Download A proof

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Infinitesimal wikipedia , lookup

Peano axioms wikipedia , lookup

Axiom of reducibility wikipedia , lookup

Intuitionistic logic wikipedia , lookup

Laws of Form wikipedia , lookup

Inquiry wikipedia , lookup

Axiom wikipedia , lookup

Foundations of mathematics wikipedia , lookup

Propositional calculus wikipedia , lookup

Turing's proof wikipedia , lookup

Mathematical logic wikipedia , lookup

Argument wikipedia , lookup

Law of thought wikipedia , lookup

Sequent calculus wikipedia , lookup

Georg Cantor's first set theory article wikipedia , lookup

Curry–Howard correspondence wikipedia , lookup

Gödel's incompleteness theorems wikipedia , lookup

Truth-bearer wikipedia , lookup

Natural deduction wikipedia , lookup

Theorem wikipedia , lookup

Mathematical proof wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
Methods of proving theorems – Counterexample
21
 Counterexample : To show that a statement of the form ∀xP(x) is false, we need only
find a counterexample, that is, an example x for which P(x) is false.
 E.g. Prove that “For all real numbers x2 > x” is false
X=0.5 is a counterexample since 0.52 > 0.5 is not true
 Example Show that the statement: “Every positive integer is the sum of the
squares of two integers” is false.
 To show that this statement is false, we look for a counterexample which is 3
because we cannot write 3 as the sum of the squares of two integers.
To show this is the case, note that the only perfect squares not exceeding 3 are:
(02 = 0 & 12 = 1), but 3  1+0. Therefore the statement is false