* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Incorporating ecological process in landscape-scale planning
Ecology of Banksia wikipedia , lookup
Introduced species wikipedia , lookup
Island restoration wikipedia , lookup
Occupancy–abundance relationship wikipedia , lookup
Human impact on the nitrogen cycle wikipedia , lookup
Latitudinal gradients in species diversity wikipedia , lookup
Biodiversity action plan wikipedia , lookup
Coevolution wikipedia , lookup
Restoration ecology wikipedia , lookup
Biological Dynamics of Forest Fragments Project wikipedia , lookup
Habitat conservation wikipedia , lookup
Incorporating ecological process in landscape-scale planning Dave Hole Why target ecological processes? In the past conservation planners have focused on PATTERN – e.g. representation and retention To ensure persistence MUST incorporate PROCESS If lost, difficult to restore – therefore apply precautionary approach and target as a matter of urgency Incorporating ecological processes Few attempts made – but see CFR and SK in South Africa; WWF in Central Indochina Dry Forests Ecoregion Why so few? – two major challenges: 1. Identification of critical processes 2. Defining spatial/quantifiable targets Generic criteria – e.g. conserve large areas = probably capture many processes, but all? First things first – what actually is an ecological process? Biotic interactions, abiotic processes and ecosystem services all classed as ‘ecological processes’ Working definition? – “flows of nutrients, water, energy, organisms, and other resources between landscape elements” – HUGE number of potential processes Continued… How do we narrow down to those that are: 1) Critical for the persistence of GT/GC species/KBAs 2) Can only be conserved at the landscape-scale Several considerations: 1) Different ecosystems are structured by just a few dominant processes (?) 2) Many will continue to function at site-scale 3) Many probably not manageable First-cut – critical ecological processes Category 1) Species driven processes Interspecific ecological interactions Intraspecific population dynamics Disturbance regimes 2) Non-species driven processes Disturbance regimes Resource flows Other Process Predation* Herbivory* Competition Seed-dispersal* Pollination* Parasitism Migration and dispersal Metapopulation dynamics Source-sink dynamics Engineer species* Grazing/trampling* Fire* Flood* Other* Hydrology Nutrient-cycling Evolutionary processes 1) Species-driven processes: Interspecific ecological interactions E.g. predation, herbivory, pollination Operate over a wide-range of spatial scales Loss of (e.g. top predators) = extinction cascade ‘Keystone’ species Identify keystones that cannot be conserved at site-scale a) Predation and herbivory X Many interactions conserved at site-scale GT/GC species, keystone role, cannot be conserved at site-scale = picked up at species definitions stage Keystone role, cannot be conserved at site-scale, but non-threatened, e.g. 1) Impact on prey/flora vital for persistence of globally threatened species/KBAs 2) Represent a crucial prey-base X a) Predation and herbivory – continued… Examples: 1) Sea otters influence persistence of kelp forests through predation of sea urchins X a) Predation and herbivory – continued… Examples: 2) Wolves regulate moose populations, preventing overbrowsing of riparian willow communities, maintaining neotropical migrant bird diversity 3) Anadromous fish are critical prey-base for a wide range of predators b) Pollination & seed-dispersal Crucial in spatial dynamics, regulating community stability and persistence Middle of global pollination crisis; >180 vertebrate pollinators listed as endangered Diversity of pollinators/seed-dispersers = processes occur at a range of spatial scales b) Pollination & seed-dispersal – continued… X Many interactions conserved at site-scale GT/GC species, keystone role, cannot be conserved at site-scale = picked up at species definitions stage Keystone role, cannot be conserved at site-scale, but non-threatened, e.g. 1) Pollinators/seed dispersers of huge range of plants (e.g. Flying foxes, hornbills) 2) Pollinators/seed-dispersers of keystone plant resources (e.g. fig-wasps) X b) Pollination & seed-dispersal – continued… Examples: 1) Lesser long-nosed bat [VU] in N. American deserts pollinates X Agave and columnar cacti 2) Pteropus spp. on oceanic islands and in mangrove ecosystems b) Pollination & seed-dispersal – continued… Examples: 3) Figs and their fig-wasp pollinators b) Pollination & seed-dispersal – continued… Examples: 1) Southern cassowary [VU] in Australia – sole disperser of > 75 rainforest plant species X 2) Hornbills (Ceratogymna spp.) in Cameroon – disperse 22% of known tree flora b) Pollination & seed-dispersal – continued… Examples: 3) Pteropus spp. in Samoa – utilize fruit resources of > 69 plants spp. from 51 genera in 36 families c) Species-driven disturbance regimes – e.g. engineer species; grazing/trampling Engineer species significantly modify their environments (e.g. pocket gopher, termite) Grazing/trampling by large herbivores represents a significant large-scale disturbance process Some species may be non-threatened but still require conservation above the site-scale c) Species-driven disturbance regimes – continued… Examples: 1) Asian elephants [EN] in Indochina dry forests – influence forest structure and plant community composition through selective grazing X d) Species-driven disturbance regimes – continued… Examples: 2) Beavers in N. America – dramatically alter riparian landscapes 3) White rhino in southern Africa – prime controlling influence on tree-shrub-grass balance in savanna ecoregion 2) Non-species-driven (abiotic) disturbance regimes Occur in all biomes, helping to shape ecosystems Often modified by humans, but crucial for persistence of individual species and ecoregions Vast range of spatial scales – e.g. tree-fall (local); hurricane (regional); El Nino (continental) Some will require conservation at the landscape-scale a) Fire regimes Anthropogenic fire disturbance is widespread Remains a crucial natural disturbance – e.g. grasslands Many fire regimes maintained at site-scale Where large areas are disturbed (e.g. savanna systems) – requires landscape-scale conservation a) Fire regimes – continued… Fire periodically affects most ecoregions – but several are strongly dependent for their persistence: 1) Fynbos ecoregion (South Africa) – determines protea demography and successional sequence a) Fire regimes – continued… 2) Prairies (North America) – selects against woody plants, favoring fire-adapted grasses and forbs 3) Cerrado (Brazil) – maintains dynamic balance between savanna and forest ecoregions b) Flood regimes Flood disturbance crucial to persistence of a variety of globally threatened species and/or ecoregions: 1) Flooded forests (Brazil) – flood pulse regulates forest structure, species richness and distribution b) Flood regimes – continued… 2) Pantanal (Brazil) – maintains habitats and dictates abundance and availability of fish-prey c) Other disturbance regimes Many other disturbance processes exist – e.g. tree-fall, wind, landslides, El Nino events, drought Some likely to be conserved at the site-scale e.g. (tree-fall) Others not practicable to manage (e.g. hurricanes) – but manage for impacts on GT/GC spp Targeting and managing critical ecological processes Processes are complex and often poorly understood For species-driven processes = identify & target keystones that cannot be conserved at site-scale alone GT/GC keystones picked up at species outcomes Need to identify and target non-threatened keystones – maintain EFDs Degree of redundancy may help? Target/monitor trophic guilds? (e.g. seed dispersers) But careful of ‘wild goose chase’ Targeting and managing critical ecological processes – continued… For non-species-driven processes: Some we can/should manage – e.g. fire, flood Others we cannot – e.g. volcanoes, hurricanes Need to consider Minimum Dynamic Area Non-interventionist – target Natural Range of Variability Interventionist – mimic impacts required for target species Decision may depend on whether a wilderness area or a hotspot To think about Do we target all critical processes in every landscape/ seascape (i.e. precautionary approach) or only those where a direct link to GT/GC species or KBA persistence is proved? Further research clearly vital (e.g. identify non-threatened keystones AND provide evidence of role) Other processes (e.g. hydrology; nutrient cycling; evolutionary processes) still need to be evaluated