Download Supplementary data

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Endomembrane system wikipedia , lookup

Protein phosphorylation wikipedia , lookup

Hedgehog signaling pathway wikipedia , lookup

SR protein wikipedia , lookup

Proteasome wikipedia , lookup

Protein wikipedia , lookup

Protein moonlighting wikipedia , lookup

Cellular differentiation wikipedia , lookup

Apoptosome wikipedia , lookup

Intrinsically disordered proteins wikipedia , lookup

Signal transduction wikipedia , lookup

Histone acetylation and deacetylation wikipedia , lookup

List of types of proteins wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
Supplementary data
PcG/ TrxG system
The PcG was originally defined as a set of genes whose individual mutation results in homeotic gene
overexpressed phenotypes similar to those Pc mutations, or which can enhance the phenotypes of Pc
mutant alleles. In contrast, TrxG genes are defined by their ability to counteract the activity of PcG genes in
homeotic gene regulation. There are at least 30 identified members of the PcG and TrxG family. Most of
these have mammalian homologs (Brock and van Lohuizen 2001, Dillon et al 2005, Francis and Kingston
2001, Kennison 1995, Ringrose and Paro 2004) (supplementary Table 1). PcG and TrxG genes encode
proteins that work in complex to modify chromatin. Two distinct PcG protein complexes have been
characterized to date: Polycomb repressive complex 1 (PRC1), and the E(z)-Esc complex (or PRC2). The
PRC1 complex contains Polycomb (Pc), Polyhomeotic (Ph), Posterior sex comb (Psc), zeste (z), dSbf1 and
Sex comb extra (Sce) (Brown et al 2005, Shao et al 1999) and five general transcription factors (Saurin et
al 2001). The E(z)-Esc complex contains Esc, E(z), Su(z)12, and histone binding NURF-55. The histone
deacetylase HDAC1 (Rpd3) may be present in some forms of the PRC2 complex (Czermin et al 2002,
Huang and Chang 2004). Biochemically purified PRC1 and PRC2 do not contain Pho or Phol (Muller et al
2002, Ng et al 2000, Saurin et al 2001). A new finding demonstrated that Pho exists in two distinct protein
assemblies: a Pho-dINO80 complex containing Drosophila INO80 nucleosome-remodeling complex, and a
Pho-repressive complex (PhoRC) containing the uncharacterized gene product dSfmbt (Klymenko et al
2006).
Similar PcG complexes are present in mammals. The first human PcG complex, termed the HPC-HPH PcG
complex, contains HPC, HPH, BMI1 and RING1. The second human PcG complex, termed the EED-EZH2
PcG complex, contains EED, EZH2, YY1, SUZ12, and RbAp46/48(Ng et al 2000, Satijn et al 1997, Satijn
et al 2001, Sewalt et al 1998, van Lohuizen et al 1991, van Lohuizen et al 1998). As EED has four isomers,
EED-EZH2 complex is further divided into PRC2 complex and PRC3 complex. The PRC2 complex
contains the longest EED form (form1) whereas PRC3 complex contains the two smallest EED forms
(form3 and form4). These EED isoforms selectively associate with distinct EED-EZH2 complexes with
resultant differential targeting of their associated histone lysine methyltransferase (HMTase)
activity
toward histone H3K27 or histone H1K26(Kuzmichev et al 2002, Kuzmichev et al 2004).
1
To date, 4 TrxG protein complexes have been identified from Drosophila, all with different
chromatin-modifying properties (Cernilogar and Orlando 2005). The first complex contains BRM, MOR,
and OSA TrxG proteins, and at least 4 accessory proteins (Collins and Treisman 2000). The BRM proteins
functions as the ATPase subunit of this complex which is strongly related to the yeast SWI/SNF
nucleosome remodeling complex. The TrxG proteins Ash1 and TRX exist in the other two distinct
multiprotein complexes. Both are SET-domain proteins and function as histone methyltarnsferase. Ash1
selectively methylates H3K4, H3K9 and H4K20 (Beisel et al 2002, Byrd and Shearn 2003), whereas TRX
(trithorax) complex selectively methylates H3K4. The fourth TrxG complex, TAC1, contains the TrxG
protein TRX, the histone acetyltransferase CBP (CREB-binding protein), and the anti-phosphatase Sbf1
(Petruk et al 2001). A mammalian trithorax family histone methyltransferase complex has been extensively
investigated recently. This SET1-complex contains MLL1, MLL2, ASH2L, WDR5 and Rbp5. They have
been shown to be required for binding of the methyltransferase complex to the K4-dimethylated
H3(H3K4M2) tail as well as for global H3K4 trimethylation (H3K4M3) and Hox gene activation in human
cells (Hughes et al 2004, Wysocka et al 2005).
PcG and TrxG maintenance elements
Drosophila transgenic assays show that PcG and TrxG complexes are recruited to specific DNA elements
named as PcG and TrxG response elements (PREs and TREs, respectively). Both PREs and TREs are
complex elements, made up of binding sites for many proteins. The DNA binding proteins and the
consensus binding sites include Pho/phol (GCCAT), GAF/psg (GAGAG), zeste (BGAGTGV, YGAGYG),
Dsp1 (GAAAA) and Sp1/Klf (RRGGYG (Busturia et al 2001, Hodgson et al 2001, Mihaly et al 1998,
Mishra et al 2001, Schweinsberg et al 2004). Several of these proteins have been reported to have dual
roles in the recruitment of PcG and TrxG components. For example, Zeste binding sites appear to be
necessary for TrxG recruitment on PRE/TRE sequence (Dejardin and Cavalli 2004). At the same time,
Zeste binding sites are critical for PcG-dependent silencing at Ubx (Hur et al 2002). Similarly, GAF is a
member of the TrxG genes but may also play a role in PcG repression (Busturia et al 2001, Horard et al
2000, Mahmoudi et al 2003). Structural analysis of PREs and TREs shows that the elements required for
TrxG-dependent activation and PcG-dependent repression are separable but within 30-40 bp of each other.
Chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) experiments demonstrated that the TrxG and PcG proteins bind to
2
largely overlapping regions(Orlando et al 1998). Therefore, these DNA sequences required for maintenance
of gene regulation are generally called ‘maintenance elements’ or ‘cellular memory module’ (CMM) in
recognition of their dual function (Dejardin and Cavalli 2004).
The intermingling of PREs and TREs required for activation and repression raises the possibility that PRE
and TRE sequences may act in a concerted manner. Both of them might simultaneously be needed for
changing and maintaining opposite transcriptional states. In TrxG (ash1 and trx) mutants, expression of
Hox genes is lost within their normal expression domains, but the expression is restored in the TrxG and
PcG (E(z) double mutants (Klymenko and Muller 2004). Noticeably, a combination of zeste, Dsp1,
GAF/psg and pho /phol binding sites in the same number, orientation and spacing as in the native PRE is
insufficient to restore full PRE activity (Dejardin and Cavalli 2005). Thus, the PcG and TrxG proteins
recognizing the targeting chromatin is not only sequence-specific but also structure-dependent, where
additional interactions may be required to usher PcG and TrxG complexes to their DNA target. Current
work has suggested possible additional roles for other proteins as cofactors, such as the corepressor CtBP,
the DNA binding factor Grainhead (GRH) and members of the Sp1/KLF family (Blastyak et al 2006,
Brown et al 2005, Srinivasan and Atchison 2004, Srinivasan et al 2005). Most recently it has been found
that the Jumonji- and ARID-domain-containing protein, JARID2, is sufficient to recruit PcG proteins to a
heterologous promoter and form stable complex with PRC2(Pasini et al 2010). We have found the
coexistence of active and repressive histone modifications along the Hoxa9 regulatory region (Yan et al
2006). Ablation of menin abolishes both active and repressive histone modifications, including H3K4M3,
H3K4M2, H3K4M1, H3K9M2 and H3K27M2). These data suggest that co-localization of PcG-repressors
and TrxG-activators is able to guarantee regulated levels of transcription of active genes..
References
Beisel C, Imhof A, Greene J, Kremmer E, Sauer F (2002). Histone methylation by the Drosophila
epigenetic transcriptional regulator Ash1. Nature 419: 857-862.
Blastyak A, Mishra RK, Karch F, Gyurkovics H (2006). Efficient and specific targeting of Polycomb group
proteins requires cooperative interaction between Grainyhead and Pleiohomeotic. Mol Cell Biol 26:
1434-1444.
Brock HW, van Lohuizen M (2001). The Polycomb group--no longer an exclusive club? Curr Opin Genet
Dev 11: 175-181.
3
Brown JL, Grau DJ, DeVido SK, Kassis JA (2005). An Sp1/KLF binding site is important for the activity
of a Polycomb group response element from the Drosophila engrailed gene. Nucleic Acids Res 33:
5181-5189.
Busturia A, Lloyd A, Bejarano F, Zavortink M, Xin H, Sakonju S (2001). The MCP silencer of the
Drosophila Abd-B gene requires both Pleiohomeotic and GAGA factor for the maintenance of repression.
Development 128: 2163-2173.
Byrd KN, Shearn A (2003). ASH1, a Drosophila trithorax group protein, is required for methylation of
lysine 4 residues on histone H3. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 100: 11535-11540.
Cernilogar FM, Orlando V (2005). Epigenome programming by Polycomb and Trithorax proteins. Biochem
Cell Biol 83: 322-331.
Collins RT, Treisman JE (2000). Osa-containing Brahma chromatin remodeling complexes are required for
the repression of wingless target genes. Genes Dev 14: 3140-3152.
Czermin B, Melfi R, McCabe D, Seitz V, Imhof A, Pirrotta V (2002). Drosophila enhancer of Zeste/ESC
complexes have a histone H3 methyltransferase activity that marks chromosomal Polycomb sites. Cell 111:
185-196.
Dejardin J, Cavalli G (2004). Chromatin inheritance upon Zeste-mediated Brahma recruitment at a minimal
cellular memory module. Embo J 23: 857-868.
Dejardin J, Cavalli G (2005). Epigenetic inheritance of chromatin states mediated by Polycomb and
trithorax group proteins in Drosophila. Prog Mol Subcell Biol 38: 31-63.
Dillon SC, Zhang X, Trievel RC, Cheng X (2005). The SET-domain protein superfamily: protein lysine
methyltransferases. Genome Biol 6: 227.
Francis NJ, Kingston RE (2001). Mechanisms of transcriptional memory. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2:
409-421.
Hodgson JW, Argiropoulos B, Brock HW (2001). Site-specific recognition of a 70-base-pair element
containing d(GA)(n) repeats mediates bithoraxoid polycomb group response element-dependent silencing.
Mol Cell Biol 21: 4528-4543.
Horard B, Tatout C, Poux S, Pirrotta V (2000). Structure of a polycomb response element and in vitro
binding of polycomb group complexes containing GAGA factor. Mol Cell Biol 20: 3187-3197.
Huang DH, Chang YL (2004). Isolation and characterization of CHRASCH, a polycomb-containing
silencing complex. Methods Enzymol 377: 267-282.
Hughes CM, Rozenblatt-Rosen O, Milne TA, Copeland TD, Levine SS, Lee JC et al (2004). Menin
associates with a trithorax family histone methyltransferase complex and with the hoxc8 locus. Mol Cell 13:
587-597.
Hur MW, Laney JD, Jeon SH, Ali J, Biggin MD (2002). Zeste maintains repression of Ubx transgenes:
support for a new model of Polycomb repression. Development 129: 1339-1343.
Kennison JA (1995). The Polycomb and trithorax group proteins of Drosophila: trans-regulators of
homeotic gene function. Annu Rev Genet 29: 289-303.
Klymenko T, Muller J (2004). The histone methyltransferases Trithorax and Ash1 prevent transcriptional
silencing by Polycomb group proteins. EMBO Rep 5: 373-377.
4
Klymenko T, Papp B, Fischle W, Kocher T, Schelder M, Fritsch C et al (2006). A Polycomb group protein
complex with sequence-specific DNA-binding and selective methyl-lysine-binding activities. Genes Dev 20:
1110-1122.
Kuzmichev A, Zhang Y, Erdjument-Bromage H, Tempst P, Reinberg D (2002). Role of the Sin3-histone
deacetylase complex in growth regulation by the candidate tumor suppressor p33(ING1). Mol Cell Biol 22:
835-848.
Kuzmichev A, Jenuwein T, Tempst P, Reinberg D (2004). Different EZH2-containing complexes target
methylation of histone H1 or nucleosomal histone H3. Mol Cell 14: 183-193.
Mahmoudi T, Zuijderduijn LM, Mohd-Sarip A, Verrijzer CP (2003). GAGA facilitates binding of
Pleiohomeotic to a chromatinized Polycomb response element. Nucleic Acids Res 31: 4147-4156.
Mihaly J, Hogga I, Barges S, Galloni M, Mishra RK, Hagstrom K et al (1998). Chromatin domain
boundaries in the Bithorax complex. Cell Mol Life Sci 54: 60-70.
Mishra RK, Mihaly J, Barges S, Spierer A, Karch F, Hagstrom K et al (2001). The iab-7 polycomb
response element maps to a nucleosome-free region of chromatin and requires both GAGA and
pleiohomeotic for silencing activity. Mol Cell Biol 21: 1311-1318.
Muller J, Hart CM, Francis NJ, Vargas ML, Sengupta A, Wild B et al (2002). Histone methyltransferase
activity of a Drosophila Polycomb group repressor complex. Cell 111: 197-208.
Ng J, Hart CM, Morgan K, Simon JA (2000). A Drosophila ESC-E(Z) protein complex is distinct from
other polycomb group complexes and contains covalently modified ESC. Mol Cell Biol 20: 3069-3078.
Orlando V, Jane EP, Chinwalla V, Harte PJ, Paro R (1998). Binding of trithorax and Polycomb proteins to
the bithorax complex: dynamic changes during early Drosophila embryogenesis. Embo J 17: 5141-5150.
Pasini D, Cloos PA, Walfridsson J, Olsson L, Bukowski JP, Johansen JV et al (2010). JARID2 regulates
binding of the Polycomb repressive complex 2 to target genes in ES cells. Nature.
Petruk S, Sedkov Y, Smith S, Tillib S, Kraevski V, Nakamura T et al (2001). Trithorax and dCBP acting in
a complex to maintain expression of a homeotic gene. Science 294: 1331-1334.
Ringrose L, Paro R (2004). Epigenetic regulation of cellular memory by the Polycomb and Trithorax group
proteins. Annu Rev Genet 38: 413-443.
Satijn DP, Olson DJ, van der Vlag J, Hamer KM, Lambrechts C, Masselink H et al (1997). Interference
with the expression of a novel human polycomb protein, hPc2, results in cellular transformation and
apoptosis. Mol Cell Biol 17: 6076-6086.
Satijn DP, Hamer KM, den Blaauwen J, Otte AP (2001). The polycomb group protein EED interacts with
YY1, and both proteins induce neural tissue in Xenopus embryos. Mol Cell Biol 21: 1360-1369.
Saurin AJ, Shao Z, Erdjument-Bromage H, Tempst P, Kingston RE (2001). A Drosophila Polycomb group
complex includes Zeste and dTAFII proteins. Nature 412: 655-660.
Schweinsberg S, Hagstrom K, Gohl D, Schedl P, Kumar RP, Mishra R et al (2004). The enhancer-blocking
activity of the Fab-7 boundary from the Drosophila bithorax complex requires GAGA-factor-binding sites.
Genetics 168: 1371-1384.
Sewalt RG, van der Vlag J, Gunster MJ, Hamer KM, den Blaauwen JL, Satijn DP et al (1998).
Characterization of interactions between the mammalian polycomb-group proteins Enx1/EZH2 and EED
5
suggests the existence of different mammalian polycomb-group protein complexes. Mol Cell Biol 18:
3586-3595.
Shao Z, Raible F, Mollaaghababa R, Guyon JR, Wu CT, Bender W et al (1999). Stabilization of chromatin
structure by PRC1, a Polycomb complex. Cell 98: 37-46.
Srinivasan L, Atchison ML (2004). YY1 DNA binding and PcG recruitment requires CtBP. Genes Dev 18:
2596-2601.
Srinivasan S, Armstrong JA, Deuring R, Dahlsveen IK, McNeill H, Tamkun JW (2005). The Drosophila
trithorax group protein Kismet facilitates an early step in transcriptional elongation by RNA Polymerase II.
Development 132: 1623-1635.
van Lohuizen M, Verbeek S, Scheijen B, Wientjens E, van der Gulden H, Berns A (1991). Identification of
cooperating oncogenes in E mu-myc transgenic mice by provirus tagging. Cell 65: 737-752.
van Lohuizen M, Tijms M, Voncken JW, Schumacher A, Magnuson T, Wientjens E (1998). Interaction of
mouse polycomb-group (Pc-G) proteins Enx1 and Enx2 with Eed: indication for separate Pc-G complexes.
Mol Cell Biol 18: 3572-3579.
Wysocka J, Swigut T, Milne TA, Dou Y, Zhang X, Burlingame AL et al (2005). WDR5 associates with
histone H3 methylated at K4 and is essential for H3 K4 methylation and vertebrate development. Cell 121:
859-872.
Yan J, Chen YX, Desmond A, Silva A, Yang Y, Wang H et al (2006). Cdx4 and menin co-regulate hoxa9
expression in hematopoietic cells. PLoS ONE 1: e47.
Supplementary Table 1. PCG and TrxG proteins and their homologues
Drosophila proteins
Gene symbol
Human
homologues
Mouse
homologues
Protein domains
PcG
Extra sex combs
Multi sex combs
Pleiohomeotic
Pho-like
Polycomb
esc
mxc
pho
phol
Pc
eed
YY1
YY1
M33, mPc2
WD40 repeats
Polycomb-like
Polyhomeotic
Sex comb extra
Additional sex combs
Enhancer of zeste
Enhacer of Polycomb
Posterior sex combs
Pcl
ph
Sce
Asx
E(z)
E(Pc)
Psc
EED
YY1
YY1
M33 (HPC1), HPC2,
HPC3
PHF1
HPH1, HPH2
RING
ASXL1, ASXL2
EZH1, EZH2
EPC1, EPC2
BMI1, MEL18
Mph1, rae28, Mph2
Asxl1, Asxl2
Enx2, Enx2
Epc1, Epc2
Bmi1, mel18
PHD fingers
SAM
RING
Sex combs on midleg
Scm
Suppressor of zeste 2
Supressor of zest 12
Corto
Lola like (batman)
Pipsqueak
Super sex comb
Su(z)2
Su(z) 12
corto
lolal
psq
sxc
SCML1, SCML2,
SCMH1
BMI1, MEL18
SUZ12
Scml1, Scml2,
Scmh1
Bmi1, mel18
Chromodomain
SET
RING (zinc
finger)+helix-turn-helix
SAM
RING finger
Chromodomain
BTB/POZ domain
GA(n), DNA binding
6
TrxG
Trithorax
Trithorax-like
trx
trxl
MLL/ALL1
MLL1
Absent, small, or
homeotic discs2
Absent, small, or
homeotic disc1
Brahma
Ash-2
hASH2
ASH2L
SET
Single zinc-finger
DNA-binding motif
PHD, SPRY domain
Ash-1
hASH1
ASH1L
SET, PHD
brm
HBRM, BRG1
Osa
Moria
osa
mor
ELD/OSA1
BAF170/BAF155
Zeste
GAF(GAGA factor)
Kismet
Tonalli
Devenir (breathless)
Kohtalo
Skuld
Little imaginal discs
z
Trl
kis
tna
Dev (btl)
kto
skd
lid
Urdur
Leg arista wing
complex
urd
lawc
SNF2/SWI2 ATPase
domain; bromodomain
ARID
SANT domain, leucine
zipper
GA(n), DNA binding
SNF2/SWI2 ATPase
SP-RING zinc finger
Fgfr, tyrosine kinase
ARID; RING/PHD;
Leucin zipper; PHD(2)
7