* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download experimenters must be careful that the designs of their studies do
Memory conformity wikipedia , lookup
False consensus effect wikipedia , lookup
Communication in small groups wikipedia , lookup
Milgram experiment wikipedia , lookup
Impression formation wikipedia , lookup
Group dynamics wikipedia , lookup
Attitude (psychology) wikipedia , lookup
Introspection illusion wikipedia , lookup
Social tuning wikipedia , lookup
Albert Bandura wikipedia , lookup
Social perception wikipedia , lookup
Attitude change wikipedia , lookup
Stanford prison experiment wikipedia , lookup
The Power of Social Roles & Ethical Experimentation I. Research Ethics: Procedures and Issues A. Ethical Concerns with Humans: experimenters must be careful that the designs of their studies do not harm participants mentally, emotionally, or physically. B. Deception: in research, when participants are misinformed or misled regarding a study’s methods and purposes. C. Informed Consent: a statement informing participants what to expect in an experiment and that requires their acceptance of the procedures. D. Debriefing: an important post-experiment interview between experimenters and participants verifying that participants are fully informed about, and were not harmed in any way by, their experience in an experiment. II. When Behavior Predicts Attitudes A. The Snowball Effect: a process that starts from an initial state of small significance and builds upon itself, becoming larger and perhaps potentially dangerous or disastrous (a "spiral of decline"), though it might be beneficial instead. B. Cognitive Dissonance Theory: a state of tension that exists when an individual holds contradictory attitudes, or exhibits behavior that is inconsistent with their attitudes. There are four basic ways we try to reduce cognitive dissonance… 1) By changing our behavior to bring it in line with the dissonant cognition. 2) By attempting to justify our behavior through changing one of the dissonant cognitions. 3) By attempting to justify our behavior by adding new cognitions. 4) Trivialize and/or ignore the entire dissonance arousing situation. III. Social Role Playing A. Norms: standards for accepted and expected behavior in different situations. Norms prescribe “proper” behavior and can vary among different cultures. Norms typically describe what most others do; what is “normal”. B. Role: a specific set of norms that define how people ought to behave in a given social position. C. Conformity: a change in behavior or belief as the result of real or imagined group pressure. Conformity often occurs in response to established norms. 1) Informational Influence: the influence of other people that leads us to conform because we see them as a source of information to guide our behavior. We conform because we believe that others’ interpretation of an ambiguous situation is more correct than ours and will help us choose an appropriate course of action. 2) Normative Influence: the influence of other people that leads us to conform in order to be liked and accepted by them; this type of conformity results in public compliance with the group’s beliefs and behaviors but not necessarily private acceptance of those beliefs and behaviors. IV. The Stanford Prison Experiment A. It examined the psychological effects of playing the social role of a prisoner or prison guard. B. The question was: Is prison brutality due to evil prisoners and malicious guards or does the situation make them that way? C. A total of 24 psychologically healthy undergraduates were selected out of over 75 to play the roles of both guards and prisoners and live in a fake prison in the basement of the Stanford psychology building. D. Behavioral cruelty and hateful attitudes developed between prisoners and guards. E. The experiment was supposed to run for 2 weeks, but had to be abruptly stopped after only six days because of the dangerous situation taking place.