* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Environmental Microbiology Reports
Gene expression profiling wikipedia , lookup
Koinophilia wikipedia , lookup
Genome evolution wikipedia , lookup
Site-specific recombinase technology wikipedia , lookup
Genetically modified crops wikipedia , lookup
Designer baby wikipedia , lookup
Genetic engineering wikipedia , lookup
Pathogenomics wikipedia , lookup
Microevolution wikipedia , lookup
Metagenomics wikipedia , lookup
bs_bs_banner Environmental Microbiology Reports (2013) doi:10.1111/1758-2229.12122 Endophytic Bradyrhizobium spp. isolates from sugarcane obtained through different culture strategies Luc Felicianus Marie Rouws,1* Jakson Leite,2 Gustavo Feitosa de Matos,2 Jerri Edson Zilli,1 Marcia Reed Rodrigues Coelho,1 Gustavo Ribeiro Xavier,1 Doreen Fischer,3 Anton Hartmann,4 Verônica Massena Reis1 and José Ivo Baldani1 1 Embrapa Agrobiologia, BR 465 km 7, 23891-460, Seropédica, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. 2 Instituto de Agronomia, Departamento de Solos, Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro, BR 465 km 7, 23890-000, Seropédica, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. 3 Department Environmental Genomics and 4 Department Microbe-Plant Interactions, Helmholtz Zentrum München, German Research Center for Environmental Health, Ingolstaedter Landstrasse 1, 85764 Neuherberg, Germany. Summary Brazilian sugarcane has been shown to obtain part of its nitrogen via biological nitrogen fixation (BNF). Recent reports, based on the culture independent sequencing of bacterial nifH complementary DNA (cDNA) from sugarcane tissues, have suggested that members of the Bradyrhizobium genus could play a role in sugarcane-associated BNF. Here we report on the isolation of Bradyrhizobium spp. isolates and a few other species from roots of sugarcane cultivar RB867515 by two cultivation strategies: direct isolation on culture media and capture of Bradyrhizobium spp. using the promiscuous legume Vigna unguiculata as trap-plant. Both strategies permitted the isolation of genetically diverse Bradyrhizobium spp. isolates, as concluded from enterobacterial repetitive intergenic consensus polymerase chain reaction (PCR) fingerprinting and 16S ribosomal RNA, nifH and nodC sequence analyses. Several isolates presented nifH phylotypes highly similar to nifH cDNA phylotypes detected in fieldgrown sugarcane by a culture-independent approach. Four isolates obtained by direct plate cultivation Received 30 July, 2013; accepted 27 October, 2013. *For correspondence. E-mail [email protected]; Tel. + 55 21 3441-1606; Fax + 55 21 2682-1230. © 2013 Society for Applied Microbiology and John Wiley & Sons Ltd were unable to nodulate V. unguiculata and, based on PCR analysis, lacked a nodC gene homologue. Acetylene reduction assay showed in vitro nitrogenase activity for some Bradyrhizobium spp. isolates, suggesting that these bacteria do not require a nodule environment for BNF. Therefore, this study brings further evidence that Bradyrhizobium spp. may play a role in sugarcane-associated BNF under field conditions. Introduction Sugarcane production in Brazil traditionally occurs with low nitrogen (N) fertilizer inputs, maintaining productivity. This observation led scientists to study the nutrient balance of the sugarcane culture, and 15N isotope-aided studies in Brazil have indicated that sugarcane obtains at least 40 kg N ha−1 year−1 from biological N fixation (BNF) (Lima et al., 1987; Urquiaga et al., 1992; 2012). Accordingly, several sugarcane-associated diazotrophic bacteria have been isolated from sugarcane, the first of which were obtained from rhizosphere soil and belonged to the genus Beijerinckia (Döbereiner, 1961). In the 1970s, the group of Johanna Döbereiner started using semi-solid N-free culture media to isolate diazotrophic bacteria from non-leguminous plants. This is usually done by inoculating serum vials with N-free semi-solid media with a small volume of plant extract. In these media, an oxygen (O2) concentration gradient is formed and mobile diazotrophic bacteria, which are present in the extract, can migrate to a zone of appropriate O2 concentration for BNF, forming characteristic pellicles. Since their development, these media have become standard for the isolation of diazotrophic bacteria from non-legumes, enabling the isolation of several new bacterial species (reviewed by Baldani and Baldani, 2005). Several diazotrophic bacteria have been isolated from internal tissues of sugarcane, and these bacteria have been classified as endophytes (Döbereiner, 1992). The first sugarcane endophyte to be isolated was Gluconacetobacter diazotrophicus (Cavalcante and Döbereiner, 1988), which was found in roots and shoots. Later, bacteria from genera such as Herbaspirillum and Burkholderia were also identified as sugarcane endophytes (James, 2000; Perin et al., 2006). 2 L. F. M. Rouws et al. Studies have been conducted under greenhouse and field conditions in order to explore the potential of associative diazotrophic bacteria to increase growth of sugarcane and resulted in the selection of a consortium of five bacterial species (G. diazotrophicus, Herbaspirillum seropedicae, Herbaspirillum rubrisubalbicans, Azospirillum amazonense and Burkholderia tropica) (Oliveira et al., 2006). This mixed inoculant has also been tested in large scale field experiments, where it led to increased yields (Schultz et al., 2012). However, 15N isotope dilution experiments showed that the growth promotion effect of the inoculant was not due to BNF because non-inoculated plants showed similar 15N dilution levels. Production of growth-promoting substances, such as auxins, by the bacteria in the inoculants, which has been demonstrated in vitro, may be the determinant responsible factor for the growth promotion (Lee et al., 2004). Therefore, a question remains which bacterium or bacterial consortium is responsible for sugarcane-associated BNF. In an effort to get more insight into the natural N-fixing bacterial community present in sugarcane plants, Ando and colleagues (2005) evaluated nifH gene diversity in sugarcane tissues and found phylotypes similar to the genera Serratia, Klebsiella and Bradyrhizobium. More recently, culture-independent studies have focused on the presence and phylogenetic composition of sugarcaneassociated 16S ribosomal RNA (rRNA) and nifH messenger RNAs (mRNAs). Tissues from sugarcane plants grown in Latin America, Africa and Japan (Burbano et al., 2011; Thaweenut et al., 2011; Fischer et al., 2012) presented relatively high abundances of nifH mRNA phylotypes related to rhizobia (including genera Rhizobium and Bradyrhizobium). This suggests that rhizobia can express nifH genes in association in sugarcane and thus, they may be of quantitative importance during sugarcane-associated BNF. In accordance with this observation, the isolation of (fast-growing) Rhizobium spp. isolates from sugarcane was recently reported in the south of Brazil (Beneduzi et al., 2013). However, isolates of the slow-growing Bradyrhizobium genus have not been described, and the data provided by molecular techniques can serve here as a guide to isolation strategies (Bomar et al., 2011). All culture methods, including the N-free semi-solid media used to isolate these diazotrophic bacteria, are selective for certain groups of bacteria. For example, if slow-growing and fast-growing diazotrophs are present in the same inoculum that is introduced in a vial with semisolid medium, the fast-growing bacteria may outcompete the slow-growing ones, preventing the isolation of the latter (Davis et al., 2011). Also, certain diazotrophic bacteria might possibly require the presence of a host plant to efficiently fix N, a requirement that is not met under traditional in vitro conditions, although the addition of sugar- cane extract to culture media has been applied to mimic endophytic nutritional conditions (Baldani and Baldani, 2005). These factors may explain why Bradyrhizobium spp. have not been isolated from sugarcane. In the present study, two alternative cultivation strategies were applied with the aim of isolating endophytic Bradyrhizobium spp. from sugarcane. The first strategy used direct inoculation of diluted sugarcane extracts on plates containing yeast extract (YE) as the N source and preferential carbon sources for Bradyrhizobium spp. (referred to as ‘direct plate isolates’). The second strategy relied on the use of the nodule-forming trap-plant Vigna unguiculata that is considered promiscuous for nodulation with Bradyrhizobium spp. (referred to as ‘trap-plant isolates’). Results and discussion Isolation of sugarcane-inhabiting bacteria that induce nodules on V. unguiculata plants Unlignified white shoot roots (Smith et al., 2005) and shoot pieces (stem base) were obtained from 5-monthold sugarcane plants (cultivar RB867515) growing at the Embrapa Agrobiologia experimental field station in Seropédica, Brazil. After surface disinfection and placing disinfected roots on yeast mannitol agar (YMA) plates, or plating an aliquot of the water from the last washing step, no bacterial growth was ever observed on YMA (Vincent, 1970), showing that the disinfection methodology was effective. A pilot experiment was conducted in a growth chamber with pots containing sterile sand to select an effective trap-plant species. Thirty days after inoculation of Macroptilium atropurpureum (siratro) plants with sugarcane root extract, sporadic small white and apparently inactive nodules were observed, whereas V. unguiculata (cowpea) formed abundant, apparently active (reddish) nodules (data not shown). In contrast, inoculation with sugarcane shoot extract did not induce any nodules on either plant species (data not shown). For being the best performing plant species in this pilot experiment, V. unguiculata was selected as a trap-plant to capture sugarcane root-inhabiting rhizobia under in vitro conditions. Fifteen V. unguiculata plants were individually grown in glass tubes with slopes of N-free agarized Norris solution and inoculated with 1 ml sugarcane root extract each. After 3–4 weeks of incubation, nodules on 13 plants could be observed. After surface disinfection of these nodules and crushing them on YMA plates, a total of 112 bacterial isolates was obtained. These trap-plant isolates received names as follows: P followed by (number of V. unguiculata plant) − (isolate number) (Fig. S1). The vast © 2013 Society for Applied Microbiology and John Wiley & Sons Ltd, Environmental Microbiology Reports Bradyrhizobium spp. isolates from sugarcane majority (109 isolates) grew slowly and alkalinized the culture medium, characteristics typical for the genus Bradyrhizobium (Kuykendall, 2005). Three isolates (P5–2, P5–21 and P5–25) were fast growing and showed a neutral/acidic reaction on YMA. Three non-inoculated control plants, which were included as negative control, did not form any nodules. Positive controls, inoculated with the recently described V. unguiculata-nodulating strain Microvirga vignae BR3299 (Radl et al., 2013), nodulated abundantly (data not shown). These data indicated that V. unguiculata nodule-inducing bacteria occur as endophytes in roots of sugarcane cultivar RB 867515. Enterobacterial repetitive intergenic consensus polymerase chain reaction fingerprinting reveals genetic diversity among nodule-inducing bacteria obtained from sugarcane In order to identify genotypic redundancy among the 112 trap-plant isolates, enterobacterial repetitive intergenic consensus polymerase chain reaction (ERIC-PCR) fingerprinting was applied (Fig. S1) (Woods et al., 1993). This analysis revealed 34 distinct ERIC profiles (six from Bradyrhizobium spp. type strains) when all isolates/ strains were grouped with a low level of correlation (28% similarity). Some identical fingerprint profiles were shared by up to 36 isolates, demonstrating that these genotypes in the collection were redundant. These isolates sharing identical ERIC-PCR profiles were obtained from nodules of the same plant, but also from nodules of independent V. unguiculata plants inoculated with the same aliquot of sugarcane root extract. Some ERICPCR profiles (13) represented fewer isolates, and several profiles represented unique isolates in the collection (Fig. S1). The relative abundance of certain ERIC-PCR profiles may reflect the abundance of the respective bacterial genotype in the sugarcane roots, differences in colonization efficiency of the V. unguiculata trap-plants by different bacterial genotypes, or differences in bacterial growth rate. Based on the ERIC-PCR profiles, 23 representative isolates were selected for more detailed analyses. Bradyrhizobium isolates from sugarcane root extract by direct plate cultivation The use of trap-plants to obtain novel rhizobia has the drawback that it may select certain groups of bacteria that are effective nodule inducers on the chosen plant species. Therefore, as a complementary isolation strategy, sugarcane root extracts were also directly inoculated on modified YMA plates, containing mannitol (1 g l−1) or a mixture of sodium gluconate (0.5 g l−1) and 3 arabinose (0.5 g l−1) as carbon source (Tong and Sadowsky, 1994), which permitted the isolation of 24 slow-growing and one fast-growing isolate. These direct plate isolates received names formed by M (obtained on mannitol plates) or AG (obtained on arabinose/gluconate plates) followed by sequential numbers. Nine isolates (eight slow-growing and one fast-growing) were selected for further characterization. Classification of isolates based on 16S rRNA gene sequence analyses The partial 16S rRNA gene sequence was determined for 23 representative trap-plant isolates that were selected based on the ERIC-PCR profiles. Partial 16S rRNA gene sequences were also determined for eight slow-growing direct plate isolates that were positive for the nifH gene, as revealed by PCR, and for one fastgrowing direct plate isolate with colony morphology compatible to the genus Rhizobium. The dendrogram in Fig. 1 shows the phylogenetic relationships among these isolates and several reference strains from the genera Bradyrhizobium, Rhizobium, Methylobacterium and Herbaspirillum. These analyses showed that 22 of the 23 trap-plant isolates and six out of nine direct plate isolates belong to the genus Bradyrhizobium (Fig. 1; Table 1). These isolates were grouped into the two Bradyrhizobium super clades, known as the as Bradyrhizobium japonicum and Bradyrhizobium elkanii lineages (Aserse et al., 2012) (Fig. 1). The Bradyrhizobium spp. direct plate isolates M21, AG41, AG48 and M12 grouped in the B. japonicum super clade and the direct plate isolates M3 and AG14 grouped in the B. elkanii super clade (Fig. 1). Apart from Bradyrhizobium spp., one slow-growing plate isolate (AG46) was most similar to the genus Methylobacterium, and one (AG47) was classified as Herbaspirillum sp. The fast-growing plate isolate M30 and the trap-plant isolate P5-2 were similar to the genus Rhizobium (Fig. 1; Table 1). Burbano and colleagues suggested an important role of Rhizobium rosettiformans in sugarcane rootassociated BNF in Africa and South America, based on the detection of nifH transcript phylotypes related to this bacterial species in sugarcane roots (Burbano et al., 2011). Nevertheless, R. rosettiformans were not isolated from sugarcane roots in the present study because basic local alignment search tool (BLAST) analyses with the 16S rRNA gene sequences of strains P5-2 and M30 showed only 95% identity to the R. rosettiformans 16S rRNA gene (accession number EU781656). Together, these data showed that both direct plate cultivation and the trap-plant strategy permit for the isolation of diverse Bradyrhizobium spp. isolates from sugarcane roots. © 2013 Society for Applied Microbiology and John Wiley & Sons Ltd, Environmental Microbiology Reports 4 L. F. M. Rouws et al. P8-5 (KF113089) P4-5 (KF113077) P5-27 (KF113083) AG14 (KF113098) P10-5 (KF113094) P10-6 (KF113095) P7-17 (KF113086) P15-7 (KF113097) P5-5 (KF113081) P5-26 (KF113082) P7-40 (KF113088) P8-11 (KF113090) M3 (KF113103) P5-32 (KF113084) 92% Bradyrhizobium pachyrhizi PAC48T (AY624135) Bradyrhizobium elkanii USDA 76T (U35000) 90% Bradyrhizobium jicamae PAC68T (AY624134) 100% Bradyrhizobium lablabi CCBAU 23086T (GU433448) Bradyrhizobium retamae Ro19T (KC247085) Bradyrhizobium daqingense CCBAU 15774T (HQ231274) Bradyrhizobium yuanmingense CCBAU 10071T (AF193818) 69% Bradyrhizobium liaoningense USDA 3622T (AF208513) Bradyrhizobium canariense BTA-1T (AJ558025) Bradyrhizobium japonicum USDA 6T (AB231927) B. elkanii superclade Bradyrhizobium iriomotense LMG 24129T (AB300992) P9-21 (KF113092) P4-7 (KF113078) P9-20 (KF113091) P4-29 (KF113079) P7-6 (KF113085) Bradyrhizobium huanghuaihaiense CCBAU 23303T (HQ231463) 58% Bradyrhizobium arachidis CCBAU 051107T (HM107167) M21 (KF113105) P1-6 (KF113075) AG41 (KF113099) P7-35 (KF113087) P2-1 (KF113076) 52% P9-22 (KF113093) M12 (KF113104) AG48 (KF113102) P11-1 (KF113096) Bradyrhizobium cytisi CTAW11T (EU561065) 71% Bradyrhizobium rifense CTAW71T (EU561074) Bradyrhizobium betae LMG 21987T (AY372184) 83% Bradyrhizobium denitrificans LMG 8443T (X66025) 100% Bradyrhizobium oligotrophica LMG 10732T (JQ619230) Bradyrhizobium sp. STM 3843 (EU781679) 88% Bradyrhizobium sp. STM 3844 (EU781680) 100% 96% Bradyrhizobium sp. STM 3964 (EU781684) 100% Methylobacterium oryzae CBMB20T (AY683045) 70% Methylobacterium organophilum ATCC 27886T (AB175638) 99% Methylobacterium nodulans ORS 2060T (AF220763) 100% AG46 (KF113100) Rhizobium miluonense CCBAU 41251T (EF061096) P5-2 (KF113080) Rhizobium tropici CIAT 889T (U89832) 100% M30 (KF113106) Rhizobium leguminosarum USDA 2370T (U29386) 100% Herbaspirillum_seropedicae Z67T (Y10146) AG47 (KF113101) 99% 99% 4 B. japonicum superclade outgroup 0.10 Fig. 1. Phylogenetic relationships of partial 16S rRNA gene sequences of Bradyrhizobium spp. and some other isolates from sugarcane cultivar RB867515. The evolutionary history was inferred using RAxML method using the GTRMIX rate distribution model. Bootstrap values (expressed as percentages of 1000 replications) are shown at the branch. Evolutionary analyses were conducted in ARB (Ludwig et al., 2004). Neighbour-joining analysis of the same dataset led to a highly similar tree topology. GenBank accession numbers are shown between parentheses. See Appendix S1 for experimental details. Functional and genetic nodulation traits of sugarcane isolates The individual capability to nodulate V. unguiculata plants in vitro was checked for all trap-plant isolates and all direct plate isolates in two independent experiments with three replicates. All of the trap-plant isolates, except the Rhizobium sp. isolate P5-2, were able to nodulate this host plant (Table 1). Possibly, P5-2 represents a passenger that entered a V. unguiculata nodule formed by © 2013 Society for Applied Microbiology and John Wiley & Sons Ltd, Environmental Microbiology Reports Bradyrhizobium spp. isolates from sugarcane 5 Table 1. Genetic and phenotypic symbiotic characteristics of selected bacterial isolates from roots of sugarcane cultivar RB867515f. 1st BLAST hit (16S rRNA) GenBank accession number 1st BLAST hit nifH PCRa nodC PCRb Nodulationc KF113075 KF113076 KF113077 KF113078 KF113079 KF113080 KF113081 KF113082 KF113083 KF113084 KF113085 KF113086 KF113087 KF113088 KF113089 KF113090 KF113091 KF113092 KF113093 KF113094 KF113095 KF113096 KF113097 Bradyrhizobium genosp. TUXTLAS-6 1020v Bradyrhizobium genosp. TUXTLAS-6 1020v Uncultured Bradyrhizobiumsp. clone Bradyrhizobium japonicum SEMIA 6192 Bradyrhizobium japonicum SEMIA 6192 Rhizobium tropici BRUESC261 Bradyrhizobium elkanii USDA 4348 Bradyrhizobium elkanii USDA 4348 Uncultured Bradyrhizobium sp. clone Bradyrhizobium elkanii USDA 4348 Bradyrhizobium sp. H10 Uncultured Bradyrhizobium sp. clone Bradyrhizobium genosp. TUXTLAS-6 1020v Bradyrhizobium sp. RST88bis Bradyrhizobium elkanii USDA 4348 Uncultured Bradyrhizobium sp. clone Bradyrhizobium japonicum SEMIA 6192 Bradyrhizobium japonicum SEMIA 6192 Bradyrhizobium genosp. TUXTLAS-6 1020v Bradyrhizobium elkanii CCBAU 83387 Bradyrhizobium elkanii CCBAU 83387 Bradyrhizobium sp. RITF 1109 Bradyrhizobium elkanii CCBAU 83387 JF266658 JF266658 FJ193273 AY904772 AY904772 KF031510 JQ911631 JQ911631 FJ193273 JQ911631 AB601649 FJ193273 JF266658 FJ514041 JQ911631 FJ193273 AY904772 AY904772 JF266658 EF549397 EF549397 JQ697598 EF549397 + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + – + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + – + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + KF113098 KF113099 KF113100 KF113101 KF113102 KF113103 KF113104 KF113105 KF113106 Bradyrhizobium elkanii CCBAU 53142 Bradyrhizobium sp. CCBAU 65749 Uncultured bact. clone YT-49 Herbaspirillum sp. sptzw31 Bradyrhizobium sp. DW3.1 Bradyrhizobium sp. RST88bis Bradyrhizobium liaoningense z82b Bradyrhizobium arachidis CCBAU 23155 Rhizobium miluonense CC-B-L1 EF394150 JF834148 JQ770097 GU377118 JQ349504 FJ514041 AB698736 GU433450 JN896360 + faintd + faint + + + faint NTe + – + – – + – – NT + – – – – + – – NT Isolate Nucleotides sequenced (16S rRNA) GenBank accession number Trap-plant isolates P1–6 P2–1 P4–5 P4–7 P4–29 P5-2 P5–5 P5–26 P5–27 P5–32 P7–6 P7–17 P7–35 P7–40 P8–5 P8–11 P9–20 P9–21 P9–22 P10–5 P10–6 P11–1 P15–7 1345 1350 1350 1365 1356 1339 1344 1350 1355 1362 1325 1360 1358 1045 1349 1361 1360 1370 1361 1360 1359 1364 1354 Direct plate isolates AG14 AG41 AG46 AG47 AG48 M3 M12 M21 M30 1354 1341 1351 984 1350 1359 1208 1084 1342 a. The plus sign indicates positive reaction with primer pair nifHF/nifHI. b. The plus sign indicates positive reaction with primer pair NodCFor540/NodCRev1160. c. The plus sign indicates induction of nodules in vitro on V. unguiculata with three replicates. d. Faint PCR product obtained. e. NT: not tested. f. See Appendix S1 for experimental details. another nodulating bacterial strain. To form a better understanding of their symbiotic characteristics, the strains shown in Fig. 1 were submitted to PCR for the nodC gene with primers NodCFor540 and NodCRev1160 (Sarita et al., 2005), and the success of amplification was evaluated by gel electrophoresis. As shown in Table 1, all trapplant isolates, apart from P5-2, contain the nodC gene. Among the direct plate isolates, only two (M3 and AG14) were able to nodulate V. unguiculata, whereas the other direct plate isolates identified as Bradyrhizobium spp. (AG41, AG48, M12 and M21) were not. Accordingly, only the Bradyrhizobium spp. isolates M3 and AG14 and the Methylobacterium sp. isolate AG46 tested positive for the nodC gene, although this latter isolate was not able to nodulate V. unguiculata (Table 1). Figure 2 shows a dendrogram representing the phylogenetic relationships among the nodC gene sequences of the isolates. In general terms, the nodC phylogenetic relationships are congruent with the 16S rRNA phylogeny in that similar clusters are formed for both genes, although there are some exceptions as will be discussed later on (Figs 1 and 2). Photosynthetic and also non-photosynthetic Bradyrhizobium spp. isolates lacking nod genes (strains BTAi1 and ORS278) have previously been shown to nodulate dalbergioid legumes of the genus Aeschynomene (Giraud et al., 2007; Miché et al., 2010; Okubo et al., 2012). Some recently described Aeschynomene isolates present 16S rRNA genes (accession numbers EU781684, EU781679 and EU781680) similar to several isolates obtained in the present study (Fig. 1). Photosynthetic Bradyrhizobium spp. isolates have also been isolated from African wild © 2013 Society for Applied Microbiology and John Wiley & Sons Ltd, Environmental Microbiology Reports 6 L. F. M. Rouws et al. P7-17 (KF196787) AG14 (KF196798) P8-5 (KF196790) 99 P10-5 (KF196794) P7-40 (KF196789) 50 P8-11 (KF196791) 100 P15-7 (KF196797) 86 M3 (KF196799) Bradyrhizobium elkanii USDA 76T (AB354631) P5-27 (KF196785) 100 100 P5-32 (KF196786) Bradyrhizobium pachyrhizi PAC 48T (HM047128) Bradyrhizobium arachidis CCBAU 051107T (HM107267) 87 P11-1 (KF196796) Bradyrhizobium daqingense CCBAU 15774T (HQ231326) Bradyrhizobium japonicum IAM 12608T (AB354632) 100 99 Bradyrhizobium huanghuaihaiense CCBAU 23303T (HQ231507) 94 Bradyrhizobium yuanmingense CCBAU 10071T (AB354633) P7-35 (KF196788) 99 100 P9-22 (KF196793) P4-7 (KF196783) 96 P4-29 (KF196784) 100 P9-20 (KF196792) P10-6 (KF196795) Bradyrhizobium canariense BTA-1T (AJ560653) Bradyrhizobium cytisi CTAW11T (EU597844) 86 Bradyrhizobium rifense CTAW71T (EU597853) Bradyrhizobium jicamae PAC 68T (AB573869) Bradyrhizobium lablabi CCBAU 23086T (GU433565) Bradyrhizobium retamae Ro19T (KC247112) Bradyrhizobium iriomotense LMG 24129T (AB301000) Bradyrhizobium liaoningense LMG 18230T (GU263466) Burkholderia mimosarum PAS44T (EU386155) 91 88 93 99 49 21 45 100 75 100 0.05 Fig. 2. Phylogenetic relationships of partial nodC gene sequences (450 basepair positions) of Bradyrhizobium spp. isolates from sugarcane cultivar RB867515. The evolutionary history was inferred using the neighbour-joining method (Saitou and Nei, 1987) based on the Kimura two-parameter model (Kimura, 1980). Burkholderia mimosarum PAS44T was used as outgroup. Bootstrap values (expressed as percentages of 1000 replications) are shown at the branch. Bar, 0.02 substitutions per nucleotide position. Evolutionary analyses were conducted in MEGA 5. GenBank accession numbers are shown between parentheses. See Appendix S1 for experimental details. wetland rice (Oryza breviligulata), a species which, like sugarcane, is a member of the Poaceae family (Chaintreuil et al., 2000). The infection processes of dalbergioid legumes by rhizobia and of Poaceae by endophytic bacteria share the so-called crack-entry infection mechanism, which is distinct from the wellcharacterized Nod factor-dependent infection mechanism via root hairs (Okubo et al., 2012). However, when inoculated on in vitro grown Aeschynomene sensitiva plants, none of the isolates M12, M21, AG48 or AG14 induced any nodules, whereas consistent nodulation was observed at the stem-base of this plant species 3 weeks after inoculation with strain BTAi1, which served as a positive control (data not shown) (Giraud et al., 2007). Partial nifH sequence characterization of sugarcane isolates Partial nifH gene sequences from the isolates were amplified with the primers nifHF and nifHI, and sequenced with primer nifHI (Laguerre et al., 2001). Although sequencing efforts of some faint nifH PCR products were not successful, phylogenetic analyses were conducted for the majority of the isolates (Fig. 3; Table 1). The results of these analyses, which are presented in Fig. 3, showed the formation of two major nifH clades, the largest of which contained all nodule-inducing isolates described in this study. This clade also accommodated one nifH complementary DNA (cDNA) phylotype (accession number JF297300) © 2013 Society for Applied Microbiology and John Wiley & Sons Ltd, Environmental Microbiology Reports Bradyrhizobium spp. isolates from sugarcane 7 P15-7 (KF113070) M3 (KF113073) P8-11 (KF113063) 99 P7-40 (KF113061) P5-26 (KF113057) 79 P5-5 (KF113055) P8-5 (KF113062) P4-7(KF113053) 96 65 P7-17 (KF113059) 67 P4-5 (KF113052) AG14 (KF113071) Bradyrhizobium elkanii USDA 76T (AB094963) 76 P10-5 (KF113067) 98 79 41 Uncultured bacterium clone F8S 30 (JF297300) P4-29 (KF113054) P5-32 (KF113056) 96 P5-27 (KF113058) 38 P9-20 (KF113064) Bradyrhizobium pachyrhizi PAC48T (HM047124) P10-6 (KF113068) 59 Bradyrhizobium arachidis CCBAU 051107T (HM107283) 94 P11-1 (KF113069) Bradyrhizobium yuanmingense CCBAU 10071T (EU818927) 67 P7-35 (KF113060) 74 100 P9-22 (KF113066) Bradyrhizobium huanghuaihaiense CCBAU 23303T (HQ231551) 79 Bradyrhizobium liaoningense USDA 3622T (EU818925) T 100 Bradyrhizobium daqingense CCBAU 15774 (HQ231323) T Bradyrhizobium japonicum USDA 6 (HM047126) AG48 (KF113072) Bradyrhizobium lablabi CCBAU 23086T (GU433546) Bradyrhizobium cytisi CTAW11T (GU001618) 76 72 20 Bradyrhizobium rifense CTAW71T (U001627) 100 Bradyrhizobium canariense BTA-1T (EU818926) Bradyrhizobium iriomotense LMG 24129T (AB300998) 20 30 Bradyrhizobium jicamae PAC 68T (HM047127) M12 (KF113074) 11 Uncultured bacterium clone F8R 27 (JF297299) 35 Bradyrhizobium denitrificans LMG 8443T (HM047125) 83 Uncultured bacterium clone F13R 20 (JF297297) 53 98 59 Uncultured bacterium clone F7R 17 (JF297298) Uncultured bacterium clone F4R 7 (JF297301) Burkholderia mimosarum PAS44T (AY883420) 0.02 Fig. 3. Phylogenetic relationships of partial nifH genes sequences (314 bp) of Bradyrhizobium spp. isolates from sugarcane cultivar RB867515. nifH cDNA phylotypes described by Fischer and colleagues (2012) were also included in the analysis. The evolutionary history was inferred using the neighbour-joining method (Saitou and Nei, 1987) based on the Kimura two-parameter model (Kimura, 1980). Bootstrap values (expressed as percentages of 1000 replications) are shown at the branch. Bar, 0.02 substitutions per nucleotide position. Evolutionary analyses were conducted in MEGA 5. GenBank accession numbers are shown between parentheses. See Appendix S1 for experimental details. © 2013 Society for Applied Microbiology and John Wiley & Sons Ltd, Environmental Microbiology Reports 8 L. F. M. Rouws et al. obtained by culture-independent approach by Fischer and colleagues (2012). The smaller clade contained the nifH phylotypes of the non-nodulating Bradyrhizobium isolates AG48 and M12, and also three nifH cDNA phylotypes obtained from field-grown sugarcane tissues by Fischer and colleagues (2012) in a culture-independent manner (JF297299, JF297297, JF297298 and JF297301) (Fig. 3). In order to permit the inclusion of the short nifH cDNA phylotypes from Fischer and colleagues (2012), the nifH analyses took into account only 314 base pair residues. When these short sequences were omitted from the analysis and the analysis was performed with 584 base pair positions, the topology was almost identical (data not shown). For the majority of isolates, the phylogenetic relationships deduced from nifH gene sequences appeared to be congruent with the relationships observed for the nodC gene (Figs 2 and 3). However, there are some exceptions; for example, the isolates P4–29, P9–20, P5–27 and P5–32 form a cluster in the nifH dendrogram (Fig. 3), although the isolates P4–29 and P9–20 on one side and P5–27 and P5–32 on the other form distinct nodC clusters (Fig. 2). Also, the nifH sequence of isolate P10-6 did not cluster with any other sequence in the dataset, which was also observed for the nodC gene of this isolate (Fig. 2). Another interesting observation is that both the nodC and the nifH gene from isolate P11-1 are highly similar to the recently described species Bradyrhizobium arachidis CCBAU 051107T (Wang et al., 2013), where this is not the case for its 16S rRNA gene (Figs 1, 2 and 3). The lack of congruence of phylogenetic relationships among 16S rRNA and symbiotic genes has been reported on before and is probably attributable to lateral gene transfer events (Menna and Hungria, 2011). In general terms, the analyses conducted in the present study showed considerable nodC and nifH sequence diversity in the Bradyrhizobium spp. endophytic population from sugarcane roots. In vitro nitrogenase activity Because sugarcane does not form nodules, it is important to know if the Bradyrhizobium spp. isolates from sugarcane are capable of fixing N outside of the nodule environment. To test this, the acetylene reduction assay (ARA) was used, which permits a semi-quantitative analysis of nitrogenase activity. Cell suspensions of some isolates were inoculated in vials with modified semi-solid JMV medium. Under these conditions, the bacteria can migrate to a depth with adequate O2 concentration for BNF to occur. After 5 days of growth, nitrogenase activity was evaluated. None of the isolates presented any nitrogenase activity when no N source was provided, and so we conducted ARA assays in YE-supplemented media (40 or 400 mg l−1 YE) (Table 2). Apart from the positive Table 2. Acetylene-dependent ethylene productiona in semi-solid culture medium by Bradyrhizobium spp. isolates from roots of sugarcane cultivar RB867515. Isolate Mean ethylene production (nmol)a Uninoculated Ppe8 M3 M12 AG48 AG14 P9–20 P9–21 P5–2 P8–11 P10–5 P11–1 P15–7 YE 40 mg l−1 ≤ 0.01 ≤ 0.01 40.2 ± 23.0 ≤ 0.01 ≤ 0.01 3.5 ± 2.0 3.1 ± 1.7 ≤ 0.01 ≤ 0.01 5.9 ± 3.3 ND NDb ≤ 0.01 ≤ 0.01 ≤ 0.01 ≤ 0.01 ≤ 0.01 ≤ 0.01 ≤ 0.01 ≤ 0.01 ≤ 0.01 ≤ 0.01 Standard error Mean ethylene production (nmol) Standard error YE 400 mg l−1 ≤ 0.01 ≤ 0.01 128.8 ± 74.0 ≤ 0.01 ≤ 0.01 7.0 ± 4.0 51.6 ± 29.8 ≤ 0.01 ≤ 0.01 17.7 ± 10.2 3.5 ± 2.0 ≤ 0.01 ≤ 0.01 ≤ 0.01 ≤ 0.01 ≤ 0.01 ≤ 0.01 ≤ 0.01 ≤ 0.01 ≤ 0.01 ≤ 0.01 a. See Appendix S1 for detailed experimental procedures. b. ND, not determined. control, B. tropica Ppe8 (Reis et al., 2004), the direct plate isolates M12 and AG48 and the trap-plant isolates P9–20 and P9–21 showed significant AR activity (Table 2). However, the majority of the trap-plant isolates and the V. unguiculata-nodulating isolates M3 and AG14 did not show any AR activity. Also, no ethylene was ever formed when no acetylene was provided (data not shown). These data demonstrate that at least some of these Bradyrhizobium spp. isolates may present nitrogenase activity outside the nodule environment. Several studies carried out in the 1970s and 1980s showed that some Bradyrhizobium spp. strains, such as strain 32H1, are able of fixing N under in vitro conditions, while others are not and that this capability depends on the carbon and/or N source provided (Kurz and LaRue, 1975; Pagan et al., 1975; Kaneshiro and Kurtzman, 1982). Altogether, some sugarcane endophytic Bradyrhizobium spp. apparently have the capability to fix N outside the nodule environment, a trait required for sugarcane-associated BNF. Concluding remarks The data presented here showed, by using two different isolation strategies, that Bradyrhizobium spp. occur as endophytes in roots of sugarcane cultivar RB867515 in Seropédica, Brazil. It was also shown that the application of differentiated isolation strategies (direct plate cultivation and trap-plant mediated cultivation) permits the cultivation of diverse novel diazotrophic bacteria from sugarcane, especially Bradyrhizobium spp. This study also emphasized that growth rate is an important feature to be taken into account in efforts to cultivate novel bacterial groups. Although the ecological relevance of the © 2013 Society for Applied Microbiology and John Wiley & Sons Ltd, Environmental Microbiology Reports Bradyrhizobium spp. isolates from sugarcane presence of Bradyrhizobium spp. remains to be determined, the fact that some of these isolates presented nitrogenase activity in vitro suggests that these bacteria might possibly fix N in association to sugarcane plants. Acknowledgements The authors thank CNPq (Instituto Nacional de Ciência e Tecnologia FBN and process 477231/2012-8) and Faperj (process E-12/111–398/2012) for financial support. Bruno José Rodrigues Alves and Robert Michael Boddey are acknowledged for their support with the gas chromatography experiments. References Ando, S., Goto, M., Meunchang, S., Thongra-Ar, P., Fujiwara, T., Hayashi, H., and Yoneyama, T. (2005) Detection of nifH sequences in sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum L.) and pineapple (Ananas comosus [L.] Merr.). Soil Sci Plant Nutr 51: 303–308. Aserse, A.A., Räsänen, L.A., Aseffa, F., Hailemariam, A., and Lindström, K. (2012) Phylogenetically diverse groups of Bradyrhizobium isolated from nodules of Crotalaria spp., Indigofera spp., Erythrina brucei and Glycine max growing in Ethiopia. Mol Phylogenet Evol 65: 595–609. Baldani, J.I., and Baldani, V.L.D. (2005) History on the biological nitrogen fixation research in graminaceous plants: special emphasis on the Brazilian experience. An Acad Bras Cienc 77: 549–579. Beneduzi, A., Moreira, F., Costa, P.B., Vargas, L.K., Lisboa, B.B., Favreto, R., et al. (2013) Diversity and plant growth promoting evaluation abilities of bacteria isolated from sugarcane cultivated in the South of Brazil. Appl Soil Ecol 63: 94–104. Bomar, L., Maltz, M., Colston, S., and Graf, J. (2011) Direct culturing of microorganisms using metatranscriptomics. mBio 2: e00012-11. doi:10.1128/mBio.00012-11. Burbano, C.S., Liu, Y., Rösner, K.L., Reis, V.M., Caballero-Mellado, J., Reinhold-Hurek, B., and Hurek, T. (2011) Predominant nifH transcript phylotypes related to Rhizobium rosettiformans in field-grown sugarcane plants and in Norway spruce. Environ Microbiol Rep 3: 383–389. Cavalcante, V.A., and Döbereiner, J. (1988) A new acidtolerant nitrogen-fixing bacterium associated with sugarcane. Plant Soil 108: 23–31. Chaintreuil, C., Giraud, E., Prin, Y., Lorquin, J., Bá, A., Gillis, M., et al. (2000) Photosynthetic bradyrhizobia are natural endophytes of the African wild rice Oryza breviligulata. Appl Environ Microbiol 66: 5437–5447. Davis, K.E.R., Sangwan, P., and Janssen, P.H. (2011) Acidobateria, Rubrobacteridae and Chloroflexi are abundant among very slow-growing and mini-colony-forming soil bacteria. Environ Microbiol 13: 798–805. Döbereiner, J. (1961) Nitrogen-fixing bacteria of the genus Beijerinckia derx in the rhizosphere of sugar cane. Plant Soil 15: 211–216. Döbereiner, J. (1992) Recent changes in concepts of plant bacteria interactions: endophytic N2 fixing bacteria. Ciência e Cultura 44: 310–313. 9 Fischer, D., Pfitzner, B., Schmid, M., Simões-Araújo, J., Reis, V.M., Pereira, W., et al. (2012) Molecular characterization of the diazotrophic bacterial community in uninoculated and inoculated field-grown sugarcane (Saccharum sp.). Plant Soil 356: 83–99. Giraud, E., Moulin, L., Vallenet, D., Barbe, V., Cytryn, E., Avarre, J.C., et al. (2007) Legume symbioses: absence of nod genes in photosynthetic bradyrhizobia. Science 316: 1307–1312. James, E.K. (2000) Nitrogen fixation in endophytic and associative symbiosis. Field Crops Res 65: 197–209. Kaneshiro, T., and Kurtzman, M.A. (1982) Glutamate as a differential nitrogen source for the characterization of acetylene-reducing Rhizobium strains. J Appl Bacteriol 52: 201–207. Kimura, M. (1980) A simple method for estimating evolutionary rate of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. J Mol Evol 16: 111–120. Kurz, W.G.W., and LaRue, T.A. (1975) Nitrogenase activity in rhizobia in absence of plant host. Nature 256: 407–408. Kuykendall, L.D. (2005) Genus Bradyrhizobium, family Bradyrhizobiaceae. In Bergey’s Manual of Systematic Bacteriology, 2nd edn, 2nd Volume. George, G. (ed.). New York: Springer–Verlag, pp. 438–443. Laguerre, G., Nour, S.M., Macheret, V., Sanjuan, J., Drouin, P., and Amarger, N. (2001) Classification of rhizobia based on nodC and nifH gene analysis reveals a close phylogenetic relationship among Phaseolus vulgaris symbionts. Microbiology 147: 981–993. Lee, S., Flores-Encarnación, M., Contreras-Zentella, M., Garcia-Flores, L., Escamilla, J.E., and Kennedy, C. (2004) Indole-3-acetic acid biosynthesis is deficient in Gluconacetobacter diazotrophicus strains with mutations in cytochrome c biogenesis genes. J Bacteriol 186: 5384– 9531. Lima, E., Boddey, R.M., and Döbereiner, J. (1987) Quantification of biological nitrogen fixation associated with sugarcane using a 15N aided nitrogen balance. Soil Biol Biochem 19: 165–170. Ludwig, W., Strunk, O., Westram, R., Richter, L., Meier, H., Yadhukumar, A., et al. (2004) ARB: a software environment for sequence data. Nucleic Acids Res 32: 1363– 1371. Menna, P., and Hungria, M. (2011) Phylogeny of nodulation and nitrogen-fixation genes in Bradyrhizobium: supporting evidence for the theory of monophyletic origin, and spread and maintenance by both horizontal and vertical transfer. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 61: 3052–3067. Miché, L., Moulin, L., Chaintreuil, C., Contreras-Jimenez, J.L., Minuve-Hernández, J.A., Villegas-Hernández, M.C., et al. (2010) Diversity analyses of Aeschynomene symbionts in tropical Africa and Central America reveal that nod-independent stem nodulation is not restricted to photosynthetic bradyrhizobia. Environ Microbiol 12: 2152– 2164. Okubo, T., Fukushima, S., and Minamisawa, K. (2012) Evolution of Bradyrhizobium-Aeschynomene mutualism: living testimony of the ancient world or highly evolved state? Plant Cell Physiol 53: 2000–2007. Oliveira, A.L.M., Canuto, E.L., Urquiaga, S., Reis, V.M., and Baldani, J.I. (2006) Yield of micropropagated sugarcane © 2013 Society for Applied Microbiology and John Wiley & Sons Ltd, Environmental Microbiology Reports 10 L. F. M. Rouws et al. varieties in different soil types following inoculation with diazotrophic bacteria. Plant Soil 284: 23–32. Pagan, J.D., Child, J.J., Scowcroft, W.R., and Gibson, A.H. (1975) Nitrogen fixation by Rhizobium cultured on a defined medium. Nature 256: 406–407. Perin, L., Martínez-Aguilar, L., Castro-González, R., Estrada-de Los Santos, P., Cabellos-Avelar, T., Guedes, H.V., et al. (2006) Diazotrophic Burkholderia species associated with field-grown maize and sugarcane. Appl Environ Microbiol 72: 3103–3110. Radl, V., Simões-Araújo, J.L., Leite, J., Passos, S.R., Martins, L.M.V., Xavier, G.R., et al. (2013) J.E. Microvirga vignae sp. nov., a root nodule symbiotic bacterium isolated from cowpea grown in the 3 semi-arid of Brazil. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.053082-0. Reis, V.M., Estrada-de los Santos, P., Tenorio-Salgado, S., Vogel, J., Stoffels, M., Guyon, S., et al. (2004) Burkholderia tropica sp. nov., a novel nitrogen-fixing, plant-associated bacterium. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 54: 2155–2162. Saitou, M.H., and Nei, M. (1987) The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol 4: 406–425. Sarita, S., Sharma, P.K., Priefer, U.B., and Prell, J. (2005) Direct amplification of rhizobial nodC sequences from soil total DNA and comparison to nodC diversity of root nodule isolates. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 54: 1–11. Schultz, N., Morais, R.F., Silva, J.A., Baptista, R.B., Oliveira, R.P., Leite, J.M., et al. (2012) Avaliação agronômica de variedades de cana-de-açúcar inoculadas com bactérias diazotróficas e adubadas com nitrogênio. Pesqui Agropec Bras 47: 261–268. Smith, D.M., Inman-Bamber, N.G., and Thorburn, P.J. (2005) Growth and function of the sugarcane root system. Field Crops Res 92: 169–183. Thaweenut, N., Hachisuka, Y., Ando, S., Yanagisawa, S., and Yoneyama, T. (2011) Two seasons’ study of nifH gene expression and nitrogen fixation by diazotrophic endophytes in sugarcane (Saccharum spp. hybrids): expression of nifH genes similar to those of rhizobia. Plant Soil 338: 435–449. Tong, Z., and Sadowsky, M.J. (1994) A selective medium for the isolation and quantification of Bradyrhizobium japonicum and Bradyrhizobium elkanii strains from soils and inoculants. Appl Environ Microbiol 60: 581–586. Urquiaga, S., Cruz, K.H.S., and Boddey, R.M. (1992) Contribution of nitrogen fixation to sugar cane: nitrogen-15 and nitrogen-balance estimates. Soil Sci Am J 56: 105–114. Urquiaga, S., Xavier, R.P., Morais, R.F., Batista, R.B., Schultz, N., Leite, J.M., et al. (2012) Evidence from field nitrogen balance and 15N natural abundance data for the contribution of biological N2 fixation to Brazilian sugarcane varieties. Plant Soil 356: 5–21. Vincent, J.M. (1970) A manual for the practical study of rootnodule bacteria. IBP Handbook no. 15. Oxford and Edinburgh, UK: Blackwell Publishing. Wang, R., Chang, Y.L., Zheng, W.T., Zhang, D., Zhang, X.X., Sui, X.H., et al. (2013) Bradyrhizobium arachidis sp. nov., isolated from effective nodules of Arachis hypogaea grown in China. Syst Appl Microbiol 36: 101–105. Woods, C.R., Versalovic, J., Koeuth, T., and Lupski, J.R. (1993) Whole-cell repetitive element sequence-based polymerase chain reaction allows rapid assessment of clonal relationships of bacterial isolates. J Clin Microbiol 31: 1927–1931. Supporting information Additional Supporting Information may be found in the online version of this article at the publisher’s web-site: Fig. S1. Genetic similarity (UPGMA) tree of ERIC-PCR patterns from Bradyrhizobium spp. type strains and 112 bacterial isolates obtained from nodules of V. unguiculata plants inoculated with root extract of sugarcane cultivar RB867515. Boldfaced isolates indicated with dots were selected for more detailed analyses. See Appendix S1 for experimental details. Appendix S1. Detailed experimental procedures. © 2013 Society for Applied Microbiology and John Wiley & Sons Ltd, Environmental Microbiology Reports