* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download PGRN-RIKEN Proposal Submission We are encouraging
Survey
Document related concepts
Site-specific recombinase technology wikipedia , lookup
Genomic library wikipedia , lookup
Nutriepigenomics wikipedia , lookup
Heritability of IQ wikipedia , lookup
Microevolution wikipedia , lookup
Bisulfite sequencing wikipedia , lookup
Designer baby wikipedia , lookup
Whole genome sequencing wikipedia , lookup
Public health genomics wikipedia , lookup
Genome-wide association study wikipedia , lookup
Artificial gene synthesis wikipedia , lookup
Gene expression profiling wikipedia , lookup
Pathogenomics wikipedia , lookup
Pharmacogenomics wikipedia , lookup
Transcript
PGRN-RIKEN Proposal Submission We are encouraging applications from a broad group of investigators who are members of the PGRN or have recently applied for membership (see http://www.pgrn.org/join.html). Applicants must have samples from pharmacogenomics studies of well-phenotyped patients. The review process will involve reviewers who have approved PGRN-RIKEN projects (http://www.pgrn.org/pgrn-riken.html). Applicants with projects that have been selected for a PGRN-RIKEN collaborative study must agree to (a) review proposals if requested; and (b) attend PGRN-RIKEN meetings (at your own expense). The new PGRN-RIKEN collaboration is evolving and continues to expand. We encourage both types of proposals for sequencing and genomewide association studies. In particular, applications from investigators who are studying drugs that have not been previously studied using genomewide approaches, or new phenotypes of drug response that have not been studied. Such phenotypes may include hard endpoints, e.g. rather than statin-associated change in LDL-cholesterol, a new phenotype might be time to a cardiovascular event on statins. Timeline for PGRN-RIKEN Proposals, Round 15 September 19th, 2016 (Monday) by 9 am Pacific Time: Proposals due from investigators. September 21st, 2016 (Wednesday): Proposals assigned to reviewers (members of the past PGRNRIKEN collaboration). October 13th, 2016 (Thursday): Proposals reviewed on a call by the members of the past PGRNRIKEN collaboration. October 24th, 2016 (Monday): Final revised proposals due from investigators. October 28th, 2016 (Friday): Approved proposals sent to RIKEN. November 28th, 2016 (Monday): Proposals accepted for presentation by RIKEN. January 18th and 19th, 2017 (Wednesday, Thursday): Presentations and Meeting in Yokohama, Japan. Instructions and criteria for PGRN-RIKEN Proposals, Round 15 We will accept two types of proposals: one is the usual proposal focused on genome-wide association studies (see Section 1), and the second is a new proposal to perform deep sequencing (see Section 2). Two types of sequencing proposals will be accepted; one for sequencing around previously identified gene regions within the past PGRN-RIKEN projects (Round 1 to Round 14) (see Section 2), and the other for sequencing of one or more specific pharmacogenes, which can be from current or new projects. The list of specific pharmacogenes is appended. Send any questions to Dr. Sook Wah Yee at [email protected] SECTION 1: Submission for Genome-wide Association Study 1. Proposal Format (GWAS): Apply according to the following format. If not compliant with the following, the proposal will be returned without reviewed. 1. One page cover with study title and all investigators involved (indicate PI and Co-PI), with their affiliations and funders listed (also indicate which PGRN groups or the name of the funded pharmacogenomics research) 2. Three page length overall for the submission with these elements: a. Background including other studies in the field b. Importance of the problem to pharmacogenomics c. Population to be studied, and description of any approvals needed from collaborators d. Phenotypes that will be analyzed (description of primary endpoint/s, other information that may be available) e. Genotyping requested, with justification for approach f. Statistical analysis plan, including power calculations Updated July 2016 1 g. Data deposits plan, and statement of consent status (for Genome-wide Association Study). h. Data analysis and replication plans, within appropriate time line i. Functional follow up plan to reveal the mechanism of the SNP j. Statement of agreement to follow Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs). Contact [email protected] to request a copy of the SOP. 3. Proposal may be resubmitted in a subsequent call if they are responsive to the concerns of the reviewers. Resubmission applications must include a short paragraph at the beginning of the proposal indicating how the proposal has been changed to reflect the concerns expressed by the reviewers. 4. Submit as a single pdf file to [email protected]. 5. PIease include a statement that a PI on the project will be present for the meeting in Yokohama, Japan. 2. Criteria for evaluation of genome-wide association study (by past PGRN-RIKEN members) 1. What is the scientific merit of the proposed study? Scientific merit will include the significance and innovation of the proposal. 2. Is the sample size adequate and is the statistical plan appropriate? (evaluation by statisticians selected by the PGRN-RIKEN Leadership) 3. Do proposals meet the following qualifications? a. Are the DNA samples ready-to-ship, and will the phenotype data for the studies be ready within 6 months from the study’s approval? b. If the situation is anything other than samples ready-to-ship, is there reason to proceed now rather than wait? c. Did the investigators agree to SOPs? d. Does the proposal conform to the required format guidelines? (see above) 4. Plan to attend and present at the meeting. SECTION 2: Submission for Deep Sequencing Study That May Include the Top Pharmacogenes (see Table 1) or Specific Loci With Appropriate Rationale 1. Proposal Format (Deep Sequencing): Apply according to the following format. If not compliant with the following, the proposal will be returned without reviewed 1. One page cover with study title and all investigators involved (indicate PI and Co-PI), with their affiliations and funders listed (also indicate which PGRN groups or the name of the funded pharmacogenomics research). 2. Three page length overall for the submission with these elements: a. Background including other studies in the field b. Importance of the problem to pharmacogenomics c. Summary of previous GWAS results if applicable d. Rationale for proposed sequencing e. Sequencing requested - specify loci to be sequenced and samples. Provide brief rationale for each loci and for the samples. f. Specific gene information – gene name(s), length of coding region, information for pseudogene and family genes, priority of each gene (Number of genes is assumed to be less than 30. Final gene list to be sequenced is determined after the discussion with RIKEN). Investigator can also propose to sequence the top pharmacogenes and Updated July 2016 2 simply select any genes from the gene list irrespective of gene group/category (see Table 1). g. Study Design Plan, including power calculations h. Data analysis plan, within appropriate time line 3. Proposal may be resubmitted in a subsequent call if they are responsive to the concerns of the reviewers. Resubmission applications must include a short paragraph at the beginning of the proposal indicating how the proposal has been changed to reflect the concerns expressed by the reviewers. 4. Submit as a single pdf file to [email protected]. 5. PIease include a statement that a PI on the project will be present for meeting in Yokohama, Japan. 2. Criteria for evaluation of deep sequencing study (by past PGRN-RIKEN members) 1. Are the samples requested for deep sequencing from PGRN-RIKEN projects (Round 1 to 14)? If not, are they new projects for specific pharmacogenes? 2. What is the scientific merit of the proposed study? Scientific merit will include the significance and innovation of the proposal. 3. Is the sample size adequate and is the statistical plan appropriate? (evaluation by statisticians selected by the PGRN-RIKEN Leadership) 4. Is the deep sequencing project well-rationalized? 5. Do proposals meet the following qualifications? a. Are the DNA samples at RIKEN and enough for deep sequencing? (> 1 μg) b. Are the phenotype data for the studies sufficient and ready for the association analysis? c. Does the proposal conform to the required format guidelines? (see above) 6. Plan to attend and present at the meeting in Japan. POST-SELECTION RESPONSIBILITIES FOR PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR: 1. Plan to attend the PGRN-RIKEN Calls (2nd Thursday of each month), or send a very informed representative as needed. Plan to respond to all requests for information (for PGRN oversight, communication and coordination, and sharing of “best practices” network-wide). 2. Plan to work directly with your assigned RIKEN collaborator for coordination of the particulars of your study (for sample preparation and plating, shipping dates, review of data quality and analysis of results, and publications). Within 6 months of the study’s approval, samples should be sent to RIKEN, and all phenotypic information for the data analysis should be ready. 3. Plan to attend the PGRN-RIKEN meetings, typically once or twice per year at alternating locations between the US and Japan. 4. These are collaborations, and communication should be bi-directional about data analysis, results, and planned replication studies (remember that the PGRN-RIKEN is facilitating this collaboration, and please credit). 5. Immediately after selection, and thereafter as needed: a. Submit monthly updates (e.g. shipping and data receipt dates, IRB clearances, status of Updated July 2016 3 results, abstracts & papers, etc.) during monthly calls or by e-mail to [email protected]. b. Be a reviewer if requested by the PGRN-RIKEN Leadership. 6. Immediately after publication of the genomewide association study, the summary statistics of the data will be deposited to PGRN-RIKEN website as a pharmacogenomics resource to other studies. Any researcher who uses your data should acknowledge your publication. Updated July 2016 4 Table 1. List of 100 Pharmacogenes. Group Group 1 Group 2 Category Core Pharmacogenes Genes expressed in liver Gene list Updated July 2016 CYP1A2 CYP2A6 CYP2B6 CYP2C19 CYP2C8 CYP2C9 CYP2D6 CYP2E1 CYP3A4 CYP3A5 CYP4A11 NAT2 UGT1A1 CES1 ABCB1 ABCC2 ABCG2 SLCO1B1 SLCO1B3 VKORC1 CYP2C18 CYP2J2 CYP3A7 CYP3A43 CYP4F2 CYP4F3 CYP4F12 FMO3 FMO5 UGT1A3 UGT1A4 UGT1A6 UGT1A9 UGT2B7 UGT2B10 UGT2B15 UGT2B28 SULT1A1 SULT1A2 CES2 GSTM1 ABCB11 ABCC3 SLC10A1 SLC22A1 SLC22A9 SLC29A3 SLC47A1 SLCO2B1 POR Group 3 Genes expressed in other tissues CYP1A1 CYP1B1 CYP4B1 FMO1 FMO2 FMO4 GSTA1 NAT1 SLC10A2 SLC15A1 SLC22A2 SLC22A5 SLC22A6 SLC22A8 SLC22A11 SLC28A1 UGT1A5 UGT1A7 UGT1A8 UGT1A10 Group 4 Genes expressed in multiple tissues ABCC1 ABCC4 CYP11A1 CYP17A1 CYP19A1 CYP2A13 CYP2S1 CYP2W1 CYP26A1 CYP4F8 CYP4Z1 GSTT1 GSTP1 SLC15A2 SLC16A7 SLC19A1 SLC22A3 SLC22A4 SLC22A12 SLC28A2 SLC28A3 SLC29A1 SLC29A2 SLC31A1 SLC46A1 SLC47A2 SLCO1A2 SULT1E1 SULT2B1 TPMT 5