Download Abstract_SFE_GD

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Renewable resource wikipedia , lookup

Island restoration wikipedia , lookup

Ecological resilience wikipedia , lookup

Biogeography wikipedia , lookup

Ecosystem wikipedia , lookup

Unified neutral theory of biodiversity wikipedia , lookup

Conservation biology wikipedia , lookup

Human impact on the nitrogen cycle wikipedia , lookup

Bifrenaria wikipedia , lookup

Overexploitation wikipedia , lookup

Molecular ecology wikipedia , lookup

Fauna of Africa wikipedia , lookup

Occupancy–abundance relationship wikipedia , lookup

Tropical Andes wikipedia , lookup

Operation Wallacea wikipedia , lookup

Habitat wikipedia , lookup

Ecology wikipedia , lookup

Restoration ecology wikipedia , lookup

Biodiversity wikipedia , lookup

Biological Dynamics of Forest Fragments Project wikipedia , lookup

Theoretical ecology wikipedia , lookup

Habitat conservation wikipedia , lookup

Latitudinal gradients in species diversity wikipedia , lookup

Ecological fitting wikipedia , lookup

Reconciliation ecology wikipedia , lookup

Biodiversity action plan wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
New metrics of species’ ecological niche to assess relationships between
biodiversity and ecosystem processes
Safaa Wasof, Jonathan Lenoir, Guillaume Decocq*
Ecologie et Dynamique des Systèmes Anthropisés (EDYSAN, FRE 3498 CNRS-UPJV)
Université de Picardie Jules Verne, 1 rue des Louvels, 80037 Amiens Cedex
Corresponding author: [email protected]
How biodiversity influences ecosystem processes, such as plant productivity, is still a
challenging question. Among leading hypotheses proposed to explain the diversityproductivity relationship, Tilman’s diversity hypothesis postulates that ecosystem
processes are enhanced in more diverse communities because of complementary use of
available resource between species, via niche partitioning. But surprisingly, niche
complementarity has been mostly examined indirectly, via taxonomic, functional or
phylogenetic facets of biodiversity, but not via species’ habitat requirements.
Here we propose two straightforward metrics to assess niche complementarity via
species’ ecological characteristics. It quantifies the diversity of ecological distances
between local environmental conditions prevailing in a given habitat and the key
synthetic parameters (optimum and margins) of the realized ecological niche of all
species co-occurring within this focal community. We tested the effect of ‘ecologicalniche diversity’ on productivity of the herb layer of contrasted forest ecosystems in N
France at different spatial scales. We related aboveground biomass to various measures
of species dominance, taxonomic, functional and phylogenetic diversity indices in
addition to our newly elaborated index. We show that the abundance and traits of the
most dominant species matter more than taxonomic, functional or phylogenetic
diversity of the forest herb layer in explaining its aboveground biomass. Our ecologicalniche diversity metrics also positively affects aboveground biomass, indicating that the
latter increases with the divergence of species’ closest realized-niche margin from the
focal habitat conditions. We conclude that these metrics offer a new perspective on the
relative importance of biodiversity for ecological processes.
Key words
Ecological niche; Plant community diversity; Forest herb layer; Aboveground biomass;
Biomass ratio hypothesis; Diversity hypothesis