Download The Conflict Paradigm in Sociology and the Study of Social

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Social exclusion wikipedia , lookup

Social Darwinism wikipedia , lookup

Differentiation (sociology) wikipedia , lookup

In-group favoritism wikipedia , lookup

Structuration theory wikipedia , lookup

Social constructionism wikipedia , lookup

Social network wikipedia , lookup

Public sociology wikipedia , lookup

Postdevelopment theory wikipedia , lookup

Structural functionalism wikipedia , lookup

Sociology of culture wikipedia , lookup

Social group wikipedia , lookup

Index of sociology articles wikipedia , lookup

Symbolic interactionism wikipedia , lookup

Sociology of terrorism wikipedia , lookup

Group dynamics wikipedia , lookup

History of sociology wikipedia , lookup

Role conflict wikipedia , lookup

Sociology of knowledge wikipedia , lookup

Sociological theory wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
Theory in Action, Vol. 9, No. 1, January (© 2016)
DOI:10.3798/tia.1937-0237.16001
The Conflict Paradigm in Sociology and the Study of Social Inequality:
Paradox and Possibility
Richard M. Simon*
Conflict theory is one of the major paradigms utilized in contemporary
sociology. Conflict theory takes competition between social groups for scarce
resources, and the inequalities that result, to be fundamental elements of social
structure. However, at the same time, the empirical study of social inequalities
has revealed that group conflict produces a great deal of human misery and
frustration, and one important dimension of conflict theory is the study of how to
redress inequalities in power, status, and material conditions between social
groups. This produces a paradox, in which social conflict and its resulting
inequalities are taken to be fundamental to social structure, and yet conflict
sociologists and policy makers attempt to write equality into social structure.
This paper explores the theoretical foundations of the conflict paradigm in
sociology, and in doing so exposes the possibilities for dismantling social
conflicts and the inequalities that result from them before they become
institutionalized in social structure. It is argued that the liberal method of
managing inequality ex post facto traditionally adopted by conflict sociologists is
inadequate because it fails to account for the symbolic roots of inequality, and
that social inequalities cannot be overcome until sociologists develop a means of
intervening in the creation of symbols in micro rituals before they become
institutionalized into groups in conflict. It is proposed that a conflict sociology
rooted in individualist anarchism that targets the reproduction of culture at the
individual-level is a promising avenue for addressing the symbolic production of
social conflict. [Article copies available for a fee from The Transformative
Studies Institute. E-mail address: [email protected] Website:
http://www.transformativestudies.org ©2016 by The Transformative Studies
Institute. All rights reserved.]
KEYWORDS: Social Conflict, Inequality, Anarchism, Critical Theory,
Symbolic Interaction, Culture.
* Richard M. Simon, Ph.D., earned his doctorate in sociology from the Pennsylvania
State University In 2011. He is currently an Assistant Professor of Sociology at the
University of Alabama in Huntsville. His Areas of interest include: public attitudes
toward and evaluations of sciences and technologies, gender, social theory, quantitative
methods, and anarchist sociology. His Research in anarchist sociology currently involves
establishing a theoretical synthesis between anarchist political philosophy, conflict
sociology, and symbolic interactionism for the purpose of laying the theoretical
groundwork necessary for dismantling civilization. Address correspondence to: Dr.
Richard M. Simon, University of Alabama in Huntsville, 301 Sparkman Drive,
Huntsville, Alabama 35899; e-mail: [email protected].
1937-0229 ©2016 Transformative Studies Institute
1