* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Chapter I
Foundations of mathematics wikipedia , lookup
Large numbers wikipedia , lookup
Law of large numbers wikipedia , lookup
Mathematical proof wikipedia , lookup
Mathematics of radio engineering wikipedia , lookup
List of first-order theories wikipedia , lookup
Infinitesimal wikipedia , lookup
Vincent's theorem wikipedia , lookup
Series (mathematics) wikipedia , lookup
Non-standard calculus wikipedia , lookup
Fundamental theorem of calculus wikipedia , lookup
Fermat's Last Theorem wikipedia , lookup
List of important publications in mathematics wikipedia , lookup
Four color theorem wikipedia , lookup
Wiles's proof of Fermat's Last Theorem wikipedia , lookup
Hyperreal number wikipedia , lookup
Elementary mathematics wikipedia , lookup
Georg Cantor's first set theory article wikipedia , lookup
System of polynomial equations wikipedia , lookup
Non-standard analysis wikipedia , lookup
Real number wikipedia , lookup
Naive set theory wikipedia , lookup
Birkhoff's representation theorem wikipedia , lookup
Fundamental theorem of algebra wikipedia , lookup
Chapter I
The Real Line System
Readings:
Elementary Analysis: The Theory of Calculus. (chapter 1)
Introduction to Real analysis (chapter 2)
The set N of Natural Numbers:
We denote the set {1,2,3,……} of all numbers by N.
The set N has the following properties:
N1. 1 N .
N2. If n N , then its successor n 1 N .
N3. 1 is not the successor of any element in N.
N4. If n and m in N have the same successor, then n = m.
N5. A subset of N which contains 1 and which contains n+1 whenever it
contains n, must equals N.
(i.e. If B N such that (i) 1 B
(ii) If n 1 Bn B , then B = N)
Properties N1~N5 are known as the Peano Axioms.
Axiom N5 is the basis of mathematical induction.
The set Q of Rational Numbers:
Rational numbers are numbers of the form
1
m
where m , n Z and
n
n 0.
The set Q of rational numbers is a very “nice” algebraic system until one tries to
solve equations like x2 = 2. No rational number satisfies this equation (we’ll prove
this later), but there is a number that satisfies this equation.
2 , , e Q ( Do you know why?).
So there are “gaps” in Q.
Definition 1.1:
A number is called an algebraic number if it satisfies a polynomial equation
an xn+an-1 xn-1+..........+a1 x +ao = 0
where ao , a1, ………, an are all integers, an 0 , and n 1 .
Notes:
(i) Rational numbers are algebraic numbers. If r
m
, then r satisfies the equation
n
nx-m=0.
(ii)
2 is an algebraic number.
Theorem 1.2: (The Rational Zeros Theorem)
Suppose that ao , a1, ………, an are integers and that r is a rational number
satisfying the equation
an xn+an-1 xn-1+..........+a1 x +ao = 0
n 1 , an 0 , ao 0 , and r
(1) where
p
, p and q are integers having no common factor and
q
q 0 . Then q divides an and p divides ao.
2
In other words: The only rational candidate for solutions of (1) have the form
r
p
where q divides an and p divides ao.
q
Proof: r
p
satisfies equation (1). Then
q
n
p
p
an ...............a1 ao 0
q
q
Multiplying by qn, we get
an pn+an-1 pn-1q+an-2 pn-2q2+……………+a1 pqn-1+aoqn= 0
an pn=-q[an-1 pn-1+an-2 pn-2q+……………+a1 pqn-2+aoqn-1]
q divides an pn
But p and q have no common factor, therefore q divides an .
Also, aoqn =-p[an pn-1+an-1 pn-2q+……………+a1 qn-1]
p divides ao .
2 can’t represent a rational number.
Example 1.3:
By theorem 1.2 the only rational number that could possibly solve the equation
x 2- 2 = 0 are ±1, ±2 (since an = 1 and ao = -2 p = ±1, ±2 and q = ±1). We can
substitute each of the four numbers into the equation x2- 2 = 0 to eliminate them as
possible solutions. But
Example 1.4:
3
2 is a solution, therefore
2 can’t be a rational number.
6 can’t be a rational number.
By theorem 1.2 the only rational numbers that could possibly solve the equation
3
x 3- 6 = 0 are ±1, ±2, ±3, ±6 (since an = 1 and ao = -6 p = ±1, ±2, ±3, ±6 and
q = ±1). We know that none of these numbers is a solution of the equation x3- 6 =0.
But
3
6 is a solution, therefore
3
6 can’t be a rational number.
1
2
Example 1.5: b (2 5 ) does not represent a rational number.
3
b is a solution of the equation x6 -6x4 +12x2 -13 = 0. ( an = 1 and ao = -13 p = ±1,
±13 and q = ±1). By theorem1.2 the only possible rational solutions are ±1, ±13. We
know that none of these numbers is a solution. But b is a solution, therefore b can’t
be a rational number.
H.W. 1 : See Homework problems for chapter I
The Algebraic and Order Properties of R:
Algebraic Properties of R:
A1. a +b = b +a a, b R .
A2. (a +b) +c = a +(b +c) a, b, c R .
A3. a +0 = 0 +a = a a R .
A4. a R there is an element a R such that a +(-a ) = (-a ) +a = 0.
M1. a .b = b .a a, b R .
M2. (a .b) .c = a .(b .c) a, b, c R .
M3. a .1 = 1 .a = a a R .
4
M4. a R(a 0) there is an element
1
1
1
R such that a .(
) = ( ) .a = 1.
a
a
a
D. a .(b +c) = (a .b) + (a .c)
(b +c) .a = (b .a) + (c .a) a, b, c R
Definition 1.6:
A system that has more than one element and satisfies the nine above
properties is called a field .
The Order Properties of R:
O1. Given a and b, either a ≤ b or b ≤ a
O2. If a ≤ b and b ≤ a , then a = b
O3. If a ≤ b and b ≤ c , then a ≤ c
O4. If a ≤ b , then a + c ≤ b + c
O5. If a ≤ b and 0 ≤ c , then a . c ≤ b . c
Definition 1.7:
A field with an ordering satisfying O1 ~ O5 is called an ordered field.
Thus R is an ordered field.
Theorem 1.8:
If a R is such that 0 ≤ a < ε for every ε > 0, then a = 0.
1
2
Proof: Suppose to the contrary that a > 0. Then take o a 0 o a which is a
contradiction. Therefore a = 0.
5
Absolute Value and the Real Line:
Definition 1.9:
The absolute value of a real number a, denoted by |a|, is defined by:
a if
a 0 if
a if
a 0
a 0
a 0
Theorem 1.10:
(i)
|ab| = |a| |b|
a, b R
(ii)
|a|2 = |a2|
a R
(iii)
If c > 0, then |a| ≤ c if and only if –c ≤ a ≤ c
(iv)
-|a| ≤ a ≤ |a|
a R
Theorem 1.11: (Triangular Inequality)
If a, b R , then |a + b| ≤ |a| + |b|.
Proof: -|a| ≤ a ≤ |a| and -|b| ≤ b ≤ |b|. Adding we get
(a b) ab a b
ab a b
by theorem 1.10(iii).
Corollary 1.12: If a, b R , then
(i) a b a b
(ii) a b a b
6
Proof: (i) a = a - b + b
a a b b a b b
a b a b
b=b–a+a
b b a a b a a
a b b a a b
Therefore, a b a b a b
a b a b
by theorem 1.10(iii)
(ii) a b a (b) a b a b
Therefore, a b a b .
Definition 1.13:
The distance between two elements a and b in R is dist (a , b) = a b .
Definition 1.14:
Let a R and ε > 0. Then the ε-neighborhood of a is the set
V a x R : x a
[ x V a x a a x a ]
Theorem 1.15:
Let a R . If x V (a) for every ε > 0, then x = a.
7
Proof: x V (a) 0
xa
0
x a 0 by theorem 1.8
x a.
H.W. 2: See Homework problems for chapter I
___________________________________________________________________
The Completeness property of R:
Suprema and Infima:
Definition 1.16:
Let S be a nonempty subset of R.
(a) If S contains a largest element so (i.e., so S and s so s S ), then we call so
the maximum of S and we write so = max S.
(b) If S contains a smallest element s1 (i.e., s1 S and s s1 s S ), then we call s1
the minimum of S and we write s1 = min S.
Example 1.17:
(a) Every finite nonempty subset of R has a maximum and a minimum.
max{ n Z : 4 n 100} 100
min{ n Z : 4 n 100} 3
(b) max [a , b] = b
min [a , b] = a
(a , b) has no maximum or minimum.
[a , b) has no maximum but its minimum is a.
8
(c) The sets Z and Q have no maximum or minimum.
N has a minimum which is 1.
(d) min{ r Q : 0 r 2} 0 . But the set has no maximum.
Note: Always min S S and max S S .
Definition 1.18:
Let S be a nonempty subset of R.
(a) The set S is said to be bounded above if there exists a number u R such that
s u s S . Each number u is called an upper bound of S.
(b) The set S is said to be bounded below if there exists a number w R such that
s w s S . Each number w is called a lower bound of S.
(c) A set is said to be bounded if it is both bounded above and below. A set is said
to be unbounded if it is not bounded.
Example 1.19:
(a) The sets (a , b), (a , b], [a , b) and [a , b]are bounded above, the number b and
any number larger then b is an upper bound.
Also they are bounded below, the number a and any number less then a is a
lower bound.
(b) The sets Z, Q, N and R are unbounded. But N is bounded below, the number 1
and any number less then 1 is a lower bound.
9
(c) The set {r Q : 0 r 2} is bounded. The number
then
2 and any number larger
2 is an upper bound, the number 0 and any number less then 0 is a lower
bound.
(d) The set {n( 1) : n N} is unbounded. It is not bounded above.
n
Note: If the set S is bounded above (or below) then the upper bounds (or the lower
bounds) don’t have to belong to S.
Definition 1.20:
Let S be a nonempty subset of R.
(a) If S is bounded above, then a number u is said to be a supremum (or a least
upper bound) of S if it satisfies the conditions:
(i)
u is an upper bound of S.
(ii)
If v is any upper bound of S, then u ≤ v.
We write u = sup S.
(b) If S is bounded below, then a number w is said to be an infimum (or a greatest
lower bound) of S if it satisfies the conditions:
(iii)
w is a lower bound of S.
(iv)
If t is any lower bound of S, then t ≤ w.
We write w = inf S.
10
Example 1.21:
(a) sup [a , b] = sup (a , b) = sup (a , b] = sup [a , b) = b.
inf [a , b] = inf (a , b) = inf (a , b] = inf [a , b) = a.
(b) sup {r Q : 0 r 2} =
2.
inf {r Q : 0 r 2} = 0.
(c) inf {n( 1) : n N} = 0.
n
Notes:
(i)
If a set S has a maximum, then max S = sup S.
Also if it has a minimum, then min S = inf S.
(ii)
sup S and inf S need not belong to the set S.
(iii)
There can only be only one supremum and only one infimum.
(iv)
Not every subset of R has a supremum or an infimum.
Lemma 1.22:
Let S be a nonempty set, and u = sup S. Then the following statements are
equivalent:
(i)
If v is any upper bound of S, then u ≤ v.
(ii)
If z < u, then z is not an upper bound of S.
(iii)
If z < u, then sz S such that z < sz .
(iv)
If ε > 0, then s S such that u – ε < sε .
11
Exercise: Obtain the four equivalent statements above for w = inf S.
The Completeness Property of R:
Every nonempty set of real numbers that has an upper bound also has a
supremum in R.
Corollary 1.23: Every nonempty subset of R that has a lower bound also has an
infimum in R.
Proof: Let –S = { s : s S } .
S is bounded below, therefore there exists a real number t such that
t s s S
t s s S
t is an upper bound of –S.
By the completeness property of R, the set –S has a supremum u = sup (-S).
Then by definition 1.20:
(i) s u s S
(ii) If v is any upper bound of –S, then u v .
(i) u s s S
(ii) If -v is any lower bound of S, then v u .
Therefore, -u = inf S.
i.e. sup (-S) = -inf S .
H.W. 3: See Homework problems for chapter I
12
Theorem 1.24: (The Archimedean Property):
If x R , then nx N such that x < nx .
Proof: Assume that n x n N . x is an upper bound of N. Therefore by the
completeness property, N has a supremum u R .
u - 1 < u u – 1 is not an upper bound of N
m N such that u – 1 < m
u<m+1
But m 1 N , and this contradicts the fact that u is an upper bound of N.
Hence, nx N such that x < nx .
Corollary 1.25:
If t > 0, then nt N such that 0
1
t.
nt
1
Proof: inf : n N = 0.
n
1
t > 0 t is not a lower bound of the set : n N . Thus nt N such that
n
0
1
t.
nt
13
Density of Rational Numbers in R:
Theorem 1.26: (The Density Theorem):
If x and y are real numbers with x < y, then a rational number r Q such that
x < r < y. (In other words: Between any two real numbers there is a rational number).
Proof: Assume that x > 0.
-x + y > 0 by corollary 1.24 n N such that
1
yx
n
nx + 1 < ny
m N such that m 1 nx m
nx > 0
m nx 1
Therefore, m < ny
Now, nx < m < ny x
m
y.
n
Thus the rational number r
m
satisfies x < r < y.
n
What if x 0 ? (Exercise)
Corollary 1.27:
If x and y are real numbers with x < y, then an irrational number z such that
x < z < y.
Proof:
x
2
y
2
By theorem 1.26, r Q such that
xr 2 y.
Then z r 2 is irrational and satisfies x < z < y.
14
x
2
r
y
2
The Extended Real Numbers.
It is often convenient to extend the system of real numbers by the addition of
two elements +∞ and -∞. This enlarges the set R to the set R {,} . The set
R R {,} is called the set of extended real numbers.
One use of the extended real numbers is in the expression “sup S ”. If S is a
nonempty set of real numbers with an upper bound, we define sup S to be the least
upper bound of S. If S has no upper bound, we write sup S = +∞. Then sup S is
defined for all nonempty sets.
If S is bounded below then inf S is defined to be the greatest lower bound of S.
If S has no lower bound, we write inf S = -∞.
15
Finite and Infinite Sets:
Definition 1.28:
(a) The empty set φ is said to have 0 elements.
(b) If n N , a set S is said to have n elements if there is a bijection (1-1 and onto
mapping) from the set Nn = {1,2,3,……..,n} onto S.
(c) A set is said to be finite if it is either empty or it has n elements.
(d) A set S is said to be infinite if it is not finite. i.e., if S has an infinite number of
elements.
Example 1.29:
(a) The sets N, Z, Q, and R are all infinite sets.
(b) All intervals are infinite sets.
(c) The set {r Q : 0 r 2} is an infinite set.
(d) The set {n Z : 10 n 20} is a finite set.
Theorem 1.30:
Suppose that S and T are sets such that T S .
(i)
If S is a finite set, then T is a finite set.
(ii)
If T is an infinite set, then S is an infinites set.
Theorem 1.31:
The finite union of finite sets is also finite. (i.e., if A1 , A2 , ……,An are all finite
n
sets, then B Ai is also finite).
i 1
16
Countable Sets:
Definition1.32:
(a) A set S is said to be denumerable if there exists a bijection of N onto S. And
we write S = {s1 , s2 , s3 ,………}.
(b) A set S is said to be countable if it is either finite or denumerable.
(c) A set S is said to be uncountable if it is not countable
Sets
Finite Sets (Countable)
Infinite Sets
Denumerable Sets (Countable)
Uncountable Sets
Theorem 1.33:
(i)
The union of two denumerable sets is denumerable.( countable)
(ii)
N × N is denumerable.( countable)
(iii)
The set Q of rational numbers is denumerable.( countable)
Theorem 1.34:
Suppose that S and T are sets such that T S .
(i)
If S is a countable set, then T is a countable set.
(ii) If T is an uncountable set, then S is an uncountable set.
17
Theorem 1.35:
The countable union of countable sets is countable. (i.e. if A1 , A2 , A3…… are
all countable sets, then B Ai is also countable).
i 1
Example 1.36:
(a) The set E {2n : n N } of even natural numbers is denumerable since the
mapping f (n) = 2n for n N is a bijection of N onto E.
Similarly, the set O {2n 1 : n N } is denumerable. (why?)
(b) The set Z of integers is denumerable since the mapping f : N → Z defined by
0
n
f ( n)
2
1 n
2
if
n 1
if
nE
if
nO
is a bijection of N onto Z.
(c) All intervals are uncountable sets.
(d) The set {r Q : 0 r 2} is a countable set.
(d) The set {n Z : 10 n 20} is a countable set.
Exercise:
Is the countable union of finite sets also finite?
18