* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Angle Matrix Elements
Identical particles wikipedia , lookup
EPR paradox wikipedia , lookup
Measurement in quantum mechanics wikipedia , lookup
Quantum entanglement wikipedia , lookup
Bell's theorem wikipedia , lookup
Renormalization wikipedia , lookup
Quantum group wikipedia , lookup
Tight binding wikipedia , lookup
Wave–particle duality wikipedia , lookup
Bra–ket notation wikipedia , lookup
Noether's theorem wikipedia , lookup
Density matrix wikipedia , lookup
Hidden variable theory wikipedia , lookup
Hydrogen atom wikipedia , lookup
Quantum state wikipedia , lookup
Renormalization group wikipedia , lookup
Path integral formulation wikipedia , lookup
Particle in a box wikipedia , lookup
Matter wave wikipedia , lookup
Canonical quantization wikipedia , lookup
Relativistic quantum mechanics wikipedia , lookup
Symmetry in quantum mechanics wikipedia , lookup
Theoretical and experimental justification for the Schrödinger equation wikipedia , lookup
Physics 601, Angle Matrix elements It has been brought to my attention that the basic equation k 4π X ∗ Pk (cos θ12 ) = Y (r̂1 )Ykm (r̂2 ) 2k + 1 m=−k km (1) where r̂ denotes the set of coordinates θ, φ giving the direction of the unit vector r̂ = r/r is not well known. The version given here is from Jackson, Classical Electrodynamics, 2nd Ed., Eq. (3.70). The whole point of this formula is to separate the variables of particle 1 from the variables of particle 2. Once that has been done it is easy to evaluate angular matrix elements. That is, we need to find < `1 m1 `2 m2 |Pk (cos θ12 )|`01 m01 `02 m02 > (2) Our author did this for the special case when two of the `’s were zero. The general case is given by < `1 m1 `2 m2 |Pk (cos θ12 |`01 m01 `02 m02 k 4π X ∗ < `1 m1 |Ykm (r̂1 )|`01 m01 > > = 2k + 1 m=−k × < `2 m2 |Ykm (r̂2 )|`02 m02 > (3) Using Eq. (4.6.3) of the book by Edmonds, Angular Momentum in Quantum Mechanics, namely, < `1 m1 |Ykm (r̂1 )|`01 m01 >= (−1)m1 0 (2`1 + 1)(2`1 + 1)(2k + 1) 4π 1/2 `1 k 0 0 `01 0 `1 k −m1 m m01 one can write < `1 m1 `2 m2 | Pk (cos θ12 )|`01 m01 `02 m02 >= [(2`1 + 1)(2`2 + 1)(2`01 + 1)(2`02 + 1)]1/2 (−1)m1 +m2 +m 0 0 0 0 `1 k `1 ` k `1 ` k `2 ` k `2 1 2 2 × (5) 0 0 0 −m1 −m m01 0 0 0 −m2 m m02 where the j1 j2 j3 m1 m2 m3 1 `01 (6) (4) are called three-j symbols. They are available in Mathematica, but one can also get them by a search of the internet. In any case, just treat them as another integral that you look up in tables. The symbol vanishes unless m1 + m2 − m03 = 0 and |j1 − j3 | ≤ j2 ≤ j1 + j3 Some special cases that occur frequently are j−m j j 0 = (−1) √ 2j + 1 m −m 0 (7) It follows that < `1 m1 |Ykm (r̂1 )|00 >= δk`1 δmm1 (8) The three-j symbols are unchanged under an even permutation of the columns, and are multiplied by (−1)j1 +j2 +j3 under an odd permutation of the columns. 2