* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download advertising-promotion-and-other-aspects-of-integrated
Market segmentation wikipedia , lookup
Market penetration wikipedia , lookup
Marketing plan wikipedia , lookup
Social media marketing wikipedia , lookup
Product placement wikipedia , lookup
Advertising management wikipedia , lookup
Marketing strategy wikipedia , lookup
Target audience wikipedia , lookup
Guerrilla marketing wikipedia , lookup
Direct marketing wikipedia , lookup
Street marketing wikipedia , lookup
Food marketing wikipedia , lookup
Multicultural marketing wikipedia , lookup
Product planning wikipedia , lookup
Viral marketing wikipedia , lookup
Marketing communications wikipedia , lookup
Celebrity branding wikipedia , lookup
Visual merchandising wikipedia , lookup
Marketing channel wikipedia , lookup
Target market wikipedia , lookup
Green marketing wikipedia , lookup
Customer engagement wikipedia , lookup
Consumer behaviour wikipedia , lookup
Digital marketing wikipedia , lookup
WWE brand extension wikipedia , lookup
Integrated marketing communications wikipedia , lookup
Neuromarketing wikipedia , lookup
Global marketing wikipedia , lookup
Advertising campaign wikipedia , lookup
Marketing mix modeling wikipedia , lookup
Youth marketing wikipedia , lookup
Brand awareness wikipedia , lookup
Brand loyalty wikipedia , lookup
Personal branding wikipedia , lookup
Brand ambassador wikipedia , lookup
Chapter 2 MARKETING COMMUNICATIONS CHALLENGES: ENHANCING BRAND EQUITY, INFLUENCEING BEHAVIOR, AND BEING ACCOUNTABLE Chapter Objectives Explain the concept of brand equity from both the company’s and the customer’s perspectives. Describe the positive outcomes that result from enhancing brand equity. Appreciate a model of brand equity from the customer’s perspective. Understand how marcom efforts must influence behavior and achieve financial accountability. Chapter Overview The basic issues addressed in this chapter are these: What can marketing communicators do to enhance the equity of their brands and, beyond this, affect the behavior of their present and prospective customers? Also, how can marketing communicators justify their investments in advertising, promotions, and other marcom elements and demonstrate financial accountability? The concept of brand equity is explained from both the company’s perspective and the consumer’s perspective. The firm-based viewpoint of brand equity focuses on outcomes extending from efforts to enhance a brand’s value to its various stakeholders and discusses various outcomes: (1) achieving a higher market share, (2) increasing brand loyalty, (3) being able to charge premium prices, and (4) earning a revenue premium. From the perspective of the customer, a brand possesses equity to the extent that they are familiar with the brand and have stored in their memory favorable, strong, and unique brand associations. Brand equity from the customer’s perspective consists of two forms of brand-related knowledge: (1) brand awareness and (2) brand image. The chapter covers three ways by which brand equity is enhanced and labels these the (1) speak-foritself approach, (2) message-driven approach, and (3) leveraging approach. The chapter then discusses ten traits shared by the world’s strongest brands. The latter portion of the chapter covers the concept of ROMI, or return on marketing investments. Several difficulties of measuring marcom effectiveness are discussed: (1) choosing a metric, (2) gaining agreement, (3) collecting accurate data, and (4) calibrating specific effects. The chapter then discusses marketing-mix modeling (i.e., multivariate regression analysis) and how it can assist managers in determining the effect of each marcom element on sales volume. Marketing Communications Challenges 19 When Polls Fail to Reveal the Complete Picture Marketing researchers and pollsters are constantly surveying people about their likes and dislikes, their voting intentions, their thoughts about which actors should win Academy Awards, and on and on. Pollsters also investigate consumers’ thoughts and feelings toward brands. In a recent online poll 2,400 adults were asked to spontaneously identify up to three brands that they personally regarded as the “best.” Coca-Cola, Sony, Toyota, Dell, Ford, Kraft Foods, Pepsi-Co, Microsoft, Apple, and Honda were identified as the 10 “best” brands. Critics suggest that such polls are not true indicators of the equity of a brand, as Ford Motors is anything but one of the world’s best brands in terms of profitability, market share, sales growth, and consumer confidence. “Best brands” surveys are more a measure of brand awareness than of brand equity. The World’s Perception of America Nations can be thought of as brands. Firms that use “country of origin” labels are affected by the positive or negative image of that country. Many countries actively market themselves with the goal of forging favorable and strong associations in the minds of people around the world. The Nations Brand Index (NBI) is a barometer of global opinion toward over 35 countries. Each quarter, 25,000 people are surveyed on their perceptions of these countries. Respondents are asked questions about each country in six areas: 1. Exports—satisfaction with products and services produced 2. People—thoughts and feelings about the people 3. Governance—perceptions of whether the country can be trusted to make responsible decisions and to uphold international peace and security. 4. Tourism— perceptions of a country’s natural beauty and historical heritage 5. Culture and Heritage—perceptions and feelings of a country’s heritage and its culture 6. Immigration and Investment—willingness to live, work, and/or pursue education. A nation’s “brand” image is the sum of its scores on these six dimensions. The countries rank the best overall are: UK, Germany, Canada, France, Switzerland, Australia, Italy, Sweden , Japan, and the Netherlands. The US is ranked 11th. Many people outside the United States regard America as relatively uncultured, and given the recent US war mongering the poor performance on the governance dimension is hardly surprising given the widespread opposition to the war in Iraq, the U.S. government’s recent record on treatment of enemy combatants (think Abu Ghraib and Guantanamo Bay), its saber-rattling posture toward Iran and North Korea, and so on. A country’s image, like any brand image, can be changed. It is important as a matter of international relations and economics that a country has a positive image. 20 Chapter 2 Neuromarketing and the Case of Why Coca-Cola Outsells Pepsi The infamous “Pepsi Challenge” was conducted with the use of neuromarketing, which is a specific application of the field of brand research called neuroscience. Functional magnetic resonance images (fMRIs) can scan the brains of individuals employing their various senses upon exposure to stimuli. Brain scans reveal which areas of the brain are most activated in response to external stimuli. In the new-fangled Pepsi Challenge, the reward center of the brain revealed a much stronger preference for Pepsi versus Coke when study participants were unaware of which brand they had tasted. However, the result was opposite when participants knew the name of the brand they were about to taste. In the non-blind taste test, a different region of the brain was more activated and Coca-Cola was the winner. Activation of the area of the brain associated with cognitive functions revealed that participants now preferred Coke. The inferred explanation is a difference in brand images, with Coke possessing the more attractive image earned through years of effective marketing and advertising effort. Chapter Outline 1. Introduction Recall from Chapter 1 the framework for thinking about all aspects of the marcom process (Figure 1-3): Fundamental decisions (positioning, targeting, objective setting, and budgeting) Implementation decisions (mixing elements, creating messages, selecting media, and establishing momentum) Outcomes (enhancing brand equity and affecting behavior) Program Evaluation This chapter focuses on the desired outcomes of marcom efforts. 2. Brand Equity A brand represents a “name, term, sign, symbol, or design, or a combination of them intended to identify the goods and services of one seller or group of sellers and to differentiate them from those of competition.” Without a recognizable brand, a product is but a mere commodity. It’s more than just a name, term, symbol, etc. – a brand is everything that one company’s particular offering stands for in comparison to other brands in a category of competitive products. Marketing Communications Challenges 21 Brand equity can be considered either from the perspective of the organization that owns a brand or from the vantage point of the customer. A Firm-Based Perspective on Brand Equity Focuses on outcomes extending from efforts to enhance a brand’s value to its various stakeholders. As the value, or equity, of a brand increases, various positive outcomes result: achieving a higher market share increasing brand loyalty being able to charge premium prices earning a revenue premium, which is defined as the revenue differential between a branded item and a corresponding private labeled item A Customer-Based Perspective on Brand Equity Brand equity exists to the extent that consumers are familiar with the brand and have favorable, strong, and unique associations with the brand. Brand equity has two main forms of consumer knowledge: brand awareness and brand image. Figure 2.1 portrays the two dimensions of brand knowledge and delineates each dimension into its specific components. Brand awareness: when a consumer thinks about a product category and a brand name comes to mind. Awareness is the basic dimension of brand equity and has three dimensions: Brand recognition: consumer is able to identify a brand if it is presented to them on a list or if hints/cues are provided. Brand recall: consumer can retrieve a brand name from memory without any reminders. Top-of-mind-awareness (TOMA): brand is first that consumer thinks of when asked about product category. The failure of dot-coms can be seen in part as a failure of not building successful brand equity such that consumers could remember and know what their businesses did. Indeed, the dot-coms assumed that basic brand awareness was all they needed, when in fact the brand must ultimately be tied to some benefit. Brand Image: the types of associations that come to mind when contemplating a particular brand. An association is simply the particular thoughts and feelings that a consumer has about a brand. 22 Chapter 2 Associations can be based on attributes (product-related and non-product-related), benefits, and overall evaluation (attitude). Associations derived from brand benefits stem from functional, symbolic, or experiential needs. (Note: These needs are explained in Chapter 5) Four main kinds of associations are type, favorability, strength, and uniqueness. Five dimensions have been identified for different brands’ “personalities.” 1. Sincerity—brand is seen as down to earth, wholesome and cheerful (e.g., Mr. Goodwrench). 2. Excitement—brand is seen as daring, spirited, imaginative, and up-to-date (e.g., Hummer). 3. Competence—brand is seen as reliable, intelligent, and successful (e.g., Toyota). 4. Sophistication—brand is seen as upper class and charming (e.g., Rolex). 5. Ruggedness—brand is seen as tough and outdoorsy (e.g., Timberland) Enhancing Brand Equity Efforts to enhance a brand’s equity are accomplished through the initial choice of a positive brand identity but mostly through marketing and marcom programs that forge favorable, strong, and unique associations with the brand in the consumer’s mind. Three ways by which brand equity is enhanced: (1) speak-for-itself approach, (2) message-driven approach, and (3) leveraging approach. 1. Enhancing Equity by Having Brand Speak for Itself - by trying and using brands, consumers learn how good (or bad) they are and what benefits they are (in)capable of delivering. Marketers help the brand to speak for itself through point-of-purchase materials and appealing sales promotions. 2. Enhancing Equity by Creating Appealing Messages - marcom practitioners can build advantageous associations via the dint of repeated claims about the features a brand possesses and/or benefits it delivers. This tack is effective if the marcom message is creative, attention getting, and believable. 3. Enhancing Equity via Leveraging - brand associations can be shaped and equity enhanced by leveraging positive associations already contained in the world of people, places, and “things” that are available to consumers. Marketing Communications Challenges 23 TEACHING NOTE: When using the leveraging approach, three factors influence the result (from Keller 2003, chapter endnote #21): o What is the consumer’s knowledge of the other entity (i.e., person, place, or thing)? o How meaningful is that knowledge? o How likely is it that that knowledge will actually affect what they think of the brand? Leveraging Associations from other Brands – alliances between two brands can enhance both brands’ equity and profitability. o Co-branding: two brands enter into an alliance that potentially serves to enhance both brands’ equity and profitability. Brands that enter into alliances do so on grounds that their images are similar, that they appeal to the same market segment, and that the cobranding initiative is mutually beneficial. Most important requirement for success is that brands possess a common fit and that the combined marcom efforts maximize the advantages of the individual brand while minimizing the disadvantages. TEACHING NOTE: A recent study examined the impact of cobranding on consumers’ perceptions of brand equity for the co-branded product and the two brands that comprised it and concluded that cobranding represents a “win/win strategy” for both partners. The study found that while low equity brands benefit most from co-branding, the brand equity of the high equity brand was not denigrated even when paired with a low equity partner brand. So the worst case scenario of a high equity brand paired with a low-equity partner results in no loss of equity for the higher equity brand, and the best case scenario is one in which both partners experience substantial benefits from the alliance. (Source: Washburn, Judith H., Brain D. Till, and Randi Priluck (2000), “Co-Branding: Brand Equity and Trial Effects,” Journal of Consumer Marketing, 17(7), 591-604.) o Ingredient branding: pairing a branded ingredient to build equity in a brand (e.g., “Intel Inside”). TEACHING NOTE: Another example of ingredient branding is The Solae Company, which is trying to increase consumer awareness of its soy protein and products that include it. This company, along with General Mills, created 8th Continent Soymilk, and the Solae soy protein ingredient is prominently featured in the product’s advertising. The man- 24 Chapter 2 ufacturers believe that touting the fact that Solae soy protein is an ingredient is a smart strategy because they can provide consumers taste assurance and years of nutritional research backing its nutrition claims. This example, as well as a few others, led the author to suggest three things that should be kept in mind when considering ingredient branding: o the ingredient brand and the finished product should each support the other’s positioning, o functional claims need to be backed by research, and the host brand should receive incremental marketing value from the relationship, and o all marketing activity should convey a consistent message to consumers. (Source: “Branding Partnerships: The Combination of Branded Products With Branded Ingredients Can Create Consumer Pull,” (2005), Beverage Industry, (June), 59-62.) Leveraging Associations from People – aligning a brand with people, such as employees or endorsers, can be both advantageous and disastrous as the brand is linked with their reputation. Companies that cannot manage the reputation of the people with whom they have linked their brand may suffer if the person becomes discredited. Leveraging Associations from Things – events and causes provide opportunities for linkages with brands. Leveraging Associations from Places – the channel through which a brand is carried (Wal-Mart vs. Nordstrom) or country-of-origin both serve as possible associations through which a brand can enhance their image. “Made in” labels have varying influence on consumers dependent upon the associations of the target market with the particular country. What Benefits Result From Enhancing Brand Equity? brand loyalty determines the long-term growth and profitability of a brand insulates the brand from price competition consumers expectations and adoption of brand extensions influence their loyalty Marketing Communications Challenges 25 TEACHING NOTE: Marketers should be aware, however, that care must be taken when enhancing brand equity to avoid the situation called trademark cancellation, or “genericide.” This is a condition in which a manufacturer’s brand represents a product category in consumers’ minds, and consequent legal action may result in that brand name being declared a generic term. Examples of brands that have suffered from genericide are aspirin, thermos, yo-yo, shredded wheat, escalator, and trampoline. If this is the case, that brand’s mark can be used by competitors. Taylor and Walsh (2002) reviewed court cases and offer ways to avoid a finding of genericness: select a distinctive, nongeneric name when the product is introduced, monitor employees’ and advertising’s use of the trademark, monitor competitors’ and others’ use (i.e., trade) of the trademark, make use of appropriate survey evidence when a case comes about, and make use of expert witnesses (p. 165). While marketers want their brand to dominate a product category, it is imperative that a brand’s owner takes actions to preserve the legal protection of the brand’s equity. For more information on this issue, see Oakenfull, Gillian and Betsy Gelb (1996), “Research-Based Advertising to Preserve Brand Equity But Avoid ‘Genericide’,” Journal of Advertising Research, (Sept/Oct) 65-73 and Taylor, Charles R. and Michael G. Walsh (2002), “Legal Strategies for Protecting Brands from Genericide: Recent Trends in Evidence Weighted in Court Cases,” Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 21 (Spring), 160-167. Characteristics of World-Class Brands The biannual EquiTrend survey uses three main dimensions to determine highly successful brands: familiarity with a brand, quality and likelihood of purchasing a product. Combining the three dimensions gives a brand equity score. 10 world class brands identified in Table 2.2: Reynolds Wrap, Ziploc, Hershey’s Milk Chocolate Bars, Kleenex Facial Tissues, Clorox Bleach, WD40,Heinz, Windex, and Campbell’s Soup. All these brands had a straightforward promise of what they deliver, have consistently delivered it, and have positive associations in consumers’ memories. The annual Interbrand ranking determines 100 top global brands by using: (1) the percentage of a company’s revenue that can be credited to a brand, (2) the strength of a brand in terms of influencing customer demand at the point of purchase, and (3) the ability of the brand to secure continued customer demand. 26 Chapter 2 Top brands identified in Table 2.3: Coca-Cola, Microsoft, IBM, GE, Nokia, Toyota, Intel, McDonald’s, Disney, and Mercedes. 3. Affecting Behavior and Achieving Marcom Accountability Marcom efforts should be directed, ultimately, at affecting behavior rather than stopping with enhancing equity. Marcom’s objective is to ultimately affect sales volume and revenue. ROMI: return on marketing investment. TEACHING NOTE: For a good overview of ROMI and marketing mix modeling, see Cook, William A. and Vijay S. Talluri (2004), “How the Pursuit of ROMI is Changing Marketing Management,” Journal of Advertising Research, 44 (Sept/Oct), 244-254. This article discusses ROMI’s importance, benefits, requirements, integration with core business processes, and barriers to success as well as the role of marketing mix modeling. Another good example that shows the genesis of this approach can be found in Stone, Randy and Mike Duffy (1993), “Measuring the Impact of Advertising,” Journal of Advertising Research, 33 (Nov/Dec), RC-8-RC-12. It provides a case discussion of how Kraft began employing these methods in the early 1990s. It is interesting to note that Kraft was featured as a “best-practice” firm in the Advertising Research Foundation’s benchmarking study (2001) as a company recognized for implementing a successful program to improve their ROMI. The ARF benchmarking studies (2001 and 2003) as well as several others are discussed extensively in Cook and Talluri (2004). Motivations underlying the increased focus on measuring marketing performance: demands for accountability from the CEO, the Board, and other executives imperative for CMOs to get better at what they do in light of budget battles TEACHING NOTE: Another pressure on marketing accountability is the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (Sarbox), which was passed in 2002. In the aftermath of corporate scandals such as WorldCom and Enron, this legislation tightens corporategovernance and reporting requirements, and it requires CEOs and CFOs to sign off on the validity of corporate accounts. Some claim the impact on marketing could be substantial. First, the additional auditing fees necessary to comply with the act will have to come from budget cuts somewhere else, and marketing is a likely target. Second, corporate boards tend to be made up of finance and audit experts, so more energy may be focused on complying with Sarbox than focusing on marketing and customers. Third, marketing expenditures have been suspect as some marketing service providers have been overbilling clients. In this climate, marketing requires good management and measurement to build credibility. (Source: McGovern, Gail Marketing Communications Challenges 27 and John Quelch (2005), “Sarbox Still Putting the Squeeze on Marketing,” Advertising Age, (September 19), 28.) Difficulty of Measuring Marcom Effectiveness Several reasons account for the complexity of measuring marcom effectiveness: Choosing a Metric: brand awareness, attitudes, purchase intentions, and sales volume. Gaining Agreement: individuals from different backgrounds and with varied organizational interests often see the “world” differently or operate with varying ideas of what best indicates suitable performance. Collecting Accurate Data: data must be reliable and valid. Calibrating Specific Effects: identify the relative effectiveness of individual program elements. Assessing Effects with Marketing-Mix Modeling Employs well known statistical techniques (e.g., multivariate regression analysis) to estimate the effects that the various advertising and promotion elements have in driving sales volume. Relatively long series of longitudinal data (i.e., two years) is required. Data for each period would include the level of sales during that period (i.e, dependent variable) along with corresponding marcom expenditures for each program element (i.e., independent variables). Can learn which elements outperform others and can shift budgets accordingly. Widely used by consumer package good companies (e.g., P&G, Clorox), but it is also being used increasingly by other B2C and B2B companies. TEACHING NOTE: Advertising agencies are adopting this approach as well. For example, one of the world’s largest ad companies, WPP Group, is applying econometrics to help measure the effectiveness of an ad. Changes in media technologies making traditional TV advertising less effective and demands by corporate managers for accountability have put pressure on agencies to show that ads produce sales. WPP is putting resources into econometrics by increasing the number of employees working on econometric models to 150, up from just 20 employees five years ago. Omnicom Group, another large agency holding company, is also devoting more resources to this type of effort by increasing its staff devoted to econometric modeling to 45 from six just three years ago. Not everyone in the agency world is jumping on this bandwagon, though. For example, at an advertising conference in Cannes, France, one CEO of another agency told WPP Group’s CEO, Sir Martin Sorrell with whom he was sharing the stage, that he didn’t understand what Sir 28 Chapter 2 Martin was talking about, and the audience reacted with cheers and clapping. So there might be a long way to go before econometrics is readily accepted in the advertising world. (Source: Patrick, Aaron O. (2005), “Econometrics Buzzes Ad World As a Way of Measuring Results,” The Wall Street Journal, (August 16), B8.) Answers to Discussion Questions 1. With reference to the Marketing Insight segment that opened the chapter and in view of the detailed section on brand equity later in the chapter, explain why brand awareness is a necessary but insufficient indicator of brand equity. Answer: Brand equity consists of two forms of brand-related knowledge: brand awareness and brand image. Without awareness consumer cannot form opinions about a brand. The opinion, or brand image is based upon the favorablity, the strengths, and the uniqueness of the associations consumers have of a brand. Those associations maybe based on the actual attributes of the brand, the benefits they receive from it, and their overall evaluation or attitude toward the brand. 2. Using the framework in Figure 2.1, describe all personal associations that the following brands hold for you: (a) Harley-Davidson motorcycles, (b) Hummer vehicles, (c) Red Bull energy drink, (d) The Wall Street Journal newspaper, (e) entertainer Paris Hilton, and (f) the Prius hybrid automobile Answer: Brand image can be thought of in terms of the types of associations that come to the consumer’s mind when contemplating a particular brand. An association is simply the particular thoughts and feelings that a consumer has about a brand, and students’ answers will vary for this question. These associations can be conceptualized in terms of type, favorability, strength, and uniqueness. The type of brand associations can be based on the brand’s attributes, both product-related (e.g., color, size, design features) and non-product-related (e.g., price, packaging, user and usage imagery), the brand’s benefits (e.g., functional, symbolic, experiential), and consumers’ overall evaluation, or attitude, toward the brand. 3. An ex-CEO of PepsiCo, was quoted in the text as saying, “In my mind the best thing a person can say about a brand is that it’s their favorite.” Identify two brands that you regard as your favorites. Describe the specific associations that each of these brands holds for you and thus why they are two of your favorites. Answer: Students should realize that associations are not just with immediate obvious product benefits (most will probably name some snack food as one) such as taste, but also with other product benefits such as packaging (a water bottle with a sports cap), Marketing Communications Challenges 29 accessibility or convenience (e.g., a candy machine near their dorm room or class), price (e.g., they can afford it), and usage context (e.g., coffee with friends). The ability of products to make the consumer an "expert" is also an interesting benefit for students who name some health and beauty aid, such as a hair shampoo, and give a very specific benefit of how the product works for them (e.g., helps relax tangled hair). 4. Provide examples of brands that in your opinion are positioned in such a way as to reflect the five personality dimensions: sincerity, excitement, competence, sophistication, and ruggedness. Answer: Examples: Sincerity: Hallmark Greeting Cards Excitement: Victoria’s Secret Competence: Norton Anti Virus Sophistication: Talbots Ruggedness: Timberland boots 5. Provide several examples of co-branding or ingredient branding other than those presented in the chapter. Answer: Some examples of co-branding include: Hershey Foods and General Mills making the breakfast cereal “Reese’s Peanut Butter Puffs,” MicroSoft and NBC (MSNBC), Visa and the United Airlines Mileage Plus Program. Some examples of ingredient branding include: Gore-Tex material in sport and outdoor clothing, Splenda in the new Coke Zero, Teflon in cookware, Thinsulate in clothing, Kevlar in clothing, and NutraSweet in soft drinks. 6. When discussing brand equity from the firm’s perspective, it was explained that as the equity of a brand increases, various positive outcomes result: (1) a higher market share, (2) increased brand loyalty, (3) ability to charge premium prices, and (4) capacity to earn a revenue premium. Select a brand you are particularly fond of and explain how its relatively greater equity compared to a lesser brand in the same product category is manifest in terms of each of these four outcomes. Answer: Students can select any number of brands to answer this question, and one they might select is Coca-Cola soft drink. Coke has the highest market share in the cola category, some consumers will only purchase Coke instead of other brands of cola, even if they are on sale, Coke is more expensive than lesser brands, such as RC Cola and store brands, and thus, Coke enjoys a revenue premium. Revenue premium is defined as the revenue differential between a branded item and a corresponding private labeled item, so students should discuss the brand they selected with respect to private 30 Chapter 2 label, or store, brands. With revenue equaling the product of a brand’s net price x volume, a branded good enjoys a revenue premium over a corresponding private labeled item to the degree it can charge a higher price and/or generate greater volume. 7. Compare and contrast the speak-for-itself and message-driven approaches to enhancing brand equity, Answer: With the “speaks for itself” approach, consumers form brand-related associations (positive or negative) merely by consuming a brand absent any significant brand knowledge prior to the usage experience. Thus through the consumption experience, the brand informs consumers of its quality, desirability, and suitability for satisfying their consumption-related goals. With the “message-driven approach” marcom practitioners attempt to build positive brand-related associations through creative messages that are attention getting, believable, and memorable. Each of these approaches should be independent. Through a consumers first-hand experience with a brand it should “speak for itself” with a message consistent with the “message-driven approach.” 8. Select a brand of vehicle (automobile, truck, motorcycle, SUV, etc.) and with this brand illustrate the meaning to you personally of type, favorability, strength, and uniqueness of brand associations. Answer: Students should answer this question along the lines of the illustration given in the chapter of Henry and the McDonald’s fast-food chain. 9. What are your reactions to the application of neuroscience to marketing (neuromarketing) that was described in the IMC Focus? Do you consider this technique ethical? Do you fear that with the knowledge obtained from its application marketers will be able to manipulate consumers? Answer: The application of neuroscience to marketing described in the IMC Focus really serves to illustrate the importance of building brand equity through various marketing and marcom processes. It seems to validate that consumers’ preferences can be influenced by these activities. The IMC Focus illustrated that consumers preferred Pepsi when they did not know the brands they tasted, but they preferred Coke when they did know, seemingly because of all the strong and positive associations they had with the Coke brand. The real ethical question comes down to whether or not it is ethical for marketing to influence consumers’ preferences for a brand they would not have chosen based on actual experience but no knowledge of brand associations. Marketing Communications Challenges 31 10. Describe the leveraging strategy for enhancing brand equity. Take a brand of your choice and, with application of Figure 2.8, explain how that brand could build positive associations, thereby enhancing its equity, by linking itself to (a) places, (b) things, (c) people, and (d) other brands. Be specific. Answer: The leveraging strategy for enhancing brand equity holds that brand associations can be shaped and equity enhanced by leveraging positive associations already contained in the world of people, places, and “things” that are available to consumers. The culture and social systems in which marketing communications takes place are loaded with meaning. Through socialization, people learn cultural values, form beliefs, and become familiar with the physical manifestations, or artifacts, of these values and beliefs. Marcom practitioners can leverage meaning, or associations, for their brands by connecting them with other objects that already possess well-known meaning. Students can select any brand to answer this question, and they should be aware that (a) “places” can refer to country of origin or channels, (b) “things” include events, causes, and third party endorsements, (c) “people” refers to employees and endorsers, and (d) “other brands” includes things such as alliances, ingredients, company, and extensions. 11. What does it mean to say that marketing communications should be directed, ultimately, at affecting behavior rather than merely enhancing equity? Provide an example to support your answer. Answer: Marketing communications are directed communications from a marketer to a target audience with a goal of changing or affecting behaviors. While enhancing equity is important as it implies that consumers have awareness of, and favorable attitudes toward a brand, it does not necessarily mean that consumers will act. As with the example in the text, consumers are aware of the dangers of smoking, and believe that smoking is bad for them; yet, new consumers take up smoking every year. The real goal of anti-smoking campaigns is to convince people to either quit smoking or not to take up smoking at all. 12. Why is demonstrating financial accountability an imperative for marcom practitioners? Answer: Two primary motivations underlie the increased focus on measuring marketing performance. The first is from the CEO, the Board, and other executives putting greater demand for accountability on the marketing function. A second reason is that CMOs must get better at what they do because it is becoming increasingly difficult to justify expenditures without knowledge of what works and what doesn’t. 32 Chapter 2 13. Assume that your college or university has had difficulty getting nonstudent residents in the local community to attend football games. Your school’s athletic director requests that an organization you belong to (say, a local chapter of the American Marketing Association) develop an advertising program that is to be targeted to local residents to encourage them to attend football games. What measures/metrics could you use to assess whether the advertising program you developed has been effective? How might you assess the ad campaign’s ROMI? Answer: One metric could be the number of non-student tickets sold for each game throughout the season. One way to assess the effects of the marcom program is to use marketingmix modeling. The data for each period could be the non-student attendance at each game along with corresponding advertising and promotion expenditures for each program element during the time leading up to a given game. While just looking at game attendance will let you know how successful the over-all marcom program was, marketing mix modeling will allow you to determine the relative effectiveness of each marcom element.