* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download hardy weinberg examples for review
Genetics and archaeogenetics of South Asia wikipedia , lookup
Quantitative trait locus wikipedia , lookup
Gene nomenclature wikipedia , lookup
Pharmacogenomics wikipedia , lookup
Human genetic variation wikipedia , lookup
Artificial gene synthesis wikipedia , lookup
Gene expression programming wikipedia , lookup
Genomic imprinting wikipedia , lookup
X-inactivation wikipedia , lookup
Polymorphism (biology) wikipedia , lookup
Designer baby wikipedia , lookup
Genome-wide association study wikipedia , lookup
Population genetics wikipedia , lookup
Microevolution wikipedia , lookup
Genetic drift wikipedia , lookup
ALBINISM: A SAMPLE HARDY-WEINBERG PROBLEM Albinism is a rare genetically inherited trait that is only expressed in the phenotype of homozygous recessive individuals (aa). The most characteristic symptom is a marked deficiency in the skin and hair pigment melanin. This condition can occur among any human group as well as among other animal species. The average human frequency of albinism in North America is only about 1 in 20,000. Referring back to the Hardy-Weinberg equation (p² + 2pq + q² = 1), the frequency of homozygous recessive individuals (aa) in a population is q². Therefore, in North America the following must be true for albinism: q² = 1/20,000 = .00005 By taking the square root of both sides of this equation, we get: this example are rounded off for simplification.) (Note: the numbers in q = .007 In other words, the frequency of the recessive albinism allele (a) is .00707 or about 1 in 140. Knowing one of the two variables (q) in the Hardy-Weinberg equation, it is easy to solve for the other (p). p=1-q p = 1 - .007 p = .993 The frequency of the dominant, normal allele (A) is, therefore, .99293 or about 99 in 100. The next step is to plug the frequencies of p and q into the Hardy-Weinberg equation: p² + 2pq + q² = 1 (.993)² + 2 (.993)(.007) + (.007)² = 1 .986 + .014 + .00005 = 1 This gives us the frequencies for each of the three genotypes for this trait in the population: p² = predicted frequency = .986 = 98.6% of homozygous dominant individuals 2pq = predicted frequency = .014 = 1.4% of heterozygous individuals q² = predicted frequency = .00005 = .005% of homozygous recessive individuals (the albinos) With a frequency of .005% (about 1 in 20,000), albinos are extremely rare. However, heterozygous carriers for this trait, with a predicted frequency of 1.4% (about 1 in 72), are far more common than most people imagine. There are roughly 278 times more carriers than albinos. Clearly, though, the vast majority of humans (98.6%) probably are homozygous dominant and do not have the albinism allele. To illustrate how the Hardy-Weinberg principle works, let us consider the MN blood group. Humans inherit either the M or the N antigen which is determined by two different alleles at the same gene locus. If we let the frequency of allele M=p and the frequency of the other allele N=q, then the next generation's genotypes will occur as follows: Frequency of MM genotype = p2 Frequency of MN genotype = 2pq Frequency of NN genotype = q2 We can take a sample of the population and count the number of people with each genotype. For example, a sample of 5000 from Forensic Town, USA, has: 1460 individuals of type MM, that is 1460/5000 or 29.2% 2550 of type MN, that is 2550/5000 or 51% 990 of type NN, that is 990/5000 or 19.8% If we apply the Hardy-Weinberg equation (p2 + 2pq + q2 = 1) we can calculate the allele frequencies as: Frequency of M = p2 + 0.5 (2pq) = 0.292 + (0.5 x 0.51) = 0.547 Frequency of N = q = 1 - p = 1 - 0.547 = 0.453 We can now calculate our expected genotype frequencies: MM = p2 = 0.5472 = 0.299, or 1496 individuals in the sample MN = 2pq = 2 x 0.547 x 0.453 = 0.496, or 2478 individuals NN = q2 = 0.4532 = 0.205, or 1026 individuals The Hardy-Weinberg Equilibrium If we mate two individuals that are heterozygous (e.g., Bb) for a trait, we find that 25% of their offspring are homozygous for the dominant allele (BB) 50% are heterozygous like their parents (Bb) and 25% are homozygous for the recessive allele (bb) and thus, unlike their parents, express the recessive phenotype. This is what Mendel found when he crossed monohybrids [Link]. It occurs because Meiosis separates the two alleles of each heterozygous parent so that 50% of the gametes will carry one allele and 50% the other. When the gametes are brought together at random, each B (or b)-carrying egg will have a 1 in 2 probability of being fertilized by a sperm carrying B (or b). (Left table) Results of random union of the two gametes produced by two individuals, each heterozygous for a given trait. As a result of meiosis, half the gametes produced by each parent with carry allele B; the other half allele b. 0.5 B 0.5 b 0.5 B 0.25 BB 0.25 Bb 0.5 b 0.25 Bb 0.25 bb Results of random union of the gametes produced by an entire population with a gene pool containing 80% B and 20% b. 0.8 B 0.2 b 0.8 B 0.64 BB 0.16 Bb 0.2 b 0.16 Bb 0.04 bb But the frequency of two alleles in an entire population of organisms is unlikely to be exactly the same. Let us take as a hypothetical case, a population of hamsters in which 80% of all the gametes in the population carry a dominant allele for black coat (B) and 20% carry the recessive allele for gray coat (b). Random union of these gametes (right table) will produce a generation: 64% homozygous for BB (0.8 x 0.8 = 0.64) 32% Bb heterozygotes (0.8 x 0.2 x 2 = 0.32) 4% homozygous (bb) for gray coat (0.2 x 0.2 = 0.04) So 96% of this generation will have black coats; only 4% gray coats. Will gray coated hamsters eventually disappear? No. Let's see why not. All the gametes formed by BB hamsters will contain allele B as will one-half the gametes formed by heterozygous (Bb) hamsters. So, 80% (0.64 + .5*0.32) of the pool of gametes formed by this generation with contain B. All the gametes of the gray (bb) hamsters (4%) will contain b but one-half of the gametes of the heterozygous hamsters will as well. So 20% (0.04 + .5*0.32) of the gametes will contain b. So we have duplicated the initial situation exactly. The proportion of allele b in the population has remained the same. The heterozygous hamsters ensure that each generation will contain 4% gray hamsters. Now let us look at an algebraic analysis of the same problem using the expansion of the binomial (p+q)2. (p+q)2 = p2 + 2pq + q2 The total number of genes in a population is its gene pool. Let p represent the frequency of one gene in the pool and q the frequency of its single allele. So, p + q = 1 o p2 = the fraction of the population homozygous for p o q2 = the fraction homozygous for q o 2pq = the fraction of heterozygotes In our example, p = 0.8, q = 0.2, and thus (0.8 + 0.2)2 = (0.8)2 + 2(0.8)(0.2) + (0.2)2 = 064 + 0.32 + 0.04 The algebraic method enables us to work backward as well as forward. In fact, because we chose to make B fully dominant, the only way that the frequency of B and b in the gene pool could be known is by determining the frequency of the recessive phenotype (gray) and computing from it the value of q. q2 = 0.04, so q = 0.2, the frequency of the b allele in the gene pool. Since p + q = 1, p = 0.8 and allele B makes up 80% of the gene pool. Because B is completely dominant over b, we cannot distinguish the Bb hamsters from the BB ones by their phenotype. But substituting in the middle term (2pq) of the expansion gives the percentage of heterozygous hamsters. 2pq = (2)(0.8)(0.2) = 0.32 So, recessive genes do not tend to be lost from a population no matter how small their representation. So long as certain conditions are met, gene frequencies and genotype ratios in a randomly-breeding population remain constant from generation to generation. This is known as the Hardy-Weinberg law in honor of the two men who first realized the significance of the binomial expansion to population genetics and hence to evolution. Evolution involves changes in the gene pool. A population in Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium shows no change. What the law tells us is that populations are able to maintain a reservoir of variability so that if future conditions require it, the gene pool can change. If recessive alleles were continually tending to disappear, the population would soon become homozygous. Under Hardy-Weinberg conditions, genes that have no present selective value will nonetheless be retained.