Download Previews Synaptic Asymmetry to Go Leading Edge Michael L. Dustin

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Adaptive immune system wikipedia , lookup

T cell wikipedia , lookup

Molecular mimicry wikipedia , lookup

Lymphopoiesis wikipedia , lookup

Cancer immunotherapy wikipedia , lookup

Innate immune system wikipedia , lookup

Immunosuppressive drug wikipedia , lookup

Polyclonal B cell response wikipedia , lookup

Immunomics wikipedia , lookup

Adoptive cell transfer wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
Leading Edge
Previews
Synaptic Asymmetry to Go
Michael L. Dustin1,*
Helen L. and Martin S. Kimmel Center for Biology and Medicine, Skirball Institute of Biomolecular Medicine, New York University School
of Medicine, New York, NY 10016, USA
*Correspondence: [email protected]
DOI 10.1016/j.cell.2008.02.016
1
Cell polarity is critical for T lymphocyte movement during their hunt for antigen-bearing cells and
for infected target cells. In this issue of Cell, Yeh et al. (2008) now reveal a direct link between T
cell polarity and the production of proinflammatory cytokines in mice lacking the class I MHCrestricted T cell-associated molecule (Crtam).
The proinflammatory cytokines produced by CD4+ helper T cells, including interferon-γ and the interleukins
IL-17 and IL-22, play a critical role in
orchestrating immune responses. For
example, patients lacking interferon-γ
receptors are highly susceptible to
mycobacterial infections (Jouanguy et
al., 1996), and extracellular bacterial
infections are controlled with the help
of T cells that produce IL-17 and IL-22
(Mangan et al., 2006). Yeh et al. (2008)
now demonstrate that the class I MHCrestricted T cell-associated molecule
(Crtam), which is not expressed by
naive T cells, is expressed in a small
subset of naive CD4+ T cells 6–12 hr
after the initiation of T cell receptor
signaling. They establish that expression of Crtam is required for early
(12–48 hr) production of interferon-γ
and IL-22 and show that Crtam-deficient T cells display hyperproliferation
and decreased transcription of genes
encoding interferon-γ, IL-17, and IL-22.
Thus, Crtam is of significant immunological interest given its role in mediating the production of proinflammatory
cytokines. But the insights provided
by Yeh et al. into Crtam’s mechanism
of action have wider implications. Furthermore, their finding suggests a solution to a logistical dilemma posed by
recent studies linking immunological
synapses to asymmetric cell division in
T cells (Chang et al., 2007).
Yeh et al. (2008) report that Crtam regulates cytokine production and proliferation by recruiting the basolateral polarity
protein Scribble. Scribble is recruited to
the same pole of the T cell as the T cell
receptor during the late period of T cell
priming (between 12–14 hr after initiation
of T cell receptor signaling). The signaling pathways downstream of Crtam and
Scribble are not known, but the outcome
was reconstituted by the authors by
directly linking Crtam to Scribble, suggesting that Scribble recruitment is sufficient for Crtam action (Figure 1). Previously, Scribble had attracted attention as
a tumor suppressor that inhibits epithelial cell growth (Bilder et al., 2000; Nakagawa and Huibregtse, 2000). The mechanisms for the antiproliferative effects of
Crtam in T cells may be similar to those
mediating the antiproliferative effects of
Scribble in epithelial cells. The influence
of Crtam-Scribble on the transcription
of proinflammatory genes reported by
Yeh et al. is particularly interesting given
recent studies suggesting a role for the
immunological synapse in asymmetric
division in T cells.
When T lymphocytes interact with
dendritic cells presenting appropriate
antigenic complexes, the T cell forms
Figure 1. The Immunological Synapse and Asymmetric Cell Division
Yeh et al. (2008) provide evidence that Crtam regulates the late phase of T cell polarity. The model
depicted links the immunological synapse to asymmetric cell division and is compiled from studies of
Crtam-Scribble (Yeh et al., 2008), the role of Scribble in migration (Ludford-Menting et al., 2005), and
asymmetric cell division (Chang et al., 2007). Immunological synapses establish polarized distributions
of key effector molecules, such as LFA-1 (red), talin (orange), the T cell receptor (green), and CD44/Ezrin
(blue). (For clarity, each molecule is represented only once or twice but represents the thousands of
molecules observed in the immunofluorescence images.) When T cells renew migration in the late phase
of activation, they are likely to internalize many of the components that were polarized to the synapse.
These components may be degraded or recycled, but a third alternative is that they may be sequestered
in a regulated endosomal compartment in a manner dependent on the Crtam-Scribble complex (purple).
The sequestered components may be partitioned preferentially to one daughter cell during asymmetric
cell division. Although asymmetric cell division is temporally and spatially separated from formation of
the immunological synapse, polarity information may be retained by the Crtam-Scribble complex. In this
model, Crtam is cleared from the surface after its role in partitioning of components between daughter
cells is completed.
Cell 132, March 7, 2008 ©2008 Elsevier Inc. 733
a stable cell-cell junction with the dendritic cells, known as an immunological
synapse. The immunological synapse
is an extension of cell polarity intrinsic
to T cell mobility. It is characterized by
the recruitment of the T cell receptor,
adhesion molecules, and associated
proteins, such as LFA-1 and talin, to
the synapse and segregation of CD44
and Ezrin to the distal pole of the cell
away from the synapse. Scribble is
required for uropod formation, migration, and immunological synapse formation by CD8+ T cells (Ludford-Menting et al., 2005). In the T cell activation
assay used by Yeh et al. (2008), which
involved placing T cells on an antiCD3/anti-CD28 substrate, T cells interact tightly with the substrate for ?6 hr
(the synaptic phase). The T cells then
increase progressively in volume and
migrate over the substrate rapidly until
the onset of mitosis. Little is known
about how signal integration and polarity are controlled in these premitotic
T cells (also known as blast-stage T
cells). The authors found that a subset
of molecules that are polarized in the
immunological synapse remain polarized in T cells expressing Crtam during this migratory phase. These include
Scribble, CD3, Talin, PKCζ, and Cdc42
at one pole, and CD44 at the opposite
pole (Yeh et al., 2008). Given that Scribble is known to be associated with the
uropod in migrating T cells (LudfordMenting et al., 2005), it is not clear if
the pole with CD3 is the leading edge
or the trailing edge of the migrating
cell. Regardless, this ability of Crtam to
enable a migrating T cell to retain signatures of the immunological synapse
suggests that the Crtam-Scribble system not only regulates proliferation and
cytokine production, but may be able
to form a bridge between the polarity
generated in the immunological synapse and asymmetric cell division that
follows up to 2 days later.
Asymmetric cell division is a critical
process in the development of multicellular organisms and plays an important role in maintaining stem cell populations later in life (Lechler and Fuchs,
2005; Sternberg and Horvitz, 1988). It
is based on the asymmetric partitioning of components between daughter
cells at mitosis with the result that the
daughter cells have different characteristics and fates. We have previously
speculated that the immunological
synapse could organize asymmetric
cell divisions leading to the production of memory and effector T cells
(Dustin and Chan, 2000). However, a
problem with this proposal was that
in vivo observations of immunological
synapses showed that they break off
in the premitotic blast stage and that
T cells return to a highly motile state
prior to mitosis (Mempel et al., 2004).
Subsequently, Reiner and colleagues
have performed a striking analysis of
asymmetric cell division in CD8+ lymphocytes during the immune response
to intracellular bacterial pathogens
(Chang et al., 2007). This study demonstrated asymmetric partitioning of synapse components, such as LFA-1 and
CD8 between daughter cells and thus
revived the model that the immunological synapse is a niche that organizes
asymmetric cell divisions to allow generation of memory and effector T cells.
Although it is likely that immunological
synapses do not directly organize the
asymmetric cell divisions observed by
Chang et al. (2007), Crtam is expressed
by 100% of CD8+ T cells after activation (Yeh et al., 2008). Hence, Crtam
734 Cell 132, March 7, 2008 ©2008 Elsevier Inc.
could enable postsynapse/premitotic
T cells to take their synaptic polarity
“to go” and then partition the stored
synaptic components asymmetrically
between daughter cells at a remote
location. Crtam’s ability to retain information from a niche, the immunological synapse, and then read this out at a
later time and different place—to produce cytokines, control proliferation,
or speculatively to mediate asymmetric cell division—make it a compelling
molecule to study further.
References
Bilder, D., Li, M., and Perrimon, N. (2000). Science
289, 113–116.
Chang, J.T., Palanivel, V.R., Kinjyo, I., Schambach,
F., Intlekofer, A.M., Banerjee, A., Longworth, S.A.,
Vinup, K.E., Mrass, P., Oliaro, J., et al. (2007). Science 315, 1687–1691.
Dustin, M.L., and Chan, A.C. (2000). Cell 103,
283–294.
Jouanguy, E., Altare, F., Lamhamedi, S., Revy, P.,
Emile, J.F., Newport, M., Levin, M., Blanche, S.,
Seboun, E., Fischer, A., and Casanova, J.L. (1996).
N. Engl. J. Med. 335, 1956–1961.
Lechler, T., and Fuchs, E. (2005). Nature 437,
275–280.
Ludford-Menting, M.J., Oliaro, J., Sacirbegovic, F.,
Cheah, E.T., Pedersen, N., Thomas, S.J., Pasam,
A., Iazzolino, R., Dow, L.E., Waterhouse, N.J., et al.
(2005). Immunity 22, 737–748.
Mangan, P.R., Harrington, L.E., O’Quinn, D.B.,
Helms, W.S., Bullard, D.C., Elson, C.O., Hatton,
R.D., Wahl, S.M., Schoeb, T.R., and Weaver, C.T.
(2006). Nature 441, 231–234.
Mempel, T.R., Henrickson, S.E., and Von Andrian,
U.H. (2004). Nature 427, 154–159.
Nakagawa, S., and Huibregtse, J.M. (2000). Mol.
Cell. Biol. 20, 8244–8253.
Sternberg, P.W., and Horvitz, H.R. (1988). Dev.
Biol. 130, 67–73.
Yeh, Y.-H., Sidhu, S.S., and Chan, A.C. (2008).
Cell, this issue.