* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Quantum Mechanics Lecture 3 Dr. Mauro Ferreira
Interpretations of quantum mechanics wikipedia , lookup
EPR paradox wikipedia , lookup
Matter wave wikipedia , lookup
Particle in a box wikipedia , lookup
Bell's theorem wikipedia , lookup
Wave–particle duality wikipedia , lookup
Coherent states wikipedia , lookup
Relativistic quantum mechanics wikipedia , lookup
Ensemble interpretation wikipedia , lookup
Probability amplitude wikipedia , lookup
Molecular Hamiltonian wikipedia , lookup
Path integral formulation wikipedia , lookup
Copenhagen interpretation wikipedia , lookup
Second quantization wikipedia , lookup
Coupled cluster wikipedia , lookup
Wave function wikipedia , lookup
Measurement in quantum mechanics wikipedia , lookup
Bra–ket notation wikipedia , lookup
Hidden variable theory wikipedia , lookup
Renormalization group wikipedia , lookup
Quantum state wikipedia , lookup
Theoretical and experimental justification for the Schrödinger equation wikipedia , lookup
Density matrix wikipedia , lookup
Compact operator on Hilbert space wikipedia , lookup
Self-adjoint operator wikipedia , lookup
Quantum Mechanics Lecture 3 Dr. Mauro Ferreira E-mail: [email protected] Room 2.49, Lloyd Institute Monday 10 October 2011 Postulates of Quantum Mechanics P2: All physically “observable” properties of a system are represented by dynamic variables that are linear operators Consider a linear operator Ô representing a dynamic variable “O”. The knowledge of the wave function ψ(x) that describes the state of a system does not provide a fully deterministic value for the observable quantity but only a statistical distribution of possible measurements Monday 10 October 2011 Definition: A linear operator Ô is by definition a mathematical entity that associates with every function ψ(x) another function ϕ(x), the correspondence being linear. Ô ψ = φ Ô(λ1 ψ1 (x) + λ2 ψ2 (x)) = λ1 Ô ψ1 (x) + λ2 Ô ψ2 (x) Examples of linear operators are: Π̂ ψ(x, y, z) = ψ(−x, −y, −z) (Parity operator) ∂ D̂x ψ(x, y, z) = ψ(x, y, z) ∂x (Differential operator) Monday 10 October 2011 Postulates of Quantum Mechanics P2: All physically “observable” properties of a system are represented by dynamic variables that are linear operators Consider a linear operator Ô representing a dynamic variable “O”. The knowledge of the wave function ψ(x) that describes the state of a system does not provide a fully deterministic value for the observable quantity but only a statistical distribution of possible measurements In mathematical terms, we can express the above by !O" = ! ∞ −∞ dx ψ ∗ (x) Ô ψ(x) The operator is “sandwiched” by the wave functions and integrated Monday 10 October 2011 !x" = ! ∞ dx ψ (x) X̂ ψ(x) ∗ } ⇒ X̂ = x −∞ ! ∞ ˆ ! ⇒ R = !r tic ∗ !x" = dx ψ (x) x ψ(x) e n i k e k i l , −∞ s ? e i c t t i e t , n y a g u r q e n c i e l m a a i t n y n e d t r o p ! ∞ ut othe , m u t n o e b m a o t ∗ a m h r (x) P̂ ψ(x) a !p"W= dx ψ l u g n a , y g ! ∂ r ene −∞ ⇒ P̂ = ! ∞ i ∂x ! ∂ ψ(x) ∗ !p" = dx ψ (x) !! ˆ i −∞ ∂x ! ⇒P = ∇ Monday 10 October 2011 } i Operators associated with a given observable can always be expressed in terms of the canonical operators X and P, following the same functional dependence found in classical mechanics. Kinetic energy: 2 2 −! ∂ P̂ = T̂ = 2m 2m ∂x2 2 T̂3D −!2 2 = ∇ 2m Potential energy: V̂ (X̂) = V (x) ˆ ! V̂ (R) = V (!r) ˆ ˆ ˆ ! ! ! Angular momentum: L = R × P Monday 10 October 2011 Interesting consequence: Ô ψ = φ Monday 10 October 2011 Mathematically, an operator applied to a function ψ changes it to another function ϕ. Physically, a measurement of O on a system in a state described by ψ disturbs it, changing it to the state ϕ. Remember ? l c i t r a p e Wav y t i l a e du Com Unce y t i l i ab b o r P rtaint Inte y plem enta rfer enc e rity n o i t a z i t Quan e M e r u s a Monday 10 October 2011 t n me it s n e s y t i iv Interesting consequence: Ô ψ = φ Mathematically, an operator applied to a function ψ changes it to another function ϕ. Physically, a measurement of O on a system in a state described by ψ disturbs it, changing it to the state ϕ. How does o ne know wh ether it is p have compl ossible to ete simultan eous knowl specific pro edge of two perties of a system, say A and B ? This can only be possible if the order of measurements of the two properties does not matter, regardless of the state ψ the system is in. In other words... Monday 10 October 2011  B̂ ψ = B̂  ψ  B̂ ψ = B̂  ψ ( B̂ − B̂ Â) ψ = 0 In operator form :  B̂ − B̂  = 0̂ It is convenient to define the commutator of two operators as  B̂ − B̂  = [Â, B̂] Monday 10 October 2011 e ? h t f o m r u t o en t a t om u m m m o and c e on h t s ti i i s t o a p h W tors [ X̂, P̂ ] =? a r e p o [X̂, P̂ ] = X̂ P̂ − P̂ X̂ ! d ! d − x) ψ(x) [X̂, P̂ ]ψ(x) = (x i dx i dx ! dψ(x) ! dψ(x) ! [X̂, P̂ ]ψ(x) = x −x − ψ(x) i dx i dx i ! [X̂, P̂ ]ψ(x) = − ψ(x) i [X̂, P̂ ] = i ! It is simple to generalize this to higher dimensions [X̂, P̂x ] = i ! ; [Ŷ , P̂y ] = i ! ; [Ẑ, P̂z ] = i ! Monday 10 October 2011 It is straightforward to see that [X̂, Ŷ ] = [X̂, Ẑ] = [Ŷ , Ẑ] = 0̂ and [P̂x , P̂y ] = [P̂x , P̂z ] = [P̂y , P̂z ] = 0̂ Monday 10 October 2011 Properties of commutators [Â, B̂] = −[B̂, Â] (antisymmetry) [Â, B̂ + Ĉ + D̂ + ...] = [Â, B̂] + [Â, Ĉ] + [Â, D̂] + ... (linearity) [Â, B̂ Ĉ] = [Â, B̂] Ĉ + B̂ [Â, Ĉ] (distributivity) [Â, λ] = 0 (commutation with scalars) [Â, B̂ n ] = n−1 ! B̂ j [Â, B̂] Ân−j−1 j=0 [Ân , B̂] = n−1 ! j=0 Monday 10 October 2011 Ân−j−1 [Â, B̂] B̂ j Consider the uncertainties of the observables A and B written as operators ∆ =  − "Â# ∆B̂ = B̂ − "B̂# ∆ ψ(x) = χ(x) ∆B̂ ψ(x) = φ(x) When applied to a state function ψ(x) Applying the Schwarz inequality to both χ(x) and ϕ(x) Monday 10 October 2011 Schwarz inequality ! ∞ −∞ dx ψ ∗ (x) ψ(x) ≥ 0 constant writing ψ(x) as ψ(x) = φ(x) + λη(x) ! ∞ −∞ dx {φ φ + λφ η + λ η φ + λ λη η} ≥ 0 ∗ ∗ ∗ ∗ ∗ ∗ which is certainly true for every λ. It is then also true for !∞ ∗ dx η φ −∞ λ = − !∞ a slightly tedious algebra leads to ∗ dx η η −∞ ! ∞ −∞ Monday 10 October 2011 dx | φ|2 ! ∞ −∞ dx | η|2 ≥ | ! ∞ −∞ dx φ∗ η|2 Consider the uncertainties of the observables A and B written as operators ∆ =  − "Â# ∆B̂ = B̂ − "B̂# ∆ ψ(x) = χ(x) ∆B̂ ψ(x) = φ(x) When applied to a state function ψ(x) Applying the Schwarz inequality to both χ(x) and ϕ(x) !(∆Â)2 " !(∆B̂)2 " ≥ |!∆ ∆B̂"|2 Further manipulation leads to 1 ∆ ∆B̂ ≥ |"[Â, B̂]#| 2 Monday 10 October 2011 (General uncertainty principle) 1 ∆ ∆B̂ ≥ |"[Â, B̂]#| 2 As a particular case, we have the operators momentum and position What’s the effect of [X̂, P̂ ] = i ! ! ⇒ ∆x ∆p ≥ 2 confining a particle ? (Standard uncertainty principle) As a direct consequence, we see that the commutator of two operators determine whether or not the quantities they are n o i t associated with can be simultaneously specified. ntiza Speaking of measurements ... Monday 10 October 2011 a u q s e o ? d t u w Ho ome abo c Quantization comes about when we impose that the allowed values for an observable quantity O are the eigenvalues of the operator Ô Monday 10 October 2011 Eigenvalues and eigenvectors When the result of applying an operator  to a function ψ is a multiple of that function, the function is called an eigenfunction and the multiple is called the eigenvalue of the operator. eigenfunction ÂΨa = aΨa (eigenvalue equation) eigenvalue Eigenvalues can be either discrete or continuous Monday 10 October 2011 Quantization comes about when we impose that the allowed values for an observable quantity O are the eigenvalues of the operator Ô Quantization occurs for observables that have discrete eigenvalues (e.g. atomic energies) Q̂Ψqi = qi Ψqi (i = 1, 2, 3, ...) ... but is not always the case, since eigenvalues can be continuously distributed (e.g. particle position in a confined space) Q̂Ψq = qΨq Monday 10 October 2011 Example: Suppose an electron is confined to a zero-potential region between two impenetrable walls at x=0 and x=a and is described by the following wave function ψ(x) = ! 2 3πx sin( ) a a f or 0 ≤ x ≤ a a) Calculate the expectation value of the kinetic energy b) What is the corresponding uncertainty in the kinetic energy ? Monday 10 October 2011