* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download 0,48 MB - COMMIN.org
ExxonMobil climate change controversy wikipedia , lookup
German Climate Action Plan 2050 wikipedia , lookup
Politics of global warming wikipedia , lookup
Climate change denial wikipedia , lookup
General circulation model wikipedia , lookup
Climate resilience wikipedia , lookup
Climate sensitivity wikipedia , lookup
Economics of global warming wikipedia , lookup
Effects of global warming on human health wikipedia , lookup
Climate change in Tuvalu wikipedia , lookup
Attribution of recent climate change wikipedia , lookup
Climate governance wikipedia , lookup
Climate change in the United States wikipedia , lookup
Scientific opinion on climate change wikipedia , lookup
Public opinion on global warming wikipedia , lookup
Media coverage of global warming wikipedia , lookup
Climate change adaptation wikipedia , lookup
Citizens' Climate Lobby wikipedia , lookup
Climate engineering wikipedia , lookup
IPCC Fourth Assessment Report wikipedia , lookup
Climate change and poverty wikipedia , lookup
Solar radiation management wikipedia , lookup
Climate change, industry and society wikipedia , lookup
Effects of global warming on humans wikipedia , lookup
Climate change and agriculture wikipedia , lookup
Surveys of scientists' views on climate change wikipedia , lookup
Climate change risk management instruments in agriculture Proposal for the Lithuanian case study (WP4) LITHUANIA • Panevėžys regions is one of the biggest region in the country, its territory is 2,2 thous. sq. km. • Region is a sparsely neighboured place: in 1 sq. km approximately are 20 residents. Population of this region – 43 thous. citizens. •Region does not have its own administrative centre and is influenced by Panevėžys city. Economic profile of Panevėžys region is determined by these conditions: • Roads and network of highways are rational and in excellent conditions; • Activities in agriculture are predominant; • Level of industry is low (small enterprises dominate). No one has more to lose — or gain — from our climate crisis than farmers. • Agricultural producers have demonstrated their ability to adapt to changes in climate and other factors in the past, and they will continue to adapt in the future. • However, the key question for agriculture is whether adaptation will be predominantly planned or reactive. The Lithuanian Ministry of Agriculture has the aim to create powerful and cost effective instruments to manage risks in agriculture related to the climate change. Climate risk management strategies tended to fall into three main areas: • Financial instruments; • Technology adoption; • Product diversification. The case study will include: • Evaluation how 2007-2013 support measures help farmers to mitigate climate impact; • Farmers’ need of new risk management tools evaluation: • ex ante - more adapted seeds, irrigation systems, better farm advisory services etc.; • ex post - innovations in insurance, more and improved funding for social assistance programs targeted for smaller and poorer farmers, etc. • Proposals for Government concerning climate risk management strategy in agriculture. Methods used in the implementation case – survey and questionnaire research methods Thank You !