Download EGU2017-5944

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

History of geology wikipedia , lookup

Seismic inversion wikipedia , lookup

Age of the Earth wikipedia , lookup

Global Energy and Water Cycle Experiment wikipedia , lookup

Geology wikipedia , lookup

Post-glacial rebound wikipedia , lookup

Plate tectonics wikipedia , lookup

Large igneous province wikipedia , lookup

Seismic anisotropy wikipedia , lookup

Geophysics wikipedia , lookup

Earthscope wikipedia , lookup

Mantle plume wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
Geophysical Research Abstracts
Vol. 19, EGU2017-5944, 2017
EGU General Assembly 2017
© Author(s) 2017. CC Attribution 3.0 License.
Global radial anisotropy in the Earth’s mantle: new constraints from
seismology and geodynamics
Ana MG Ferreira (1), Manuele Faccenda (2), Sung-Joon Chang (3), William Sturgeon (4), and Lewis Schardong
(5)
(1) University College London, London, United Kingdom ([email protected]), (2) Universita di Padova, Padova, Italy
([email protected]), (3) Kangwon National University, Chuncheon, South Korea ([email protected]),
(4) University College London, London, United Kingdom ([email protected]), (5) University College
London, London, United Kingdom ([email protected])
When combined with information from mineral physics and geodynamics, seismic anisotropy is one of the most
direct ways to constrain mantle deformation and flow. However, it can be challenging to image it globally due to
limited data’s sensitivity and difficulties in separating shallow and deep Earth signals. In this presentation we review
recent developments in the global seismic imaging and interpretation of radially anisotropic mantle structure. We
show that it is highly beneficial to invert simultaneously for mantle and crustal structure using multiple datasets,
notably: (i) short-period group velocity data with strong sensitivity to the crust; and, (ii) surface wave overtone
measurements sensitive to the transition zone and uppermost lower mantle. Moreover, we show that comparisons
between anisotropy tomography and combined micro- and macro-flow geodynamic simulations help constrain the
Earth’s mineralogy and the patterns of mantle convection. As a case study, we present new results highlighting the
ubiquitous presence of anisotropy in the uppermost lower mantle beneath subduction zones. These observations
are consistent with 3-D numerical models of deformation from subducting slabs and the associated lattice preferred
orientation of bridgmanite produced by a combination of dislocation and diffusion creep mechanisms.