* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Lecture #25
Van der Waals equation wikipedia , lookup
Dynamometer wikipedia , lookup
Equation of state wikipedia , lookup
Virtual work wikipedia , lookup
Machine (mechanical) wikipedia , lookup
Friction-plate electromagnetic couplings wikipedia , lookup
19-inch rack wikipedia , lookup
Stepper motor wikipedia , lookup
Transmission (mechanics) wikipedia , lookup
Newton's laws of motion wikipedia , lookup
Differential (mechanical device) wikipedia , lookup
Work (physics) wikipedia , lookup
Equations of motion wikipedia , lookup
Classical central-force problem wikipedia , lookup
Lecture #25 SPUR GEAR Tooth Loads and Mass Moment of Inertia Course Name : DESIGN OF MACHINE ELEMENTS Course Number: MET 214 In order to develop an understanding of the factors affecting tooth size and the forces that can be transmitted by a tooth consider the diagram provided below. The forces to be transmitted between a pair of gear teeth are transferred between the teeth at the point of contact. As the gears rotate, the point of contact existing between a pair of teeth changes itβs location on each tooth. Due to the shape chosen for the teeth, the direction of the forces to be transmitted between the teeth lies along the line of action, or as referred to in the diagram on the previous slide, the axis of transmission. As to be noted from the diagram provided above, the point of contact on the driven gear starts out near the top of the tooth and proceeds toward the root. In addition, it must be noted that the forces to be transmitted between the teeth are distributed along the width of the teeth. In addition, the teeth of meshing gears make contact only for a small portion of a revolution. These features of meshing gears are summarized in the figure provided in the figure on the next slide. In order to analyze the loads that can be transmitted between a pair of teeth, a worst case analysis may be performed. In the case of the forces acting on a gear tooth, the most extreme situation involved with transmitting a force between teeth occurs when the force to be transmitted between the teeth is applied at the tip of one of the teeth as indicated below. The force to be transmitted acts along the line of action and may be resolved into tangential and radial components as shown in the figure on the next slide. Each force component leads to different types of stresses in the tooth. It should be noted that the figure on the next slide was copied from a different source and therefore the orientation of the load is different that what has been shown in the previous slides. Such a change in perspective should not be the source of any confusion. Due to the fact that the teeth in contact are in contact only over a very small area of the tooth at any particular point of contact, the loads to be transmitted between teeth are distributed over a very small area which can lead to very high stress levels in a tooth as illustrated below. As indicated in the diagram provided on a previous slide, the repetitive nature of how the teeth of a pair of gears engage one another, the high stress levels associated with the small area of contact can lead to pitting of the gear face as indicated below. In addition, as was noted in the previous lecture, the teeth of a pair of mating gears slide relative to one another which also contributes to the wear of the gear teeth. A geometry necessary for analyzing the level of stress due to the small area of contact existing between a pair of teeth is shown on the next slide. The tangential force component transmitted to a tooth produces a bending moment on the gear tooth similar to that on a cantilever beam. The resulting bending stress is maximum at the base of the tooth in the fillet that joins the involute profile to the bottom of the tooth space. Taking the detailed geometry of the tooth into account, Wilfred Lewis developed the equation for the stress at the base of the involute profile which is now called the Lewis equation. The Lewis equation is provided below: ππ‘ = ππ‘ ππ πΉπ Where : ππ‘ = π‘ππππππ‘πππ πππππ πππππππππ‘ πππππππ π‘π ππππ π‘πππ‘β ππ = π·πππππ‘πππ πππ‘πβ ππ ππππ πΉ = ππππ π€πππ‘β ππ ππππ π‘πππ‘β π = πΏππ€ππ ππππ ππππ‘ππ The Lewis form factor depends on the tooth form, the pressure angle, the diametral pitch, the number of teeth in the gear, and the point of contact existing with ππ‘ . A derivation of the Lewis equation has been copied from the book titled βMechanical Engineering Designβ 4th edition, by Shigley and Mitchell and provided on the next few slides to acquaint the reader with a context necessary to understand the application of the Lewis equation. The modification to the Lewis equation necessary to utilize the equation in practice involves many factors that are discussed in detail in books addressing the design of gears. The reader interested in the material may consult any number of texts books concerned with machine design including the book by Mott. The system shown below is referred to as a rack and pinion and can be used to convert rotational motion to linear motion and vise versa. The rack is in essence a spur gear with an infinite pitch radius so as to evolve to a shape that has zero curvature along the pitch line of the rack as shown in the figure. The velocity of the rack can be related to the velocity of the pitch point of the pinion. The equation relating the linear velocity of the rack to the rotational velocity of the pinion appears below. π£π = ππ ππ Where: π£π = π‘βπ ππππππ π£ππππππ‘π¦ ππ π‘βπ ππππ ππ = πππππ’π ππ πππ‘πβ ππππππ ππ ππππππ ππ = ππππ’πππ π£ππππππ‘π¦ ππ ππππππ ππ ππππ /π ππ In order to relate the system level requirement pertaining to the acceleration of the rack to the force to be transmitted between gear teeth, consider the system shown below. The system contains a motor driving a pinion which in turn drives a rack which is attached to a ball slide. The ball slides offers very low resistance to linear motion. In order to relate the acceleration of the ball slide, which is the same as the acceleration of the rack since the rack is attached to the ball slide, use Newtonβs law of motion to describe the acceleration of the slide. πΉπ = ππ΅π π Where : πΉπ = πππππ πππππππ π‘π π ππππ ππ¦ ππππ π‘π πππππππππ‘π π‘βπ π ππππ ππ΅π = πππ π ππ ππππ π ππππ πππ πππ ππ‘πππ πππππ π‘ππππ ππππ‘ππ ππ π ππππ π = ππππππ πππππππππ‘πππ ππ π ππππ The force generated by the rack is due to the torque the motor applies to the pinion and the fact that the rack and pinion transforms the torque into a force applied to the rack. The equation describing this behavior of the rack and pinion is provided below. ππ = πΉπ ππ Where ππ = π‘ππππ’π ππ ππππππ π‘ππππ ππππππ π‘π π ππππ Substituting the expression above for πΉπ and recalling that linear acceleration is related to angular acceleration produces the following expression for the torque of the pinion. ππ = ππ΅π π ππ = ππ΅π ππ 2 πΌπ Where: πΌπ = ππππ’πππ πππππππππ‘πππ ππ ππππππ In order to determine the torque required from the motor to accelerate the slide with an acceleration of a, write Newtonβs 2nd law for rotational systems as shown below. π = π½ππ πΌ π Where π = π π’ππππ‘πππ ππ π‘ππππ’ππ πππ‘πππ ππ π βπππ‘ ππ ππππππ π½ππ = πππ π ππππππ‘ ππ πππππ‘ππ ππ π βπππ‘ ππ πππ‘ππ πππ ππππππ π = ππ β ππ Where ππ = π‘ππππ’π πππππππ π‘π π βπππ‘ ππ¦ πππ‘ππ Rearranging terms ππ = π½ππ πΌπ + ππ Substituting for ππ yields an expression for motor torque and how the mass of the slide and the radius of the pinion effect motor torque. ππ = π½ππ πΌπ + πππ ππ 2 πΌπ The expression in the above equation includes the influence of acceleration the ball slide in terms of angular measures. In essence, the linear motion characteristics have been transformed into angular measures so a concise description of the torque required from the motor can be obtained. In order to further organize the information concerning the torque requirements of the motor, note that the equation can be simplified further. ππ = π½ππ + ππ΅π ππ 2 πΌπ ππ = π½ππ πΌπ Where π½ππ = π½π + ππ΅π ππ 2 In essence, the mass of the slide and the radius of the pinion have been combined in a manner that allows the combination to be treated as a mass moment of inertia term that can be combined with other mass moment of inertia terms in order to simplify the process of determining the amount of motor torque required to accelerate the ball slide where the acceleration requirements of the ball slide have been transformed into an angular acceleration requirement . Although no friction forces were assumed to be acting on the slide in the analysis presented, forces that would be associated with slide motion in certain applications could be included in the analysis. Such examples include the use of a rack to move a slide on a lathe. The machining operations being performed on the lathe would result in reaction forces being applied to the slide that would resists the motion of the slide. The next few lectures will be dedicated to expanding on the transformations necessary to determine equivalent mass moment of inertia terms and/or how to reflect force terms in addition to mass terms back to a motor in order to streamline the process of motor selection.