* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Roadmap for Diagnosis
Anorexia nervosa wikipedia , lookup
Major depressive disorder wikipedia , lookup
Combat stress reaction wikipedia , lookup
Memory disorder wikipedia , lookup
Sluggish cognitive tempo wikipedia , lookup
Substance use disorder wikipedia , lookup
Rumination syndrome wikipedia , lookup
Separation anxiety disorder wikipedia , lookup
Bipolar II disorder wikipedia , lookup
Eating disorder wikipedia , lookup
Personality disorder wikipedia , lookup
Autism spectrum wikipedia , lookup
Glossary of psychiatry wikipedia , lookup
Bipolar disorder wikipedia , lookup
Panic disorder wikipedia , lookup
Munchausen by Internet wikipedia , lookup
Social construction of schizophrenia wikipedia , lookup
Sluggish schizophrenia wikipedia , lookup
Gender dysphoria in children wikipedia , lookup
Depersonalization disorder wikipedia , lookup
Factitious disorder imposed on another wikipedia , lookup
Causes of mental disorders wikipedia , lookup
Generalized anxiety disorder wikipedia , lookup
Child psychopathology wikipedia , lookup
Treatment of bipolar disorder wikipedia , lookup
Spectrum disorder wikipedia , lookup
Conduct disorder wikipedia , lookup
Depression in childhood and adolescence wikipedia , lookup
Mental disorder wikipedia , lookup
Schizoaffective disorder wikipedia , lookup
Antisocial personality disorder wikipedia , lookup
Conversion disorder wikipedia , lookup
Asperger syndrome wikipedia , lookup
History of mental disorders wikipedia , lookup
Dissociative identity disorder wikipedia , lookup
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders wikipedia , lookup
Roadmap for Diagnosis EPC 659B Level I. Level II. Level III. Level IV. Level V. Level VI. Level VII. Gather a complete database from counselee and other informants, including: History of current illness Previous mental health Personal and social background (See Table 8.1, p. 89) Family history (p. 96-97) Medical history (See Table 9.1, p. 102-105) (See Table 9.2, p.113) Mental status examination Identify syndromes; i.e., a collection of symptoms (See DSM-IV-TR, p. 13 – 26) Construct a differential diagnosis; i.e., a listing of all possible diagnoses (#1 below). Using a decision tree, select most likely provisional diagnosis. Identify other diagnoses that might be comorbid with principal diagnosis (See Table 3.1, Hierarchy of Conservative (Safe) Diagnoses, p. 17) Arrange multiple diagnoses according to urgency of need for treatment. Write a formulation; i.e., a brief summary of findings and conclusions, as a check on your evaluation. Reevaluate the diagnoses as new data become available. Diagnostic Principles 1. Create a Differential Diagnosis A. Arrange your wide-ranging differential diagnoses according to a safety hierarchy (See Table 3.1, p. 17) Hierarchy of Conservative (Safe) Diagnoses Most desirable (most dangerous, most treatable, best outcome) Any disorder due to substance use or a medical illness Recurrent depression Mania or hypomania Middle ground Alcohol dependence Panic disorder Phobic disorders Obsessive-compulsive disorder Anorexia nervosa Adjust disorder Substance (other that alcohol) dependence Borderline personality disorder Least desirable (hard to treat poor outcome) Schizophrenia Antisocial personality disorder AIDS-related dementia Alzheimer’s dementia B. Family history can guide diagnosis, but because you often can’t trust reports, clinicians should attempt to rediagnose each family member (p. 29) C. Physical disorders & their treatment can produce or worsen mental symptoms (p.102105) D. Consider somatoform disorder; i.e., multiple, unexplained symptoms (including pain and mood symptoms), whenever symptoms don’t jibe or treatments don’t work (p.110) E. Substance use can cause a variety of mental disorders (p.17) F. Always consider mood disorders, because of their ubiquity, potential for harm, and ready response to treatment. 2. When Information Sources Conflict G. H. I. J. K. L. M. N. History beats current appearance (p.24) Recent history beats ancient history (p.26) Collateral information sometimes beats the client’s own (p.26) Signs beat symptoms (p.27) Be wary when evaluating crisis-generated data (p.28) Objective findings beat subjective judgment (p.28) Use Occam’s razor: Choose the simplest explanation (p.30) Horses are more common than zebras; prefer the more frequently encountered diagnosis (p.31) O. Watch for contradictory information (p.36) 3. Resolve Uncertainty P. The best predictor of future behavior is past behavior (p.47) Q. More symptoms of a disorder increase its likelihood as your diagnosis (p.47) R. Typical feature of a disorder increase its likelihood as your diagnosis; in the presence of nontypical features, look for alternatives (p.47) S. Previous typical response to treatment for a disorder increases its likelihood as your diagnosis (p.48) T. Use the word undiagnosed whenever you cannot be sure of your diagnosis (p.48) U. Consider the possibility that this client should be given no mental diagnosis at all (p.51) 4. Multiple Diagnoses V. When symptoms cannot be adequately explained by a single disorder, consider multiple diagnoses (p.61) W. Avoid personality disorder diagnoses when your client is acutely ill with an Axis I disorder (p.62) X. Arrange multiple diagnoses to list first the one that is most urgent, treatable, or specific. Whenever possible, also list diagnoses chronologically (p.64) Morrison, J. (2007). Diagnosis made easier: Principles and techniques for mental health clinicians. New York: The Guilford Press.