* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Savannas and the carbon storage story
Climate governance wikipedia , lookup
Iron fertilization wikipedia , lookup
Climate change and poverty wikipedia , lookup
2009 United Nations Climate Change Conference wikipedia , lookup
Climate engineering wikipedia , lookup
Global warming wikipedia , lookup
Climate change mitigation wikipedia , lookup
Solar radiation management wikipedia , lookup
Citizens' Climate Lobby wikipedia , lookup
Decarbonisation measures in proposed UK electricity market reform wikipedia , lookup
Politics of global warming wikipedia , lookup
Carbon pricing in Australia wikipedia , lookup
Climate change in Canada wikipedia , lookup
Low-carbon economy wikipedia , lookup
Reforestation wikipedia , lookup
Mitigation of global warming in Australia wikipedia , lookup
Carbon emission trading wikipedia , lookup
Carbon Pollution Reduction Scheme wikipedia , lookup
Climate change feedback wikipedia , lookup
Carbon dioxide in Earth's atmosphere wikipedia , lookup
IPCC Fourth Assessment Report wikipedia , lookup
Climate-friendly gardening wikipedia , lookup
The tropical savannas cover around 20% of the earth’s land surface and while they have fewer trees and stored carbon than rainforests or temperate forests, their extent makes them significant in the global carbon cycle. So how does carbon cycling work in the tropical savannas and where is the carbon stored? How much is emitted and absorbed and are these processes changing? Such questions were the focus of several Tropical Savannas CRC projects. By Peter Jacklyn. Photo: Jason Beringer climate Lindsay Hutley checks on a 23-metre tower threatened by fire at the Howard Springs study site. The five-year study measured heat, moisture and CO2 flux and was able to show that despite regular fires, the surrounding woodlands absorbed around two tonnes of carbon per hectare per year. Savannas and the carbon storage story A ustralia’s tropical savannas account for around a third of Australia’s land-based carbon stores. However, savannas are regularly swept by bushfires that release many tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2) into the atmosphere. To find out how much carbon is stored in Australian tropical savanna ecosystems, researchers Lindsay Hutley (CDU), Dick Williams (CSIRO) and PhD student Chen Xiaoyong (CDU) dug up roots and chopped down trees in plots around Darwin and Katherine in the Northern Territory and then weighed and analysed the woody material to estimate the carbon stored. They found these savanna woodlands store, on average, around 25–35 tonnes of carbon above and around 20 tonnes of carbon in roots beneath each hectare. Around two to three times as much carbon per hectare is stored as organic material in the soil. Using airborne radar data they estimated the equivalent figures for a broader woodland landscape in the Wildman River region of the NT which were around 70–80 tonnes a hectare for the carbon in trees and roots. These figures are less than for densely forested landscapes which can store more than 150 tonnes of carbon a hectare but much greater than for grasslands. animals and bushfires. It is thought that this process is effectively ‘thickening up’ the woodlands of Howard Springs every year, particularly through increasing the number of shrubs. It is likely that this thickening is a response to the changes in the carbon cycle itself—to the higher levels of CO2 in the atmosphere and possibly increasing rainfall over north Australia. This thickening may be somewhat different to the thickening reported from the drier savannas in places like the Victoria River District and the Queensland Gulf of Carpentaria where the increase in woody shrubs may not only be responding to increased CO2 but also to changes in grazing, fire patterns and climate. Also, while the Howard Springs site has regular fires, these are usually not the hot, late dry-season wildfires that plague some parts of the savannas like central Arnhem Land (see diagram facing page). Such fires consume a substantial amount of tree material and are likely to be major sources of CO2. Nevertheless, broader analyses estimate that the wetter savannas as a whole (the Kimberley, the NT Top End, Queensland’s Cape York Peninsula and northern Gulf) are probably absorbing around a tonne of carbon per hectare every year on average. Although this rate of sequestration is low compared to forest plantations, it is greater than estimates for African savanna woodlands and other savannas around the world (e.g. see Elmar et al, 2004). This is probably because our eucalypts are so well-adapted to the wet-dry tropics, rainfall is generally high in this region (greater than 1200 mm annually) and we have more trees and shrubs that are evergreen, absorbing CO2 all year round. Given the vast area of these landscapes this is a significant ‘sink’ for CO2. This sink will presumably only last as long as there are enough nutrients in the soil and water available to sustain a yearly increase in savanna trees and shrubs—sooner or later a limit will be reached and savanna ecosystems will no longer How much carbon is emitted and absorbed each year from savannas? A study site in un-grazed savanna woodland near Howard Springs, Darwin was used to measure heat, moisture and CO2 flux over a five-year period from 2001–2006. The CO2 flux was measured by an instrument atop a 23-metre tower above the woodland. The study was able to show that despite regular fire the Howard Springs woodland ecosystem actually absorbs around two tonnes of carbon per hectare each year. In other words, every year two tonnes more carbon is incorporated into the wood, grass and soils in each hectare of the Howard Springs woodland than is emitted to the atmosphere by the plants, 2007 Why the carbon cycle is important MANY elements cycle from the atmosphere to living things, the oceans or the soil and then back to the atmosphere, but the cycling of carbon atoms is particularly important. One reason is that carbon dioxide (CO2) plays a key role in trapping heat in the atmosphere—one of the basic mechanisms behind the greenhouse effect, which raises temperatures near the earth’s surface. Another factor that makes the cycling of carbon important is that carbon plays a central role in combustion—burning—and in the last 200 years we have dramatically changed the carbon cycle through burning fossil fuels, which has released large volumes of CO2 into the atmosphere. Also, substantial areas of forest have been cut down, removing a pathway for CO 2 absorption (see diagram above). Consequently, recent times have seen the amount of CO2 in the air increase and the amount of oxygen decrease. Because there is so much oxygen in the air, the oxygen drop is hardly noticeable, but as there is very little CO2 (0.038% of the atmosphere) the extra CO 2 from burning and deforestation has caused a dramatic rise as shown in the graph at right. This has contributed to an enhanced greenhouse effect in recent decades. Given the potentially serious consequences for the earth’s climate of this enhanced greenhouse effect, great importance is now placed on ways of reducing CO2 emissions and on reducing the CO2 already in the air. Atmospheric CO2 concentrations over the last 20,000 years from various sources including ice cores. The grey bars show the reconstructed ranges of natural variability for the past 650,000 years. Note the dramatic increase in recent times. Modified from IPCC AR4 2007. The global carbon cycle where black numbers indicate the annual flows of carbon in pre-industrial times and red numbers indicate recent human-caused annual flows. The flows and stores are in billions of tonnes or Gigatonnes of carbon GtC. Source: IPCC AR4 2007 be able to absorb extra carbon every year. Climate change and the spread of gamba grass may also result in more intense fires and the current trend of sequestration may shift to CO2 emission. emissions from cars and absorption resulting from the cessation of land clearing are counted. Savanna fires are considered to be anthropogenic as they are mostly lit by people for one reason or another, but the consequent emission of CO2 by fire and re-absorption by savanna plants is not counted because these processes are considered to cancel each other out. The new findings outlined here have not yet been taken into account. The official figures of emission from savanna fires are therefore not CO2, but those from methane and nitrous oxide. Like CO2 these The official figures? How do these findings square with official greenhouse accounts for the Northern Territory which show that savannas are major emitters of greenhouse gases through fires? These accounts look at human-caused—anthropogenic—emission and absorption of greenhouse gases only. So for example, Cont. pg 3 Savanna Links <savanna.cdu.edu.au> Savannas and the carbon storage story Cont. from pg. 2 gases also trap heat and are greenhouse gases—although their overall contribution to the greenhouse effect is less than that of CO2. Unlike CO2, these gases cannot be re-absorbed by plants and so are included in the current greenhouse emission accounts. What is striking is that even counting methane and nitrous oxide, savanna fires still accounted for 47% of NT greenhouse emissions in 2000. This underscores how, despite the savannas being an overall CO2 sink, places like Arnhem Land with frequent wildfires emit huge amounts of greenhouse gases. Applications There are two broad practical applications of this research: Abating emissions from savannas It should be possible to abate or offset substantial greenhouse gas emissions by reducing the incidence of intense, tree-consuming wildfires. This is now happening in west Arnhem Land where several Indigenous communities are reducing the incidence of late dry-season wildfires, consequently reducing greenhouse gas emissions (see Eureka Prize for West Arnhem Land Fire Project, page. 2). These communities are receiving payment for this work to the tune of $1 million a year for 17 years from Darwin Liquid Natural Gas, a large energy consortium which can then offset the emissions abated against its own greenhouse gas emissions. Although substantial quantities of CO2 are being abated in this work, as outlined above, they cannot currently be counted in the official figures. Even so, methane and nitrous gas emissions, which can be counted, and are equivalent to more than 250,000 tonnes of CO 2, were abated by the project in its first two years. Importantly, agreements like this provide enormous benefits apart from greenhouse gas reduction. These include long-term employment and linked social and economic benefits and increased protection for biodiversity and cultural values. Such strategies may also be possible in other fire-prone high biodiversity areas like the Kimberley. Carbon sequestration Some savanna landscapes should be able to be managed to enhance storage of carbon in trees, shrubs and soils, for The aftermath of late dry-season wildfire in west-central Arnhem Land in 2004. Wildfires in such a landscape are a major CO2 source. Picture courtesy of Andrew Edwards ( Bushfires NT) example by reducing the incidence of fire. Unlike abatement schemes, land managers could be paid for additional carbon stored rather than emissions abated. If carbon storage in woody vegetation can be accurately assessed or counted, areas on cattle stations could be excised and used for ‘carbon farms’. In the absence of fire, growth of tropical eucalypt trees would absorb CO2 from the atmosphere relatively rapidly. Pastoral enterprises could thus be managed for grazing and carbon sequestration. A key activity would be fire management—a major fire could consume the tree crop and emit stored CO2 to the atmosphere. However, losses may not be large as tropical savanna trees are not highly flammable, can recover from fire events and litter would be the dominant fuel consumed. References IPCC Fourth Assessment Report <ipcc-wg1.ucar.edu/wg1/wg1-report.html> Elmar M., Veenendaal, Olaf Kolle, Jon Lloyd 2004, ‘Seasonal variation in energy fluxes and CO2 exchange for a broad-leaved semi-arid savanna (Mopane woodland) in Southern Africa’, Global Change Biology, 10 (3), 318–328. Williams R.J, Hutley L.B., Cook G.D., Russell-Smith J., Edwards A., Chen X. 2004, ‘Assessing the carbon sequestration potential of mesic savannas in the Northern Territory, Australia: approaches, uncertainties and potential impacts of fire’, Functional Plant Biology, 31: 415–422 Contacts and more information Dr Lindsay Hutley, Charles Darwin University, <[email protected]> Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change website <www.ipcc.ch/> TS-CRC carbon dynamics project <www.savanna.cdu.edu.au/research/projects/ carbon_dynamics.html> Monash University Savanna Fire Experiment <arts.monash.edu.au/ges/research/climate/ fire/index.php> Climate change report CSIRO has released a report on the latest information on climate change in Australia and its likely causes. Climate Change in Australia updates projections of changes in temperature, rainfall and other aspects of climate that can be expected over coming decades as a result of continued global emissions of greenhouse gases. Developed by CSIRO and the Bureau of Meteorology, in partnership with the Australian Greenhouse Office, the report also states that droughts are likely to become more frequent, particularly in the south-west; evaporation rates are likely to increase, particularly in the north and east; high fire danger weather to increase in the south-east; and sea levels will continue to rise. Download the full report: <www.csiro.au/resources/ps3j6.html> <www.climatechangeinaustralia.gov. au/> 2007