Download Immune response to multiple stimuli

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

DNA vaccination wikipedia , lookup

Molecular mimicry wikipedia , lookup

Adaptive immune system wikipedia , lookup

Immune system wikipedia , lookup

Hygiene hypothesis wikipedia , lookup

Immunosuppressive drug wikipedia , lookup

Adoptive cell transfer wikipedia , lookup

Innate immune system wikipedia , lookup

Polyclonal B cell response wikipedia , lookup

Cancer immunotherapy wikipedia , lookup

Immunomics wikipedia , lookup

Psychoneuroimmunology wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
Immune response to multiple stimuli
Ann Babtie
17th December 2014
17th December 2014
Immune response to multiple stimuli
1 / 18
Zebrafish larvae model for innate immune response
Translucent, genetically tractable, only innate immunity
Juliane — immune cell migration to wounds
(Immunology and Cell Biology, 2013):
17th December 2014
Immune response to multiple stimuli
2 / 18
Innate immune response to cancer
Pre-neoplastic cells trigger inflammatory response in zebrafish
Collaboration with Paul Martin’s group, Bristol University
(Feng et al, PLoS Biology 2010 & Current Biology 2012)
17th December 2014
Immune response to multiple stimuli
3 / 18
Immune response to wound and cancer in vivo
Data from Laura Ward, Bristol lab
17th December 2014
Immune response to multiple stimuli
4 / 18
Feng et al, PLoS Biology 2010
Neutrophils migrate to both wounds and cancer cells
17th December 2014
Immune response to multiple stimuli
5 / 18
Feng et al, PLoS Biology 2010
Cancer triggers chronic (non-resolving) inflammation
17th December 2014
Immune response to multiple stimuli
6 / 18
Feng et al, PLoS Biology 2010
Neutrophils attracted by (stochastic) H2 O2 signal
Leukocytes physically interact with cancer cells
17th December 2014
Immune response to multiple stimuli
7 / 18
Feng et al, Current Biology 2012
Leukocyte-derived prostaglandin E2 promotes tumor growth
17th December 2014
ph
ils
+ neu
PG tro
E2 ph
ils
tro
eu
-n
co
nt
ro
l
Cancer cell count reduced by Cox-2 or mPGES inhibitors,
neutrophil knockdown, EP1 receptor inhibition ....
Immune response to multiple stimuli
8 / 18
Project aim
What are spatio-temporal dynamics of chemoattractants?
What is spatial range of signal from cancer cells?
Threshold for immune cell to move from wound to cancer?
Does wound visit impact leukocyte response to cancer cell?
How do immune cells behave around different cancer types?
Do neutrophils & macrophages influence each other?
What are molecular mediators of cell behaviour?
....
Tools
Tracking software, cell migration statistics, models
17th December 2014
Immune response to multiple stimuli
9 / 18
Cell tracking software
1) Original image
2) Thresholding
6) Reduce each cell to point 0
100
200
300
400
3) Binarised image
500
80
60
60
4) Labelling 5) Combine z-­‐stacks 0
80
100
300
200
400
500
40
40
z
20
20
z
0
500
400
0
500
400
300
300
200
200
100
100
y
y
0
0
x
x
(pymol example)
17th December 2014
Immune response to multiple stimuli
10 / 18
Cell tracking software — problems
Over/under-segmentation of cells
Short cell tracks
Trade-off between noise and time-resolution
A) macrophages
C) neutrophils (good time-resolution)
B) cancer cells
D) cancer cells (good time-resolution)
17th December 2014
Immune response to multiple stimuli
11 / 18
Cell tracking software — planned changes
Record cell areas (and “volumes”) to help segmentation
Use cell volumes to help tracking
Calculate full cell-cell distance matrix for adjacent times
t3
t3
t2
t1
t2
t1
Alternative tracking algorithms (e.g. keyhole, multiple paths)
Correct for fish movement over time
How to validate?
17th December 2014
Immune response to multiple stimuli
12 / 18
Cell tracking software — adapt alternative?
17th December 2014
Immune response to multiple stimuli
13 / 18
Cell migration statistics
Are there spatial/temporal patterns for cell migration features?
Distance from wound/cancer
Step size
Direction of movement
Sliding window averages
Level of bias?
17th December 2014
Immune response to multiple stimuli
14 / 18
300
500
0 100
Distance / um
0 100
0 1
80
120
Min dis
50
100
length (no. timepoints)
150
300
0 100 500 300
Distance / um Distance / um
Fre
0
5
10
15
length (no. timepoints)
0 500
100
300
Distance / um
0
0
0 500
100
0
0
0
40
Frequency
Frequency
100
50
150
Frequency
50
80
40
Frequency
150
100
300
Distance / um
Distance / um
120
Frequency
150
200
30
50
Frequency
80 120
20
0 100
500
Step (um)
0 050
5 10
300
40
Frequency
0
20
max. radius (um)
0
15
800
Frequency
1200
10
0
5
400
0
40
Frequency
80
120
600
400
200
0
50
500
Short trajectories
150
800
0 500
100
300
Distance / um
Trajectory lengths
Distance to wound, t Min
41−80
Min distance to cancer, t 41−80
distance to cancer,
t 1−40
Distance
to wound, t 81−120
Trajectory Step sizes Cell size Distance to wound, t 1−40
lengths 0
Frequency
300
Distance / um
0
Fre
0
0 100
Step sizes
Neutrophils (3174 cells)
0 50
40
Fre
40
Fre
0
Cell migration statistics — problems & plans
500
20
0 1
!me 0 100
300
500
0 100
Distance / um
300
Distance / um
Distance to wound, t 41−80
0 500
100
300
0 100 500 300
Distance / umDistance / um
300
0 100 500 300
Distance / um Distance / um
Min distance to cancer,
Distancet 41−80
to wound, t Min
121−167
Distance to wound, t 81−120
distance to cancer, t 81−120
100
0
50
Frequency
80
40
Frequency
0
0
0 500
100
Min dis
120
100 150
50
Frequency
150
Frequency
0
50
80
40
Frequency
0
150
0 50
Frequency
80 120
0
40
Frequency
80
40
Frequency
0
120
Min distance to cancer,
Distancet 1−40
to wound, t Min
81−120
Min distance to cancer, t 81−120
Distance to wound, t 41−80
distance to cancer,
t 41−80
Distance
to wound, t 121−167
120
Distance to wound, t 1−40
0 500
100
300
Distance / um
500
Min distance to cancer, t 121−167
50
Frequency
80
40
Frequency
50
Frequency
Frequency
80
40
Frequency
40
Frequency
Broken trajectories — improve tracking software
100
120
100 150
150
80 120
120
Developmental guidelines dominate — image different section
0 100
300
500
Distance / um
17th December 2014
Distance to wound, t 81−120
0 100
300
Distance / um
0
0
0 500
100
0
50
0
0
0
How to compare videos — normalise by cancer cell density?
pre/post-wound video?
300
0 100 500 300
Distance / umDistance / um
0 500
100
300
500
Distance / um
distance to cancer, t 121−167
Immune response to multipleMinstimuli
Min distance to cancer, t 81−120
Distance to wound, t 121−167
0 100
300
500
Distance / um
15 / 18
0 1
Models — stochastic population simulations
Can we use stochastic models to analyse cell population dynamics?
Define species and reactions
Simulate using Gillespie’s algorithm
from à to 1.  Ø N 2.  N Ø 3.  C C* 4.  C* C 5.  N+C NC 6.  N+C* NC* 7.  NC NC* 8.  NC* NC 9.  NC N + C 10. NC* N + C* 11. N NW 12. NW N 17th December 2014
N NW C NC Immune response to multiple stimuli
C* NC* 16 / 18
Models — stochastic population simulations
Define species (populations) by spatial groups — comparison
between videos?
17th December 2014
Immune response to multiple stimuli
17 / 18
Biological questions?
What are spatio-temporal dynamics of chemoattractants?
What is spatial range of signal from cancer cells?
Threshold for immune cell to move from wound to cancer?
Does wound visit impact leukocyte response to cancer cell?
How do immune cells behave around different cancer types?
Do neutrophils & macrophages influence each other?
What are molecular mediators of cell behaviour?
17th December 2014
Immune response to multiple stimuli
18 / 18