Download A Connective Tissue Disorders NGS Panel: Development

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Saethre–Chotzen syndrome wikipedia , lookup

Biology and consumer behaviour wikipedia , lookup

Point mutation wikipedia , lookup

Site-specific recombinase technology wikipedia , lookup

Public health genomics wikipedia , lookup

Gene therapy wikipedia , lookup

Frameshift mutation wikipedia , lookup

Nutriepigenomics wikipedia , lookup

Gene expression profiling wikipedia , lookup

Epigenetics of neurodegenerative diseases wikipedia , lookup

Epigenetics of diabetes Type 2 wikipedia , lookup

Pharmacogenomics wikipedia , lookup

Genome (book) wikipedia , lookup

Medical genetics wikipedia , lookup

Down syndrome wikipedia , lookup

Artificial gene synthesis wikipedia , lookup

Microevolution wikipedia , lookup

Neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis wikipedia , lookup

DiGeorge syndrome wikipedia , lookup

Designer baby wikipedia , lookup

RNA-Seq wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
A Connective Tissue Disorders NGS Panel:
Development, Validation, and Novel Findings
Jennifer A. Lee, Monica J. Basehore, Stephen McGee, Katharine Kubiak, Kellie King,
Kristen J. Champion, Julie R. Jones, and Michael J. Friez
www.GGC.org
Greenwood Genetic Center, Greenwood, South Carolina 29646, USA
Background
Diagnostic Workflow
Connective tissues are the structurally supportive components of the
body that form a framework or structural matrix, connect body tissues,
and provide protection of organs and storage of energy. Connective tissue
disorders represent a heterogeneous group of more than 200 recognized
conditions for which the connective tissues are the primary pathologic
target. These disorders fall into two categories: autoimmune and
heritable. The heritable disorders affect a wide variety of mesenchymal
tissues, and include either soft connective tissue disorders which may be
characterized by excessive skin laxity, joint hypermobility, easy bruising,
or skeletal dysplasias which may affect the development of the bones.
Making a specific diagnosis can be important in determining the
appropriate medical management. Many of these conditions can have
life-threatening complications (i.e., aortic root rupture, bowel rupture,
etc.), many require regular monitoring/surveillance of symptoms, and for
many of these conditions treatment is available.
While certain connective tissue disorders are associated with definitive
phenotypes, some patients may have non-specific or atypical
presentations. Also, many patients present with similar features due to
the clinical variability and variable expressivity observed among these
disorders. For cases of phenotypic variability and variable expressivity,
we have developed and validated a targeted sequencing panel for
routine clinical diagnostic testing.
Using RainDanceTM microdroplet enrichment and SOLiDTM Next
Generation Sequencing (NGS), we can analyze the coding and flanking
intronic regions of 31 genes (Table 1) associated with various connective
tissue disorders simultaneously. This method enables the detection of
single nucleotide changes and small duplications and deletions in genes
that, collectively, are associated with at least 80 distinct connective tissue
disorder phenotypes (Table 2).
Connective Tissue 31-Gene Panel
• ABCC6
• ACTA2
• ACVR1
• ADAMTS2
• ATP6V0A2
• CBS
• CHST14
• COL11A1
• COL1A1
• COL1A2
• COL2A1
• COL3A1
• COL5A1
• COL5A2
• ELN
• FBLN5
• FBN1
• FBN2
• FKBP14
• MYLK
• NOTCH1
• PKD2
• PLOD1
• PRDM5
• SLC2A10
• SLC39A13
• SMAD3
• TGFBR1
• TGFBR2
• TNXB
• ZNF469
Table 1. List of 31 connective tissue disorder genes on the NGS panel
Upon reviewing the current literature, 31 genes were selected for inclusion in the
Connective Tissue gene panel. Inheritance patterns include autosomal dominant
and autosomal recessive.
Detection and Limitations
• Can detect single nucleotide changes and small duplications and
deletions in genes that are associated with at least 80 distinct
connective tissue disorder phenotypes
• Large deletions/duplications (CNVs) not detected
• 99% of targeted sequence can be analyzed:
+/- 20 bp at intron/exon boundaries
Promoters and 3’-UTRs are not included
Indications for Clinical Testing
• Patients with non-specific presentation who do not fit the typical
phenotype for a specific connective tissue disorder
• For patients with a specific suspected connective tissue disorder,
individual gene sequencing should be considered first
• Molecular testing is useful to confirm the diagnosis and to identify the
disease causing mutations within a family to allow for carrier testing and
prenatal diagnosis
Patient 3
DNA extraction
Enrichment for panel
genes (RainDanceTM)
Figure 3. Clinical signs observed for patient 3.
Library Preparation
& Emulsion PCR
• For patient 3, differential diagnoses of brittle cornea syndrome and
osteogenesis imperfecta were considered due to keratoglobus bilateral,
blue/purple sclera, abnormal red reflex, no skin or cardiac findings (Figure 3).
• Results: apparently homozygous c.6644delA in ZNF469 gene (frameshift,
predicted pathogenic)
• Mutation is maternal; also has paternal deletion including ZNF469 by array.
• The ZNF469 gene encodes a zinc-finger protein. It may function as a
transcription factor or extra-nuclear regulator factor for the synthesis or
organization of collagen fibers. Mutations in this gene cause brittle cornea
syndrome.
• Diagnosis: brittle cornea syndrome (autosomal recessive)
NGS (SOLiDTM)
Sanger sequencing:
RDOs
Director analysis
Sanger sequencing:
confirmations & UDOs
Director review &
interpretation of all
Sanger data
Figure 1. Diagnostic workflow
RDO : recurrent dropout
UDO : unique dropout
Reporting
Molecular Methods
DNA extraction was performed using standard methods. Five micrograms of
each genomic DNA sample were fragmented to 4-6 kb using a Covaris
instrument. Enrichment for the 31 connective tissue genes was performed
using an RDT1000 instrument (RainDance TechnologiesTM). Standard
fragment libraries were prepared for each sample, library amplification was
performed using emulsion PCR, and these PCR products were purified
(AMPure) and then deposited onto glass slides for analysis by the SOLiDTM
5500xl system (Applied Biosystems). After bioinformatic processing, these
data were analyzed to identify novel alterations as well as those previously
reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD). Identified
alterations for a given patient were cross-referenced to those found for
other samples within the same run, as well as to a cumulative database of
sample results from all previous runs. After filtering out known SNPs, we
could determine which changes were most likely novel, thus warranting
further consideration. All potentially clinically relevant changes were
confirmed by Sanger sequencing using custom primers. In addition to NGS,
a dropout Sanger sequencing panel was performed for each sample to
analyze those regions that are missed routinely (recurrent dropout, RDO) or
have poor coverage (unique dropout, UDO) using NGS.
Marfan syndrome
Marshall syndrome
MASS syndrome
Moyamoya disease
Osteogenesis Imperfecta
Polycystic kidney disease (AD)
Pseudoxanthoma elasticum
Shprintzen-Goldberg syndrome
Stickler syndrome
Stiff skin syndrome
Spondylocheirodysplasia
Spondyloperipheral dysplasia
Supravalvular aortic stenosis
Thoracic aortic aneurysms & dissections
Wrinkly skin syndrome
and more…
Table 2. List of connective tissue disorders associated with the 31 interrogated genes
• Patient 4 has the following signs: impressive joint hypermobility, irregular
menses, bilateral carpal tunnel syndrome, mild scoliosis, and postural
orthostatic tachycardia syndrome.
• Results: heterozygous c.2539C>T (p.R847X) in TNXB gene (nonsense,
predicted pathogenic)
• The TNXB gene encodes a member of the tenascin family of extracellular
matrix glycoproteins. The tenascins have anti-adhesive effects, as opposed
to fibronectin which is adhesive. This protein is thought to function in
matrix maturation during wound healing, and its deficiency has been
associated with Ehlers-Danlos syndrome.
• Diagnosis: Ehlers-Danlos syndrome hypermobility type (autosomal
dominant)
Patient 5
Preliminary Results
Molecular testing was performed using our diagnostic NGS panel on an
initial cohort of 22 patients with suspected connective tissue disorders.
Since the submission of this abstract, an additional 24 patients had been
tested. Of all 46 patients tested to date, we identified novel likelypathogenic changes in five (11%) of these patients (see below, Figures 2-4).
Of the remaining patients, only 6 (13%) were found to have normal results
with no potentially pathogenic molecular alterations detected, and 35
(76%) had at least one variant of uncertain clinical significance (VUS).
Patient 1
• Patient 1 has features of osteogenesis imperfecta: easy fractures.
• Results: heterozygous c.2550delT in COL1A1 gene (frameshift, predicted
pathogenic) + 4 VUS
• The COL1A1 gene encodes the pro-alpha1 chains of type I collagen. Type I
is a fibril-forming collagen found in most connective tissues and is abundant
in bone, cornea, dermis, and tendon. Mutations in this gene are associated
with osteogenesis imperfecta types I-IV, Ehlers-Danlos syndrome type VIIA
and classical type, Caffey Disease, and idiopathic osteoporosis.
• Diagnosis: osteogenesis imperfecta (autosomal dominant)
Patient 2
Associated Disorders
Achondrogenesis
Aortic valve disease
Arterial tortuosity syndrome
Arthrogryposis
Beals contractural arachnodactyly
Brittle cornea syndrome
Caffey disease
Cutis laxa
Czech dysplasia
Ehlers-Danlos syndrome
Epiphyseal dysplasia
Fibrochondrogenesis
Fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva
Homocystinuria
Hypochondrogenesis
Legg-Calve-Perthes disease
Loeys-Dietz syndrome
Patient 4
Figure 2. Clinical signs observed for patient 2.
• Patient 2 has features of Ehlers-Danlos syndrome classical or type II: easy
bruising/abnormal wound healing, joint hypermobility, soft skin (Figure 2);
her father has similar signs: hyperextensible elbows, skin elasticity,
problems with wound healing and scarring.
• Results: heterozygous c.4714delG in COL5A1 gene (frameshift, predicted
pathogenic) + 1 VUS
• The COL5A1 gene encodes alpha chain of a low abundance fibrillar
collagen. Type V collagen is found in tissues containing type I collagen and
appears to regulate the assembly of heterotypic fibers composed of both
type I and type V collagen. Mutations in this gene are associated with
Ehlers-Danlos syndrome types I and II.
• Diagnosis: Ehlers-Danlos syndrome type I or II (autosomal dominant)
Figure 4. Clinical signs
observed for patient 5.
• Patient 5 has features of Ehlers-Danlos syndrome type I or other CT
disorder: joint hypermobility, patellar dislocations, flat feet, no skin or
cardiac findings, upslanting palpebral fissures, hypertelorism, low-set
posteriorly rotated ears, mild brachyclinodactyly of 5th fingers, and squaring
of the thumbs (Figure 4).
• Results: heterozygous c.3527-1G>T in COL1A2 gene (splice site,
predicted pathogenic) + 3 VUS
• The COL1A2 gene encodes the pro-alpha2 chain of type I collagen. Type I
is a fibril-forming collagen found in most connective tissues and is
abundant in bone, cornea, dermis and tendon. Mutations in this gene are
associated with osteogenesis imperfecta types I-IV, Ehlers-Danlos syndrome
type VIIB, recessive Ehlers-Danlos syndrome classical type, idiopathic
osteoporosis, and atypical Marfan syndrome.
• Diagnosis: Ehlers-Danlos syndrome type VIIB (autosomal dominant)
Summary
• For cases of phenotypic variability and variable expressivity, we have
developed and validated a targeted sequencing panel for routine clinical
diagnostic testing.
• With our Connective Tissue NGS panel, we analyze coding and flanking
intronic regions of 31 genes associated with various connective tissue
disorders simultaneously.
• We can detect single nucleotide changes and small duplications and
deletions in genes that are associated with at least 80 distinct connective
tissue disorder phenotypes.
• Preliminary findings suggest that our targeted NGS panel may have a
potentially high diagnostic value for patients with suspected connective
tissue disorders.
• Our mutation detection rate is approximately 11%, and is expected to
increase as more family members are tested to clarify the clinical
significance of detected unclassified variants.
• The simultaneous analysis of a panel of 31 connective tissue disorder
genes enables a more efficient diagnostic strategy compared to a singlegene approach using traditional Sanger sequencing.
Acknowledgments
We thank the clinicians and genetic counselors who have referred patients
for clinical diagnostic testing. We also recognize the contributions of our
laboratory staff for their efforts to provide comprehensive clinical testing.