* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Lawrence Kohlberg
Individualism wikipedia , lookup
Role-taking theory wikipedia , lookup
Moral disengagement wikipedia , lookup
Morality and religion wikipedia , lookup
Ethical intuitionism wikipedia , lookup
Moral responsibility wikipedia , lookup
Critique of Practical Reason wikipedia , lookup
Moral relativism wikipedia , lookup
Secular morality wikipedia , lookup
Moral development wikipedia , lookup
Lawrence Kohlberg wikipedia , lookup
Thomas Hill Green wikipedia , lookup
Morality throughout the Life Span wikipedia , lookup
Lawrence Kohlberg's stages of moral development wikipedia , lookup
Moral Dilemma Approach • Write the alternatives you think a person has in making his/her decision about the dilemma and the possible consequences each alternative might have. Alternative 1: _______________ Consequence: _______________ Consequence: _______________ Alternative 2: _______________ Consequence: _______________ Consequence: _______________ Lawrence Kohlberg (1927-1987) • Harvard University professor of developmental psychology, later moved to the field of moral education •His theory of moral development was dependent on the thinking of the Swiss child psychologist Jean Piaget and the American philosopher and educator John Dewey • These men emphasized that human beings develop philosophically and psychologically in a progressive fashion. Hierarchical order of morality FIRST LEVEL [Preconventional] Stage 1: defer to authority (obedience and punishment) {Simple Authority Orientation} People behave to socially acceptable norms because they are told to do so by some authority figure (parent, teacher). This obedience is compelled by the threat or application of punishment. (soldiers carrying out orders under threat of punishment) Stage 2: satisfy own needs {Instrumental Relativist} Right behavior means acting in one’s own best interests; satisfies one's own needs and occasionally the needs of others (People are valued in terms of their utility) •“You scratch my back, I’ll scratch yours” •Justice: “Do unto others as they do unto you” Relativism Most often associated with an empirical* thesis that there are deep and widespread moral disagreements and that the truth or justification of moral judgments is not absolute, but relative to some group of persons. *verifiable or provable by means of observation or experiment SECOND LEVEL [Conventional Morality] Stage 3: {Interpersonal Concordance} seek others’ approval by conforming to stereotypes (“good boy/good girl”) Examples? -conformity to the behavioral expectations of one's society or peers Stage 4: {Law and Order} individual is oriented toward authority, fixed rules, and the maintenance of the social order This stage is marked by obeying laws, respecting authority, and performing one’s duties so that the social order is maintained. THIRD LEVEL [Post Conventional] Stage 5: {Social Contract and Individual Rights} a good society is best conceived as a social contract into which people freely enter to work toward the benefit of all *Considers the rights and values that a society should uphold *Contractual, legalistic orientation but laws can be changed for the benefit of society (belief that rational people want certain basic rights – liberty and life – and want democratic procedures for changing unfair laws and improving society) Stage 6*: {Ethical Principle} *more of a theoretical stage • Individual acts out of universal principles based on the equality and worth of all human beings. • These principles are abstract and ethical (the Golden Rule, the “categorical imperative”) (see Kant) • Orientation to principles above social rules Immanuel Kant • The philosophical concept of a categorical imperative is central to the moral philosophy of Immanuel Kant. In his philosophy, it indicates an absolute, unconditional requirement that allows no exceptions, and is both required and justified as an end in itself, not as a means to some other end. • Individuals progress through stages one at a time; there is no jumping from one stage to another • Like Piaget, Kohlberg believed that most moral development occurs through social interaction. Carol Gilligan (1936 - ) • Earned her doctorate in social psychology from Harvard University •research assistant for Lawrence Kohlberg •Her criticisms of Kohlberg’s sex-biased theory were published in her most famous book titled, In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women's Development (1982) *Gilligan argues that Kohlberg’s stages reflect a male orientation *Men=rules, rights, abstract principles *Women=rules & rights but also interpersonal relationships and the ethics of compassion and care *Women's morality is more contextualized*, it is tied to real, ongoing relationships rather than abstract solutions to hypothetical dilemmas *circumstances in which an event occurs Gilligan’s Stages Stage 1: focus on caring for self for survival Stage 2: transition from selfishness to responsibility to others Stage 3: focus on care and conformity, with desire to please others (*sacrifice of self) Stage 4: transition from self sacrifice as goodness to concern with truth of Self as worthy person • Stage 5: equalization between self and others • Stage 6: care becomes a self chosen principle, accompanied by condemnation of exploitation and hurt of self and others ___________________________________ -women undergo a moral development distinct from but parallel to that of men • Many psychologists now disagree with the empirical* claim that men and women differ in their moral reasoning in the way Gilligan outlines • Several studies have found that both men and women use both justice and care dimensions in their moral reasoning • Question: How do you determine what is the “right” action to take? How do you know what you should do? *proof by means of observation or experiment Differences between Men’s & Women’s Moral Voices Men -justice -rights -treat everyone fairly and the same -apply rules impartially to everyone -responsibility toward abstract codes of conduct Women -care -responsibility -concern with everyone’s suffering -preserve emotional connectedness -responsibility toward real individuals