Download 6.2 Growth and structure of semiconductor quantum wells

yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Quantum electrodynamics wikipedia, lookup

Probability amplitude wikipedia, lookup

Theoretical and experimental justification for the Schrödinger equation wikipedia, lookup

Delayed choice quantum eraser wikipedia, lookup

Coherent states wikipedia, lookup

Double-slit experiment wikipedia, lookup

Bohr–Einstein debates wikipedia, lookup

Quantum key distribution wikipedia, lookup

Copenhagen interpretation wikipedia, lookup

Wave–particle duality wikipedia, lookup

Density matrix wikipedia, lookup

History of quantum field theory wikipedia, lookup

Canonical quantization wikipedia, lookup

Quantum state wikipedia, lookup

Interpretations of quantum mechanics wikipedia, lookup

Path integral formulation wikipedia, lookup

Hidden variable theory wikipedia, lookup

T-symmetry wikipedia, lookup

Scalar field theory wikipedia, lookup

Max Born wikipedia, lookup

Renormalization group wikipedia, lookup

Quantum machine learning wikipedia, lookup

EPR paradox wikipedia, lookup

Quantum group wikipedia, lookup

Hydrogen atom wikipedia, lookup

Bohr model wikipedia, lookup

Symmetry in quantum mechanics wikipedia, lookup

Relativistic quantum mechanics wikipedia, lookup

Atomic orbital wikipedia, lookup

Electron configuration wikipedia, lookup

Many-worlds interpretation wikipedia, lookup

Orchestrated objective reduction wikipedia, lookup

Renormalization wikipedia, lookup

Matter wave wikipedia, lookup

Bell's theorem wikipedia, lookup

Quantum entanglement wikipedia, lookup

Quantum teleportation wikipedia, lookup

Quantum field theory wikipedia, lookup

Quantum decoherence wikipedia, lookup

Quantum computing wikipedia, lookup

Quantum dot wikipedia, lookup

Quantum fiction wikipedia, lookup

Particle in a box wikipedia, lookup

Measurement in quantum mechanics wikipedia, lookup

Franck–Condon principle wikipedia, lookup

Quantum dot cellular automaton wikipedia, lookup

Quantum cognition wikipedia, lookup

Basil Hiley wikipedia, lookup

quantum well
6.1 Quantum confined structures
6.2 Growth and structure of semiconductor quantum wells
6.3 Electronic levels
6.4 Optical absorption and excitons
6.5 Optical emission
6.6 Intersubband transitions
6.7 Quantum dot
6.1 Quantum confined structures
Single quantum well
Quantum confinement effect:
pX  h / x .
Econfinement = (pX )2/ 2m  h2 / 2m(x)2
If Econfinement > 1/ (2 kBT), that is
 deB
Quantum size effects will be important.
x  5 nm (me*= 0.1 m0, electrons in semiconductor at RT)
Three basic types of quantum confined structure
6.2 Growth and structure of semiconductor
quantum wells
heterostructure made by epitaxial growth
A single GaAs/AlGaAs quantum well. It is formed in
the thin GaAs layer sandwiched between AlGaAs layers
which have a large band gap. d is chosen so that the
motion of the electrons in the GaAs layer is quantized in
z direction. The lower figure shows the spatial variation
of the conduction band (C.B) and the valence band (V.B)
that corresponds to the change of composition. The band
gap of AlGaAs is larger. The electrons and holes in
GaAs layer are trapped by the potential barriers at each
side by the discontinuity in the C.B and V.B. These
barriers quantize the states in the z direction, but the
motion in x, y plane is still free.
6.2 Growth and structure of semiconductor
quantum wells
MQW or superlattice
6.3 Electronic levels
6.3.1 Separation of the variables
Wave function:  ( x, y, z )   ( x, y ) ( z ),
The total energy: E total (n, k )  E  E(k )
The x, y plane motion is free, the wave function of
1 ikr
plane waves:
 k ( x, y ) 
e ,
where A is the normalization area.
  2k 2
The kinetic energy: E (k ) 
2 2
The total energy: E total (n, k )  En 
2m 
6.3.3 Infinite potential wells:
GaAs / AlGaAs multiple quantum well (MQW) or
superlattice The distinction between them depends on
the thickness b of the barrier separating the quantum
wells. MQWs have lager b value, the individual
quantum wells are isolated from each other.
Superlattices, by contrast, have much thinner barriers,
the quantum wells are thus coupled by tunnelling
through the barrier, and new extended states are formed
in the z direction.
 2 d 2 ( z )
 *
 E ( z ),
2m dz 2
 n ( z )  sin( kn z  ),
kn  ,
 2 k n2  2  n 
En      
2m 2m  d 
E1= 38 mV;
E2= 150 mV;
kBT=25 mV;
m* =0.1 m0.
6.3.3 Finite potential wells:
Wave function in the well:
w ( z )  C sin( kz), even n;
w ( z )  C cos( kz), odd n
 2k 2
For the finite potential barrier, the electrons and
holes tunnel into the barriers, the Schrodinger
equation in the barrier regions:
 2 d 2 ( z )
 V0 ( z )  E( z ),
2mb dz 2
( z )  C ' exp(  z )
( z )  C ' exp( z )
 2 2
 V0  E.
z   d / 2,
z   d / 2,
Although the infinite well
model overestimates the
confinement energies, it is
a useful starting point for
the discussion because of
its simplicity.
Note that the separation of
the first two electron level
is more than three times
the thermal energy at RT,
where kBT  25 meV.
6.4 Optical absorption and excitons
6.4.1 Selection rules
Photons incident on a quantum
well with light propagating in
the z direction. The electrons
from an initial state i at
energy Ei in the valence band
are excited to a finial state f 
at energy Ef in the conduction
band. Conservation of energy
requires that Ef = (Ei + h).
Fermi’s golden rule of the transition:
Wi  f 
f H' i
g (),
  2
Wi  f 
f  er  E i g ().
The matrix element (selection rule):
M  f x i    f (r ) x i (r )d 3r
The polarization vector of the light is in the x, y plane, thus we
f x i = f y i  f z  i )
Interband optical transitions in a quantum well.
The figure shows a transition from an n=1 hole
level to an n=1 electron level, and from an n=2
hole level to an n =2 electron level.
There are three factors in these two wave functions:
1. Conservation of momentum in the transition:
kxy = k’xy ;
M = MCV Mnn’
 
M CV  uC x uV   uC (r ) xuV (r )d 3r ;
M nn'  en' hn   en ' ( z ) hn ( z )dz;
Considering a general transition from the nth hole state to the n’th
electron state, we can write the initial and final quantum well
MCV is the valence- conduction band dipole momentum;
wave functions in Bloch function form:
 
Mnn’ is the electron-hole overlap.
i  i 
uV (r )hn ( z )e
ik xy rxy
 
ik ' xy  rxy
i  f 
uC (r )hn' ( z )e
d / 2
n' 
M nn'   sin( kn z  ) sin( kn' z 
d d / 2
6.4.1 Selection rules
Mnn’ = 1 if n = n’, Mnn’ = 0 otherwise.
Selection rules for infinite quantum well:
n = 0
In finite quantum wells the electron and hole wave
functions with differing quantum numbers are not
necessarily orthogonal to each other because of the
differing decay constant in the barrier regions. This
means that there are small departures from the
selection rule of a infinite quantum well. However
these non-zero transitions are usually weak, and are
strictly forbidden if n is an odd number, because
the overlap of states with opposite parities is zero.
Interband optical transition in a quantum well at finite kxy.
6.4.2 Two-dimensional absorption
The threshold (absorption edge ):
h = Eg + Ehh1 + Ee1,
(Shifted by (Ehh1 + Ee1) compared to the bulk)
The frequency of absorption:
 2 k xy2  
 2 k xy2
E 
  E g   Ehh1 
   e1
 
 2 k xy2
 E g  Ehh1  Ee1 
The joint density of state (step-like)
g (E)2D 
 2
1  2 
1/ 2 
 g ( E )3 D 
 2 (  Eg ) 
2   
The absorption coefficient for an infinite quantum well of width d
The threshold energy for the nth transition:
 2 n 2 2  2 n 2 2
 2 n 2 2
  Eg 
 Eg 
2med 2 2mhd 2
2d 2
6.4.3 Experimental data
Absorption coefficient of a 40 period GaAs/AlAs
MQW structure with 7.6 nm quantum wells at 6 K.
The steps in the spectrum are due to the n = 0
transition. The first of these occurs for the n = 1
heavy hole transition at 1.59 eV. This is closely
followed by the step due to the n = 1 light hole
transition at 1.61eV. The steps at the band edge are
followed by a flat spectrum up to 1.74 e. At 1.77
eV there is a further step due to the onset of the n =
2 heavy hole transition, then n = 3 at 2.03 eV….
The two weak peaks identified by arrows are
caused by parity-conserving n  0 transitions.
The one at 1.69 eV is the hh3 -> e1, while that at
1.94 eV is the hh1-> e3 transition.
6.4.4 Excitons in quantum wells
RT absorption spectrum of a GaAs/ Al0.28Ga0.72As MQW
structure containing 77 GaAs quantum wells of width
10 nm. The spectrum of GaAs at the same temperature is
shown for comparison. Detailed analysis reveals that the
binding energies of the quantum well excitons are about
10 me, higher than the value of 4.2 meV in bulk GaAs.
The enhancement is a consequence of the quantum
confinement of the electrons and holes in the QW.
The excitons are still stable at RT in the QW. The bulk
sample merely shows a weak shoulder at band edge, but
the MQW shows strong peaks for both the heavy and the
light hole excitons. The lifting of the degeneracy
originates from the different effective masses of the
heavy and light holes and the lower symmetry of the
QW sample.
6.5 The quantum confined Stark effect
d = 9.0 nm
li = 1 m
Vbi = 1.5 V
Vo= 0
Z=1.5106 V/m
Vo= -10
Z=1.5107 V/m
EZ 
Vbi  V0
bulk= 6 105 V/m
Red Shift
6.6 Optical emission
The use of quantum well structure in EL devices is
their main commercial application:
1. A greater range of emission wavelength;
2. An enhancement of device efficiency.
Zn0.8Cd0.2Se/ZnSe is a II-VI alloy semiconductor
with a direct band gap of 2.55 eV at 10K, and ZnSe
has a band gap of 2.82 eV
Emission spectrum for bulk semiconductor:
I ( h )  M
g ( h )
 h  E g
 ( h  E g ) 2 exp 
k BT
Emission spectrum for QW:
1. The (hv -Eg)1/2 factor from will be replaced by
the unit step function derived from the 2-D density
of states;
2. The peak at energy: hv=Eg+Ehh1+Ee1, is shifted
by the quantum confinement of the electrons and
holes to higher energy;
3. spectral width  kBT.
Main advantages:
• the wavelength of light emitting is tunable by choice of the
well width;
• the emission probability is higher, and the radiative lifetime
is shorter, the radiative recombination wins out over
competing non-radiative decay mechanisms;
• the thickness of QW is well below the critical thickness for
dislocation formation in non – lattice - matched epitaxial
Emission spectrum of a 2.5 nm Zn0.8Cd0.2Se/ZnSe
quantum well at 10 K and RT. The spectrum at 10
K peaks at 2.64 eV(470 nm) and has a full width
at half maximum of 16 meV. The emission energy
is about 0.1 eV larger than the band gap of the
bulk material, and the line width is limited by the
inevitable fluctuations in the well width that occur
during the epitaxial growth. At RT the peak has
shifted to 2.55 eV(486 nm) with the broadened
line width about 2.55 meV(~ 2kBT) .
6.7 Intersubband transitions
The electrons and holes are excited between the levels
(or ‘subband’) within the conduction and valence band.
6.9 Quantum dots (QD)
A quantum dot structure may be considered as a 3-D
quantum well, with no degrees of freedom at all and
with quantized levels for all three directions of motion.
For a rectangular dot with dimensions (dx, dy, dz), the
energy levels ( the infinite barriers assumed in all three
 2  2  nx2 n y nz2 
E (nx , n y , nz ) 
2m  d x2 d y2 d z2 
The energy spectrum is completely discrete. The energy
levels is tunable by altering the size of the QD.
The intersubband transition corresponds to an infrared
Selection rule on n = ( n -- n’ ) is that n must be an
odd number.
Quantum cascade laser
6.8 Bloch oscillators
e E l
Variation of the electron density of states with
dimensionality. The dashed line shows the (E – Eg )1/2
dependence of the bulk material. The thin solid line
corresponds to a quantum well with the characteristic
step-like density of states of 2-D materials. The thick
solid line shows the density of states with a series of
delta functions at the energies described by above eqn
for the 0-D quantum dot.
Quantum Cascade Laser (QCL)
6.9 Quantum dots (QD)
6.9.2 Self-organized III-V quantum dots
6.9.1 Semiconductor doped glasses
II-VI semiconductor such as CdS, CdSe, ZnS and ZnSe
are introduced into the glass during the melt process,
forming very small microcrystals with the glass matrix.
It is possible to make quantum dots with good size
Absorption spectra of glasses with CdS microcrystals
of varying at 4.2 K. Spectra are shown for four
different sizes of the microcrystals. Quantum size
effects are expected when the d of the crystal is less
than 3.5 nm. The sample with d = 33 nm effectively
represents the properties of bulk CdS (band edge
occurs at 2.58 eV). The others show an increasing
shift of the absorption edge to higher energy with
decreasing dot size (a shift of over 0.5 eV for the
sample with d = 1.2 nm). The spectra also show a
broad peak at the edge which is caused by the
enhanced excitonic effects.
The dot are typically formed when we try to grow layer
of InAs on a GaAs substrate. There is a large mismatch
between the lattice constant of the epitaxial layer and
the substrate. In the right conditions, it is energetically
advantageous for the INAs to form small clusters rather
than a uniformly strained layer. The surface physics
determines that the dimensions of these clusters is of
order 10 nm, which provides excellent quantum
confinement of the electrons and holes in all three