* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Full text
Politics of global warming wikipedia , lookup
Scientific opinion on climate change wikipedia , lookup
Effects of global warming on humans wikipedia , lookup
Global warming hiatus wikipedia , lookup
Attribution of recent climate change wikipedia , lookup
Climate change and poverty wikipedia , lookup
Effects of global warming on human health wikipedia , lookup
Solar radiation management wikipedia , lookup
Surveys of scientists' views on climate change wikipedia , lookup
Public opinion on global warming wikipedia , lookup
Global warming wikipedia , lookup
Climate change and agriculture wikipedia , lookup
Climate change feedback wikipedia , lookup
Climate change, industry and society wikipedia , lookup
Years of Living Dangerously wikipedia , lookup
Effects of global warming on Australia wikipedia , lookup
John D. Hamaker wikipedia , lookup
Instrumental temperature record wikipedia , lookup
Scientific registration no: 2047 Symposium no: 26 Presentation: poster Effects of an increased soil temperature on nitrous oxide emissions from an arable Eutrochrept in Southern Germany Effet d'une augmentation de température sur l'émission d'oxydes nitreux dans un Eutrochrept cultivé du sud de l'Allemagne KAMP Thomas (1), STEINDL Hubert (1), HANTSCHEL Ralph E. (2), BEESE Friedrich (3), MUNCH Jean-Charles (1) (1) GSF - Institute of Soil Ecology, 85764 Neuherberg, Germany (2) Agiplan AG, 45470 Muelheim/Ruhr, Germany (3) Institute of Soil Science and Forest Nutrition, 37077 Goettingen, Germany Introduction Theoretical and numerical analyses agree that rising trace gas emissions will cause a global warming (Houghton et al. 1990, 1996) and most General Circulation Models estimate in Central Europe an increasing temperature of 2-4°C during the next decades (Rowntree et al. 1991; Harrison et al. 1995; Hollwurtl and Beinhauer 1995). As a consequence, changes in evaporation, precipitation and soil moisture will undoubtedly occur (Houghton et al. 1990; Anderson 1992). However, increasing temperatures have significant impacts on agriculture and will affect the microbial activity and the productivity of crops (Waggoner 1983; Rosenzweig and Parry 1993; Kutsch et al. 1995). Among other trace gases, nitrous oxide is contributing to global warming (Yung et al. 1976) and is involved in the destruction of stratospheric ozone (Crutzen 1970). Its total atmospheric emission is calculated as approximately 10-17 Tg N2O-N a-1 (Houghton et al. 1996) with an increasing rate of 0.2 to 0.3% per year (Badr and Probert 1992). About 70% of the total emitted nitrous oxide is derived from soils (Bouwman 1990) and recently Iserman (1994) calculated the share of agriculture as 81% of the anthropogenic nitrous oxide emissions. In consequence Mosier et al. (1996) suggested to use nitrification inhibitors mixed to N fertilizers to mitigate nitrous oxide emissions from agricultural soils. Continuing, Beauchamp (1997) gave a review of several management practices and procedures to control nitrous oxide emissions from agroecosystems. 1 Fig. 1 Simplified scheme of the influence on N2O emissions from arable soils and its feedback via changing temperature and precipitation due to climate change. A more detailed scheme about the variables regulating processes that form nitrous oxide in agroecosystems is given by Benckiser (1994) for denitrification and by Beauchamp (1997) for nitrification. The production of nitrous oxide in soils is mostly depended on denitrification and nitrification (Delwiche 1981; Firestone 1982; Kuenen and Robertson 1988; Rheinbaben 1990). Because these formations are biotic processes they will be controlled by factors influencing the microbial activity. Climate is one of them. Therefore, a hypothetical positive feedback is regulating the interaction between climate change as induced by nitrous oxide emissions and the formation of nitrous oxide as influenced by global warming (Fig. 1). To proof the effects of a postulated increased temperature on soil biological processes in agroecosystems a field experiment with special regard to nitrous oxide releases was carried out. The soil warming experiment was related to the scenario SA90 of the IPCC (Houghton et al. 1990) and an increase of the soil temperature of 3°C above ambient was assumed. Materials and Methods The experiments were performed on the research station of the 'Forschungsverbund Agrarökosysteme München' (FAM) in southern Germany, approximately 45 km north of Munich in the Bavarian tertiary hillslopes. The research farm (N 48°30.0', E 11°20.7') is located 454 m above sea level. The mean annual air temperature is about 7.4°C with minimum in January (-4°C daily mean temperature) and maximum in August (22°C daily mean temperature). The annual precipitation is 833 mm (60% in the summer months). The studies were carried out on a fine-loamy district Eutrochrept (clay 18%, silt 57% sand 25%) with a pH (CaCl2) of 5.2. Total organic C was 1.83% and total organic N 0.17%. Bulk density was 1.3 g cm-3. In summer 1994 two heating grids were installed in a fallow (cut twice a year) and a wheat field (100 kg N ha-1 as ammonium urea solution and white mustard as catch crop), respectively. Each grid consisted of a 25 m2 (5 × 5 m) heated plot with a control plot of the same size beside. The heating equipment was modified after a technique as reported by Hantschel et al. (1995) and was previously described by Kamp and Steindl (1997). 2 The heating started in August 1994 after a short control period of investigation. The plots in the fallow remained installed over the total investigation period whereas the plots in the wheat field were shortly removed in autumn 1994 and 1995 and reinstalled after tillage. Monitoring of gas fluxes was carried out weekly from July 1994 to March 1996 using the closed chamber technique (Hutchinson and Mosier 1981). In each plot five permanent PVC rings were installed. Five gas samples were collected periodically from the chambers' atmosphere within a period between 45 and 90 minutes. Nitrous oxide concentration in the gas samples was analyzed using a gas chromatograph with a 63Ni electron capture detector (ECD) connected to an autosampler with pneumatic multiport valves (Loftfield et al. 1997). The chamber design and the calculations of N2O fluxes are described by Flessa et al. (1995). Accompany to the gas flux measurements soil samples were taken monthly down to 0.5 m depth in the experimental plots and analyzed gravimetrically for soil moisture (dried at 105°C). Results and Discussion Within the investigated period temperature and precipitation differed between the years. The average of the daily mean air temperature in winter 1994/95 was 5.6°C whereas it was -0.1°C in winter 1995/96. The daily mean air temperatures during the summer months 1994 was 16°C and 14°C in 1995 and the total precipitation in the first winter period was 372 mm whereas it was 214 mm in the second period. Fortunately in the present investigation two different climatic years appeared: the warm and wet year 1994/95 and the cold and dry year 1995/96. Therefore, the effects of the soil warming experiment could be proofed under different natural climatic fluctuations. In January 1994 as well as in January and February 1995 snow was covering the fields which insulated the soil and the plants against the cold air temperatures. However, due to the heating of the wheat field snow melted and no snow cover occurred in the heated plot. As a result the topsoil of the heated wheat field was exposed to the very cold wind. Despite of heating this effect resulted in lower temperatures in the heated plot as against in the control plot. We assume that without heating the soil temperature in the snowless heated plot would have been 5 to 6°C lower. Surprisingly this effect was not observed in the fallow field. Both control plot and heated plot of the fallow field were very closely covered with different grasses and herbs which separated the topsoil and the snow cover from each other. The effect was that the snow did not reach the ground and the resistance wires, respectively, and therefore snow could not melt. For this reason the temperature differences between control and heated plot could kept at approximately 3°C as desired. Heating the topsoil (0.01 m) 3°C above ambient influenced the soil temperatures in the lower horizons. The treatment resulted in temperature differences of approximately 1 to 1.8°C even at 1 m depth between the heated and the control plots. The soil temperatures in the 1 m profile of the fallow plots is shown exemplary in figure 2 for a summer day (31.07.95) and a late autumn day (14.11.95). 3 soil depth (m) 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 soil temperature (°C) 23 24 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 0.0 0.0 -0.2 -0.2 -0.4 -0.4 -0.6 -0.6 -0.8 -0.8 -1.0 31.07.95 soil depth (m) soil temperature (°C) 15 -1.0 14.11.95 Fig. 2 Soil temperature in the 1 m profile of the control plot ( ) and the heated plot ( ) of the fallow during the 31.07.95 and the 14.11.95. soil depth (m) 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 soil moisture [% DS ] 24 26 28 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 0.0 0.0 -0.1 -0.1 -0.2 -0.2 -0.3 -0.3 -0.4 -0.4 -0.5 14.11.95 31.07.95 soil depth (m) soil moisture [% DS ] 8 -0.5 Fig. 3 Soil moisture in the 0.5 m profile of the control plot ( ) and the heated plot ( ) of the fallow during the 31.07.95 and the 14.11.95. The same amounts of precipitation reached the topsoil in both plots, heated and control. However, soil moisture in the heated plots decreased, by approximately 20% the soil moisture in the control plots. Corresponding to the higher temperatures in lower horizons soil moisture in the soil profile of the heated plots decreased as against in the control plots. Even at 0.3 to 0.5 m depth we measured a lower soil moisture. For example the soil moisture of the heated plot of the fallow was 84% and 80% on the 31.07.95 and the 14.11.95, respectively, of that of the control plot in this depth (Fig. 3). We did not measure the evaporation nor the transpiration and we could not distinguish between the direct effect of the higher temperature and the indirect effect due to a higher water uptake of faster growing plants in the heated plot (data not shown). Nevertheless, elevated soil temperatures of only 3°C obviously have a profound effect on soil water balance. Throughout the year plants covered the fallow soil very closely. In contrast wheat plants do not grow closely packed and evaporation might be higher than from the fallow. In consequence soil water content in mid summer months 1995 was less in the wheat field (control plot 13.6 %DS, heated plot 6.8 %DS) than in the fallow field (control plot 19.4 %DS, heated plot 14.3 %DS). However, we found a clear negative relation between soil temperature and soil moisture, and this would have a negative effect on microbial activity. 4 12 12 2 -1 N O-N release (kg ha ) fallow 10 10 8 8 6 4 6 ** * ** 4 ** 2 2 0 0 Sum 94 W in 94/95 Sum 95 field W in 95/96 * Sum 94 W in 94/95 * Sum 95 W in 95/96 Fig.4 Cumulated release of nitrous oxide from the control plots (n) and heated plots (o) of the fallow and the wheat field over the single seasons (summer from May to October and winter from November to April). During the first summer while white mustard was growing as a catch crop no significant differences in nitrous oxide releases between the two plots of the field occured. Nitrous oxide releases from the fallow (0.73 kg N2O-N ha-1) were higher as from the field (0.62 kg N2O-N ha-1). The emissions of nitrous oxide between fallow and wheat field are difficult to compare for the first summer period because the fallow was laid out only a few weeks before the start of the experiment and the former field was well fertilized. Nevertheless, in the following year the fallow was not fertilized while in the wheat field 100 kg N ha-1 was applied during the vegetation period. As a consequence in the control plots the total summer releases of the wheat field (1.54 kg N ha-1) were three times higher compared to the fallow (0.47 kg N ha-1) (Fig. 4). Surprisingly, the releases from the heated plots increased in the fallow (1.40 kg N ha-1) and decreased in the wheat field (0.66 kg N ha-1) under elevated soil temperatures. Significant higher emissions from the heated fallow plot as against the control plot was even observed in the same range during the first summer 1994. It seems that the emissions from the fallow were considerably influenced by temperature whereas they were impeded by the lower soil moisture in the heated field plot. And in fact, cumulated summer releases from the wheat field could be explained by 94% with increasing soil moisture and by 78% with decreasing soil temperature. In contrast 53% of the nitrous oxide emissions from the fallow could be explained with increasing soil temperatures whereas we found only a slight relation with soil moisture. Due to decreasing soil moisture with increasing soil temperature two contrary factors were controlling nitrous oxide releases from the investigated plots. Therefore, the direct effects of temperature might be of importance in ecosystems where a closed vegetation covers the soil as in the fallow. In a more open stand as it is in cropped fields soil moisture might become more important for regulation of the emissions of nitrous oxide. However, in both control plots 71% (fallow) and 60% (wheat field) of the total nitrous oxide releases during the investigation period were measured in winter 1995/96. In winter 1995/96 soil temperature in the heated fallow plot was mostly above 0°C and in the control fallow plot several freezing thawing cycles with high short term peaks were observed. In contrast, in the wheat field several high emissions of nitrous oxide occurred in connection with freezing and thawing in both, control and heated plot. As mentioned above soil of the heated wheat field was exposed to the cold wind due to a missing snow cover. As a result the soil in the upper layer was frozen several times as well. The only difference between the two plots of the wheat field was that the time when the freezing thawing peaks of nitrous oxide appeared was quite unlike. 5 Conclusions The hypothetically expected higher emissions of nitrous oxide from a warmer soil were also affected by the lower soil moisture during the vegetation period in the heated plot of the wheat field as against they occurred in the fallow. The winter months will be the most sensitive season in relation to nitrous oxide emissions when climate will change. The results indicate that if soil temperature is lower than the freezing point or if temperatures are higher as 0°C most the time in the winter months only little nitrous oxide releases from agriculture will occur. However, if warmer conditions will become likely the mean winter temperatures in southern Germany will rise to approximately 0°C and freezing-thawing events will change. If as predicted for Central Europe, not only temperature will rise but also summer rainfall will increase, which might compensate the higher evapotranspiration caused by a warmer soil surface the overall effect must result in dramatically higher nitrous oxide losses from arable soils which will sustain an advanced global warming. References Anderson JM (1992) Responses of soils to climate change. In: Woodward FI (ed) The ecological consequences of climate change. Adv Ecol Res 22: 163-210 Badr O, Probert SD (1992) Nitrous oxide in the earth's atmosphere. Appl Energy 41: 177-200 Beauchamp EG (1997) Nitrous oxide emissions from agricultural soils. Can J Soil Sci 77: 113-123 Benckiser G (1994) Relationships between field-measured denitrification losses, CO2 formation and diffusional constraints. Soil Biol Biochem 26: 891-899 Bouwman AF (1990) Exchange of greenhouse gases between terrestrial ecosystems and the atmosphere. In: Bouwman AF (ed) Soils and the greenhouse effect. John Wiley and Sons Ltd., Chichester, pp 61-167 Crutzen PJ (1970) The influence of nitrogen oxides on the atmospheric ozone content. Quart J Roy Met Soc 96: 320-325 Delwiche CC (ed) (1981) Denitrification, nitrification and atmospheric nitrous oxide. Wiley & Sons Ltd., Chichester, 286 pp Firestone MK (1982) Biological denitrification. In: Stevenson FJ (eds) Nitrogen in agricultural soils. Agronomy 22: 289-236, Am Soc Agron, Madison, Wisconsin Flessa H, Dörsch P, Beese F (1995) Seasonal variability of N2O and CH4 fluxes in differently managed arable soils in Southern Germany. J Geophys Res 100: 2311523124 Hantschel RE, Kamp T, Beese F (1995) Increasing the soil temperature to study global warming effects on the soil nitrogen cycle in agroecosystems. J Biogeogr 22: 375-380 Harrison PA, Butterfield RE, Downing TE (eds) (1995) Climate change and agriculture in Europe - Assessment of impacts and adaptation. Einvironmental Change Unit, Research Report No. 9, University of Oxford, Oxford, 411 pp Hollwurtl E, Beinhauer R (1995) Klimaszenarien. In: Verein zur Förderung der Ökosystemforschung e.V. (eds) EcoSys - Beiträge zur Ökosystemforschung: Auswirkungen einer Temperaturerhöhung auf die Ökosysteme der Bornhöveder Seenkette. Bd. 1995/2: 17-31 6 Houghton JT, Jenkins GJ, Epharaums JJ (eds) (1990) Climate Change - The IPCC Scientific Assessment. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 364 pp Houghton JT, Meira Filho LG, Callander BA, Harris N, Kattenberg A, Maskell K (eds) (1996) Climate Change 1995 - The Science of Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 572 pp Hutchinson GL, Mosier AR (1981) Improved soil cover method for field measurement of nitrous oxide flux. Soil Sci Soc Am J 45: 311-316 Iserman K (1994) Agriculture's share in the emission of trace gases affecting the climate and some cause-orientated proposals for reducing this share. Environ Pollut 83: 95111 Kamp T, Steindl H (1997) N2O Emissions from agriculture in a warmer climate - how will soils react on Global Climate Change? Proc. 7th Int. Workshop Nitrous Oxide Emissions: 297-302 Kuenen JG, Robertson LA (1988) Ecology of nitrification and denitrification. In: Cole JA, Ferguson SJ (eds) The nitrogen and sulphur cycles. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 161-218 Kutsch WL, Beinhauer R, Branding A, Buscot F, Dilly O, Eschenbach C, Irmler U, Hingst R, Hinrichs A, Hoffmann F, Kluge W, Lenfers U, Middelhoff U, Munch JC, Schleuss U, Thamm F, Wachendorf C, Weisheit K, Wiebe C (1995) Auswirkungen auf den Kohlenstoffhaushalt. In: Verein zur Förderung der Ökosystemforschung e.V. (eds) EcoSys Beiträge zur Ökosystemforschung: Auswirkungen einer Temperaturerhöhung auf die Ökosysteme der Bornhöveder Seenkette. Bd. 1995/2: 5068 Loftfield N, Flessa H, Augustin J, Beese F (1997) Automated gas chromatograhic system for rapid analysis of the atmospheric trace gases CH4, CO2 and N2O. J Environ Quality 26: 560-564 Mosier AR, Duxbury JM, Freney JR, Heinemeyer O, Minami K (1996) Nitrous oxide emissions from agricultural fields: assessment, measurement and mitigation. Plant Soil 181: 95-108 Rheinbaben von W (1990) Nitrogen losses from agricultural soils through denitrification - a critical evaluation. Z Pflanzenernaehr Bodenk 153: 157-166 Rosenzweig C, Parry ML (1993) Potential impacts of climate change on world food supply: a summary of a recent international study. In: Kaiser HM, Drennen TE (eds) Agricultural dimensions of global climate change. St. Lucie Press, Delray Beach, pp 87-116 Rowntree PR, Callander BA, Cochrane J (1991) Modelling climate change and some potential effects on agriculture in the UK. J Roy Agric Soc Engl 152: 153-170 Waggoner PE (1983) Agriculture and a Climate Change by more Carbon Dioxid. In: NRC (eds) Changing Climate, Report of the Carbon Dioxide Committee, Board of Atmospheric Sciences and Climate, National Academic Press, Washington, pp 383418 Yung YL, Wang WC, Lacis AA (1976) Greenhouse effect due to atmospheric nitrous oxide. Geophys Res Lett 3: 619-621 Keywords : climate change, nitrous oxide, soil warming, agriculture Mots clés : changement climatique, oxyde d'azote, réchauffement du sol, agriculture 7