* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download 3.4 Seismic waves in a spherical earth 3.5 Body wave travel time study
Global Energy and Water Cycle Experiment wikipedia , lookup
Deep sea community wikipedia , lookup
Post-glacial rebound wikipedia , lookup
Seismic inversion wikipedia , lookup
Shear wave splitting wikipedia , lookup
Plate tectonics wikipedia , lookup
Large igneous province wikipedia , lookup
Surface wave inversion wikipedia , lookup
3.4 Seismic waves in a spherical earth • Ray paths and travel times • Velocity distribution • Travel time curve inversion 3.5 Body wave travel time study • • • • Body wave phases C Core phases h Upper mantle structure Lower mantle structure 3.4.1 Ray paths and travel times 1 2 3.4.2 Velocity distributions 3 3.4.3 Travel time inversion 4 3.5 Body wave travel time studies J-B (1940) IASP91 (1995) 5 3.5.1 Body wave phases 6 7 8 3.5.2 Core phases PKP series 9 Detailed Inner core velocity Structure A B Tae-Gyu Yee, 2009 Real observation of core phases 1. The arrivals do not fall along narrow lines. 2. The PKP-BC branch continues beyond its geometrically predicted limit of 153 deg 3. The PKP travel times show an additional branch not predicted by geometrical ray theory 10 11 Inner core anisotropy Spherical harmonic expansion up to a degree 4 of the PKIKP-P travel time residual field. Values are in tenths of a second. A low number means a fast velocity in the core. PKIKP and P travel time residuals are computed p with respect to JB travel time curve. • Station residuals of the seismic core phase PKIKP have been computed for 400 seismological observatories worldwide using 5 yr of the International Seismological Center (ISC) Bulletics. • PKIKP travel times can be corrected for upper mantle propagation by subtracting P delays 9PKIKP-P residuals • PKIKP-P exhibit a latitudinal dependence 9Polar stations tend to be faster than equatorial stations. 9This pattern may reflect a departure from spherical symmetry in the P-velocity distribution in the vicinity of the inner core boundary of the Earth. Poupinet et al., Nature, 1983 12 Super rotation study using doublets Zhang, Science, 2003 Super rotation study using doublets Zhang, Science, 2003 13 Topography of ICB using doublets Cao el al., PNAS, 2007 PKJKP Cao et al., Science (2005) 14 3.5.3 Upper mantle structure • The sub-crustal lithosphere (seismic lithosphere or lid) – – – – • P- and S- wave velocities of about 8.1 and 4.5 km/s On global average, the thickness is about 80-100 km At mid-ocean ridge, its thickness becomes zero Beneath stable cratons,, lithosphere p extends to about 200 km Low velocity zone (asthenosphere – mechanical term) – In tectonically active regions, the LVZ is well developed and relatively shallow. – In stable continental regions, the LVZ is deeper and less pronounced, and may not even present • Transition zone The Transition Zone (TZ) • • • • • 410 – 660 km (the lower part of the upper mantle) Velocity is increased by 4 and 8% at 410 and 660 km Phase transition (olivine - β spinel, γ spinel i l – perovskite) ki ) Topography change due to subducting slab or hot plume Whole mantle convection vs. upper and lower mantle convections ? 15 Comaprison of GCA GCA: the Gulf of California model ARC-TR: Arc-trench for the Japan subductioon zone T7: Tectonically active western portion of North America K8: Stable Eurasia shield A study of the transition zone using SS or PP precursors Shearer and Flanagan, Science, 1999 16 A thickness of the transition zone Gu and Dziwonski, EPSL, 1998 3.5.4 Lower mantle structure • • Velocity increase rapidly with depth for roughly 100 km beneath the 660 km, but then increase more slowly • The mineral transformation continues up to 100 km • No N transformation f i at deeper d depth. d h Only O l controlled by pressure. • Weak seismic discontinuities at 900 and 1300 km Very complex layer at the base of the lower mantle – D” • Thermal boundary layer between the mantle and hotter core. (~1000 deg difference) 17 Very complex structure in D” Variability of the D” • SdS or PdS phase are observed at many locations on the CMB, but not everywhere. • Even nearby • The Discontinuity has large topographic hi variations i i over small ll spatial wavelengths the focus and defocus waves. • There is no actual discontinuity, but that complex three dimensional velocity heterogeneities give the appearance of discontinuity 18 D″ Discontinuity •Is it intermittent? •Relation to slabs? •Due to anisotropy? •Due to phase change? •Due to CBL? Correlation between regions of fast velocities in D” and the projected locations of fossil slabs from ancient subduction zones 19 A Study of CMB usign SPdKS phase (ULVZ) Thorne and Garnero, JGR, 2004 A Detailed Seismic Structure of D” Ni et al., Science (2002) 20 Medical Tomography CT (Computerized tomography) Scan Seismic Tomography data Travel time tomography T = ∫ 1 / v( s )ds = ∫ u ( s )ds δT = ∫ δu ( s )ds ΔTi = ∑ Gij Δu j j =1 21 Travel time tomography van der Hilst, Nature, 1999 22 3.6 Anisotropic earth structure SPO (shape-preferred orientation) or LPO (lattice-preferred orientation) 23 “Azimuthal” anisotropy: like transverse isotropy on its side 24 25 3.6.5 Anisotropy in the lithosphere and the asthenosphere Variations in Pn wave velocities. Maximum is in the direction of spreading when the plate formed Anisotropy in the crust – the presence of the crack 26 How to study anisotropy within and beneath the continental lithosphere? 27 The Appalachian orogenic belt SH faster 28 3.6.6 Anisotropy in the mantle and the core D″ Anisotropy • Lattice-Preferred Lattice Preferred Orientation (LPO)? • Shape-Preferred Orientation (SPO)? • Result of a Chemical Boundary Layer? • Related to Slabs? McNamara, van Keken, and Karato [2002] 29 D″ Anisotropy • Often most intense at the top of D″. • Most always with SH faster than SV (Æ transverse isotropy) • Shows large lateral variation. • Often associated with y the D″ discontinuity. Fouch et al. [2001] 30 3.7 Attenuation and anelasticity • • • • Geometric spreading Multipathing Scattering Intrinsic attenuation 31 3.7 Attenuation and anelasticity Earthquake in Texas. MNV : 15° (Nevada) MM18 : 14° (Missouri) Seismic velocity variations between these areas are less than 10% Attenuation vs. Temperature 32 Melt-filled magma chamber 3.7.2 Geometric spreading “Energy per unit wave front varies as a wave front expands or contracts” For body wave, the amp. decreases as 1/r 33 3.7.3 Multipathing 34 3.7.4 Scattering a = size of heterogeneity L = distance wave travels lambda = wavelength 35 36 3.7.5 Intrinsic attenuation 37 38 39 40 3.7.7 Spectral resonance peaks 41 Three damped harmonic oscillator systems in Seismology 1. The attenuation of the normal modes 2 The behavior of a seismometer 2. 3. The response of a building 42 3.7.8 Physical dispersion due to anelasticity 43 EUS : Eastern US B&R : Basin and Range 44 45 46 47 48 3.8.1 Density within the earth 49 50 51 52 3.8.2 Temperature in the earth 53 3.8.3 Composition of the mantle Mantle Dunite : 92% Olivine 90% Forsterite (Mg2SiO4) < 50% Fayalite (Fe2SiO4) Core Iron + lighter element e.g., Fe2Si 54 Oxygen (white) Silicon (Black) Magnesium/Iron (Grey) 55 410 km 520 km 56 3.8.4 Composition of D” General thermal convection The interaction of subducting slabs with a chemical boundary layer consisting of dense mantle dregs A chemical boundary layer formed from delaminated post-eclogite g down with the ocean crust brought slabs A mineralogical phase chage 3.8.5 Composition of the core Inner core is hotter than outer core. Temperature increases by 3 % but pressure increases by 11 % 57 3.8.6 Seismology and planetary evolution Whole core molten The core cooled Th l d The geotherm lowered A frozen inner core 58 A cause of seismicity : Meteoroid impacts or moonquakes by tidal forces • The existence of the core is inconclusive •The moment of inertia ratio of 0.39 allows at most a small core Interior of other planets Europa Io 59