Download Pennington`s Overview of Participles

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Arabic grammar wikipedia , lookup

Malay grammar wikipedia , lookup

Comparison (grammar) wikipedia , lookup

Lexical semantics wikipedia , lookup

Germanic weak verb wikipedia , lookup

Portuguese grammar wikipedia , lookup

Modern Hebrew grammar wikipedia , lookup

Ojibwe grammar wikipedia , lookup

English clause syntax wikipedia , lookup

Inflection wikipedia , lookup

Georgian grammar wikipedia , lookup

Macedonian grammar wikipedia , lookup

Germanic strong verb wikipedia , lookup

Scottish Gaelic grammar wikipedia , lookup

Spanish grammar wikipedia , lookup

Old Irish grammar wikipedia , lookup

Esperanto grammar wikipedia , lookup

Udmurt grammar wikipedia , lookup

Spanish verbs wikipedia , lookup

Modern Greek grammar wikipedia , lookup

Russian declension wikipedia , lookup

Pipil grammar wikipedia , lookup

Kannada grammar wikipedia , lookup

Old English grammar wikipedia , lookup

Swedish grammar wikipedia , lookup

Latvian declension wikipedia , lookup

Sanskrit grammar wikipedia , lookup

French grammar wikipedia , lookup

Lithuanian declension wikipedia , lookup

Latin conjugation wikipedia , lookup

Polish grammar wikipedia , lookup

Italian grammar wikipedia , lookup

Yiddish grammar wikipedia , lookup

Icelandic grammar wikipedia , lookup

Old Norse morphology wikipedia , lookup

Lithuanian grammar wikipedia , lookup

Bulgarian verbs wikipedia , lookup

Ukrainian grammar wikipedia , lookup

Latin syntax wikipedia , lookup

Serbo-Croatian grammar wikipedia , lookup

Ancient Greek grammar wikipedia , lookup

Participle wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
Pennington’s Overview of Participles
Jonathan T. Pennington
Introduction
Participles are very important, and at the same time potentially confusing. They are important
because nearly one out of every four verbs (about 24%) in the GNT is participial in form. Further, there is
a significant degree of flexibility in how one interprets participles that can make a big difference in
interpretation. Participles are potentially confusing because there are many different forms of participles
yet one must be able to parse them well to translate easily. Nevertheless, the paradigms do follow regular
patterns.
I hope that what follows will serve to give you a simple overview of the forms and meaning of
participles.
Nature of Participles
Participles in Greek (and English) are verbal adjectives. This means that participles have elements
of both verbs and adjectives. The verbal elements of a participle are tense (Present; Aorist; Perfect) and
voice (Active; Middle; Passive). The adjectival elements are case (nom; acc; gen; dat), gender (m, f, n)
and number (sing; plural). Participles do not have person (1st, 2nd, 3rd). The mood is “participle.”
So when parsing a participle, please give:
- Lexical Form of the verb
- Tense
- Voice
- Mood
- Case
- Gender
- Number
- Lexical Meaning of the verb
e.g.
lu,ontoj
lu,w
Present
Active
Participle
Genitive
Masculine
Singular
to loose
Think of a participle as a hybrid (or more skeptically, a mutation) of a verb that has taken on some
of the characteristics of an adjective. Any verb can take participial forms.
Part of the flexibility of participles is that they are rather “Jekyl and Hidish” – they can function in
a sentence as either a verb or an adjective (or noun = an adjective used substantivally). More on this
below under Meaning.
There are two main issues to get clear when thinking about participles – Morphology (form) and
Meaning.
Morphology
The good news is that all participles follow the three noun/adj declensions we have learned
already. The only other things to know to recognize the form of a participle are some telltale tense
indicators (like s for Aorists, etc.). Remember – because participles are non-indicative in mood (in fact,
like infinitives they are “in-finite” – they have no person) they will never have an augment!
1
Participial Forms By Tense
PRESENT
Active
M
Nom
Gen
Dat
Acc
lu,wn
lu,ontoj
lu,onti
lu,onta
Singular
F
lu,ousa
luou,shj
luou,sh|
luou,san
N
M
lu/on
lu,ontoj
lu,onti
lu/on
lu,ontej
luo,ntwn
lu,ousin
lu,ontaj
Plural
F
N
lu,ousai
luousw/n
luou,saij
luou,saj
lu,onta
luo,ntwn
lu,ousin
lu,onta
Notes:
- Just like a typical 3-1-3 adjective (masc-3rd declension; fem-1st decl.; neut-3rd decl.)
- Remember the feminine singular is of the hybrid form because the stem ends in s
- Remember the normal 3rd declension changes that occur in the dative plural
- Remember the normal contractions that will occur with contract verbs – e.g. filou/nta
- Second Aorist Active verbs will also use this paradigm (cf. Imperfect) – e.g. balwn
- The participle of eivmi is the endings of this paradigm
Middle/Passive (including middle-only [“deponent”] verbs)
Singular
M
F
N
M
Nom
Gen
Dat
Acc
luo,menoj
luome,nou
luome,nw|
luo,menon
luome,nh
luome,nhj
luome,nh|
luome,nhn
luo,menon
luome,nou
luome,nw|
luo,menon
luo,menoi
luome,nwn
luome,noij
luome,nouj
Plural
F
luo,menai
luome,nwn
luome,naij
luome,naj
N
luo,mena
luome,nwn
luome,noij
luo,mena
Notes:
- Endings are just like a typical 2-1-2 adjective (masc-2nd declension; fem-1st decl.; neut-2nd decl.)
- Remember “men in the middle”
- Verbs that are middle-only in the present will follow this paradigm for participles
- This paradigm is very similar to that of the Aorist Middle and the Perfect Middle/Passive
2
AORIST
Active
M
Nom
Gen
Dat
Acc
lu,saj
lu,santoj
lu,santi
lu,santa
Singular
F
lu,sasa
lusa,shj
lusa,sh|
lu,sasan
N
M
Plural
F
lu/san
lu,santoj
lu,santi
lu/san
lu,santej
lusa,ntwn
lu,sasin
lu,santaj
lu,sasai
lusasw/n
lusa,saij
lusa,saj
N
lu,santa
lusa,ntwn
lu,sasin
lu,santa
Notes:
- Just like a typical 3-1-3 adjective (masc-3rd declension; fem-1st decl.; neut-3rd decl.)
- The endings are the same as paj( pasa( pan
- Remember the feminine singular is of the hybrid form because the stem ends in s
- Remember the normal 3rd declension changes that occur in the dative plural
- Remember that “liquid” stems will lack the sigma – e.g. mei,nantej
- Remember that contract verbs will lengthen before the sigma – e.g. filh,saj
Middle
M
Nom
Gen
Dat
Acc
lusa,menoj
lusame,nou
lusame,nw|
lusa,menon
Singular
F
lusame,nh
lusame,nhj
lusame,nh|
lusame,nhn
N
M
lusa,menon
lusame,nou
lusame,nw|
lusa,menon
lusa,menoi
lusame,nwn
lusame,noij
lusame,nouj
Plural
F
lusa,menai
lusame,nwn
lusame,naij
lusame,naj
N
lusa,mena
lusame,nwn
lusame,noij
lusa,mena
Notes:
- Endings are just like a typical 2-1-2 adjective (masc-2nd declension; fem-1st decl.; neut-2nd decl.)
- Remember “men in the middle”
- Remember no augment because non-indicative mood
- Verbs that are deponent in the Aorist will follow this paradigm for participles
- This paradigm is very identical to the Present Middle/Pass with the addition of the sa-.
- Remember that there is a separate paradigm for Aorist Middles and Aorist Passives.
Passive
M
Nom
Gen
Dat
Acc
luqei,j
luqe,ntoj
luqe,nti
luqe,nta
Singular
F
luqei/sa
luqei,shj
luqei,sh|
luqei/san
N
M
luqe,n
luqe,ntoj
luqe,nti
luqe,n
luqe,ntej
luqe,ntwn
luqei/sin
luqe,ntaj
Plural
F
luqei/sai
luqeisw/n
luqei,saij
luqei,saj
N
luqe,nta
luqe,ntwn
luqei/sin
luqe,nta
Notes:
- Just like a typical 3-1-3 adjective (masc-3rd declension; fem-1st decl.; neut-3rd decl.)
- Remember the typical q that indicates Aorist Passive
- Remember no augment because non-indicative mood
- Remember that there is a separate paradigm for Aorist Middles and Aorist Passives.
- Remember the Second Aorist Passives will drop the q – e.g. grafei,j
3
PERFECT
Active
M
Nom
Gen
Dat
Acc
lelukw,j
leluko,toj
leluko,ti
leluko,ta
Singular
F
lelukui/a
lelukui,aj
lelukui,a|
lelukui/an
N
leluko,j
leluko,toj
leluko,ti
leluko,j
M
leluko,tej
leluko,twn
leluko,sin
leluko,taj
Plural
F
lelukui/ai
lelukuiw/n
lelukui,aij
lelukui,aj
N
leluko,ta
leluko,twn
leluko,sin
leluko,ta
Notes:
- Just like a typical 3-1-3 adjective (masc-3rd declension; fem-1st decl.; neut-3rd decl.)
- Typical reduplication that indicates Perfect (verbs beginning with vowels with seem to lengthen)
- Typical k that indicates Perfect
Middle/Passive
M
Nom
Gen
Dat
Acc
lelume,noj
lelume,nou
lelume,nw|
lelume,non
Singular
F
lelume,nh
lelume,nhj
lelume,nh|
lelume,nhn
N
lelume,non
lelume,nou
lelume,nw|
lelume,non
M
lelume,noi
lelume,nwn
lelume,noij
lelume,nouj
Plural
F
lelume,nai
lelume,nwn
lelume,naij
lelume,naj
N
lelume,na
lelume,nwn
lelume,noij
lelume,na
Notes:
- Endings are just like a typical 2-1-2 adjective (masc-2nd declension; fem-1st decl.; neut-2nd decl.)
- Remember “men in the middle”
- Verbs that are deponent in the perfect will follow this paradigm for participles
- This paradigm is identical to the Present Middle/Passive with two exceptions – reduplication on
the front; and the o before the men is missing.
- Also like the Present, the Middle and Passive forms are identical
Meaning
There are two matters to mention under the topic of the meaning of participles. The first is simply
that there is a great deal of flexibility in the translation and interpretation of participles. Like the genitive
case (and maybe even more) there are a bewildering number of quite different options for translating a
participle. The ‘art’ of translation (as well as the ‘treason’) comes to play very much with participles. This
semantic flexibility manifests itself in that participles can function adjectivally (including substantively)
as well as verbally. In the first instance, a Greek participle can function like an attributive adjective, in a
predicate nominative construction, or as a substantive. When functioning verbally, participles can
communicate a variety of syntactical relationships, including temporal, manner, means, cause, condition,
concession, purpose, result, or function as attendant circumstance, periphrastic, redundant, imperatively,
or in a genitive absolute construction. It is important to spend some time in a good intermediate grammar
textbook such as Wallace to familiarize yourself with these options.
The other issue related to the meaning of participles concerns their “relative time.” Typically it has
been taught that participles communicate time relative to the action of the main verb. Thus, present
participles are action contemporaneous with the action of the main verb, while aorist and perfect
participles communicate action preceding the action of the main verb (unless the main verb is itself an
aorist; see Wallace). As with all such grammatical “rules”, this formulation has much to commend it but
also many exceptions and potential problems. Another theory based on word order has been put forward
by Stanley Porter. Overall, the most important thing to remember is that “context is king.” Context is the
ultimate determiner in such interpretive decisions.
4