* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Applying Reconciliation Ecology Concepts To Salmonid Habitat
Landscape ecology wikipedia , lookup
Occupancy–abundance relationship wikipedia , lookup
Deep ecology wikipedia , lookup
Molecular ecology wikipedia , lookup
Drought refuge wikipedia , lookup
Dam removal wikipedia , lookup
Human impact on the nitrogen cycle wikipedia , lookup
Riparian-zone restoration wikipedia , lookup
Island restoration wikipedia , lookup
Conservation movement wikipedia , lookup
Biogeography wikipedia , lookup
Wildlife crossing wikipedia , lookup
Extinction debt wikipedia , lookup
Cultural ecology wikipedia , lookup
Habitat Conservation Plan wikipedia , lookup
Wildlife corridor wikipedia , lookup
Soundscape ecology wikipedia , lookup
Biodiversity action plan wikipedia , lookup
Theoretical ecology wikipedia , lookup
River ecosystem wikipedia , lookup
Source–sink dynamics wikipedia , lookup
Biological Dynamics of Forest Fragments Project wikipedia , lookup
Mission blue butterfly habitat conservation wikipedia , lookup
Restoration ecology wikipedia , lookup
Habitat destruction wikipedia , lookup
Applying Reconciliation Ecology Concepts To Salmonid Habitat Restoration And Enhancement Mike Burke, Nick Nelson, Greg Koonce, Manny DaCosta and Marty Melchior Motivations • Share experiences in planning and implementing salmonid habitat enhancement in highly altered, yet natural settings that are critically important for conservation of salmonids. • Use a pair of contemporary ecological paradigms to frame the associated nuances and complexities. Outline • Definitions • Context • Introduce Case Study • Design Application • Results – Habitat and Utilization Definitions Novel Ecosystem (Seastedt et al. 2008): • Interactions between altered river systems and alien species are resulting in unprecedented combinations of species in habitat quite different from undisturbed habitat • ‘In managing novel ecosystems, the point is to not think outside the box, but to recognize that the box itself has shifted.’ Reconciliation Ecology (Rosenzweig 2003): • Practical approach to living with the new reality of these ecosystems for which recovery may be unattainable or even inadvisable • Manage these systems to provide desirable attributes, in particular to conserve biodiversity and critical species Application Context Focused on Physical Habitat Improvement: • Interaction of the altered physical processes can be similarly unprecedented • Nearly all habitat restoration effort is a direct application of reconciliation ecology • WRT to stream processes and how they create, destroy and maintain habitat, it is essentially important to not only understand that the ‘box’ has moved, but also: • Is the box still moving? • In what direction and how fast? • What is left in the box to work with? Case Study Dry Creek: • 230 mi2 watershed • 150 years of impacts lead stream far from its state at time of European contact • Chinook and coho salmon, steelhead trout • Critical resource for regional recovery of coho and steelhead • • Abundant cold water in late summer over gravel substrate, rare for region (artifact of regulation) Microcosm of overlapping alterations within a 14-mile reach of stream downstream of dam Legacy of Alteration • 1850 - 1900: Deforestation and agricultural conversion • 1910 – 1975: Instream gravel mining • Led to systemic incision (20’-25’), slowed by end of period • Disconnection of lateral habitats and floodplain Legacy of Alteration • 1980 - present: dam construction and regulation • Curtails sediment continuity and floods, elevates base flow • Veg encroachment, sequester alluvium, ‘channelization’, • Efficient at transporting available gravels Current Function (what’s left and where’s it going) • Laterally and vertically stable, minimal disturbance • limited lateral habitat creation/revitalization – limited refugia • limited recruitment of substrate and LWD • ‘it’s stuck’ – not empowered or able to create new habitat Current Function (what’s left and where’s it going) • Highly efficient at transporting available sediment with regulated hydrology • limited roughness, short substrate residence time • Deficit of riffle habitat • Poor quality pools: swift water, limited complexity and cover Prescriptions • Disturbance!: thin overbank vegetation to enable recruitment of legacy substrate and promote geomorphic change energy dissipation Prescriptions • Sediment Augmentation: ‘seed’ riffles with sediment caliber that is better fit for regulated hydrology, Energy breaks improve residence time for substrate Prescriptions • Supplement LWD: Provide cover and complexity, Foster habitat development – scour and deposition Enhance substrate residence time Prescriptions • Rejuvenate lateral habitats and floodplains: Backwaters, side channels, alcoves Adjust to present base level and hydrology Feedback (so far) • Intensive monitoring of fish utilization Feedback (so far) • Intensive monitoring of fish utilization Feedback (so far) • Intensive monitoring of fish utilization Summary Points Nearly all river systems are moderately to substantially altered from their predisturbance state, yet are essential for conservation of critical species. The paradigms of the novel ecosystem and reconciliation ecology are useful for characterizing the realities of physical habitat enhancement planning and implementation. In order to successfully achieve habitat enhancement objectives, it is necessary to reconcile the history of alteration, current physical function and future trajectory. Often, intervention is required to nudge the physical system towards a trajectory that can sustain and replenish the habitat that is enhanced. Applying Reconciliation Ecology Concepts To Salmonid Habitat Restoration And Enhancement Citations Moyle, P.B., 2013. Novel Aquatic Ecosystems: The New Reality for Streams in California and Other Mediterranean Climate Regions. River Res. Applic., DOI 10.1002/rra.2709. Rosenzweig, M.L. 2003. Win-win Ecology: How the Earth’s Species Can Survive in the Midst of Human Enterprise. Oxford University Press. Oxford. Seastedt, T.R, Hobbs, R.J, Suding, K.N. 2008. Management of Novel Ecosystems: Are Novel Approaches Required? Frontiers in Ecology and Environment 6: 547-553 Acknowledgements Sonoma County Water Agency, NMFS, CDFW