Download Louise Hicks

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Economics of global warming wikipedia , lookup

Climate change and agriculture wikipedia , lookup

Iron fertilization wikipedia , lookup

Surveys of scientists' views on climate change wikipedia , lookup

Public opinion on global warming wikipedia , lookup

Climate governance wikipedia , lookup

Climate engineering wikipedia , lookup

Climate change, industry and society wikipedia , lookup

Effects of global warming on human health wikipedia , lookup

Effects of global warming on humans wikipedia , lookup

Climate change and poverty wikipedia , lookup

Climate change in Canada wikipedia , lookup

Mitigation of global warming in Australia wikipedia , lookup

Carbon pricing in Australia wikipedia , lookup

Solar radiation management wikipedia , lookup

Climate-friendly gardening wikipedia , lookup

Reforestation wikipedia , lookup

Climate change feedback wikipedia , lookup

Politics of global warming wikipedia , lookup

IPCC Fourth Assessment Report wikipedia , lookup

Decarbonisation measures in proposed UK electricity market reform wikipedia , lookup

Low-carbon economy wikipedia , lookup

Years of Living Dangerously wikipedia , lookup

Carbon emission trading wikipedia , lookup

Biosequestration wikipedia , lookup

Carbon Pollution Reduction Scheme wikipedia , lookup

Citizens' Climate Lobby wikipedia , lookup

Business action on climate change wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
Now that we believe that climate change is a
major risk to business, how can we act on that
belief to improve our environmental
performance, and what are the challenges and
benefits of doing so?
- A Legal Perspective
31 October 2007
Louise Hicks, Partner
Environment and Carbon Law
Overview
• How to manage the increasing volume and
changeability of regulation and voluntary standards.
• How to manage environmental performance in your
supply chain.
• How to overcome lack of credibility/regulation in the
voluntary carbon market and the legal risks of
statements about your carbon status.
• Early abatement incentives, how do they work?
• Director’s duties and reporting requirements, what you
need to know.
Managing information – increased
regulation and standards
• Matrix Aus/US/EU standards.
• Being involved in the development of voluntary
standards and mandatory regulations will help to
decrease lead times and improve preparedness for
inevitable change and increase competitive edge.
(CCX)
Managing your supply chain
• Susceptibility to weak links in supply chain, inability
to find suppliers/partners with adequate
environmental credentials.
• How to frame climate change related KPIs and other
climate change related clauses in contracts.
Incentives?
• Increased top-down pressure on the supply chain will
provide incentives for improved environmental
management in a range of industries and service
providers, not just the high-profile areas.
Challenges in going ‘carbon neutral’
• Misleading and deceptive conduct.
• If claims of carbon neutrality are not legitimate then risk of:
– action by consumer watchdogs.
– loss of brand reputation.
– loss of market credibility.
• All steps must be taken with caution - use independent,
accredited experts where possible.
• Have all methodologies and procedures verified.
• Do due diligence when purchasing ‘carbon neutral’ products
such as Green Power™ and offsets.
– If the provider is later exposed as being unreliable it
may hurt your claims of carbon neutrality.
• Transparency is key - for providers and consumers
of carbon neutral products.
How to choose quality voluntary carbon
products
• Lack of credibility in the offset industry will only
increase as consumers become more informed,
unless regulation of the industry is increased
soon (Global standard?)
• Increased corporate demand for robust and
legitimate, but affordable offset products will
increase pressure on providers and regulators
to improve transparency and accountability in
the offset industry.
Issues of concern when choosing offset
providers
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Additionality?
Baseline emission calculation methodologies?
Life cycle analysis?
Leakage?
Permanence?
Ownership of carbon rights?
Double counting?
Date of accrual?
Third party
regulation/accreditation/verification?
• Transparency?
Early abatement incentives
• Difficulties in establishing and getting credit
for early abatement prior to implementation of
an emissions trading scheme in Australia.
• UK experience – lobbying.
• Any measures taken now to increase
efficiency will have an added cash-value in the
form of offsets or early action credits which
can be “cashed in” for permits which can be
used or sold to less efficient companies.
Director’s duties and reporting requirements
•
•
•
•
•
Directors’ duties under the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth):
Duty to make informed decisions.
Duty to act in the best interests of the company.
Breach of reporting duties under CLERP 9.
CEO and CFO required to certify financial statements and
risk management and compliance systems.
• Required to include details of future issues that may affect
a company’s performance.
• ASX rules on risk and the best interests of the company
etc.
• Obligation to consider medium-to-longer term issues
such as climate change.
Conclusion
• Generally speaking good environmental management is
also good risk management.
• If purchasing offsets look for transparency and
accreditation – misleading and deceptive conduct.
• Ensure compliance with ever-shifting regulations and
standards by adopting world’s best practise
environmental management – matrix.
• Encourage others in your supply chain to do the same
through contractual drafting and KPIs.
• Ensure awareness of director’s duties and reporting
requirements.