Download some features of ecosystems

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Overexploitation wikipedia , lookup

Riparian-zone restoration wikipedia , lookup

Latitudinal gradients in species diversity wikipedia , lookup

Molecular ecology wikipedia , lookup

Herbivore wikipedia , lookup

Biodiversity wikipedia , lookup

Cultural ecology wikipedia , lookup

Fire ecology wikipedia , lookup

Conservation biology wikipedia , lookup

Biogeography wikipedia , lookup

Agroecology wikipedia , lookup

Soundscape ecology wikipedia , lookup

Pleistocene Park wikipedia , lookup

Ecological economics wikipedia , lookup

Biodiversity action plan wikipedia , lookup

River ecosystem wikipedia , lookup

Habitat conservation wikipedia , lookup

Renewable resource wikipedia , lookup

Ecological fitting wikipedia , lookup

Habitat wikipedia , lookup

Food web wikipedia , lookup

Reconciliation ecology wikipedia , lookup

Lake ecosystem wikipedia , lookup

Ecological resilience wikipedia , lookup

Ecosystem services wikipedia , lookup

Restoration ecology wikipedia , lookup

Biological Dynamics of Forest Fragments Project wikipedia , lookup

Natural environment wikipedia , lookup

Ecology wikipedia , lookup

Human impact on the nitrogen cycle wikipedia , lookup

Theoretical ecology wikipedia , lookup

Ecosystem wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
Ecosystems and Ecology
Ecosystems and Ecology
Author: Prof Koos Bothma
Licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution license.
SOME FEATURES OF ECOSYSTEMS
Because ecosystems vary from being simple to complex there can be no list of essential features. What
can be concluded is that complex ecosystems are difficult or impossible to replace once they have been
destroyed. Moreover, although specific ecosystems may be relatively stable, new ecosystems may arise
when the basic components of ecosystems are altered naturally or by human intervention.
Novel ecosystems
Novel ecosystems are also known as emerging ecosystems and they result when the biotic components
occur in combinations and relative abundances that have not yet occurred previously within any given
biome. These ecosystems are the result of deliberate or inadvertent human action. As more and more
parts of the Earth become transformed by human actions, these novel ecosystems increase in
importance. Novel ecosystems either arise from the degradation of natural ecosystems or from the
abandonment of ecosystems that had been managed intensively. It is not yet clear if novel ecosystems
are persistent and what values they may have. Nevertheless, it is likely that it may be extremely difficult or
costly to return novel ecosystems to the previous ecosystem state from which they developed, although
this does not disallow the development of appropriate management objectives or approaches.
Novel ecosystems can originate in several ways:

Human impact on natural ecosystems may have resulted in the loss of essential organic elements
or the introduction of new ones,

urban degraded landscapes around natural ecosystems may create barriers to essential dispersal
processes, and

direct removal of organic components (e.g. soils, vegetation and animals) can create changes in
the abiotic components of the environment or decrease the genetic part of the organic component
to the extent that regeneration becomes impossible.
In harsh environments the total constraints wil be greatest in the abiotic components while in more benign
environments the constraints will be mainly in the biotic components. The global transport of alien
organisms is a factor in the development of novel ecosystems. Not only are new biota being spread into
existing ecosystems but new parasites and diseases enter and affect them. Novel ecosystems are
therefore appearing globally at ever more rapid rates. The illegal trade in wildlife products is currently
1|Page
Ecosystems and Ecology
spreading viruses globally into previously unaffected human populations and ecosystems (see Smith et
al. 2012 below).
Ecosystems can cross two types of threshold:

biotic thresholds that are created by dispersal barriers and result in unusual combinations of

organisms and functional groups, and
abiotic thresholds that are caused by factors such as deforestation, soil erosion, overgrazing or
climate change. Invasive organisms may also create major changes in existing ecosystem while
even the removal of target invaders could allow other invaders with new impacts to enter an
ecosystem and create more alteration.
New biotic assemblages affect key interactions and processes in ecosystems. Because they result from
human intervention it becomes vital to conserve less impacted or largely natural ecosystems. It is equally
unwise to develop costly programmes to attempt to repair natural ecosystems once they have crossed a
critical threshold of change. The only possible alternative in the latter case would be to explore and use
the benefits of the resultant novel ecosystem. The rub lies in the way in which humans interact with their
natural environment.
Genomics
Genomics is a progression from molecular studies of relatively simple model systems to complex natural
systems. The relatively recent ability to sequence genomes from key plant types is revealing the
molecular drives of community composition and ecosystem processes. A genome is the haploid set of
chromosomes which contains the complete set of genetic material but does not reflect the genetic
diversity of a species. The word is a blend of the words gene and chromosome (gen-ome). In Greek the
word means I become or I am born. Interaction between trophic levels has been shown to alter the
composition of a diverse community of fungi, insects, arachnids and avian predators. It is also possible
that indirect genetic interactions among relatively few species such as a tree, browser, mutualist and/or
pathogen and their environment may structure the composition and abundance of a larger community of
organisms and define ecosystem processes, such as the cycling of nutrients. Heritability in a community
through the tendency of related individuals within a species to support similar communities and
ecosystem processes link ecological interaction in an ecosystem with genomics. Inter alia such genetic
knowledge now extends the understanding of the function of condensed tannins and lignin in natural
forest ecosystems.
Genomic perspectives can further aid in understanding community structure and ecosystem processes by
identifying the specific genes, alleles and Earth surface mechanisms upon which the heritability of
communities and ecosystem phenotypes are based. A genomics approach to ecosystem processes is
important because these processes represent the combined effects of the interactions among multiple
species, environmental variation and complex feedback mechanisms. Consequently, quantifying the
2|Page
Ecosystems and Ecology
genetic covariance among species is important in understanding the evolution of communities and
ecosystems. A merger of genomics with community and ecosystem ecology may ultimately provide the
key to understanding how complex natural ecosystems are being formed and maintained.
Food-web matrices and feedback mechanisms
The more mature an ecosystem becomes, the more it is composed of interrelated food-web matrices and
feedback mechanisms. Food-webs are pathways for the cycling of energy through an ecosystem. Solar
radiation is the source of the energy and photosynthesis is a first step in primary production in an
ecosystem. The energy is thereafter transferred to different trophic levels with the larger herbivores
followed by the larger carnivores (if they are still present) as the higher trophic levels. Only 10 to 20 per
cent of all the solar energy that reaches an ecosystem is transferred to a next higher trophic level within it,
which means that the number of trophic levels in any ecosystem can never be large. Moreover, some of
the energy is lost through respiration. Eventually all organic matter is broken down again by microorganisms to be recycled through the ecosystem.
Reptiles are abundant in the Kgalagadi Transfrontier Park of the south-western Kalahari ecosystem where
snakes may prey in lizards
The terrestrial ecosystems produce two-thirds of the primary production in the world, and the oceanic
ones only a third. The tropical rain forests produce most primary production and are also the most
intricate ecosystems. As latitudes increase further from the equator, so primary does production
decreases. Extreme desert, rock, sand and ice, for example, have a net primary productivity that is 0.2
per cent of that of a tropical rainforest while the savannas have a net primary productivity that is 36.1 per
cent of that of a tropical rainforest despite being the second highest net primary producers in the world.
The production efficiency of energy also varies according to the taxonomic class of the organisms that are
involved. Micro-organisms that are short-lived, have a small size and a rapid population turnover rate
3|Page
Ecosystems and Ecology
have an extremely high energy production efficiency while in vertebrates it is generally around 10 per
cent. Energy efficiency is the percentage of assimilated energy that is incorporated into new biomass.
Once energy has been transferred randomly into heat it can no longer be used as energy by organisms,
except momentarily to maintain body temperature.
The proportion of nutrients in living biomass also increases from the poles to the equator. Consequently
they vary greatly between various biomes and ecosystems. Decomposition processes in the cold regions
are slow and nutrients are trapped for long periods in dead organic matter. In contrast, decomposition of
organic matter happens rapidly in tropical areas such as the rainforests where most of the nutrients are
present in living organic matter.
Food-web matrices link various trophic levels in mature ecosystems. A food-web consists of various
linked food chains. A food chain consists of pathways of energy transfer from basal species to the large
carnivores which form the apex of a food chain. Each trophic link contains a variable number of types of
organism. The Knysna Estuary in South Africa, for example, contains four trophic levels involving a total
of 15 types of organism of which only one is an apex predator. The number of trophic levels and the
mean number of types of organism per trophic level in the savannas is still unknown. Only at extremely
low levels of primary productivity does there seem to be an upper limit on the number of trophic levels.
However, species diversity is significantly highest in the most productive regions which allow each
consumer to feed on a limited number of organism types at a lower trophic level. Intricate food-web
matrices with long food chains typically experience such severe population fluctuations that the extinction
of the top or apex predators is more likely there than in those with simpler food chains. In general too,
carnivores are more likely to be opportunistic consumers that will attack any potential prey item of the
right size at a given time irrespective of its position in the food chain or food-web.
The black-backed jackal Canis mesomelas is an abundant hunter-scavenger in the Kgalagadi Transfrontier
Park of the south-western Kalahari ecosystem as here at Bedinkt windmill in May 1995. It often follows
hunting lions Panthera leo and leopards Panthera pardus to scavenge what is left of their prey but this
exposes it to a predation risk too
4|Page
Ecosystems and Ecology
Soil food-webs are the basis of the transfer of solar energy between species in an ecosystem. Above the
ground the energy moves from the primary producers (plants) to the primary consumers (herbivores) and
then to the secondary or apex consumers (carnivores). At the end of the process the decomposers such
as fungi and bacteria recycle the nutrients several more times before a specific chain of energy transfer
ends. Trophic cascades are top-down interactions that describe the indirect effects of higher trophy level
consumers on ecosystem functioning. They include herbivory and carnivory and some examples will be
discussed later.
Ecological communities
Ecological communities range in geographic size from biomes to ecosystems, landscapes, bioregions,
plant communities, animal and plant populations and habitats. The habitat is the place where the
ecological requirements of a specific organism are met and the niche of an organism is its ecological role
in an ecosystem.
Ecological communities are relatively small assemblages of organisms that occur in a defined space at a
given time and they define ecosystems in combination with the physical environment. However, because
communities are not divorced from their specific abiotic environments, the distinction between
ecosystems is more a matter of scale than nature. A community comprises all the organisms in a given
area whether they are micro-organisms, plants or animals. The major problem with the study of
communities is that only a portion of all the organisms that form part of them can readily be studied and
counted. Consequently the most common or conspicuous organisms are often emphasized and some
rarer but ecologically vital organisms may be overlooked.
In describing a community, its biodiversity is important. However, simple taxonomic lists are inadequate
because they ignore the numerical importance of each taxon. For example, most grassland communities
contain ten common types of grass, at times called key grasses, which support the bulk of the larger
herbivores. As in wildlife management generally, the objective of studying a community is important. In an
extreme case, a scientist may only be interested in a specific community of rare birds or mammals. When
plants are involved, the communities are often described in terms of biomass which defines the rate of
primary production per species in a quantitative and qualitative way. Two indices of abundance and
species richness are Simpson’s Index and Shannon’s Index. More details on these indices appear in the
references below.
Some communities have clear and sharp boundaries but usually they merge gradually. Vegetation
communities are the basis of wildlife management because they differ in a characteristic way and contain
different plant species compositions and vegetation structure which in turn affect their ability to sustain
larger herbivores. They are usually characterised by the dominant plant types. The description of plant
communities requires a variety of ordination techniques which treat communities to statistical analyses to
define their structure and the abundance of specific species, and defines their boundaries. These results
5|Page
Ecosystems and Ecology
indicate the relationship between a community and its physical environment and describe the nature of
the community.
Community boundaries imply the existence of discrete units and distinct boundaries but this is not a
fundamental question. What matters most is the level of organization within a community rather than
when and where it occurs. The plant community level of organization defines the nature of the interaction
of various organisms within the community, usually at a given place and time.
The stability of a plant community measures its resistance to disturbance while its resilience measure its
ability to return to a specific state after having been disturbed, and the speed with which it does so. Stable
and resilient communities have the ability to persist for a long time. Communities have specific
characteristics because they possess stabilizing and resilient properties. Both these properties are
sensitive to severe changes in the physical environment. A community which is only stable within a
narrow range of environmental conditions is dynamically fragile. Conversely, one which is stable within a
wide range of environmental conditions is dynamically robust.
Complex communities contain more pathways for energy transfer than simple ones. Such complexity has
originally been linked to better stability. However, it is increasingly evident that increasing complexity
eventually creates instability because the food-webs that occur in complex communities may contain nonessential random elements. Moreover, increased complexity may lead to increased stability in certain
characteristics of a community and to decreased stability in others. There are also indications that the
relationship between complexity and stability may depend on the relevant trophic level. Therefore, no
single relationship between stability and complexity exists as a generalization.
Edge effect
Edge effect is the occurrence of greater species diversity and biological density in an ecotone (the zone
of intergradation between two ecological communities) than in any of the adjacent ecological
communities. In ecosystems it is the effect of juxtaposition of contrasting environments. For example,
where land adjacent to a forest has been cleared to create an open forest boundary, sunlight and wind
now penetrate the forest to a greater extent for a specific distance and alter it environmentally and
biologically. In the Amazon rain forest it is already estimated that the penetrating edge effect exceeds that
of cleared areas in surface area. This allows fires to penetrate the forests and is slowly transforming
them. Edge effect also involves succession because of vegetation that is spreading outwards. The higher
biodiversity that this creates is the result of increases in plant and animal diversity.
Edge effects are major drivers of change in fragmented landscapes but are highly variable in space and
time. Extreme weather events also drive edge effects, and where trees form part of a community high
winds make its boundaries vulnerable. In contrast, edge effects are more productive in terms of animal
production than closed stable plant communities. However, rare animal and plant populations with
undisturbed habitat requirements can be affected negatively by the creation of edge effects.
6|Page