* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Management of Heart Failure
Management of acute coronary syndrome wikipedia , lookup
Remote ischemic conditioning wikipedia , lookup
Electrocardiography wikipedia , lookup
Rheumatic fever wikipedia , lookup
Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy wikipedia , lookup
Lutembacher's syndrome wikipedia , lookup
Arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia wikipedia , lookup
Cardiac contractility modulation wikipedia , lookup
Coronary artery disease wikipedia , lookup
Heart arrhythmia wikipedia , lookup
Heart failure wikipedia , lookup
Dextro-Transposition of the great arteries wikipedia , lookup
Management of Heart Failure Prof. Karen Sliwa Department of Cardiology Chris Hani Baragwanath Hospital Johannesburg, South Africa Definition: •Imbalance between volume of blood supplied and the tissue requirements •Definition of heart failure: Criteria 1 and 2 should be fulfilled in all cases 1 Symptoms of heart failure (at rest or during exercise) like breathlessness, ankle swelling and fatigue 2 and Objective evidence of cardiac dysfunction (at rest) and (in cases where the diagnosis is in doubt) 3 Response to treatment directed towards heart failure Guidelines from European Society of Cardiology Task Force W.J. Remme and K. Swedberg, European Heart Journal 2001; 22:1528 How big is the Problem? •2% of the total western population has heart failure ( no data available for SA population) •Patients over 70 years, the prevalence is > 10 % •Only 50 % of all patients survive 4 years •Increasing prevalence due to ageing population and increasing survivors of MI Major Causes •Valvular heart disease •CAD •HT •Cardiomyopathy –Idiopathic –Ethanol –Viral –Infiltrative –Metabolic-hypothyroidism/DM •Pericardial dx •High output states •Incessant tachyarrythmias Evolution of Heart Failure Stage A: At risk for HF But no structural heart disease or signs /symptoms of HF e.g HT,CAD, DM, Cardiotoxins Stage B: Structural heart disease But no symptoms of HF e.g LVH, prior MI, asymptomatic valve disease Stage C: Structural ht disease with prior or current symptoms of HF e.g SOB,fatigue due to LV systolic dysfunction Stage D: Advanced heart disease and severe symptoms at rest despite max therapy. Refractory HF. unable to safely discharge without specialized support e.g LVAD Hunt SA et al J Am Coll Cardiol 2001;38:2101 Functional Classification New York Heart Association (NYHA) Classes Description 1 year Survival Rate Grade I Early failure, no symptoms with regular exercise or restrictions Grade II Ordinary activity results in mild symptoms, but comfortable at rest 80 - 90% Grade III Advanced failure, comfortable only at rest; increased physical restrictions 55 - 65% Grade IV Severe failure; patient has symptoms at rest Heart failure is a chronic progressive disease > 95% 5 - 15% Assessment of the patient with heart failure Objectives of initial evaluation of a patient with possible or definitive heart failure: •Early diagnosis is important •In symptomatic patients can be in: 1. Left heart failure 2. Right heart failure 3. Low cardiac output 4. High cardiac output •Cause of heart failure •Identification of precipitating factors and reversible causes •Identify markers of prognosis: left ventricular function Investigations Electrocardiogram •Most pts with CHF due to systolic dysfunction have a significant abnormality on ECG •Normal ECG 98% neg. predictive value •Evidence of –Ischeamic heart dx –LVH –Arrythmias eg atrial fib –DCMO – limb leads low voltage/precordial LVH, wide QRS, LBBB Investigations CXR •Diff HF from lung dx •CTR>50% •Upper lobe diversion •Kerley-B •Pleural effusions Investigations Routine blood tests: • Full blood count- Anemia • Blood urea nitrogen and creatinine- Renal Dysfunction • Electrolytes-Hyponatraemia,hypokalemia,hyperkalemia • Albumin-Hypoalbuminemia • Blood glucose-Diabetis mellitus • Thyroxine ( in patients with AF or who are >65 years and the heart failure has no obvious etiology- Hyper and Hypothyroidism Investigations Echocardiography •Essential in all newly diagnosed •Detect •LV size & EF •Wall thickness / ‘texture’ •RWMA •Valve dx •Pericardial dx •Septal shunts •RV size, pressures & fn •LV thrombus •Expensive/Expertise LV thrombus postpartum Naturetic Peptides Features Amino acids Main source Hormone type Main function ANP BNP 28 cardiac atria cardiac endocrine endocrine CNP 32 22 or 53 32 (= ANP + 4) vascular ventricle endothelium autocrine Cardiac specific Regulation of homeostasis of salt and water excretion and blood pressure (natriuretic, vasodilatory, renin-and aldosterone inhibitory properties) Urodilatin paracrine Regulation of vascular tone kidney paracrine Regulation of water and sodium reabsorbtion in collecting duct Sensitivity and specificity of clinical signs in HF 100 patients presenting to casualty with signs or symptoms of congestive heart failure(eg, dyspnea,edema, wt gain) Specificity Sensitivity Jugular Venous Pressure 92% 34% Third Heart sound 90% 26% Rales 81% 57% BNP (>100pg/ml) 98% 100% Dao et al, 49th Annual Scientific Session of the American College of Cardiology Summary-Assessment of Heart Failure Heart failure is a composite of clinical symptoms, physical signs, and abnormalities on the hemodynamic, neurohormonal, biochemical, anatomic and cellular levels It’s a large problem both in the developed and developing world A thorough history is vital in identifying cause and precipitating factors Combination of clinical examination and basic investigations will aid in diagnosis, assessing severity and prognosis Echocardiography essential in newly diagnosed patients TREATMENT OF HEART FAILURE • Acute heart failure and shock ( not discussed within this lecture): clinical presentation is regardless of the cause, with hypotension, tachycardia, tachypnea, oliguria causes: -acute MI ( 8% of all cases) -acute mitral regurgitation, eg. post MI -acute AR, eg. SBE, Aortic dissection, -Acute myocarditis -pericardial tamponade, -pulmonary embolism • Chronic heart failure GOALS OF THERAPY IN CHRONIC HEART FAILURE GOAL Examples Prevention Blood pressure control Symptom reduction Increased activity tolerance Prevent progression (remodeling) Prolong survival Diuretics, digoxin, exercise training ACE-inhibitors, Beta-blockers ACE-inhibitors, beta-blockers, spironolactone Pharmacological Treatment-Diuretics Diuretics: •WHO ? -Those with signs of Na and water retention I.e. peripheral or pulmonary oedema,↑JVP Pharmacological Treatment-Diuretics Spironolactone: •RALES TRIAL reduction in all cause mortality by 27% in NYHA III-IV heart failure on conventional treatment, 17% reduction in hospitalisations •WHO ? -NYHA III-IV on diuretics/ACE/digoxin Pharmacological Treatment-Digoxin Digoxin: •- DIG TRIAL: no net effect on mortality in CHF, does improve symptoms and reduce hospitalisations •- WHO ? -Those with CHF in AF who need rate control -Those with moderate or severe symptoms despite optimal treatment Pharmacological Treatment-Neurohormonal antagonists Angiotensin Converting Enzyme Inhibitors: •Several randomised controlled clinical trials as CONSENSUS I, SOLVD, VHeFT II have shown that in patients with CHF they reduce-mortality -hospitalisation -improve symptoms and signs -slow progression from mild to congestive cardiac failure Pharmacological Treatment-Neurohormonal antagonists Angiotensin II Type I receptor antagonists: • WHO? - Those intolerant to ACE-inhibitors ( especially because of cough) Pharmacological Treatment-Beta-blockers Beta-blockers: • Over 13,000 patients evaluated in placebocontrolled clinical trials • Consistent improvement in cardiac function, symptoms and clinical status • Decrease in all-cause mortality by 30–35% (p<0.0001) • Decrease in combined risk of death and hospitalisation by 25–30% (p<0.0001) US Carvedilol Study blockers in heart failure all-cause mortality Survival 1.0 Carvedilol (n=696) 0.9 Placebo (n=398) 0.8 Risk reduction = 65% 0.7 p<0.001 0.6 0.5 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 Days Mortality % 20 Survival CIBIS-II 1.0 Packer et al (1996) MERIT-HF Placebo Bisoprolol 15 0.8 Metoprolol CR/XL 10 Risk reduction = 34% Placebo Risk reduction = 34% 5 0.6 p=0.0062 p<0.0001 0 0 0 200 400 Time after inclusion (days) 600 800 Lancet (1999) 0 3 6 9 12 15 Months of follow-up 18 21 The MERIT-HF Study Group (1999) blockers in heart failure Consensus recommendations All patients with stable class II or III heart failure due to left ventricular systolic dysfunction should receive a beta-blocker (in addition to an ACE inhibitor) unless they have a contraindication to its use or cannot tolerate treatment with the drug Implications for public health Lives saved by treating 1000 patients for 1 year HOPE (ramipril) SOLVD Prevention (enalapril) <1 7 SOLVD Treatment (enalapril) MERIT-HF (metoprolol) CIBIS-II (bisoprolol) RALES (spironolactone) COPERNICUS (carvedilol) 17 38 42 52 70 Packer, AHA 2000 Management of acute exacerbation of chronic heart failure Investigation and treatment of precipitating factors: infections, thiamine deficiency ( alcohol abuse), anaemia Intermittent use of positive inotropic drugs: • WHO? - patients admitted to hospital with severely decompensated heart failure, particular those with ‘ cardiorenal syndrome’ in which sufficient diuresis cannot be obtained without progressive deterioration of renal function New concepts in the treatment of heart failure -Anti-inflammatory/cytokine therapy -Modification of cardiac matrix -Myocyte/Myoblast implant -Biventricular pacing -Anti-remodeling strategies -Cardiac transplantation Summary-Treatment of CHF Heart failure is a composite of clinical symptoms, physical signs, and abnormalities on the hemodynamic, neurohormonal, biochemical, anatomic and cellular levels Therapy should aim: -To improve symptoms -Prevent progression of disease Early diagnosis is important! All patients should be on a beta-antagonists ( preferentially carvedilol