* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download minute word #1 ( docx , 156 kB )
Audio power wikipedia , lookup
Electrical ballast wikipedia , lookup
Stepper motor wikipedia , lookup
Resistive opto-isolator wikipedia , lookup
Power factor wikipedia , lookup
Current source wikipedia , lookup
Power inverter wikipedia , lookup
Electric power system wikipedia , lookup
Electric power transmission wikipedia , lookup
Electrification wikipedia , lookup
Opto-isolator wikipedia , lookup
Pulse-width modulation wikipedia , lookup
Electrical grid wikipedia , lookup
Surge protector wikipedia , lookup
Voltage regulator wikipedia , lookup
Variable-frequency drive wikipedia , lookup
Magnetic core wikipedia , lookup
Power electronics wikipedia , lookup
Three-phase electric power wikipedia , lookup
Amtrak's 25 Hz traction power system wikipedia , lookup
Buck converter wikipedia , lookup
Transformer wikipedia , lookup
Voltage optimisation wikipedia , lookup
Electrical substation wikipedia , lookup
Stray voltage wikipedia , lookup
Power engineering wikipedia , lookup
Switched-mode power supply wikipedia , lookup
History of electric power transmission wikipedia , lookup
A2 -50 21, rue d’Artois, F-75008 PARIS Meeting # 1 11 Sept 2013 MINUTE OF MEETING # 1 ZURICH 09/11 2013 1. Introduction The working group met on Wednesday September the 11th in ETH at Zurich. The subject was heavily discussed and the following salient points were raised: Increase of bidirectional power flow very difficult to control Reactive power transmission do exists Problem of voltage regulation and insufficient number of tapping were experienced, with risk of over fluxing and core saturation IEC allows insufficient core overfluxing under load for step up operation Example of pump storage power plant where transformers are subject to multiple load inversion. Some new transformers are equipped with fiber optics to raise evidence of differences in temperature rise between site and test field Effect of capacitive loading on both core and shell type shall be envisaged Japanese practice with tertiary capacitor for var supply Experience of distribution networks where low voltage sides capacitor bank are fitted Three winding operation with generation on one secondary and load on an other Influence of PV and need for tap changer in distribution type transformers Power electronic harmonics does not seems to be a problem within usual grid code limits. The need for more participants was expressed at the main committee meeting on Thursday and at least a member from Protection and control was required via a liaison. 2. Next meeting No fixed date was retained at the meeting due to the attendance. Nevertheless a meeting will be held in Paris during the session, and if possible at least one web conference or meeting shall be made prior to it beginning of 2014. Document1 p 1/3 3. Attendance 4. Work Despite the limited attendance a forecast table of content was established and lecture of the inputs by Bob Singh was made. 4.1 Table proposal Document1 Introduction Report of existing problems o Example o Different possible concerns and effects in transformers ( such as harmonics and winding hot spot, overfluxing and core hot spot) linked to reverse power flow o Effect of active and reactive power flow Transformer construction and a few theory o How is flux density fixed • Core type • Shell type o Stray flux • Where does the stray flux go • Effect of capacitive load o Voltage drop (and raise) Forecasted load flow evolution on “smarter grid” o Some general consideration on load flow and smart grid Step up step down operation influence on design o Typical configuration for distribution network o double LVs transformers Effect of flux density and stray flux o Temperature rise (core, hot spot) o Noise (due to “overfluxing” due to voltage and current or due to load) o Other performances Tap changer design p 2/3 o Tap changer for both way power flow (asymmetrical pennant cycle ?) o Does it affects the design of the tap changer ? o Differences with conventional tap changer o What about DETC ? Step up step down operation influence on design o Typical configuration for distribution network o double LVs transformers Effect of flux density and stray flux o Temperature rise (core, hot spot) o Noise (due to “overfluxing” due to voltage and current or due to load) o Other performances Tap changer design o Tap changer for both way power flow (asymmetrical pennant cycle ?) o Does it affects the design of the tap changer ? o Differences with conventional tap changer o What about DETC ? Voltage regulation o Tap changer control ( P&C inputs requested) o System view of the transformer control policy U, I both , where LV ? HV? For distribution and transmission o Voltage drop ( effect of high impedance end power factor) o Reactive power control o Reactive power circulation o Tapping range o Regulated voltage (LV with HV taps ?) o Tapping winding position (HV/LV) o DETC ? Effect of harmonics of current and voltage o On no load losses o On load losses Mitigation and usage restrictions o Typical example or real cases Conclusion : advices o Risks on existing fleet o Special requirement for new specification o Recommendation to standardization update ( 76-1 ?) Bibliography 4.2 Work assignment Some work assignment was proposed as follows Introduction: JC RIBOUD Typical Configurations : M ZOUITI Effects of harmonics : G GURSKY Example of Mitigation : B SINGH (if agreed) Document1 p 3/3