* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Farmacocinética
Polysubstance dependence wikipedia , lookup
Cannabinoid receptor antagonist wikipedia , lookup
Psychopharmacology wikipedia , lookup
Discovery and development of angiotensin receptor blockers wikipedia , lookup
Compounding wikipedia , lookup
NK1 receptor antagonist wikipedia , lookup
Nicotinic agonist wikipedia , lookup
Plateau principle wikipedia , lookup
Pharmacognosy wikipedia , lookup
Pharmaceutical industry wikipedia , lookup
List of comic book drugs wikipedia , lookup
Prescription costs wikipedia , lookup
Pharmacogenomics wikipedia , lookup
Prescription drug prices in the United States wikipedia , lookup
Drug interaction wikipedia , lookup
Neuropsychopharmacology wikipedia , lookup
Drug design wikipedia , lookup
Drug discovery wikipedia , lookup
Theralizumab wikipedia , lookup
Farmacología Clínica { Dr. Carlos Fernando Estrada Garzona Departamento de Farmacología Universidad de Costa Rica Ñ PRINCIPIOS DE FARMACOCINETICA CLINICA Ó Ñ ESTADO ESTACIONARIO PRINCIPIOS DE FARMACODINAMIA Ó EFICACIA CLINICA DE MEDICAMENTOS OBJETIVOS FARMACOCINETICA stained steady-state effective concentration of drugs in the fluids bath 1. Overview of pharmacology. Pharmacokinetics (PK) relates to the effect of the body o and principally includes bioavailability, distribution, and clearance. Pharmacodyna Clin Lab Med 28 (2008) 485–497 relates to drug concentration and receptor availability. The response to drug concentra be therapeutic, subtherapeutic, or toxic, depending on considerations involving both PK principles. (From Linder MW, Valdes R Jr. Pharmacogenetics: fundamentals and app it has also been shown that clinical responses can be predicted and the peak/ MIC ratio by measuring the antibiotic’s AUC over the dosing interval and dividing that value by its MIC against the target organism [3]. In essence, Peak/MIC (Concentration-Dependent) Concentration AUC/MIC Time > MIC (Time-Dependent) MIC 0 Time (Hours) Fig. 1. Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic parameters affecting antibiotic potency. AUC, area under the curve; MIC, minimum inhibitory concentration. Crit Care Clin 24 (2008) 335–348 Drug c= ˜ Vapp x of Pharmacy 1Institute x (e-k1t-e-k2t) Memorial University of Newfoundland St. John’s, Newfoundland Canada Time (t) of Bonn k2 -University k1 Germany A. Time course of drug concentration Drug concentration in blood (c) 164 color plates by Jürgen Wirth Intravenous Intramuscular Subcutaneous Oral Time (t) B. Mode of application and time course of drug concentration Thieme Stuttgart · New York · 2000 Lüllmann, Color Atlas of Pharmacology © 2000 Thieme Lüllmann, Color Atlas of Pharmacology © 2000 Thieme All rights reserved. Usage subject to terms and conditions of licens All rights reserved. Usage subject to terms and conditions of license. Ñ Velocidad à C max Ñ f absoluta = AUC ev / AUC iv Ñ f Ñ Bioequivalencia farmacocinética = + 20% Ñ y t máx relativa = AUC ev / AUC ref Bioequivalencia terapéutica = Ó EFICACIA + TOLERABILIDAD Biodisponibilidad Ñ FISIOLOGICOS Ó Ó Ñ PATOLOGICOS Ó Ó Ñ NEONATO-AM-EMBARAZO VACIAMIENTO GÁSTRICO TGI HEPATICO IATROGENICOS Ó Ó FÁRMACOS CYP ABSORCIÓN Institute of Pharmacy University of Bonn Germany Memorial University of Newfoundland St. John’s, Newfoundland Distribution in the Body 31 Canada Drug is not bound to plasma proteins Drug is strongly bound to plasma proteins 164 color plates by Jürgen Wirth Effect Effect Effector cell Effector cell Plasma Biotransformation Biotransformation Renal elimination Renal elimination concentration Plasma Free drug concentration Bound drug Free drug Time Thieme Stuttgart · New York · 2000 Time A. Importance of protein binding for intensity and duration of drug effect Lüllmann, Color Atlas of Pharmacology © 2000 Thieme All rights reserved. Usage subject to terms and conditions of licens Lüllmann, Color Atlas of Pharmacology © 2000 Thieme All rights reserved. Usage subject to terms and conditions of license. Ñ Concentración máxima / C máx Ó Ñ Obesidad vs LEC aumentado Ó Ñ Dosis de carga vs dosis mantenimiento Liposoluble / hidrosoluble Unión a proteínas plasmáticas DISTRIBUCIÓN Institute of Pharmacy Memorial University of University of Bonn Pharmacokinetics Newfoundland 45 Germany St. John’s, Newfoundland Canada Concentration (c) of drug in plasma [amount/vol] Co 164 color plates by Jürgen Wirth Plasma half life t 1 1 c t 1 = — co 2 2 ln 2 t 1 = —– 2 k 2 ct = co · e-kt ct: Drug concentration at time t co: Initial drug concentration after administration of drug dose e: Base of natural logarithm k: Elimination constant Unit of time Time (t) Thieme Stuttgart · New York · 2000 Lüllmann, Color Atlas of Pharmacology © 2000 Thieme All rights reserved. Usage subject to terms and conditions of licens Notional plasma volume per unit of time freed of drug = clearance [vol/t] Ñ FISIOLOGICOS Ó Ñ PATOLOGICOS Ó Ó Ñ EDAD-SEXO-EMBARAZO-EJERCICIO RENAL-HEPATICO-CARDIACO TABAQUISMO IATROGENICOS Ó Ó INDUCCIÓN-INHIBICION ENZIMÁTICA pH URINARIO ELIMINACION tained by dose rate, bioavailability (f), and clearance (Cl) of the drug (see Fig. 2). The catalytic activity of drug metabolizing enzymes (DMEs) is the Fig. 2. Dose rate (D) and frequency of dose administration (t) determined by physician based on the patient bioavailability (f) and clearance (Cl) to accomplish steady-state serum drug concentration. Abbreviation: Css, steady state serum drug concentration. Clin Lab Med 28 (2008) 485–497 Dose ship was Loading defined previously in Eq the desired target concentration: The loading dose is one or a the aim of (Equation achieving 2–1 the the loading dose is If the clinician chooses the desired A lo ance and bioavailability for that d steady state by the admin dosing interval can be calculated. long relative to the tempo Examplet1/2 of lidocaine is usually Goodman and Gilman'ʹs The Pharmacological Basis of Therapeutics, Twelfth Edition, 2011 Fig. 3. Pharmacodynamics of drug response. (A) Relationship be tors and drug response, where 1A is a low number, and 1B is a hi Relationship of drug response to affinity of receptors, where 2A and 2B is low affinity. The 50% effective drug concentration C2A is ceptor compared with concentration C2B. (From Weber W. Human M, Harper PS, Scriver C, et al, editors. Pharamcogenetics. New Yo 1997. p. 28; with permission.) FARMACODINAMIA Review (f) Receptor dimerization TRENDS in Pharmacological Sciences Vol.25 No.4 April 2004 25-year receptor revolution (a) Spontaneously occurring active states New mechanisms of signaling Ri (inactive) Constitutive activity, inverse agonism Ra (active state 1) (e) Allosterism Drug-like molecules for peptide receptors (b) G-protein pleiotropy G Ra (active state 2) (d) Auxiliary coupling proteins (i.e. RAMPs, RCP) Organ-selective and ligand-selective agonists (c) Agonist-selective active states G • Tissue-directed recombinant screening • Phenotypic versus genotypic organ selectivity TRENDS in Pharmacological Sciences Vol.25 No.4 April 2004 TRENDS in Pharmacological Sciences Figure 4. Discoveries of G-protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) behavior through biochemical research conducted during the past 25 years. See the main text for specific de and examples. Abbreviations: RAMPs, receptor activity-modifying proteins; RCP, receptor component protein. efficacy in compounds. It is given by the upper asymp the concentration/response curve and is, therefore, rel 100 % response/binding 100 75 50 25 0 75 response (agonist A) response (agonist B) 50 binding (agonist A/B) 25 0 -11 -10 -9 -8 -7 -6 -5 -4 -3 -2 -1 -12 -11 -10 -9 -8 -7 -6 -5 -4 -3 -2 -1 log [agonist] M log [agonist] ( M ) 100 % response % maximal response efinition of the efficacy of a candidate drug is required. Many drugs are, however, antagonists, that is, compounds 75 A British Journal ofagonist Pharmacology (2008) 153, 1353–1363 50 & 2008 Nature Publishing agonist B Group All rights reserved 0007–1188/0 www.brjpharmacol.org 25 b2-Adrenoceptor reserve on human airways MA Giembycz A B Salbutamol 100 100 N = 11 Relaxation (% Maximum) N=8 75 75 50 50 25 25 Inactivation Comparative 0 0 C 100 Terbutaline 25 50 75 Inactiv Compa 0 100 0 25 50 D (2009), 158, 287–299 British Journal of Pharmacology © 2009 The Author Procaterol Formoterol 100British Pharmacological Society Journal compilation © 2009 The KB´/α 2007.47:1-51. Downloaded from www.annualreviews.org I on 12/01/10. For personal use only. KA/α the nt ing ativity eric hosteric ns were ation 6. etween ctional t binding igand the ratio s affinity ite alone A P a KB´ b 1.0 0.5 L P Alllosteric 1 D an U KB KA binding [A*] alent both losteric eric dicated Orthosteric Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 2007. 47:1–51 α =as 300 First published online a Review in Advance on September 29, 2006 α = 100 The Annual Review of Pharmacology and Toxicology is K d A A.N. Bateson / Sleep Medicine 5 Suppl. 1 (2004) S9–S15 Loreclezole/ Etomidate GABA GABA Barbiturates? Steroids? Avermectins? Propofol? B2 Zinc furosemide Volatile anaesthetics/ Alcohols Convulsants (PTX) P P P drug binding sites of the GABAA receptor. (A) Cartoon showing the four transmembrane domains of a single subunit of the smembrane domain 2 is shown as the shaded barrel that lines the pore ofSleep the ion channel.5 (B) Schematic plan view of a GABAA Medicine Suppl. 1 (2004) S9–S15 e subunits with the pore in the centre of the heteromeric molecule; adapted with permission from Whiting et al. 1999 [55]. cartoon of the GABAA receptor sitting in the plasma membrane with ligand-binding sites indicated; adapted with permission from 3392 BRIEF REVIEWS: AT1 RECEPTOR ACTI The Journal of Immunology, 2007, 179: 3391–3395. FIGURE 1. AT1-AA may underlie many features of preeclampsia by interacting with AT1 receptors on different cell types. AT1-AA from preeclamptic FIGURE 2. tion in norm sFlt-1 is incre We have sugg a brake to in under preecla the maternal