* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download supplemental information
Casimir effect wikipedia , lookup
Tight binding wikipedia , lookup
Quantum key distribution wikipedia , lookup
Renormalization group wikipedia , lookup
Wave–particle duality wikipedia , lookup
Quantum field theory wikipedia , lookup
Aharonov–Bohm effect wikipedia , lookup
Atomic theory wikipedia , lookup
Ferromagnetism wikipedia , lookup
Quantum electrodynamics wikipedia , lookup
Scalar field theory wikipedia , lookup
History of quantum field theory wikipedia , lookup
Theoretical and experimental justification for the Schrödinger equation wikipedia , lookup
Delayed choice quantum eraser wikipedia , lookup
Coherent states wikipedia , lookup
Supplemental Material to ‘Cross Modulation of Two Laser Beams at the Individual-Photon Level’ Kristin M. Beck,1 Wenlan Chen,1 Qian Lin,1 Michael Gullans,2, 3 Mikhail D. Lukin,2 and Vladan Vuletić1 1 Department of Physics and Research Laboratory of Electronics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, USA 2 Department of Physics, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA 3 Joint Quantum Institute, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD 20899, USA (Dated: August 13, 2014) THEORETICAL DESCRIPTION The system consists of atoms with a four-state N -type level structure |f i ↔ |di ↔ |ci ↔ |ei as described in the text. Including the decay, the effective Hamiltonian for this system can be written as X Hef f /~ = c |k| a†k ak + (ωc − iκ/2)b† b + iE(b† − b) k + (ωf d − iΓ/2) X |dij hd| + (ωce − iΓ/2) j + X X |eij he| + (ωf c − iγ/2) j X |cij hc| (1) j Ω/2 eiωdc t |cix hd| + gg a† (x) |f ix hd| + gs b† |cix he| + h.c. x Here, c is the speed of light, k is the wavenumber of the signal (free-space) field, ωc is the cavity frequency and κ is the decayqrate of the cavity. The signal (free-space) and cavity fields can be written as q electric field operators for the P ikx ~ck0 ~ωc −1/2 Ês (x) = ak and b are bosonic annihilation operators, ck0 ke 0 V a(x) and Êc = 0 V b, where a(x) = N is the center frequency of the signal field, and V is the quantization volume. Additionally, E is the amplitude of the cavity input field, ωµν is the atomic transition energy between states µ and ν, Ω is the classical Rabi frequency for the coupling field, Γ is the linewidth of the excited states |di and |ei, γ is decoherence rate of two stable ground states |f i and |ci, and gs , gc are the bare couplings of the atomic transition to the two fields. We take the gate and signal fields to be resonant with the atoms so that ck0 = ωf d and ωc = ωce . The use of this effective Hamiltonian is sufficient to describe the steady state for the case of weak coherent state input fields gs hai Ω2 /Γ and gc hbi κ. In this limit, we can take the approach of [Ref. [1]] to calculate the two-time correlation function between the fields g (2) (x, τ ) = hb† (t)a† (x, t + τ )a(x, t + τ )b(t)i ha† (x, t)a(x, t)ihb† (t)b(t)i (2) In this limit, we also can write the density matrix as a product state ρ = |χ(τ )i hχ(τ )| and truncate the available states in the system at the level of two excitations from the state with zero photons and all atoms in |f i, which we refer x to as |f, 0, 0i. The one-excitation states are |f, 1x , 0i = a† (x) |f, 0, 0i, |f, 0, 1i = b† |f, 0, 0i, |cx , 0, 0i ≡ σcf |f, 0, 0i, x x (2) and |dx , 0, 0i ≡ σdf |f, 0, 0i, where σµν ≡ |µix hν|. The two-excitation states that are relevant for g are |f, 1x , 1i ≡ x a† (x) |f, 0, 1i, |cx , 0, 1i ≡ b† |cx , 0, 0i, |dx , 0, 1i ≡ b† |dx , 0, 0i, and |ex , 0, 0i ≡ σec |cx , 0, 0i. d|χi We then expand |χ(t)i in these states and find the evolution according to i dt = Hef f |χi applying the boundary condition that the free space input field is a weak coherent state. The only terms in Hef f which create excitations are the driving fields, which are perturbative implying that the amplitude of the one-excitation states are proportional to E and the two-excitation amplitudes are proportional to E 2 . To calculate g (2) (τ ) we take the picture where the detection corresponds to a quantum jump from the steady state |χss i into the state a(x, t) |χss i for τ < 0 and b(t) |χss i for τ > 0 [Ref. [1]]. To find g (2) (τ ) we can then simply evolve the operator ns (t) or nc (x, t) for a time τ under Hef f starting from the jump state. To find the steady state we expand |χ(t)i in the zero-, one- and two- excitation states |χ(x, t)i = |f, 0, 0i + A10 (x) |f, 1x , 0i + A11 (x) |cx , 0, 0i + A12 (x) |dx , 0, 0i + A13 |f, 0, 1i + A21 (x) |f, 1x , 1i + A22 (x) |cx , 0, 1i + A23 (x) |dx , 0, 1i + A24 (x) |ex , 0, 0i (3) 2 where we neglect the one- and two- excitation states in the normalization because they are perturbative. The equations of motion are for the Aji are found from i d|χi dt = Hef f |χi. √ (∂t + c ∂x )A10 (x) = −igs N A12 (x), (4) √ ∂t A12 (x) = −Γ/2A12 (x) − igs N A10 (x) − iΩ/2A11 (x), (5) ∂t A11 (x) = −γ/2A11 (x) − iΩ/2A12 (x), ∂t A13 (∂t + c ∂x )A21 (x) = −κ/2A13 + E, EA10 (x) (6) √ = −κ/2A21 (x) = −(κ + γ)/2A22 (x) − igc A24 (x) −Γ/2 A24 (x) − igc A22 (x) (7) N A23 (x), − igs √ ∂t A23 (x) = −(Γ + κ)/2A23 (x) − igs N A21 (x) − iΩ/2A22 (x) + EA12 (x), ∂t A22 (x) ∂t A24 (x) = + − iΩ/2A23 (x) + EA11 (x), (8) (9) (10) (11) These eight equations are the only ones relevant for g (2) (t), they give the steady state N x 2gs2 N x 1 Ā0 (x) = α exp − = α exp − Γ + Ω2 /γ c 2(1 + Ω2 /γΓ) L √ 2gs N Ω 1 Ā11 (x) = − 2 Ā (x), Ω + γΓ 0 √ i2gs N 1 Ā (x), Ā12 (x) = − Γ + Ω2 /γ 0 E Ā13 = , κ/2 1 Ā21 (x) η N x = + exp − + O(κ/Γ) 1+η 1+η 2ζ L Ā10 (x)Ā13 (12) (13) (14) (15) (16) where α is the amplitude of the input coherent state, N is the number of atoms, N = 4gs2 N L/cΓ is the optical depth, L is the length of the medium, η = 4gc2 /κΓ is the cooperativity, and we have defined γΓ Ω2 /κΓ + γ/κ ζ = 1+ 2 1+ (17) Ω 1+η a correction factor that accounts for finite γ and cooperativity η. When τ < 0 the free space photon is detected first leading to a quantum jump into the state |χJ i = p a(L, τ ) |χss i hχss | a† (L, τ )a(L, τ ) |χss i = |f, 0, 0i + Ā21 (L) |f, 0, 1i Ā10 (L) (18) Now |Ã1 (t)|2 hχJ (t)| b† (τ )b(τ ) |χJ (t)i = 3 2 † hχss | b (τ )b(τ ) |χss i Ā1 3 2 η −κ< |τ |/2 −N /2ζ = 1− 1−e e 1+η g (2) (τ ) = (19) (20) where κ< = κ and Ã13 (t) is found from Eq. 7 with the initial condition Ã13 (0) = Ā21 (L)/Ā10 (L). For τ > 0 the procedure is the same, except we have to evolve Eqs. 4-6 starting from the initial conditions A10 (x, τ ) = Ā21 (x), A11 (x, τ ) = Ā22 (x), and A12 (x, τ ) = Ā23 (x). This corresponds to the state |χJ i ∝ b |χss i. The result can be expressed in the same form as Eq. 19 with κ< replaced by κ> = Ω2 /Γ + γ. SCHEME TO PRODUCE POLARIZATION-ENTANGLED STATES Continuous entanglement of two light beams can be achieved in the following way: prepare the atomic ensemble in the |F = 3, mF = 3i and |F = 3, mF = −3i states with equal population in a small magnetic field oriented at small 3 angle to the cavity mode, and apply the signal beam along the magnetic field. The scheme we demonstrate in the manuscript then works independently for both circular polarizations, so that |σ+ is |σ+ ic (the subscript indicates the signal and cavity mode, respectively, and σ± indicates circular photon polarization) becomes |σ+ is |0ic or |0is |σ+ ic , |σ− is |σ− ic becomes |σ− is |0ic or |0is |σ− ic , and the states |σ+ is |σ− ic and |σ− is |σ+ ic are unchanged. When linearly polarized beams are sent into both the signal and cavity paths and we post-select for detecting a photon in each mode, the output is the entangled (Bell) state √12 (|σ− is |σ+ ic + |σ+ is |σ− ic ). [1] H. J. Carmichael, R. J. Brecha, and P. R. Rice, Optics Communications 82, 73 (1991).