Download Lecture #25

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Van der Waals equation wikipedia , lookup

Dynamometer wikipedia , lookup

Equation of state wikipedia , lookup

Virtual work wikipedia , lookup

Machine (mechanical) wikipedia , lookup

Friction-plate electromagnetic couplings wikipedia , lookup

Gear train wikipedia , lookup

19-inch rack wikipedia , lookup

Kinematics wikipedia , lookup

Stepper motor wikipedia , lookup

Transmission (mechanics) wikipedia , lookup

Newton's laws of motion wikipedia , lookup

Differential (mechanical device) wikipedia , lookup

Work (physics) wikipedia , lookup

Inertia wikipedia , lookup

Equations of motion wikipedia , lookup

Classical central-force problem wikipedia , lookup

Rigid body dynamics wikipedia , lookup

Gear wikipedia , lookup

Centripetal force wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
Lecture #25
SPUR GEAR Tooth Loads and
Mass Moment of Inertia
Course Name : DESIGN OF MACHINE ELEMENTS
Course Number: MET 214
In order to develop an understanding of the factors affecting tooth size and the forces that
can be transmitted by a tooth consider the diagram provided below.
The forces to be transmitted between a pair of gear teeth are transferred between the
teeth at the point of contact. As the gears rotate, the point of contact existing between a
pair of teeth changes it’s location on each tooth. Due to the shape chosen for the teeth,
the direction of the forces to be transmitted between the teeth lies along the line of
action, or as referred to in the diagram on the previous slide, the axis of transmission.
As to be noted from the diagram provided above, the point of contact on the driven gear
starts out near the top of the tooth and proceeds toward the root. In addition, it must
be noted that the forces to be transmitted between the teeth are distributed along the
width of the teeth.
In addition, the teeth of meshing gears make contact only for a small portion of a
revolution. These features of meshing gears are summarized in the figure provided in the
figure on the next slide.
In order to analyze the loads that can be transmitted between a pair of teeth, a worst case
analysis may be performed. In the case of the forces acting on a gear tooth, the most
extreme situation involved with transmitting a force between teeth occurs when the force
to be transmitted between the teeth is applied at the tip of one of the teeth as indicated
below.
The force to be transmitted acts along the line of action and may be resolved into tangential
and radial components as shown in the figure on the next slide. Each force component leads
to different types of stresses in the tooth. It should be noted that the figure on the next slide
was copied from a different source and therefore the orientation of the load is different that
what has been shown in the previous slides. Such a change in perspective should not be the
source of any confusion.
Due to the fact that the teeth in contact are in contact only over a very small area of the tooth
at any particular point of contact, the loads to be transmitted between teeth are distributed
over a very small area which can lead to very high stress levels in a tooth as illustrated below.
As indicated in the diagram provided on a previous slide, the repetitive nature of how the
teeth of a pair of gears engage one another, the high stress levels associated with the small
area of contact can lead to pitting of the gear face as indicated below. In addition, as was
noted in the previous lecture, the teeth of a pair of mating gears slide relative to one another
which also contributes to the wear of the gear teeth.
A geometry necessary for analyzing the level of stress due to the small area of contact existing
between a pair of teeth is shown on the next slide.
The tangential force component transmitted to a tooth produces a bending moment on
the gear tooth similar to that on a cantilever beam. The resulting bending stress is
maximum at the base of the tooth in the fillet that joins the involute profile to the
bottom of the tooth space. Taking the detailed geometry of the tooth into account,
Wilfred Lewis developed the equation for the stress at the base of the involute profile
which is now called the Lewis equation. The Lewis equation is provided below:
πœŽπ‘‘ =
π‘Šπ‘‘ 𝑃𝑑
πΉπ‘Œ
Where : π‘Šπ‘‘ = π‘‘π‘Žπ‘›π‘”π‘’π‘›π‘‘π‘–π‘Žπ‘™ π‘“π‘œπ‘Ÿπ‘π‘’ π‘π‘œπ‘šπ‘π‘œπ‘›π‘’π‘›π‘‘ π‘Žπ‘π‘π‘™π‘–π‘’π‘‘ π‘‘π‘œ π‘”π‘’π‘Žπ‘Ÿ π‘‘π‘œπ‘œπ‘‘β„Ž
𝑃𝑑 = π·π‘–π‘Žπ‘šπ‘’π‘‘π‘Ÿπ‘Žπ‘™ π‘π‘–π‘‘π‘β„Ž π‘œπ‘“ π‘”π‘’π‘Žπ‘Ÿ
𝐹 = π‘“π‘Žπ‘π‘’ π‘€π‘–π‘‘π‘‘β„Ž π‘œπ‘“ π‘”π‘’π‘Žπ‘Ÿ π‘‘π‘œπ‘œπ‘‘β„Ž
π‘Œ = 𝐿𝑒𝑀𝑖𝑠 π‘“π‘œπ‘Ÿπ‘š π‘“π‘Žπ‘π‘‘π‘œπ‘Ÿ
The Lewis form factor depends on the tooth form, the pressure angle, the diametral
pitch, the number of teeth in the gear, and the point of contact existing with π‘Šπ‘‘ . A
derivation of the Lewis equation has been copied from the book titled β€œMechanical
Engineering Design” 4th edition, by Shigley and Mitchell and provided on the next few
slides to acquaint the reader with a context necessary to understand the application of
the Lewis equation.
The modification to the Lewis equation necessary to utilize the equation in practice
involves many factors that are discussed in detail in books addressing the design of
gears. The reader interested in the material may consult any number of texts books
concerned with machine design including the book by Mott.
The system shown below is referred to as a rack and pinion and can be used to convert
rotational motion to linear motion and vise versa. The rack is in essence a spur gear with
an infinite pitch radius so as to evolve to a shape that has zero curvature along the pitch
line of the rack as shown in the figure.
The velocity of the rack can be related to the velocity of the pitch point of the pinion.
The equation relating the linear velocity of the rack to the rotational velocity of the
pinion appears below.
𝑣𝑅 = π‘Ÿπ‘ƒ πœ”π‘ƒ
Where: 𝑣𝑅 = π‘‘β„Žπ‘’ π‘™π‘–π‘›π‘’π‘Žπ‘Ÿ π‘£π‘’π‘™π‘œπ‘π‘–π‘‘π‘¦ π‘œπ‘“ π‘‘β„Žπ‘’ π‘Ÿπ‘Žπ‘π‘˜
π‘Ÿπ‘ƒ = π‘Ÿπ‘Žπ‘‘π‘–π‘’π‘  π‘œπ‘“ π‘π‘–π‘‘π‘β„Ž π‘π‘–π‘Ÿπ‘π‘™π‘’ π‘œπ‘“ π‘π‘–π‘›π‘–π‘œπ‘›
πœ”π‘ƒ = π‘Žπ‘›π‘”π‘’π‘™π‘Žπ‘Ÿ π‘£π‘’π‘™π‘œπ‘π‘–π‘‘π‘¦ π‘œπ‘“ π‘π‘–π‘›π‘–π‘œπ‘› 𝑖𝑛 π‘Ÿπ‘Žπ‘‘π‘ /𝑠𝑒𝑐
In order to relate the system level requirement pertaining to the acceleration of the rack
to the force to be transmitted between gear teeth, consider the system shown below.
The system contains a motor driving a pinion which in turn drives a rack which is
attached to a ball slide. The ball slides offers very low resistance to linear motion. In
order to relate the acceleration of the ball slide, which is the same as the acceleration of
the rack since the rack is attached to the ball slide, use Newton’s law of motion to
describe the acceleration of the slide.
𝐹𝑆 = π‘šπ΅π‘† π‘Ž
Where : 𝐹𝑆 = π‘“π‘œπ‘Ÿπ‘π‘’ π‘Žπ‘π‘π‘™π‘–π‘’π‘‘ π‘‘π‘œ 𝑠𝑙𝑖𝑑𝑒 𝑏𝑦 π‘Ÿπ‘Žπ‘π‘˜ π‘‘π‘œ π‘Žπ‘π‘π‘’π‘™π‘’π‘Ÿπ‘Žπ‘‘π‘’ π‘‘β„Žπ‘’ 𝑠𝑙𝑖𝑑𝑒
π‘šπ΅π‘† = π‘šπ‘Žπ‘ π‘  π‘œπ‘“ π‘π‘Žπ‘™π‘™ 𝑠𝑙𝑖𝑑𝑒 π‘Žπ‘›π‘‘ π‘Žπ‘™π‘™ π‘–π‘‘π‘’π‘šπ‘  𝑏𝑒𝑖𝑛𝑔 π‘‘π‘Ÿπ‘Žπ‘›π‘ π‘π‘œπ‘Ÿπ‘‘π‘’π‘‘ π‘œπ‘› 𝑠𝑙𝑖𝑑𝑒
π‘Ž = π‘™π‘–π‘›π‘’π‘Žπ‘Ÿ π‘Žπ‘π‘π‘’π‘™π‘’π‘Ÿπ‘Žπ‘‘π‘–π‘œπ‘› π‘œπ‘“ 𝑠𝑙𝑖𝑑𝑒
The force generated by the rack is due to the torque the motor applies to the pinion and
the fact that the rack and pinion transforms the torque into a force applied to the rack.
The equation describing this behavior of the rack and pinion is provided below.
𝑇𝑃 = 𝐹𝑆 π‘Ÿπ‘ƒ
Where 𝑇𝑃 = π‘‘π‘œπ‘Ÿπ‘žπ‘’π‘’ π‘œπ‘“ π‘π‘–π‘›π‘–π‘œπ‘› π‘‘π‘Ÿπ‘Žπ‘›π‘ π‘“π‘’π‘Ÿπ‘Ÿπ‘’π‘‘ π‘‘π‘œ 𝑠𝑙𝑖𝑑𝑒
Substituting the expression above for 𝐹𝑆 and recalling that linear acceleration is related
to angular acceleration produces the following expression for the torque of the pinion.
𝑇𝑃 = π‘šπ΅π‘† π‘Ž π‘Ÿπ‘ƒ = π‘šπ΅π‘† π‘Ÿπ‘ƒ 2 𝛼𝑃
Where: 𝛼𝑃 = π‘Žπ‘›π‘”π‘’π‘™π‘Žπ‘Ÿ π‘Žπ‘π‘π‘’π‘™π‘’π‘Ÿπ‘Žπ‘‘π‘–π‘œπ‘› π‘œπ‘“ π‘π‘–π‘›π‘–π‘œπ‘›
In order to determine the torque required from the motor to accelerate the slide with an
acceleration of a, write Newton’s 2nd law for rotational systems as shown below.
𝑇 = π½π‘šπ‘† 𝛼 𝑃
Where
𝑇 = π‘ π‘’π‘šπ‘šπ‘Žπ‘‘π‘–π‘œπ‘› π‘œπ‘“ π‘‘π‘œπ‘Ÿπ‘žπ‘’π‘’π‘  π‘Žπ‘π‘‘π‘–π‘›π‘” π‘œπ‘› π‘ β„Žπ‘Žπ‘“π‘‘ π‘œπ‘“ π‘π‘–π‘›π‘–π‘œπ‘›
π½π‘šπ‘† = π‘šπ‘Žπ‘ π‘  π‘šπ‘œπ‘šπ‘’π‘›π‘‘ π‘œπ‘“ π‘–π‘›π‘’π‘Ÿπ‘‘π‘–π‘Ž π‘œπ‘“ π‘ β„Žπ‘Žπ‘“π‘‘ π‘œπ‘“ π‘šπ‘œπ‘‘π‘œπ‘Ÿ π‘Žπ‘›π‘‘ π‘π‘–π‘›π‘–π‘œπ‘›
𝑇 = π‘‡π‘š βˆ’ 𝑇𝑃
Where π‘‡π‘š = π‘‘π‘œπ‘Ÿπ‘žπ‘’π‘’ π‘Žπ‘π‘π‘™π‘–π‘’π‘‘ π‘‘π‘œ π‘ β„Žπ‘Žπ‘“π‘‘ 𝑏𝑦 π‘šπ‘œπ‘‘π‘œπ‘Ÿ
Rearranging terms
π‘‡π‘š = π½π‘šπ‘† 𝛼𝑃 + 𝑇𝑃
Substituting for 𝑇𝑃 yields an expression for motor torque and how the mass of the slide
and the radius of the pinion effect motor torque.
π‘‡π‘š = π½π‘šπ‘† 𝛼𝑃 + π‘šπ‘π‘  π‘Ÿπ‘ƒ 2 𝛼𝑃
The expression in the above equation includes the influence of acceleration the ball slide
in terms of angular measures. In essence, the linear motion characteristics have been
transformed into angular measures so a concise description of the torque required from
the motor can be obtained. In order to further organize the information concerning the
torque requirements of the motor, note that the equation can be simplified further.
𝑇𝑀 = π½π‘šπ‘  + π‘šπ΅π‘† π‘Ÿπ‘ƒ 2 𝛼𝑃
π‘‡π‘š = π½π‘’π‘ž 𝛼𝑃
Where π½π‘’π‘ž = 𝐽𝑠 + π‘šπ΅π‘† π‘Ÿπ‘ƒ 2
In essence, the mass of the slide and the radius of the pinion have been combined in a
manner that allows the combination to be treated as a mass moment of inertia term
that can be combined with other mass moment of inertia terms in order to simplify the
process of determining the amount of motor torque required to accelerate the ball slide
where the acceleration requirements of the ball slide have been transformed into an
angular acceleration requirement .
Although no friction forces were assumed to be acting on the slide in the analysis
presented, forces that would be associated with slide motion in certain applications
could be included in the analysis. Such examples include the use of a rack to move a
slide on a lathe. The machining operations being performed on the lathe would result in
reaction forces being applied to the slide that would resists the motion of the slide. The
next few lectures will be dedicated to expanding on the transformations necessary to
determine equivalent mass moment of inertia terms and/or how to reflect force terms
in addition to mass terms back to a motor in order to streamline the process of motor
selection.