* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Slide 1
Neuromarketing wikipedia , lookup
Marketing research wikipedia , lookup
Food marketing wikipedia , lookup
Marketing communications wikipedia , lookup
Sports marketing wikipedia , lookup
Predictive engineering analytics wikipedia , lookup
Target audience wikipedia , lookup
Multi-level marketing wikipedia , lookup
Digital marketing wikipedia , lookup
Ambush marketing wikipedia , lookup
Target market wikipedia , lookup
Youth marketing wikipedia , lookup
Guerrilla marketing wikipedia , lookup
Marketing plan wikipedia , lookup
Product planning wikipedia , lookup
Viral marketing wikipedia , lookup
Direct marketing wikipedia , lookup
Marketing mix modeling wikipedia , lookup
Integrated marketing communications wikipedia , lookup
Multicultural marketing wikipedia , lookup
Marketing strategy wikipedia , lookup
Sensory branding wikipedia , lookup
Advertising campaign wikipedia , lookup
Green marketing wikipedia , lookup
Marketing channel wikipedia , lookup
Marketing Executives Council February 28, 2008 Today’s Agenda • • • Welcome and Introductions (Tarnacki) Review of Anti-trust guidelines (Bruno) Supplier Image Business Case (Cameron) Overview and Feedback • Getting the Message Out (Owens) AASA Proposal and Media campaign • • Break 10:30 Distributor Liabilities (Bruno) New Special Report follow-up to Risks of Direct Import • • Lunch 11:30 AAPEX – AASA Involvement (Gardner) AASA Show Committee expectations • AAPEX – Joint Association Marketing Sub-Committee (Harris) Sub-Committee Mission Open Discussion • Wrap-up & Adjourn (Tarnacki) Marketing Executives Council February 28, 2008 Supplier Image Initiative Since its inception, the MEC has continued to advance the idea of a Standard of Excellence to distinguish valueadded suppliers from all others. • Supplier Image Initiative Business Case Some members including board members expressed concern over AASA’s role in certification Business case was developed in last MEC breakout to educate and gain buy-in before moving further • Presentation to the BOG tomorrow • Move toward a formal recommendation by next BOG meeting Marketing Executives Council February 28, 2008 Business Case – Talking Points • The Marketing Executives Council has requested time on AASA Board of Governors agenda to discuss its Supplier Image Initiative - why it is important, what it is, what it is not and our hope to gain buy-in for moving forward. • When the MEC was formed, its primary objective was to develop a strategy for improving supplier image and awareness of the value added services provided. This has been on each meeting agenda since its inception in 2006. • Among issues identified by the council facing suppliers today, include: Inferior products entering the country that pose safety, quality and reliability concerns. Effects of the imported products on other components within the vehicle (which could lead to premature failures, unnecessary warranty claims, etc.). Continued loss and appreciation by customers of value-added services and programs. Increased momentum of virtually all aftermarket components becoming commodities (which will lead to a market driven only by price). Degradation of brand equity. Further erosion of North American manufacturing. Negative impact on the image of the independent aftermarket (pushing sales to OE service outlets). Marketing Executives Council February 28, 2008 Business Case – Talking Points • The Supplier Image Initiative, as it has become known, focuses on these elements to address the identified issues: What does it mean to be an AASA member? When it comes to country-of-origin, it is not about where a product is made but rather who develops and stands behind it. Retailers, distributors, program groups, jobbers and technicians can have confidence in companies that hold membership in AASA knowing that member companies will provide quality products supported by important value-added services and programs. • Over the past year or more, the MEC has developed a road map answering the questions of – where we are; where we should be; and, how we should get there, which is in your copy of the business case. • Our proposal to you is that we want to develop and present to you at a future meeting, our recommendations on a Supplier Excellence enhancement to AASA membership. This enhancement would be an additional tiered status of membership, a Premier status if you will, only attainable by meeting minimum guidelines, which you can see an example of in the Business Case. It is not a certification but rather standards of excellence. Legally, these would be administered by submitting to a “code of ethics” at the time of membership and subsequent annual renewal. Marketing Executives Council February 28, 2008 Business Case – Talking Points • • The minimum standards of these guidelines should be both attainable for the vast majority of current membership yet meaningful as to provide value downstream. It is proposed that the following be adopted as minimum standards: Sales representation / manpower Credit terms Marketing programs Industry standard cataloging Product specifications Quality control Product liability IP protection Technical support and training Category management It may be necessary to amend these guidelines in the future; however it is believed that this is a reasonable start. While these minimum standards may appear inherent to all suppliers to the aftermarket, it is believed that for many short-line and/or off-shore suppliers they will be difficult to obtain. Marketing Executives Council February 28, 2008 Business Case – Talking Points • Our desired result is to extend the value of membership in AASA down to the customer level and back that up with a tangible list of standards that not all AASA members may qualify for but should be attainable. Additionally, we want to heighten the awareness of the value added services by our members as well as the intangible benefits of dealing with well known and respected suppliers. • This is only one part of the Supplier Image Initiative but it is the foundation. Without it we will have to choose an entirely different direction. However, it is the combined thought of the Marketing Executives Council, your marketing experts, that this is the best course of action. • All details are not yet finalized and a formal recommendation is forthcoming. However, without your buy-in we are reluctant to move forward. • Questions? Marketing Executives Council February 28, 2008 Getting the Message Out on Supplier Image Jon Owens, Babcox Marketing Executives Council February 28, 2008 Break 15 minutes Marketing Executives Council February 28, 2008 Distributor Liability What You Need to Know Presented by Sarah Bruno, Esq. Arent Fox PLLC Washington, DC February 28, 2008 Distributor Liability You can be liable! –Counterfeiting –Product Liability –Recall Issues There are several theories for holding the distributor accountable… Distributor Liability – What You Need to Know. Active Participation Active Participation in a Counterfeiting Scheme • Obviously, distributors can be liable for active participation. • Microsoft case – distributor found liable for failing to act to remove counterfeit goods after receiving notice. But it is not limited to active participation…Distributors can be liable for simply "ignoring" what appears to be illegal. Distributor Liability – What You Need to Know. “Willful Blindness” Distributors are liable for being “willfully blind” • They should have known about the counterfeit goods or they failed to inquire. • Factors the courts have considered: – Where the goods were purchased – Whether the goods were sold with the authenticating documentation – Whether the quality differs from the quality expected by consumers – The pricing of the goods – Evidence on billing slips Distributor Liability – What You Need to Know. What does this mean for you? Pay attention to the details.... • Packaging slips – do they look tampered, altered or raise red flags for other reasons? • Quality – is the product of the quality that you expected? • Safety standards – does the product include the safety specifications? • Country of origin – was the product manufactured in the country that you expected? • Trademarks and logos – do they look authentic? Distributor Liability – What You Need to Know. Pay Attention to the Logos and Packaging Elements Trademarks - It can be a product name, logo, trade name, part number, the name of a service, the color and design of a product’s packaging. Distributor Liability – What You Need to Know. Contractual Protection - Protect yourself contractually - Have an agreement with the manufacturer that asks them to indemnify you for any claim of infringement. - Warranty provision from the manufacturer attesting to the legitimacy of the product. - Be vigilant! Look for the red flags and then take action when you come across them. - Notify the manufacturer when you believe there is a counterfeit goods problem. Distributor Liability – What You Need to Know. Product Liability Distributors may also be found liable for damage or harm caused by a defective product • A distributor may be “strictly liable” if it is in the chain of distribution. This means that it can be found liable without any evidence that they were negligent or acted willfully. • A distributor can also be liable if the advertising or product label indicates the product is manufactured by the distributor. • A distributor can also be liable if the foreign manufacturer is located outside of the U.S. Distributor Liability – What You Need to Know. What Can you Do? Trust your gut - if something doesn’t seem right, pull it, or contact the manufacturer and put them on notice of the problem. Protect yourself contractually • Require the manufacturer to indemnify you. • Require the manufacturer to meet all the required safety specifications. • Require the manufacturer to warranty the quality of the product and the fact that it meets the appropriate safety standards Distributor Liability – What You Need to Know. Lunch 30 minutes Marketing Executives Council February 28, 2008 AAPEX Overview Chris Gardner, AASA Marketing Executives Council February 28, 2008 AAPEX Joint Association Sub-Committee Barry Harris, Timken Marketing Executives Council February 28, 2008 General Discussion / Wrap-up • Meeting Format & Frequency Original charter called for a two-day meeting once per year Addition of Networking Opportunities – one of the most valuable assets 2008 Remaining Schedule: May 22 in conjunction with GAAS - Chicago August 19 in conjunction with BPC - Detroit November 18 - Chicago • MEC membership recruitment / prospects • What’s on Your Mind? Comment or pass • Adjourn Marketing Executives Council February 28, 2008 Next Meeting May 22 in Chicago following GAAS Marketing Executives Council February 28, 2008 Back-Up Slides 2007 In Review: Slides of AASA Supplier Standard of Excellence and Improving the Image of the NA Supplier Marketing Executives Council February 28, 2008 Communications Campaign (session 1) Universal advertising campaign that can be repurposed for all target audiences • Primary goal of campaign will be designed to elevate the North American Aftermarket Supplier • Secondary goal of campaign will be to promote AASA to industry, members and media • Get approval from AASA board of governors to create an RFP to put for bid of a complete ad campaign that would include the following: Print ads Franchise pieces Web site Public relations strategy and campaign Advertising strategy for trade publications, financial publications and consumer media Marketing Executives Council February 28, 2008 AASA Supplier Standard of Excellence (session 1) • “Standard of Excellence” will encompass the value-added supplier elements • Create a logo / seal for North American suppliers to utilize on packaging, ads, collateral materials that will reinforce the “Standard of Excellence” that they adhere to in their products, businesses and operations • Criteria can be designed and analyzed by a third party firm and administered and managed by AASA Marketing Executives Council February 28, 2008 AASA Supplier Standard of Excellence Criteria (session 1) • • • • • • • • • • • • Quality Supply Safety standards Training Product lifecycle management Cataloging / pricing Innovation / latest technology Designed for the aftermarket Warranty We are the “parts” experts We’re more efficient/profitable to do business Intellectual property Marketing Executives Council February 28, 2008 Brand Planning Process Where are we? Why are we there? Are we getting there? How do we get there? Marketing Executives Council Where could we be? February 28, 2008 Where Are We? (session 1) • “Brands” are highly valued in the aftermarket... • However, we have lost: share to OE dealers share to LCC’s (Low Cost Countries) control of Brands to retailers/distributors Marketing Executives Council February 28, 2008 Where Should We Be? (session 1) • Primary target: end user (professional installers / DIYers) • Other audiences: distributors/retailers, government, Wall Street, vehicle owners • Have them trust the aftermarket supplier Build our credibility Get credit for what we do • Regain share from the LCC’s and OEMs Marketing Executives Council February 28, 2008 How Do We Get There? (session 1) • Aftermarket supplier standard of excellence - value-added supplier • Value-added standards: • Quality Supply Safety standards Training Product lifecycle management Cataloging / pricing Innovation / latest technology Designed for the aftermarket Warranty We are the “parts” experts We’re more efficient/profitable to do business with Manpower Intellectual property Support with communications campaign • • Code of conduct Focus on the positive All sing from the same hymn book Better IP protection Better industry standards (data, quality…) Enforce adoption Marketing Executives Council February 28, 2008 Need to flesh out Communications Campaign to enhance the Image of NA Supplier (session 2) Communications Campaign • How do we know we are getting there: Measure market share in North America pre and post by product line or by dealer share • Measurements: Interest/response level of other AASA members • Pre and post evaluations: Survey key buyers pre & post • Frequency: Every six months Marketing Executives Council February 28, 2008 Communications Campaign to enhance the Image of NA Supplier (session 2) Communication Phase 1: • Target audience: Suppliers. • Message: Include meaning, measurements and some information from surveys regarding differentiation. How to get certified, where to get more information • Assumption: Standard is determined. Marketing Executives Council February 28, 2008 Communications Campaign to enhance the Image of NA Supplier (session 2) Communication Phase 2: • Target audience: Buyers and technicians • Message: Informational regarding the standard • Assumption: Standard is determined and some suppliers already have it. Marketing Executives Council February 28, 2008 Communications Campaign to enhance the Image of NA Supplier (session 2) **Prior to communication, benchmark the current market to have a pre and post opinion regarding certification. Benchmark other industries (UL or JD Powers) to understand their communication process and their methods. Marketing Executives Council February 28, 2008 Criteria for Standard of Excellence (session 2) 1. Basic Criteria for Standard of Excellence • Product Quality • Must adhere to industry standards (ISO, TS) or proprietary standards Supply proof for sourced product Adhere to current safety standards Carry product liability insurance NHTSA standards, OSHA standards, etc. No banned substances Marketing Executives Council February 28, 2008 Criteria for Standard of Excellence (session 2) 1. Basic Criteria for Standard of Excellence • Cannot engage in illegal activities or business practices • Training • Tech line Provide Catalog • No IP violations ACES compliant Conduct e-commerce with customers Marketing Executives Council February 28, 2008 Criteria for Standard of Excellence (session 2) 2. Cost of qualification or application • • AASA Member - Minimum fee or reduced fee Non-members to pay a higher fee or equivalent of membership dues for their category 3. Who Can apply for Standard? • • Any North American Aftermarket supplier Have three different application/cost levels Company (highest) Product (middle) Brand (lowest) Marketing Executives Council February 28, 2008 Results of Breakout Groups“Top Five things that can be done NOW to Reinforce doing Business with a North American Supplier” Marketing Executives Council February 28, 2008 China Quality • Recent events involving toothpaste, dog food, toys and now tires highlight the need for special care when sourcing products from here or abroad. • Is all product coming from China poor? No • How can you ensure that the product you source meets rigorous standards for quality, reliability and safety? Marketing Executives Council February 28, 2008 Solution • • • • • • Source from experienced, global aftermarket suppliers Quality/supplier certifications Rigorous product testing Engineering/manufacturing expertise We stand behind our products Training and technical support Cataloging Marketing Executives Council February 28, 2008 Communication Vehicles • • • • • • • • • • Ad Press conference AAPEX booths Press release Editorial campaign PowerPoint Collateral Website Value-add template (Proliance) White paper Marketing Executives Council February 28, 2008