Download The Proteasomes

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Protein domain wikipedia , lookup

Circular dichroism wikipedia , lookup

Bimolecular fluorescence complementation wikipedia , lookup

Protein folding wikipedia , lookup

Ubiquitin wikipedia , lookup

Hsp90 wikipedia , lookup

Protein purification wikipedia , lookup

Alpha helix wikipedia , lookup

Protein moonlighting wikipedia , lookup

Nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy of proteins wikipedia , lookup

Proteomics wikipedia , lookup

Protein structure prediction wikipedia , lookup

Polycomb Group Proteins and Cancer wikipedia , lookup

Western blot wikipedia , lookup

Protein wikipedia , lookup

Intrinsically disordered proteins wikipedia , lookup

Protein–protein interaction wikipedia , lookup

Cyclol wikipedia , lookup

Protein mass spectrometry wikipedia , lookup

List of types of proteins wikipedia , lookup

Proteasome wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
The Proteasomes
General information
Proteasomes are protein degradative machines that are found in the nucleus and the
cytoplasm. They are not only found in all eukaryotic organisms, but have also been found in
archaebacteria. Proteasomes play many roles in the cell's life:
1. They remove abnormal and misfolded proteins from the cell.
2. They are involved in the cell's stress response, where they degrade Ub-conjugated
regulatory proteins.
3. As part of the Ub system, they are involved in regulating the cell cycle.
4. They are involved in cellular differentiation (where they degrade transcription factors and
metabolic enzymes).
5. They play an important role in the immune system by generating antigenic peptides that are
presented by the major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I molecules (such molecules
are studied in Immunology).
In short, proteasome activity is involved in most of the processes that also involve ubiquitin.
We know they are essential because the removal of proteasome genes in eukaryotes is lethal.
Proteasomes are cylindrical structures very similar to hsp60 chaperonins (we'll discuss this
later). Like all cellular machines, proteasomes use ATP to drive conformational changes in
their subunits. ATP hydrolysis is not needed to actually cleave the peptide bonds of a protein,
but instead is thought to involve recognition of target proteins, their unfolding, the
translocation of the substrate protein into the proteasome's chamber, and/or the opening and
closing of proteasome gates.
20S Proteasome Chamber in Archaebacteria
Let's consider the structure of the proteasome core. We will focus on archaebacterial
proteasomes because they are simpler. Eucaryotice proteasomes are very similar, yet they
employ many more different subunits to construct the chamber.
As noted above, the proteasome core is actually a cylinder like hsp60. It is about the same size
as hsp60, namely, 15nm in length and 11 nm in diameter. It is composed of four rings stacked
on top of each other (like tires). Consider the following figure below.
Each of the four rings is composed of seven individual protein subunits. The two outer rings
are made up of alpha subunits and are proteolytically inactive. Note that they also define the
"pore" which allows substrate proteins inside. This pore is roughly 0.13 nm in diameter. The
two inner rings are composed of beta subunits and are proteolytically active. Together, these
four rings define three chambers within the proteasome, the largest one being in the center
and defined by the beta subunits. It is in this chamber that proteins are cleaved into small
peptides.
Click here to see the protein structure of the alpha and beta subunits. Note that they are very
similar in shape. The biggest difference is that the alpha subunit has an extra alpha helix
across the top of the molecule. This helix is part of the "pore" and may help guide substrate
proteins inside the chamber. The beta subunit shown is mature. At an earlier point in its life, a
prosequence was attached to the N-terminal end. This prosequence masks the proteolytic
activity of this subunit when it exists as an individual subunit. During assembly of the
proteasome, it is cut away to expose the beta-sheet cleft (which defines the active site). In
fact, the N-terminal threonine that is created by such cleaving of the prosequence is the amino
acid that is directly responsible for proteolysis.
20S Chamber Function
The proteasome represents a unique type of protease - a threonine protease. Most proteases
use other amino acids (like serine) as part of the proteolytic active site. When a substrate
protein is unfolded and guided into the middle chamber, peptide bonds are cleaved every 8-9
amino acids. Thus, the proteasome takes a single polypeptide chain containing hundreds of
amino acids and converts it into numerous short peptides 8-9 amino acids in length. That this
regular size is seen suggests a molecular ruler is involved. More specifically, the polypeptide
chain is apparently stretched across the chamber so that it interacts with two proteolytic sites
concurrently. The distance between these two sites would be thus bridged by 8-9 amino acids
of the substrate protein. However, once cut, it is still not clear how the individual short
peptides are removed from the chamber, although some have speculated the proteasome may
have side windows that serve this purpose.
Proteasome Assembly
Click here to view one model for proteasome assembly. According to this model, individual
alpha subunits first bind to individual beta subunits. These dimers are not active. Then, these
protein dimers interact with each other to form a ring complex. This activity may be guided
by chaperones. Once the rings are formed, two such rings can come together with the
concurent removal of the beta subunit prosequences. The cleavage of these subunits not only
drives the assembly of the 20S chamber, but also activates the subunits inside the chamber.
This assembly process thus protects the cytoplasm from indiscriminate proteolysis.
26S Proteasome
The 26S chamber is simply the core degradative machinery. In eukaryotic cells, the complex
is typically associated with what are called 19S caps. The 26S proteasome is thus a complex
of the 20S core chamber attached to two 19S caps on each end. Click here to see the 26S
proteasome.
It is the 19S caps that tie the proteasome to the Ub system. These caps are composed of about
20 different proteins. Some of these proteins apparently interact with Ub (recall how Ub
functions to decrease the rate of dissociation between substrate proteins and the proteasome),
although it has yet to be determined which proteins actually interact with Ub. Without the 19S
caps, Ub-conjugated proteins are no more likely to be degraded by the proteasome than any
other protein. It is also worth noting that the 19S caps appear to be flexibly attached, raising
the possibility that movement is involved in the capturing of Ub-conjugated proteins.
The best defined component of the 19S caps involve six proteins with ATPase activity. These
six proteins form a ring that sits adjacent to the pore of the proteasome defined by the alpha
subunits. ATP hydrolysis is clearly involved with the entry of proteins into the chamber, but
the exact mechanism involved remains to be determined.
Put simply, the 20S chamber is the heart of the proteasome that does the degradation. The 19S
caps serve to capture and guide proteins into this chamber. 19S caps are not seen in
archaebacteria. This is consistent with the fact that neither is Ub found in these bacteria.
Immunoproteasomes as "Hot Rod" Complexes
A very interesting feature of proteasomes is their role in the immune system. Proteasomes can
syntheisize short peptide fragments that are then used as antigens in lymphocytes. These
antigens are presented on the surface of these cells (through the MHC complex) and play an
important role in the cells ability to mount a specific immune response. This role for the
proteasome is a demanding one and calls for a "souped-up"
proteasome. In higher vertebrates (not yeast) another complex is used to replace the 19S cap.
This complex is know as PA28 (or the 11S cap). This cap is smaller than the 19S cap, but
serves to make the proteasome more efficient at generated peptides. It is thought to do so by
stretching open the mouth of the proteasome and creating a strain on it so that it is easier for
peptides to escape from the chamber. PA28 is a six member ring made up of two different
subunits.
Furthermore, in immune cells, some of the beta subunits are replaced by what are called
gamma-interferon inducible homologs. These subunits are like the beta subunits, but allow for
alterations on the degradation process that better fit the immune system's need. Interferon is a
cell hormone that is excreted locally when an infection occurs. Thus, infections cause immune
cells to replace certain proteasome parts with more effective ones. The immunoproteasome is
one mean proteasome. Click here to see it.
Comparing the proteasome and chaperonin
As the figure below shows, the 20S proteasome is very similar to the hsp60 chaperonin. Both
are cylindrical structures of the same size. Both are composed of stacked rings each made up
of seven subunits.
Yet in spite of these remarkable similarities, there are important differences. First, the two
structures are not evolutionarily related. The amino acid sequences, along with the tertiary
structure, of proteasome and chaperone subunits are quite different.
Secondly, the functions are different. Where proteasomes degrade proteins, chaperones
provide a protective environment that facilitates proper folding. Of course, it is not surprising
that the same conformational solution (the "isolation chamber") is employed for these
different functions. In the case of proteasomes, the proteins in the cytoplasm must be
protected from the proteolytic processes. Otherwise, indiscriminate degradation would occur.
In the case of the chaperones, the unfolded proteins must be protected from the proteins in the
cytoplasm. Otherwise, indisciminate aggregation would occur.
When these functional differences are realized, some of the slight differences in architecture
are explained. Notice the mouth sizes of both complexes. The diameter of the chaperone's
mouth is over three times larger than that of the proteasome. Where a chaperone would not
want to greatly restrict access to its chamber, the proteasome would. Thus, the smaller mouth
of the proteasome makes sense. Furthermore, remember that the proteasome mouth is
complexed to the 19S cap, which addes a further layer of restriction. Hsp60 chaperones do not
employ 19S-like caps.