* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download 2009-06-NCBO-Peters - National Center for Biomedical Ontology
Survey
Document related concepts
Sociality and disease transmission wikipedia , lookup
DNA vaccination wikipedia , lookup
Adoptive cell transfer wikipedia , lookup
Social immunity wikipedia , lookup
Adaptive immune system wikipedia , lookup
Immune system wikipedia , lookup
Cancer immunotherapy wikipedia , lookup
Innate immune system wikipedia , lookup
Immunosuppressive drug wikipedia , lookup
Hygiene hypothesis wikipedia , lookup
Molecular mimicry wikipedia , lookup
Transcript
Representing the Immune Epitope Database in OWL Jason A. Greenbaum1, Randi Vita1, Laura Zarebski1, Hussein Emami2, Alessandro Sette1, Alan Ruttenberg3, and Bjoern Peters1 1La Jolla Institute for Allergy and Immunology 2Science Applications International Corporation 3Science Commons Overview • Background – Immune epitopes – Epitope mapping experiments – The Immune Epitope Database (IEDB) • IEDB development cycle – Ontology development – Database design – Content curation • Database export into OWL CD8+ T cell epitopes in viral infection Mouse Virus MHC-I cell CD8+ T cell epitopes in viral infection adaptive immune response: a GO:immune response resulting from epitope binding by adaptive immune receptor Mouse Proliferation T T T Virus TCR MHC-I Cytokine Release CD8 Cytotoxicity cell epitope role: the role of a material entity that is realized when it binds to an adaptive immune receptor. Context is key – What immune receptor? What host? What happened to the host previously (infections? vaccinations? diseases?)… Entities in a epitope mapping experiment • Processes – Administering substance in vivo – Take sample from organism T T – Perform ELISPOT assay – Transform data • Material entities APC • Data items – Cell – spot count – Organism – spot forming cells per million – Peptide • Roles and Functions – Immunogen – Antigen 42 SFC/10^6 – Antigen presenting cell – Effector cell The Immune Epitope Database (IEDB) Goal: To catalog and make accessible immune epitope characterizing experiments Epitope discovery Literature curation contract submission IEDB www.immuneepitope.org 10 full time curators Content >6,500 journal articles >50,000 epitopes >300,000 experiments Completed: • 98% infectious disease • 95% allergy Next: autoimmunity (25%) Example curated experiment: typically 100 – 300 fields Example curated experiment: typically 100 – 300 fields Example curated experiment: typically 100 – 300 fields Summary I • Immune epitopes are the molecular entities recognized by adaptive immune receptors • The IEDB catalogs experiments defining immune epitopes Large amounts of complex data, which poses challenges for data consistency Overview • Background – Immune epitopes – The Immune Epitope Database (IEDB) • IEDB development cycle – Ontology development – Database design – Content curation • Database export into OWL Development cycle Ontology development • identify entities and relations Content curation • add new content • recurate invalid content Database design • table structure • lookup table values • validation rules Ontology development (ONTIE) • Re-use terms from OBO foundry candidate ontologies • Native ONTIE terms for entities specific for epitopes Goal is to find a good home for them Imports from: Gene Ontology Cell Ontology ChEBI, NCBI Taxonomy OBI Protein Ontology Information Artifact Ontology Partial high-level ‘is a’ hierarchy Available: http://ontology.iedb.org/ Database design / implementation History: • initial design (to get started) • iterative updates (to fix things) • redesign from scratch for 2.0 because we (still) can Ontology terms | Database tables Tables aligned with ontology Improved understanding between software engineers and domain experts ‘ontologic normalization’ Content migration and re-curation IEDB 1.0 1. conditional field-to-field mapping 2. script based re-curation (SQL) Rule based validation first pass: 693,133 inconsistencies IEDB 2.0 3. manual recuration (web interface) Summary II • Application specific ontology (ONTIE) developed based on OBO foundry principles, and relying heavily on OBI • Database re-designed and structure aligned with the ontology • Data migrated and consistency enforced by rule based validation engine Overview • Background – Immune epitopes – The Immune Epitope Database (IEDB) • IEDB development cycle – Ontology development – Database design – Content curation • Database export into OWL Database export into OWL Subset of IEDB 2.0 Advantages of OWL export • Allows to directly use ontology and OWL reasoner to perform consistency checks • Provides expressive query language within the IEDB • Enables query across integrated biomedical databases. Future Work • Provide IEDB in triple store / access through SPARQL queries • Complete ontology development and OWL export for all data in the IEDB • Overcome technical challenges (Pellet takes 1 minute to classify 100 assays; 300,000 in IEDB…) • Overcome ontological challenges (cells, peptides, negative data, …) THANKS! OBI Consortium - http://obi-ontology.org Alan Ruttenberg – Science Commons IEDB Team - www.iedb.org La Jolla Institute for Allergy & Immunology SAIC • Scott Stewart • Tom Carolan • Hussein Emami San Diego Supercomputer Center • Phil Bourne • Julia Ponomarenko • Zhanyang Zhu Technical University of Denmark • Ole Lund • Morten Nielsen University of Copenhagen • Søren Buus