NO2 (g)
By adding more heat, equilibrium will shift to use up the additional heat, thus favouring this
forward direction.
Why will Keq change, when it did not change when concentration, pressure, and volume were
the applied stresses?
When temperature changes cause an equilibrium to shift, one entire side of the reaction
equation is favoured over the other side. Mathematically, this will alter the value of Keq as
follows:
Mr Chiasson
Advanced Chemistry 12
5
[products]
Keq
=
[reactants]
if the forward
reaction is
favoured
if the reverse
reaction is
favoured
more products are
produced; fewer
reactants
Keq will
increase
fewer products; more
reactants
Keq will
decrease
So in our example given above, increasing the temperature will favour the forward direction.
The value of Keq will increase.
Removing heat (making the system colder) will favour the exothermic reaction - the
exothermic reaction releases heat to the surroundings, thus "replacing" the heat that has
been removed.
3.5 Addition of a Catalyst
The addition of a catalyst to an equilibrium system is our final stress factor. How will adding a
catalyst affect the following:
N2 (g) + O2 (g)
2NO (g)
Adding a catalyst to this, or any other equilibrium system, will not affect the position of an
equilibrium. A catalyst speeds up both the forward and the reverse reactions, so there is no
uneven change in reaction rates. Generally, a catalyst will help a reaction to reach the point
of equilibrium sooner, but it will not affect the equilibrium otherwise.