* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download genetic sleuths unmask secrets of big tomatoes
Biology and consumer behaviour wikipedia , lookup
Behavioral epigenetics wikipedia , lookup
Vectors in gene therapy wikipedia , lookup
Gene expression profiling wikipedia , lookup
Behavioural genetics wikipedia , lookup
Genetically modified crops wikipedia , lookup
Gene therapy wikipedia , lookup
Nutriepigenomics wikipedia , lookup
Point mutation wikipedia , lookup
Gene expression programming wikipedia , lookup
Genome evolution wikipedia , lookup
Medical genetics wikipedia , lookup
Site-specific recombinase technology wikipedia , lookup
Artificial gene synthesis wikipedia , lookup
Human genetic variation wikipedia , lookup
Public health genomics wikipedia , lookup
Population genetics wikipedia , lookup
Designer baby wikipedia , lookup
Genetic engineering wikipedia , lookup
Genome (book) wikipedia , lookup
Genetic Sleuths Unmask Secrets of Big Tomatoes By Julie Steenhuysen, Reuters May 11, 2008 CHICAGO (Reuters) - The secret behind growing large tomatoes lies not in the fertilizer or the perfect soil conditions, but in just a few genetic changes that over time have resulted in tomatoes 1,000 times bigger than their wild ancestors, U.S. researchers said on Sunday. Without these changes, tomatoes would be little more than berries on a bush. "The cherry tomato would be considered very large compared to what is found in the wild," said plant geneticist Steven Tanksley of Cornell University in Ithaca, New York. Tanksley has been working to understand the genetic changes that allowed humans to transform wild tomatoes -- which are naturally about the size of a blueberry -- into modern varieties such as the beefsteak tomato, which can weigh a pound (half a kg) or more. "Humans began domesticating plants in the last roughly 10,000 years. They had no knowledge of genetics and no knowledge of breeding, but somehow they rendered these changes genetically on plants," Tanksley said in a telephone interview. "The question we're asking is how and what did they do?" Tanksley focused on the genetic changes that give rise to a large number of compartments or locules inside the tomato, a plant that originated in the Americas. "If you take a beefsteak tomato from the supermarket and cut it open inside you'll see these compartments in there that have wells between them. They may have anywhere from 10 to 20 of these compartments," said Tanksley, whose research appears in the journal Nature Genetics. A true wild tomato may have only two to four of these. "Somehow, something made the plant start making these compartments, and by making more compartments, you can get larger fruit." GENE TROLL To understand this process, Tanksley first mapped the tomato's roughly 30,000 genes, looking for differences between the wild and modern tomato. That turned up about 10 genes, which they winnowed down by checking different gene databases to see if these gene changes were common to other plants. They were left with a handful of genes. After comparing the sequences of these, they found one called "fas" with a large mutation. "It was a smoking gun," Tanksley said. None of the wild tomatoes they studied had this mutation. When they took the "wild" version of this gene from a wild plant and put it into a modern plant, it started to make tiny tomatoes. Tanksley said this mutation weakens a signal that tells the plant to stop making compartments. In prior research, Tanksley's team found changes in a similar gene that told cells to stop dividing. "It would tell the developing, very small fruit to stop here. That's enough cells." Tanksley said. Tomatoes with just this change could reach the size of a cherry tomato, he said. Tanksley thinks it takes both genetic changes -- one controlling structure and another controlling cell division -- to explain the vast differences in the size of wild and modern tomatoes. "What's marvelous is that humans did this with no knowledge of genetics ... yet the impact was so enormous," he said. "This knowledge may help us in the future to have a renaissance of plant domestication, because we are basically living off what humans did in pre-history." (Editing by Maggie Fox and Eric Walsh) 2