• Study Resource
  • Explore
    • Arts & Humanities
    • Business
    • Engineering & Technology
    • Foreign Language
    • History
    • Math
    • Science
    • Social Science

    Top subcategories

    • Advanced Math
    • Algebra
    • Basic Math
    • Calculus
    • Geometry
    • Linear Algebra
    • Pre-Algebra
    • Pre-Calculus
    • Statistics And Probability
    • Trigonometry
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Astronomy
    • Astrophysics
    • Biology
    • Chemistry
    • Earth Science
    • Environmental Science
    • Health Science
    • Physics
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Anthropology
    • Law
    • Political Science
    • Psychology
    • Sociology
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Accounting
    • Economics
    • Finance
    • Management
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Aerospace Engineering
    • Bioengineering
    • Chemical Engineering
    • Civil Engineering
    • Computer Science
    • Electrical Engineering
    • Industrial Engineering
    • Mechanical Engineering
    • Web Design
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Architecture
    • Communications
    • English
    • Gender Studies
    • Music
    • Performing Arts
    • Philosophy
    • Religious Studies
    • Writing
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Ancient History
    • European History
    • US History
    • World History
    • other →

    Top subcategories

    • Croatian
    • Czech
    • Finnish
    • Greek
    • Hindi
    • Japanese
    • Korean
    • Persian
    • Swedish
    • Turkish
    • other →
 
Profile Documents Logout
Upload
a-logic - Digital Commons@Wayne State University
a-logic - Digital Commons@Wayne State University

First-Order Theorem Proving and Vampire
First-Order Theorem Proving and Vampire

... 125. mult(X2,X3) = mult(X3,X2) [superposition 21,90] 90. mult(X4,mult(X3,X4)) = X3 [forward demodulation 75,27] 75. mult(inverse(X3),e) = mult(X4,mult(X3,X4)) [superposition 22,19] 27. mult(inverse(X2),e) = X2 [superposition 21,11] 22. mult(inverse(X4),mult(X4,X5)) = X5 [forward demodulation 17,10] ...
Assumption-Based Argumentation with Preferences
Assumption-Based Argumentation with Preferences

... particularly over assumptions, similarly to the well known structured argumentation formalism ASPIC+ [47, 21, 49, 46] (which, however, accommodates preferences over rules too). Most existing approaches assume (e.g. [6, 14]) or perform (e.g. [47, 60]) an aggregation of objectlevel preferences to give ...
Independence logic and tuple existence atoms
Independence logic and tuple existence atoms

... Definition R relation, ~x , ~y , ~z tuples of attributes. Then R |= ~x  ~y | ~z if and only if, for all r , r 0 ∈ R such that r (~x ) = r 0 (~x ) there exists a r 00 ∈ R such that r 00 (~x ~y ) = r (~x ~y ) and r 00 (~x ~z ) = r (~x ~z ). Huge literature on the topic; If ~x ~y ~z contains all attri ...
Graphical Representation of Canonical Proof: Two case studies
Graphical Representation of Canonical Proof: Two case studies

Predicate Logic
Predicate Logic

... False. 3 is a counterexample. the set of positive integers not exceeding 4: {1, 2, 3, 4} False. 3 is a counterexample. Also note that here ∀P (x) is P (1) ∧ P (2) ∧ P (3) ∧ P (4), so its enough to observe that P (3) is false. the set of real numbers in the interval [10, 39.5] True. It takes a bit lo ...
Introduction to Computational Logic
Introduction to Computational Logic

Announcement as effort on topological spaces
Announcement as effort on topological spaces

PowerPoint
PowerPoint

Discrete Mathematics
Discrete Mathematics

... A propositional variable (lowercase letters p, q, r) is a proposition. These variables model true/false statements. The negation of a proposition P, written ¬ P, is a proposition. The conjunction (and) of two propositions, written P ∧ Q, is a proposition. The disjunction (or) of two propositions, wr ...
Artificial Intelligence
Artificial Intelligence

Chapter 9
Chapter 9

... First, the notion of logical implication will have to be refined because the behavior of these dependencies taken together is different depending on whether infinite instances are permitted. Second, both notions of logical implication are nonrecursive. And third, it can be proven in a formal sense t ...
Saying It with Pictures: a logical landscape of conceptual graphs
Saying It with Pictures: a logical landscape of conceptual graphs

Functional Dependencies in a Relational Database and
Functional Dependencies in a Relational Database and

Duplication of directed graphs and exponential blow up of
Duplication of directed graphs and exponential blow up of

... levels. The upper bound in Theorem 31 re ects well this idea and shows how patterns lying in cut-free proofs might be recoverable from the graph of the original proof with cuts. In Sections 5 and 13 we analyze how patterns in proofs evolve through cut elimination and which are the combinatorial stru ...
Logic and Proof - Numeracy Workshop
Logic and Proof - Numeracy Workshop

... The truth or falsity of a converse can not be inferred from the truth or falsity of the original statement. For example, x = 2 ⇒ x2 = 4 is true, but . . . its converse x2 = 4 ⇒ x = 2 is false, because x could be equal to −2. ...
On Weak Ground
On Weak Ground

Labeled Natural Deduction for Temporal Logics
Labeled Natural Deduction for Temporal Logics

.pdf
.pdf

Termination of Higher-order Rewrite Systems
Termination of Higher-order Rewrite Systems

... Rewriting and Termination The word rewriting suggests a process of computation. Typically, the objects of computation are syntactic expressions in some formal language. A rewrite system consists of a collection of rules (the program). A computation step is performed by replacing a part of an express ...
Dialectica Interpretations A Categorical Analysis
Dialectica Interpretations A Categorical Analysis

... The work presented in this thesis is a contribution to the area of type theory and semantics for programming languages in that we develop and study new models for type theories and programming logics. It is also a contribution to the area of logic in computer science, in that our categorical analys ...
JUXTAPOSITION - Brown University
JUXTAPOSITION - Brown University

The Deduction Rule and Linear and Near
The Deduction Rule and Linear and Near

Many-Valued Logic
Many-Valued Logic

Structural Proof Theory
Structural Proof Theory

... structural proof theory belongs, with a few exceptions, to what can be described as computational proof theory. Since 1970, a branch of proof theory known as constructive type theory has been developed. A theorem typically states that a certain claim holds under given assumptions. The basic idea of ...
1 2 3 4 5 ... 40 >

Inquiry



An inquiry is any process that has the aim of augmenting knowledge, resolving doubt, or solving a problem. A theory of inquiry is an account of the various types of inquiry and a treatment of the ways that each type of inquiry achieves its aim.
  • studyres.com © 2025
  • DMCA
  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Report