Download Penetration of Stratified Mucosa Cytolysins Augment Superantigen

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

12-Hydroxyeicosatetraenoic acid wikipedia , lookup

Immune system wikipedia , lookup

Phagocyte wikipedia , lookup

T cell wikipedia , lookup

Lymphopoiesis wikipedia , lookup

Polyclonal B cell response wikipedia , lookup

Adaptive immune system wikipedia , lookup

Molecular mimicry wikipedia , lookup

Cancer immunotherapy wikipedia , lookup

Sjögren syndrome wikipedia , lookup

Psychoneuroimmunology wikipedia , lookup

Immunomics wikipedia , lookup

Adoptive cell transfer wikipedia , lookup

Innate immune system wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
Cytolysins Augment Superantigen
Penetration of Stratified Mucosa
This information is current as
of May 9, 2017.
Subscription
Permissions
Email Alerts
J Immunol 2009; 182:2364-2373; ;
doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.0803283
http://www.jimmunol.org/content/182/4/2364
This article cites 76 articles, 32 of which you can access for free at:
http://www.jimmunol.org/content/182/4/2364.full#ref-list-1
Information about subscribing to The Journal of Immunology is online at:
http://jimmunol.org/subscription
Submit copyright permission requests at:
http://www.aai.org/About/Publications/JI/copyright.html
Receive free email-alerts when new articles cite this article. Sign up at:
http://jimmunol.org/alerts
The Journal of Immunology is published twice each month by
The American Association of Immunologists, Inc.,
1451 Rockville Pike, Suite 650, Rockville, MD 20852
Copyright © 2009 by The American Association of
Immunologists, Inc. All rights reserved.
Print ISSN: 0022-1767 Online ISSN: 1550-6606.
Downloaded from http://www.jimmunol.org/ by guest on May 9, 2017
References
Amanda J. Brosnahan, Mary J. Mantz, Christopher A.
Squier, Marnie L. Peterson and Patrick M. Schlievert
The Journal of Immunology
Cytolysins Augment Superantigen Penetration of Stratified
Mucosa1
Amanda J. Brosnahan,* Mary J. Mantz,† Christopher A. Squier,† Marnie L. Peterson,‡
and Patrick M. Schlievert2*
S
uperantigens produced by the Gram-positive pathogens
Streptococcus pyogenes and Staphylococcus aureus are
the major factors in a variety of severe infections such as
toxic shock syndrome (TSS)3 (1–7), scarlet fever (8), necrotizing
fasciitis (9), purpura fulminans (10), and necrotizing pneumonia
(11). Superantigens made by Str. pyogenes include the streptococcal pyrogenic exotoxins (SPE) A, C, G, H, I, J, K, L, and M,
streptococcal superantigen, and streptococcal mitogenic exotoxin
Z. SPE A and SPE C have been implicated in most cases of streptococcal TSS (12–17). Of the superantigens made by Sta. aureus,
the staphylococcal enterotoxins B (SEB) and C are responsible for
half of the cases of nonmenstrual TSS, whereas the other half are
caused by TSS toxin-1 (TSST-1) (18 –22). TSST-1 is also responsible for the majority of menstrual TSS (mTSS) cases. Superantigens were aptly named by Marrack and Kappler in 1990 due to
*Department of Microbiology, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN 55455; †Dows Institute for Dental Research, College of Dentistry, University
of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52246, and ‡Department of Experimental and Clinical Pharmacology, University of Minnesota College of Pharmacy, Minneapolis, MN 55455
Received for publication October 1, 2008. Accepted for publication November
30, 2008.
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page
charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance
with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
1
This research was supported by U.S. Public Health Service Research Grant
AI074283 and funding from the Minnesota Medical Foundation.
2
Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Patrick M. Schlievert, Department of Microbiology, University of Minnesota Medical School, 420 Delaware Street
Southeast, Minneapolis, MN 55455
3
Abbreviations used in this paper: TSS, toxic shock syndrome; HVEC, human vaginal epithelial cell; IEF, isoelectric focusing; mTSS, menstrual TSS; SEB, staphylococcal enterotoxin B; SLO, streptolysin O; SPE, streptococcal pyrogenic exotoxin;
TSST-1, TSS toxin-1.
Copyright © 2009 by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc. 0022-1767/09/$2.00
www.jimmunol.org/cgi/doi/10.4049/jimmunol.0803283
their unique mechanism of T cell stimulation (23). These exotoxins
bind to the variable region of the ␤-chain of the TCR (V␤-TCR)
and MHC II on APCs such as macrophages (24 –28). This interaction leads to the proliferation and activation of a large number of
T cells and the release of cytokines from both cell types. The
production of TNF-␣ and -␤ results in capillary leakage, IL-1␤
(IL-1␤) causes fever, and IL-2 and IFN-␥ cause rash (8, 29 –33).
The effects of the massive cytokine release caused by superantigens will eventually lead to hypotension, shock, and if not treated
properly, death.
Much is known about the interaction of superantigens with immune cells systemically, but their role at the mucosal surface is
unknown. Both Str. pyogenes and Sta. aureus typically colonize
nonkeratinized stratified squamous epithelia to initiate infections,
with Str. pyogenes initiating severe infections often following oral
mucosal colonization and mTSS initiating from vaginal mucosa
(34, 35); an important difference in streptococcal TSS and staphylococcal mTSS is that streptococci typically invade systemically,
whereas Sta. aureus remains on the mucosal surface (3, 4, 35).
Subsequent to initial bacterial colonization, superantigens may interact with the mucosa in at least two ways: 1) superantigens may
penetrate through the mucosa to reach adaptive immune cells located in the underlying tissues; and 2) superantigens may exert
effects directly on epithelial cells that contribute to the course of
the infection. In fact, TSST-1 is known to penetrate the vaginal
mucosa to cause mTSS even as Sta. aureus remains localized at the
vaginal surface (3, 4). It has been shown that there are differences
among the superantigens in their ability to penetrate mucosal surfaces to cause TSS and lethality in a rabbit model (36). When
administered vaginally to rabbits, TSST-1 is the most lethal, followed by SEC1 (staphylococcal enterotoxin C1) and then SPE A,
whereas all three superantigens are lethal when administered i.v
(36). High doses of TSST-1 are also lethal when administered
Downloaded from http://www.jimmunol.org/ by guest on May 9, 2017
Staphylococcus aureus and Streptococcus pyogenes colonize mucosal surfaces of the human body to cause disease. A group of
virulence factors known as superantigens are produced by both of these organisms that allows them to cause serious diseases from
the vaginal (staphylococci) or oral mucosa (streptococci) of the body. Superantigens interact with T cells and APCs to cause
massive cytokine release to mediate the symptoms collectively known as toxic shock syndrome. In this study we demonstrate that
another group of virulence factors, cytolysins, aid in the penetration of superantigens across vaginal mucosa as a representative
nonkeratinized stratified squamous epithelial surface. The staphylococcal cytolysin ␣-toxin and the streptococcal cytolysin streptolysin O enhanced penetration of toxic shock syndrome toxin-1 and streptococcal pyrogenic exotoxin A, respectively, across
porcine vaginal mucosa in an ex vivo model of superantigen penetration. Upon histological examination, both cytolysins caused
damage to the uppermost layers of the vaginal tissue. In vitro evidence using immortalized human vaginal epithelial cells demonstrated that although both superantigens were proinflammatory, only the staphylococcal cytolysin ␣-toxin induced a strong
immune response from the cells. Streptolysin O damaged and killed the cells quickly, allowing only a small release of IL-1␤. Two
separate models of superantigen penetration are proposed: staphylococcal ␣-toxin induces a strong proinflammatory response
from epithelial cells to disrupt the mucosa enough to allow for enhanced penetration of toxic shock syndrome toxin-1, whereas
streptolysin O directly damages the mucosa to allow for penetration of streptococcal pyrogenic exotoxin A and possibly viable
streptococci. The Journal of Immunology, 2009, 182: 2364 –2373.
The Journal of Immunology
matory cytokine production from human vaginal epithelial cells
(HVECs) (45). The second objective of the present study was to evaluate the ability of superantigens (TSST-1 and SPE A) and cytolysins
(␣-toxin and SLO) to induce cytokine responses from HVECs.
In the present study we show that ␣-toxin and SLO act to enhance penetration of TSST-1 and SPE A, respectively, across ex
vivo porcine vaginal mucosa in a model of superantigen penetration. Both cytolysins cause localized damage and inflammation in
the ex vivo porcine tissue; however purified cytolysins added to
HVECs induced cell damage and death to different extents. Superantigens incubated with HVECs induce proinflammatory cytokine
and chemokine responses from the cells, but these responses are
altered when cytolysin is present. Based on these data, we propose
two separate models for streptococcal and staphylococcal superantigen penetration across vaginal mucosa.
Materials and Methods
Penetration studies
An ex vivo porcine vaginal permeability model for superantigens has been
previously described (34, 44, 45). Briefly, porcine vaginal mucosa was
isolated from pigs at slaughter and used within 3 h of harvest. Tissue discs
(8 –10 mm in diameter) were mounted between two halves of continuous
flow perfusion chambers, exposing ⬃0.2 cm2 of the epithelial surface to
the donor compartment. Internally labeled 35S-TSST-1 (10 –50 ␮g/ml) in
the absence or presence of ␣-toxin (5 or 50 ␮g/ml) or 35S-SPE A (40
␮g/ml) in the absence or presence of SLO (5 ␮g/ml or 50 ␮g/ml) was
added to the upper compartment in PBS. DTT (Roche Diagnostics) at a
final concentration of 10 mM was added to all specimens receiving SLO to
maintain a reducing environment for the oxygen-labile cytolysin. Seven
replicates were used for each condition. PBS was continuously pumped
through the lower compartment as a collection fluid for up to eight hourly
samples and the dpm of the samples were counted in a scintillation counter.
An aliquot of each radiolabeled solution was also counted to determine the
dpm per nanogram of toxin applied. The total amount of toxin to traverse
the tissue was determined by converting the dpm of the samples to nanograms of toxin using the dpm/nanogram conversion factor determined for
the radiolabeled toxin solutions (44). Tissue discs from each treatment
group were removed from the chambers at the conclusion of the experiment, fixed in formalin, wax embedded, cross-sectioned, and stained with
H&E for histological examination. One specimen from each group was
snap frozen in liquid nitrogen and cut in cross-sections at 14 ␮m, and the
sections were placed on x-ray film and developed to visualize radioactive
toxin remaining in the tissue.
Dutch-belted rabbits are highly sensitive to TSST-1 when administered
continuously for 7 days in s.c. miniosmotic pumps (16). However, rabbit
susceptibility to TSST-1 is most easily measured by the capacity of
TSST-1 to synergize with LPS up to 106-fold through acceleration of cytokine release; the animals succumb within 48 h (65) whether TSST-1 is
administered i.v. or intravaginally (36). Thus, we performed an experiment
in female rabbits to assess the ability of ␣-toxin to facilitate TSST-1 vaginal penetration following intravaginal administration of TSST-1 plus
␣-toxin, followed 4 h later by i.v. LPS. We have experimentally determined that i.v. administration of 0.01 ␮g/kg TSST-1 to rabbits followed at
4 h with 50 ␮g/kg LPS is 100% lethal, whereas administration of these
agents is not lethal when TSST-1 is administered intravaginally (0.01 ␮g/
kg) followed i.v. with LPS (50 ␮g/kg). Incidentally, the lethal dose of
TSST-1 alone by either route is ⬎3.5 mg/kg and for LPS i.v. is ⬎500
␮g/kg. ␣-Toxin (0.05 ␮g/kg) is not lethal to rabbits whether given i.v. or
intravaginally. Thus, we compared the ability of 0.01 ␮g/kg TSST-1 with
or without ␣-toxin (both intravaginal) to synergize with LPS (50 ␮g/kg)
i.v. 4 h later. Intravaginal administrations of TSST-1 and ␣-toxin in PBS
were made through catheters threaded into the vaginas of rabbits after
anesthesia with ketamine and xylazine (36); LPS (Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium) was injected i.v. through the marginal ear veins. Animals were monitored for development of TSS over 48 h. In agreement
with rules of the University of Minnesota Institutional Animal Care and
Use Committee, rabbits that failed to exhibit escape behavior and could not
right themselves were considered to have lethal TSS and were euthanized.
In an additional experiment, Str. pyogenes strain MNBU (M-type 3 clinical isolate; 8 ⫻ 1010 CFU) or S. aureus strain MN8 (vaginal TSS isolate;
1 ⫻ 109 CFU) were added to the upper chamber in the absence or presence
of SLO and ␣-toxin (5 ␮g/ml each), respectively. DTT was added to all
conditions receiving SLO at a final concentration of 10 mM. Four to five
Downloaded from http://www.jimmunol.org/ by guest on May 9, 2017
orally; thus TSST-1 appears to penetrate mucosal surfaces better
than other superantigens (36).
Porcine vagina ex vivo has also been used to analyze the ability
of TSST-1 to penetrate the mucosa. Ex vivo porcine tissue is an
excellent model of human vaginal tissue; vaginal tissue from both
human and pig is a nonkeratinized stratified squamous epithelium
with intercellular lipids, including ceramides, glucosyl ceramides,
and cholesterol located in the surface layers (34, 37– 43). As tight
junctions are not present between the cells of the vaginal mucosa,
the intercellular lipids constitute a permeability barrier. TSST-1
labeled with [35S]methionine has been shown to cross the ex vivo
porcine vaginal mucosa with significant amounts of toxin remaining within the tissue (44). Studies by Peterson et al. demonstrated
that the penetration of TSST-1 is enhanced by the presence of
heat-killed and live Sta. aureus (45). Live bacteria were better able
to enhance penetration of TSST-1 than heat-killed bacteria, indicating that secreted factors made by the bacteria may be contributing to the disruption of the mucosal barrier. The authors suggested that cytolysins may play a role in this process due to their
probable ability to provoke inflammatory responses.
The main objective of the present study was to determine the
role of two cytolysins, streptolysin O (SLO) and ␣-toxin, in the
penetration of superantigens across vaginal mucosa as a model of
nonkeratinized stratified squamous epithelium. SLO is a thiol-activated toxin made by Str. pyogenes that belongs to a group of
cytolysins known to bind cholesterol and form pores in the membranes of eukaryotic cells (46). Seventy to 80 monomers of SLO
oligomerize on cell membranes to form large pores up to 30 nm in
diameter that can be lethal for most cell types (47, 48). ␣-Toxin,
made by Sta. aureus, is a heptamer pore-forming toxin that creates
small (2.6 nm diameter) pores in eukaryotic membranes (49).
Many species-specific cell types can be killed by ␣-toxin, including erythrocytes, platelets, mononuclear immune cells, endothelial
cells, and epithelial cells. In addition to cellular damage, both cytolysins can elicit cytokine responses from epithelial cells that may
contribute to disruption of the mucosa. Dragneva et al. showed that
low amounts of ␣-toxin induce secretion of IL-8 from epithelial
cells and monocytes (50). Nonlethal doses of SLO stimulate the
release of IL-6 and IL-8 from HaCaT human keratinocytes,
whereas a SLO-deficient Str. pyogenes mutant induces lower levels of IL-1␤, IL-6, and IL-8 from these cells compared with wildtype bacteria (51, 52).
Superantigens may also interact with cells of the mucosa to
induce inflammation that may independently disrupt the mucosal
barrier. A few studies have shown that superantigens can induce
cytokine responses from other cell types. The staphylococcal superantigen TSST-1 has been shown to bind both endothelial and
epithelial cells and in some cases is internalized by the cells (53–
56). More recently, it was demonstrated that TSST-1 and SEB
induce cytokine responses from epithelial cells. TSST-1 incubated
with vaginal epithelial cells induces TNF-␣, MIP-3␣, and IL-8 and
induces TNF-␣ and IL-8 production from bronchial epithelial cells
(45, 57). SEB has been shown to induce an IL-8 response from
nasal epithelial cells and to alter the permeability of rabbit maxillary sinus epithelium, indicating that the enterotoxin can specifically interact with epithelial cells (58, 59). Rajagopalan et al. and
Herz et al. have shown that SEB also induces systemic inflammatory
responses when administered from mucosal surfaces, including nasal,
conjunctival, and vaginal mucosae (60 – 64). Rajagopalan et al. also
demonstrated a similar effect when the streptococcal superantigen
SPE A was administered nasally to HLA-transgenic mice; however,
not much is known about the ability of streptococcal superantigens to
stimulate a cytokine response from the epithelium itself (64). Peterson
et al. demonstrated that, like TSST-1, SPE A can induce proinflam-
2365
2366
SUPERANTIGEN PENETRATION
Table I. Cytolysins augment penetration of superantigensa
Condition
Concentration of Toxin
(total ng ⫾ SEM) after 8 h
TSST-1 (10 ␮g/ml)
TSST-1 (10 ␮g/ml) plus ␣-toxin (5 ␮g/ml)
TSST-1 (10 ␮g/ml) plus ␣-toxin (50 ␮g/ml)
SPE A (40 ␮g/ml)
SPE A (40 ␮g/ml) plus SLO (5 ␮g/ml)
SPE A (40 ␮g/ml) plus SLO (50 ␮g/ml)
SPE A (10 ␮g/ml)
25 ⫾ 2.33
39 ⫾ 6.78
55 ⫾ 11.59
112 ⫾ 21.05
176 ⫾ 12.67
150 ⫾ 7.33
28 ⫾ 6.23
Statistical Difference when
Cytolysin Is Present
p ⬍ 0.05
p ⬍ 0.05
p ⬍ 0.05
NS
a
Superantigens (TSST-1 or SPE A) were internally labeled with 关35S兴methionine and applied to the epithelial surface of fresh
porcine vaginal mucosa mounted in perfusion chambers in the absence or presence of cytolysin ␣-toxin or SLO (5 or 50 ␮g/ml).
In both cases, cytolysins acted to disrupt the mucosa and augment superantigen penetration. TSST-1 was added at 10 ␮g/ml
whereas SPE A was added at a higher concentration of 40 ␮g/ml based on previous studies done on rabbit vaginal mucosa, which
indicated that SPE A was not able to penetrate the mucosa as well as TSST-1 (36). An additional set of chambers was used to
determine the penetration of only 10 ␮g/ml SPE A; this set demonstrated that SPE A penetrates the porcine vaginal mucosa just
as well as TSST-1. SEM is for 3–7 replicates. Statistical difference was calculated using Student’s unpaired t test with normally
distributed data (compared to amount of superantigen able to penetrate on its own).
Toxin preparation
The superantigens TSST-1 and SPE A were purified as previously described (22, 66). Briefly, TSST-1 was isolated from Sta. aureus strain
RN4220 (pCE107) and SPE A was isolated from Bacillus subtilis strain
IS75 (pJS103 MiniKC) grown in beef heart medium (67). The cultures
were precipitated with ethanol at 4°C, the precipitate was resolubilized in
water, and toxin was purified by isoelectric focusing (IEF). IEF was conducted in two phases; the first phase used a pH gradient of 3.5–10, followed
by another phase using a pH gradient based on the isoelectric point of the
toxin. The isoelectric point of TSST-1 is 7.2 so the second IEF phase used
a gradient of 6 – 8, whereas the isoelectric point of SPE A is 5.2 and the
second IEF phase used a gradient of 4 – 6 (22, 68). Each superantigen was
identified in a double immunodiffusion assay based on its specific reactivity
with a polyclonal Ab generated against the exotoxin (69). Purity was confirmed by SDS-PAGE, which demonstrated a single protein band at a m.w.
of 22,000 (TSST-1) or 26,000 (SPE A). Purified toxins were quantified
using the Bio-Rad protein assay (Bio-Rad) with the superantigen SE B
used for standard curve generation.
Both TSST-1 and SPE A were internally labeled with [35S]methionine
for penetration studies. In previous labeling studies with TSST-1, ⬃107
dpm/␮g protein has been achieved. SPE A has three naturally occurring
methionine residues, all of which can be labeled. The purification is the
same as that described above, but bacterial strains were cultured in 50 ml
of medium containing 10 mCi of [35S]methionine.
␣-Toxin was purified from Sta. aureus strain MNJA as described for the
superantigens. The second IEF step was done using a gradient from 7 to 9,
because the isoelectric point of ␣-toxin is 8.5 (70). SLO was purchased
from Sigma-Aldrich. In both cases, purity was confirmed by SDS-PAGE
and silver staining to identify homogenous protein samples.
Culture of immortalized cells
The use of immortalized HVECs have been previously described (45, 71,
72). HVECs were maintained in keratinocyte serum-free medium (KSFM;
Invitrogen) supplemented with bovine pituitary extract and epidermal
growth factor as provided by the manufacturer and a 1% final volume of
penicillin-streptomycin (Sigma-Aldrich) and amphotericin B (Fungizone;
Invitrogen). The cells were grown at 37°C in the presence of 7% CO2. On
days of experimentation, antimicrobials were not used because it has been
observed that amphotericin B reduces cytokine production by these cells.
Cytokine assays
Purified exotoxins (SPE A and/or SLO, TSST-1, and/or ␣-toxin) were
added to the cell culture medium and incubated with HVECs at 37°C in 7%
CO2 for 2– 6 h. DTT (Roche) at a final concentration of 10 mM was added
to all specimens receiving SLO to maintain a reduced environment for the
oxygen-labile cytolysin. At the conclusion of each experiment, the media
were collected and analyzed by ELISA (45) using human Quantikine kits
(R&D Systems). The following cytokines and chemokines were measured:
IL-1␤, IL-6, IL-8, MIP-3␣, and TNF-␣, with the minimum detectable dose
ranging from 0.70 to 3.5 pg/ml.
Uric acid assay
Uric acid release from injured cells was measured using the QuantiChrom
kit available from BioAssay Systems. This assay uses the compound 2,4,6tripyridyl-s-triazine, which forms a blue-colored complex with iron only in
the presence of uric acid. The intensity of the color change is proportional
to the amount of uric acid present in the sample.
Trypan blue cell staining
After incubation with exotoxins, HVECs were rinsed and subjected to trypsin (Invitrogen) treatment and centrifugation (200 ⫻ g for 5 min) to obtain
a cell pellet. Cells were then resuspended in 0.5 ml of keratinocyte serumfree medium and 0.1 ml 0.4% trypan blue staining solution (Sigma-Aldrich) for 15 min. HVECs were counted using a hemacytometer and survival percentages were calculated.
Statistics
In all cases where statistical analysis was necessary, mean values and SEs
of the mean were determined. Statistical difference between means was
determined using the Student’s unpaired t test with normally distributed
data. Fishers exact test was used to assess differences in TSS survival rates
between experimental and control rabbit groups.
Results
Cytolysins augment penetration of superantigens across vaginal
mucosa
An ex vivo porcine model of superantigen penetration of vaginal
mucosa has been used previously to demonstrate that staphylococcal TSST-1 penetrates the mucosa in small amounts, with most
remaining on the tissue (45). In the presence of Sta. aureus, however, the amount of superantigen that penetrates is greatly increased. When comparing the amount of TSST-1 that penetrates in
the presence of live or heat-killed Sta. aureus, more superantigen
can penetrate vaginal mucosa when live bacteria are present, suggesting that the bacteria may be making an exoprotein that augments superantigen penetration. It has been previously suggested
by our laboratory that cytolysins, such as ␣-toxin, may act to disrupt the vaginal mucosa to allow for better penetration of TSST-1.
It is also possible that this may be the case for streptococcal superantigens; therefore we chose to examine the ability of the streptococcal cytolysin SLO to augment penetration of SPE A.
Table I shows the penetration through porcine vaginal tissue of
radiolabeled 35S-TSST-1 and 35S-SPE A in the absence or presence of cytolysins ␣-toxin and SLO, respectively. In both cases,
Downloaded from http://www.jimmunol.org/ by guest on May 9, 2017
replicates were used for each condition. Perfusate was collected every 2 h
for 8 h. Samples were concentrated to obtain a bacterial pellet (14,000 rpm
for 5 min) and then resuspended in 400 ␮l of PBS and plated out on
Todd-Hewitt agar to determine the amount of bacteria that penetrated the
epithelium. The total number of CFU was determined for each sample and
averaged among the replicates for each time point. The total number of
CFU at the conclusion of the experiment were determined by adding the
average total CFU number for each time point (2, 4, 6, and 8 h).
The Journal of Immunology
FIGURE 1. ␣-Toxin disrupts vaginal mucosa. TSST-1 (10 ␮g/ml) and
␣-toxin at 5 ␮g/ml (A) or 50 ␮g/ml (B) were applied to ex vivo porcine
vagina and incubated for 8 h. Tissue was sectioned and stained with H&E
for histological examination. Both concentrations of ␣-toxin appear to disrupt the surface layers of the vaginal epithelium, with the higher concentration causing sloughing of the uppermost epithelial layers.
FIGURE 3. Most SPE A remains in the tissue. SPE A was radiolabeled
with [35S]methionine before application to the porcine vagina ex vivo.
Whole pieces of tissue were sectioned and exposed to x-ray film to determine where the superantigen remained in the tissue. In all conditions SPE
A primarily remained in the uppermost layers of the epithelium, which can
be seen on the x-ray film (top). Stained tissue sections are also shown for
reference (bottom).
not penetrate throughout. It is important to remember that only microgram amounts of superantigen are required to cause TSS in humans (73); therefore, although the differences between the amount of
superantigen that penetrates in the absence or presence of cytolysin
may appear small, the differences may explain the development of
TSS or the simple clearance of superantigen without TSS.
Superantigens and cytolysins induce different cytokine responses
from HVECs
Although cytolysins were shown to damage the vaginal mucosa, it
was possible that both superantigens and cytolysins induced proinflammatory responses that disrupted the barrier and facilitated
greater penetration of molecules across the vaginal surface. In fact,
our laboratory has previously shown that TSST-1 (100 ␮g/ml) can
induce the production of proinflammatory cytokines and chemokines (IL-8, MIP-3␣, and TNF-␣) from an immortalized HVEC
line (45). However, in this study we show that a lower dose of
TSST-1 (10 vs 100 ␮g/ml) induced only a small amount of IL-1␤
and IL-6 from HVECs (Fig. 4). When ␣-toxin was incubated with
HVECs at two concentrations (50 and 5 ␮g/ml) it induced all cytokines and chemokines tested (IL-1␤, TNF-␣, IL-6, and IL-8) in
a dose-dependent manner, with the exception of MIP-3␣, which
was not detected. When TSST-1 (10 ␮g/ml) was coincubated with
␣-toxin (5 or 50 ␮g/ml) on the HVECs, very little IL-1␤ or TNF-␣
was detected, but IL-6 and IL-8 were induced to a greater extent,
indicating synergy between TSST-1 and ␣-toxin. In general, when
both TSST-1 and ␣-toxin were incubated with the cells, the extent
of the immune response was dependent on the concentration of
FIGURE 2. SLO damages vaginal tissue. SPE A (40 ␮g/ml) in the absence or presence of SLO (5 or 50 ␮g/ml) was applied to ex vivo porcine vagina
for 8 h. Tissues were sectioned and stained with H&E for histological examination. A, SPE A alone does not damage the mucosa. B and C, A lower dose
of SLO (5 ␮g/ml) shows damage to the epithelial surface (B), but more distinct damage, including intraepithelial separation, can be seen at the higher dose
(50 ␮g/ml) (C). D, Control tissue that has been incubated in PBS alone for 8 h.
Downloaded from http://www.jimmunol.org/ by guest on May 9, 2017
the presence of cytolysins increased the total amount of superantigen that penetrated the vaginal mucosa. In the case of TSST-1
and ␣-toxin, both concentrations of cytolysin significantly enhanced the amount of TSST-1 that penetrated the epithelium ( p ⬍
0.05). In the case of SPE A and SLO, however, only the lower dose
of SLO (5 ␮g/ml) was able to significantly augment the penetration of SPE A ( p ⬍ 0.05). A larger starting concentration of SPE
A was used (40 ␮g/ml compared with 10 ␮g/ml TSST-1), because
previous studies using rabbit vaginal mucosa showed that SPE A
was unable to penetrate as well as TSST-1 (36); however, we also
measured the amount of SPE A at 10 ␮g/ml that penetrated the
porcine tissue and found that SPE A was able to penetrate as well
as TSST-1 in this model.
At the conclusion of each experiment, tissue specimens were
sectioned and stained with H&E to visualize damage to the mucosa. ␣-Toxin at both the low (5 ␮g/ml) and high (50 ␮g/ml) doses
damaged the surface layers of the vaginal mucosa, with obvious
sloughing of the epithelium seen at the higher dose (Fig. 1). SLO
also damaged the mucosa at both concentrations (5 and 50 ␮g/ml)
with significant intraepithelial separation again seen at the higher
dose (Fig. 2). SPE A alone, in contrast, did not damage the epithelium, compared with a PBS only control.
To determine where in the tissue the nonpenetrating superantigen was located, tissue sections were placed on x-ray film and
developed. This allowed us to visualize radioactivity remaining on
or within the tissue, and it indicated that the majority of the radiolabeled superantigen was “trapped” in the uppermost epithelial
layers of mucosa (Fig. 3). It is interesting to note that even though
cytolysins augment superantigen penetration, the majority of superantigen still remained in the surface layers of the tissue and did
2367
2368
␣-toxin present. An experiment was also conducted using a higher
dose of TSST-1 (100 ␮g/ml) with both concentrations of ␣-toxin
(5 or 50 ␮g/ml) that showed the same trend; however the overall
response was reduced compared with that seen with a lower dose
of TSST-1 (data not shown).
In contrast to the proinflammatory response to ␣-toxin from the
HVECs, SLO alone (10 ␮g/ml) induced only a low level of IL-1␤
from the cells (Fig. 5). Lower doses of SLO (1 and 0.1 ␮g/ml)
were shown to elicit similar but dose-dependent responses from
the HVECs (data not shown for 0.1 ␮g/ml dose). SPE A, like
TSST-1 (at 100 ␮g/ml), induced strong IL-8 and MIP-3␣ responses from the cells, and this response was found to increase
over time (data not shown). SPE A also induced IL-6, which was
only detected in response to the lower TSST-1 concentration. A
lower concentration of SPE A (10 ␮g/ml) demonstrated a similar
trend to that seen with the higher dose. When SPE A (100 or 10
FIGURE 5. SPE A elicits a proinflammatory response from HVECs,
but only IL-1␤ can be measured when SLO is present. SPE A and/or
SLO were added to HVECs for 6 h; cell culture supernatants were
collected and analyzed by ELISA for cytokine and chemokine production by the cells. SLO alone (10 ␮g/ml) induced only a small IL-1␤
response from the cells (A), whereas SPE A alone (100 ␮g/ml) induced
large amounts of IL-6, IL-8, and MIP-3␣ (B). When administered simultaneously to the HVECs at three different combinations of concentrations (high SLO at 10 ␮g/ml and high SPE A at 100 ␮g/ml; high SLO
at 10 ␮g/ml and low SPE A at 10 ␮g/ml; and low SLO at 1 ␮g/ml and
high SPE A at 100 ␮g/ml), only IL-1␤ was detected and all cytokines
and chemokines induced by SPE A were no longer detectable (C). All
concentrations are given as a difference from a medium only or DTT
only control. Error bars represent the SEM.
␮g/ml) and SLO (10 ␮g/ml or 1 ␮g/ml) were incubated with the
HVECs, only an IL-1␤ response was seen. This response was
stronger than that to SLO alone; however, it is important to note
that any cytokines and chemokines induced by SPE A alone were
no longer detected.
Cytolysins cause different amounts of damage to the HVECs
The cytolysins may have been directly damaging or killing the
epithelial cells, which may have triggered the inflammatory response seen. Three methods were used to assess cellular damage:
trypan blue staining of dead cells, measurement of uric acid release
from damaged cells, and comparison of total cell numbers in the
absence or presence of cytolysin after 6 h. The release of uric acid
from cells and tissues has been shown to correlate with cellular
damage, and extracellular uric acid acts as a danger signal to the
immune system by triggering dendritic cells that phagocytose the
molecules to become activated (74). The high dose of ␣-toxin (50
Downloaded from http://www.jimmunol.org/ by guest on May 9, 2017
FIGURE 4. ␣-Toxin induces a proinflammatory cytokine and chemokine response from HVECs. Cells were incubated with TSST-1 (A),
␣-toxin (B), or combinations of both for 6 h (C); cell culture supernatants
were collected and assayed by ELISA for IL-1␤, TNF-␣, IL-6, IL-8, and
MIP-3␣. Peterson et al. (45) demonstrated that a higher concentration of
TSST-1 (100 ␮g/ml) can induce IL-8 and MIP-3␣ from HVECs, as well as
low levels of TNF-␣. In the present study we show that a lower concentration (10 ␮g/ml) of TSST-1 induced only low levels of IL-1␤ and IL-6
(A), whereas ␣-toxin at two doses (50 and 5 ␮g/ml) induced a wider range
of proinflammatory cytokines and chemokines (B). When administered simultaneously (TSST-1 at 10 ␮g/ml and ␣-toxin 50 ␮g/ml or 5 ␮g/ml)
IL-1␤ and TNF-␣ were no longer detected, but more IL-6 and IL-8 were
produced (C). All concentrations are given as a difference from a medium
only control. Error bars represent the SEM.
SUPERANTIGEN PENETRATION
The Journal of Immunology
2369
␮g/ml) killed the HVECs only after 6 h, as seen by only a 10%
survival rate when the total cell number was compared with that of
a medium only control (Fig. 6, yellow hatched column), but no uric
acid release was detected under any condition. Of those cells remaining adherent after 6 h in the presence of the high dose of
␣-toxin, only 33% survived (Fig. 6, yellow column). The lower
dose of ␣-toxin (5 ␮g/ml) did not induce uric acid release or kill
the cells at any time point. SLO, in contrast, induced uric acid
release from the HVECs after 2 h, but lower levels of uric acid
were detected at 4 and 6 h, indicating that uric acid may not remain
stable in the cellular medium. SLO was shown to kill the cells after
4 h (Fig. 6, green columns), with 53% survival at higher doses (10
and 50 ␮g/ml, data not shown). After 6 h with SLO, cells still
adherent to the flask were alive as indicated by trypan blue staining
(Fig. 6, blue columns); however, based on total cell counts only
38% of the cells remained compared with a medium only control
(Fig. 6, blue hatched column). The lower dose of SLO (1 ␮g/ml)
did not affect survival despite inducing a strong uric acid release
from the cells. In contrast, neither superantigen (100 ␮g/ml) induced uric acid release from the HVECs, nor did they directly kill
the cells as indicated by trypan blue staining and total cell counts
(data not shown).
SLO augments penetration of Str. pyogenes while ␣-toxin does
not enhance penetration of Sta. aureus
We hypothesized that the damage caused by SLO in the absence of
a strong proinflammatory response may also allow Str. pyogenes to
penetrate the epithelium. This may help to explain why Str. pyogenes is often found in the bloodstream of streptococcal TSS patients, whereas Sta. aureus remains localized on the mucosal surface during TSS. To test this, we monitored the penetration of Str.
pyogenes and Sta. aureus across an ex vivo porcine vagina in the
FIGURE 7. SLO enhances the ability of Str. pyogenes to penetrate vaginal epithelium, whereas ␣-toxin does not. Str. pyogenes (8 ⫻ 1010 CFU) and Sta.
aureus (1 ⫻ 109 CFU) were added to ex vivo porcine vagina and incubated for 8 h in the absence or presence of SLO and ␣-toxin (5 ␮g/ml each),
respectively. Perfusate was collected every 2 h, concentrated, and plated on Todd-Hewitt agar plates to determine the amount of viable bacteria that
penetrated the epithelium. Total bacterial concentration was determined by adding total CFU for each 2-h sample up to 8 h. Although Str. pyogenes was
able to penetrate the epithelium on its own, the presence of SLO allowed for a significantly higher amount of bacteria to penetrate (p ⬍ 0.05). There was
no significant difference between the amounts of Sta. aureus that were able to penetrate in the absence or presence of ␣-toxin.
Downloaded from http://www.jimmunol.org/ by guest on May 9, 2017
FIGURE 6. SLO induces uric acid release from dead and damaged cells, but only a high dose of ␣-toxin kills the cells without inducing the release of
uric acid. To assess the ability of the cytolysins to damage or kill HVECs, uric acid release (⽧) from the cells was measured as an indicator of cell damage
(74) and trypan blue staining (columns) was done to determine the percentage of cells alive after each time point. SLO (10 and 1 ␮g/ml) and the DTT only
control induced a strong uric acid release from the cells after only 2 h (red columns), indicating cellular damage. At 4 h (green columns), not as much uric
acid was detected but only 53% of the cells were still alive as indicated by trypan blue staining. After 6 h, the cells still adherent to the flask were alive
(blue columns) and very little uric acid could be detected, indicating that the uric acid is not stable in the cellular medium. The percentage of cells remaining
after 6 h is shown by a blue hatched column as determined by a difference in total cell number compared with a medium only control. ␣-Toxin did not
induce uric acid release from the cells at any time point, but the high dose (50 ␮g/ml) killed the majority of the cells after 6 h (yellow columns). The
percentage of total cells remaining after 6 h is shown by a yellow hatched column. Cell death due to ␣-toxin was not seen at 2 (orange columns) or 4 (violet
columns) h. The low dose of ␣-toxin (5 ␮g/ml) did not induce uric acid release or kill the cells. A medium only control is shown (white column) to
demonstrate that cells typically do not release uric acid. Error bars on uric acid data represent the SEM.
2370
SUPERANTIGEN PENETRATION
Table II. ␣-Toxin enhances the lethality of TSST-1 in rabbitsa
Condition
Rabbit Lethality after 48 h
TSST-1 (0.01 ␮g/kg)
TSST-1 (0.01 ␮g/kg) plus ␣-toxin
(0.05 ␮g/kg)
0/4
4/4 ( p ⬍ 0.03)
a
A rabbit model of TSS that monitors the ability of TSST-1 to synergize with
lipopolysaccharide to cause shock through the acceleration of cytokine release was
used to assess the ability of ␣-toxin to enhance the penetration of TSST-1 across
rabbit vaginal epithelium. TSST-1 (0.01 ␮g/kg) in the absence or presence of ␣-toxin
(0.05 ␮g/kg) was administered intravaginally to young adult female Dutch-belted
rabbits; 4 h later LPS (50 ␮g/kg) was administered i.v. and rabbits were monitored for
48 h for signs of TSS. Fisher’s exact test was used to assess differences in TSS
survival rates between experimental and control rabbit groups.
␣-toxin augments penetration of TSST-1 in a rabbit vaginal
model of TSS
Unlike the relatively thick human and porcine vaginal mucosa, the
rabbit vaginal mucosal is only 3–5 epithelial cell layers in thickness. The ability of ␣-toxin to facilitate TSST-1 penetration was
assessed following intravaginal TSST-1 with or without intravaginal ␣-toxin (Table II). Development of lethal TSS was assessed by
the synergy of cytokine production due to subsequent i.v. LPS
given 4 h after intravaginal TSST-1 with or without intravaginal
␣-toxin. Rabbits that received intravaginal TSST-1 plus intravaginal ␣-toxin succumbed to TSS (4/4) when challenged with LPS.
In contrast, rabbits that received intravaginal TSST-1 alone did not
succumb to TSS (0/4) when challenged with LPS ( p ⬍ 0.03),
suggesting the cytolysin facilitated TSST-1 penetration of the vaginal mucosa.
Discussion
Both Sta. aureus and Str. pyogenes can initiate TSS from nonkeratinized stratified squamous mucosal surfaces; Sta. aureus causes
mTSS while remaining localized on vaginal epithelia, whereas Str.
pyogenes induces TSS often associated with initial oral mucosal
colonization and subsequent penetration of the organism and superantigens systemically. In the case of mTSS, Sta. aureus locally
produces the superantigen TSST-1 which must then penetrate the
mucosal barrier to interact with adaptive immune cells to induce
the cascade of events that leads to shock. Previous research done
in our laboratory demonstrated that live bacteria could enhance superantigen penetration better than heat-killed bacteria, indicating
that live Sta. aureus may be actively secreting factors that aid in
disrupting the barrier (45). The main purpose of this study was to
determine the role of cytolysins in the penetration of superantigens
across vaginal mucosa. Although Str. pyogenes can occasionally
be found vaginally and induce TSS from this site (75), it is more
commonly found in the oral mucosa. This study used only vaginal
mucosa as a representative nonkeratinized stratified squamous epithelium to examine both staphylococcal and streptococcal superantigen penetration; however, previous studies have indicated a
Downloaded from http://www.jimmunol.org/ by guest on May 9, 2017
absence or presence of SLO and ␣-toxin, respectively. Fig. 7
shows the amount of bacteria that penetrated the epithelium after
8 h. SLO was clearly able to enhance the ability of Str. pyogenes
to penetrate the vaginal epithelium; the amount of bacteria that
penetrated was significantly higher than all other conditions ( p ⬍
0.05). Str. pyogenes alone was better able to penetrate than Sta.
aureus alone but was only significantly higher in concentration
after 2 h ( p ⬍ 0.001). No bacteria were detected to penetrate when
␣-toxin was present with Sta. aureus; however, there was no significant difference between the amounts of Sta. aureus that penetrated in the absence or presence of the cytolysin.
high similarity between vaginal and oral epithelia in both structure
and function, including permeability (41, 43).
In this study, we demonstrated that both the staphylococcal cytolysin ␣-toxin and the streptococcal cytolysin SLO are capable of
augmenting the penetration of their respective superantigens. In
the case of ␣-toxin, there was a dose-dependent increase in the
amount of TSST-1 that was able to penetrate ex vivo porcine vaginal tissue. A greater concentration of SLO, in contrast, did not
seem to further enhance the ability of SPE A to penetrate. This
may be due to the difference in the amount of monomers required
to form a pore for each cytolysin. SLO requires between 70 and 80
monomers, whereas ␣-toxin only requires seven; therefore, SLO
may cause site-specific damage to the mucosa whereas ␣-toxin can
cause a broader range of damage with an increase in concentration.
Histological examination showed disruption of the mucosa due to
the presence of cytolysin in both cases. Although more superantigen was able to penetrate through the mucosa when cytolysin was
present, we demonstrated for SPE A that the majority of the radiolabeled toxin remains in the uppermost layers of the tissue. This
entrapment of superantigen in what appears to be the mucosal
epithelium may serve as a reservoir for additional toxin during the
infection process. We have previously demonstrated a reservoir
effect in porcine oral mucosa with TGF-␤3, a molecule similar in
size to the superantigens (76).
Although damage to the mucosa was seen in histological staining of tissues exposed to cytolysins, it was unclear whether that
was due to direct damage by the cytolysins or was the result of an
inflammatory process caused by the cytolysins. To clarify this, we
examined the ability of ␣-toxin and SLO to induce proinflammatory responses from immortalized epithelial cells. Although
␣-toxin was shown to induce a strong proinflammatory response
from the cells, SLO only induced a low level of IL-1␤. To address
the possibility that cytolysins and superantigens act to synergistically induce an inflammatory response from epithelial cells, we
measured the amount of cytokines produced in response to both
␣-toxin and TSST-1 or SLO and SPE A. Although ␣-toxin alone
was proinflammatory, there was a differential immune response to
␣-toxin and TSST-1 when administered simultaneously. In the
presence of ␣-toxin and TSST-1, the cytokines IL-1␤ and TNF-␣
were no longer detected but higher amounts of IL-6 and IL-8 were
seen, indicating some synergy between the two toxins. In contrast,
there was a stronger IL-1␤ response to both SLO and SPE A;
however the cytokines and chemokines induced by SPE A alone
were not detected when SLO was present.
To examine the direct damage to HVECs caused by ␣-toxin and
SLO, we measured uric acid release (an indicator of cell damage
and a known “danger” signal for the immune system; Ref. 74) and
stained the cells with trypan blue to identify dead cells; we also
compared total cell numbers in the presence and absence of cytolysin after 6 h. Interestingly, ␣-toxin did not cause uric acid release
from the cells at 2, 4 or 6 h, but the high concentration of ␣-toxin
(50 ␮g/ml) killed ⬃90% of the cells after 6 h. The strong proinflammatory response we saw from the cells incubated with ␣-toxin
indicated that the cells are able to make and secrete large amounts
of cytokines and chemokines before the majority of them succumb
to the cytotoxic effects of the toxin. SLO killed almost half of the
cells by 4 h, but cell damage was evident after only 2 h as indicated
by a strong release of uric acid from the cells. The cells remaining
adherent after 6 h incubation with SLO were still alive; however,
most of the cells were no longer adherent (only 38% of the cells
remained). We believe that the low IL-1␤ response that SLO induces from HVECs is due to the release of preformed IL-1␤ from
the cells and not due to de novo synthesis of new cytokines, as we
The Journal of Immunology
2371
saw an IL-1␤ response as early as 2 h after SLO was added to the
cells (data not shown).
The ability of SLO to damage epithelial cells without eliciting a
strong proinflammatory response led us to hypothesize that SLO
may also act to augment penetration of Str. pyogenes across the
epithelium. Using ex vivo porcine vaginal epithelium, we demonstrated that SLO does in fact enhance the ability of Str. pyogenes
to penetrate the epithelium. In the case of Sta. aureus, however, the
presence of ␣-toxin does not increase the ability of the bacteria to
penetrate the vaginal tissue. This is interesting because Sta. aureus
typically remains on the vaginal surface in cases of menstrual TSS,
whereas Str. pyogenes is often found in the bloodstream in cases of
streptococcal TSS. Therefore, it is possible that SLO causes
enough damage to the mucosa to allow for penetration of both SPE
A and Str. pyogenes, whereas ␣-toxin only acts to enhance penetration of TSST-1 across the epithelium. This is consistent with in
vivo experiments conducted in rabbits that demonstrated the ability of ␣-toxin to enhance penetration of TSST-1 across the vaginal
epithelium to cause lethal TSS.
Based on these results we propose two separate models of penetration for staphylococcal and streptococcal superantigens (Fig.
8). In the case of Sta. aureus infections, we have demonstrated that
both ␣-toxin and TSST-1 are proinflammatory when incubated
with HVECs. Therefore, we propose that it is an inflammatory
process induced by ␣-toxin that acts to disrupt the epithelial barrier
sufficiently to allow for enhanced penetration of TSST-1. The main
cytokines induced by ␣-toxin are IL-6, IL-1␤, and TNF-␣, which
are known to induce the acute phase proteins, activate the vascular
endothelium, and cause local tissue destruction (77). Additional
research done in our laboratory has indicated that superantigens
are binding a receptor on epithelial cells to induce cytokine production from the cells (45). Typically, the outermost epithelial layers of the vaginal mucosa are senescent compared with those cells
found adjacent to the mucosal connective tissue; therefore, we believe that superantigens must be binding the viable epithelial cells
in the lower layers of the mucosal epithelium. Thus, ␣-toxin may
act on the outermost layers of the mucosa to cause inflammation,
but TSST-1 induces another set of cytokines and chemokines once
it reaches the lower layers of epithelium. The chemokines IL-8
(CCL8) and MIP-3␣ (CCL20) in particular may be responsible for
recruiting neutrophils and T cells to the site of infection (78, 79).
We believe that the recruitment of adaptive immune cells to the
subepithelial mucosa is necessary for superantigens to encounter
an adequate amount of T cells and APCs to elicit the massive
cytokine production that leads to TSS; we have shown that such
recruitment can occur in our ex vivo porcine vaginal model (34).
Str. pyogenes, although not commonly found in the vaginal
tract, is more often found on the oral mucosa. As we have already
argued, we believe that the effects shown here can be translated to
those occurring at another mucosal surface. SLO is relatively noninflammatory, but it does induce a large amount of damage to the
epithelium through direct interactions with epithelial cells. SPE A,
like TSST-1, is proinflammatory, and we believe that the interaction of SPE A with epithelial cells is actually occurring in the
lower layers of the epithelium, similar to that suggested for
TSST-1. Thus, we propose that SLO acts to directly damage epithelial cells that form the outermost layers of the mucosa without
inducing a strong inflammatory response from the cells. This allows for SPE A to better penetrate the superficial permeability
barrier and to bind a receptor on viable epithelial cells that are
located in the lower epithelial layers. SPE A induces the chemokines IL-8 (CCL8) and MIP-3␣ (CCL20) like TSST-1, and it is
possible that those chemokines are directly responsible for recruiting adaptive immune cells to the subepithelial mucosa. In this
study, the models are similar in that the superantigen is better able
to interact with T cells and macrophages when a strong immune
response is actively attracting a large number of cells to the site of
infection. Because of the direct cell damage caused by SLO in the
absence of a strong inflammatory response, we propose that SLO
may also act to enhance penetration of the bacteria through the
Downloaded from http://www.jimmunol.org/ by guest on May 9, 2017
FIGURE 8. Two different proposed models for penetration of staphylococcal and streptococcal superantigen penetration of vaginal mucosa. A, In the
case of Sta. aureus infections, both ␣-toxin and TSST-1 are secreted at the vaginal surface. ␣-Toxin induces a strong proinflammatory response from
HVECs without necessarily damaging the epithelium (unless at high concentrations). The localized inflammation caused by ␣-toxin acts to disrupt the
barrier, allowing TSST-1 to penetrate the epithelium and interact with active epithelial cells in the underlying layers to induce a proinflammatory response
of its own. Chemokines elicited by TSST-1 recruit adaptive immune cells to the area, which the superantigen can then interact with to induce T cell
proliferation and massive cytokine production, leading to TSS. B, In the case of Str. pyogenes infections, it follows that both SPE A and SLO are made
on mucosal surfaces. SLO directly damages the epithelium without inducing a strong cytokine response from the cells. The damage caused by SLO allows
SPE A to better penetrate the epithelium to gain access to lower level epithelial cells, which are more active and therefore can be stimulated to produce
proinflammatory cytokines by the superantigen. At this point, the model becomes similar to that proposed for Sta. aureus, in which adaptive immune cells
are recruited to the underlying layers of the mucosa and the superantigen starts the cytokine cascade that eventually leads to TSS. The damage caused by
SLO in the absence of a strong inflammatory response may also allow Str. pyogenes to penetrate the mucosal barrier, which may help to explain why Str.
pyogenes often becomes systemic in cases of streptococcal TSS, whereas Sta. aureus remains localized on the vaginal surface during cases of mTSS.
2372
Acknowledgments
We thank Dr. Peter Southern for his generous aid in procuring suitable
images of our histology studies.
Disclosures
The authors have no financial conflict of interest.
References
1. Cone, L. A., D. R. Woodard, P. M. Schlievert, and G. S. Tomory. 1987. Clinical
and bacteriologic observations of a toxic shock-like syndrome due to Streptococcus pyogenes. N. Engl. J. Med. 317: 146 –149.
2. Todd, J., M. Fishaut, F. Kapral, and T. Welch. 1978. Toxic-shock syndrome
associated with phage-group-I staphylococci. Lancet 2: 1116 –1118.
3. Davis, J. P., P. J. Chesney, P. J. Wand, and M. LaVenture. 1980. Toxic-shock
syndrome: epidemiologic features, recurrence, risk factors, and prevention.
N. Engl. J. Med. 303: 1429 –1435.
4. Shands, K. N., G. P. Schmid, B. B. Dan, D. Blum, R. J. Guidotti, N. T. Hargrett,
R. L. Anderson, D. L. Hill, C. V. Broome, J. D. Band, and D. W. Fraser. 1980.
Toxic-shock syndrome in menstruating women: association with tampon use and
Staphylococcus aureus and clinical features in 52 cases. N. Engl. J. Med. 303:
1436 –1442.
5. Kotb, M., A. Norrby-Teglund, A. McGeer, H. El-Sherbini, M. T. Dorak,
A. Khurshid, K. Green, J. Peeples, J. Wade, G. Thomson, B. Schwartz, and
D. E. Low. 2002. An immunogenetic and molecular basis for differences in outcomes of invasive group A streptococcal infections. Nat. Med. 8: 1398 –1404.
6. Stevens, D. L., M. H. Tanner, J. Winship, R. Swarts, K. M. Ries, P. M. Schlievert,
and E. Kaplan. 1989. Severe group A streptococcal infections associated with a
toxic shock-like syndrome and scarlet fever toxin A. N. Engl. J. Med. 321: 1–7.
7. McCormick, J. K., M. L. Peterson, and P. M. Schlievert. 2006. Toxins and superantigens of group A streptococci. In Gram Positive Pathogens, 2nd Ed.
R. P. Novick, V. A. Fischetti, J. J. Ferretti, D. A. Portnoy, and J. I. Rood, eds.
ASM Press, Washington, D.C., pp. 47–58.
8. Schlievert, P. M., K. M. Bettin, and D. W. Watson. 1979. Reinterpretation of the
Dick test: role of group A streptococcal pyrogenic exotoxin. Infect. Immun. 26:
467– 472.
9. Stevens, D. L. 2000. Streptococcal toxic shock syndrome associated with necrotizing fasciitis. Annu. Rev. Med. 51: 271–288.
10. Kravitz, G. R., D. J. Dries, M. L. Peterson, and P. M. Schlievert. 2005. Purpura
fulminans due to Staphylococcus aureus. Clin. Infect. Dis. 40: 941–947.
11. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.1999. Four pediatric deaths from
community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, Minnesota and
North Dakota, 1997–1999. J. Am. Med. Assoc. 282: 1123–1125.
12. Schlievert, P. M., A. P. Assimacopoulos, and P. P. Cleary. 1996. Severe invasive
group A streptococcal disease: clinical description and mechanisms of pathogenesis. J. Lab. Clin. Med. 127: 13–22.
13. Reichardt, W., H. Muller-Alouf, J. E. Alouf, and W. Kohler. 1992. Erythrogenic
toxins A, B and C: occurrence of the genes and exotoxin formation from clinical
Streptococcus pyogenes strains associated with streptococcal toxic shock-like
syndrome. FEMS Microb. Lett. 79: 313–322.
14. Hauser, A. R., D. L. Stevens, E. L. Kaplan, and P. M. Schlievert. 1991. Molecular
analysis of pyrogenic exotoxins from Streptococcus pyogenes isolates associated
with toxic shock-like syndrome. J. Clin. Microbiol. 29: 1562–1567.
15. Musser, J. M., A. R. Hauser, M. H. Kim, P. M. Schlievert, K. Nelson, and
R. K. Selander. 1991. Streptococcus pyogenes causing toxic-shock-like syndrome
and other invasive diseases: clonal diversity and pyrogenic exotoxin expression.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 88: 2668 –2672.
16. Lee, P. K., and P. M. Schlievert. 1989. Quantification and toxicity of group A
streptococcal pyrogenic exotoxins in an animal model of toxic shock syndromelike illness. J. Clin. Microbiol. 27: 1890 –1892.
17. Talkington, D. F., B. Schwartz, C. M. Black, J. K. Todd, J. Elliott, R. F. Breiman,
and R. R. Facklam. 1993. Association of phenotypic and genotypic characteristics
of invasive Streptococcus pyogenes isolates with clinical components of streptococcal toxic shock syndrome. Infect. Immun. 61: 3369 –3374.
18. Bergdoll, M. S. 1988. Monkey feeding test for staphylococcal enterotoxin. Methods Enzymol. 165: 324 –333.
19. Schlievert, P. M. 1986. Staphylococcal enterotoxin B and toxic-shock syndrome
toxin-1 are significantly associated with non-menstrual TSS. Lancet 1:
1149 –1150.
20. Schlievert, P. M., T. J. Tripp, and M. L. Peterson. 2004. Reemergence of staphylococcal toxic shock syndrome in Minneapolis-St. Paul, Minnesota, during the
2000 –2003 surveillance period. J. Clin. Microbiol. 42: 2875–2876.
21. Bergdoll, M. S., B. A. Crass, R. F. Reiser, R. N. Robbins, and J. P. Davis. 1981.
A new staphylococcal enterotoxin, enterotoxin F, associated with toxic-shocksyndrome Staphylococcus aureus isolates. Lancet 1: 1017–1021.
22. Schlievert, P. M., K. N. Shands, B. B. Dan, G. P. Schmid, and R. D. Nishimura.
1981. Identification and characterization of an exotoxin from Staphylococcus
aureus associated with toxic-shock syndrome. J. Infect. Dis. 143: 509 –516.
23. Marrack, P., and J. Kappler. 1990. The staphylococcal enterotoxins and their
relatives. Science 248: 1066.
24. Choi, Y., J. A. Lafferty, J. R. Clements, J. K. Todd, E. W. Gelfand, J. Kappler,
P. Marrack, and B. L. Kotzin. 1990. Selective expansion of T cells expressing
V␤2 in toxic shock syndrome. J. Exp. Med. 172: 981–984.
25. Fraser, J. D. 1989. High-affinity binding of staphylococcal enterotoxins A and B
to HLA-DR. 339: 221–223.
26. Scholl, P., A. Diez, and R. Geha. 1989. Staphylococcal enterotoxin B and toxic
shock syndrome toxin-1 bind to distinct sites on HLA-DR and HLA-DQ molecules. J. Immunol. 143: 2583–2588.
27. White, J., A. Herman, A. M. Pullen, R. Kubo, J. W. Kappler, and P. Marrack.
1989. The V␤-specific superantigen staphylococcal enterotoxin B: stimulation of
mature T cells and clonal deletion in neonatal mice. Cell 56: 27–35.
28. Callahan, J. E., A. Herman, J. W. Kappler, and P. Marrack. 1990. Stimulation of
B10.BR T cells with superantigenic staphylococcal toxins. J. Immunol. 144:
2473–2479.
29. Schlievert, P. M., K. M. Bettin, and D. W. Watson. 1978. Effect of antipyretics
on group A streptococcal pyrogenic exotoxin fever production and ability to
enhance lethal endotoxin shock. Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol. Med. 157: 472– 475.
30. Dinges, M. M., J. Jessurun, and P. M. Schlievert. 1998. Comparisons of mouse
and rabbit models of toxic shock syndrome. Int. Congr. Symp. Ser. 229: 167–168.
31. Dinges, M. M., and P. M. Schlievert. 2001. Comparative analysis of lipopolysaccharide-induced tumor necrosis factor ␣ activity in serum and lethality in mice
and rabbits pretreated with the staphylococcal superantigen toxic shock syndrome
toxin 1. Infect. Immun. 69: 7169 –7172.
32. Schlievert, P. M., and D. W. Watson. 1979. Biogenic amine involvement in
pyrogenicity and enhancement of lethal endotoxin shock by group A streptococcal pyrogenic exotoxin. Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol. Med. 162: 269 –274.
33. Kotzin, B. L., D. Y. Leung, J. Kappler, and P. Marrack. 1993. Superantigens and
their potential role in human disease. Adv. Immunol. 54: 99 –166.
34. Squier, C. A., M. J. Mantz, P. M. Schlievert, and C. C. Davis. 2008. Porcine
vagina ex vivo as a model for studying permeability and pathogenesis in mucosa.
J. Pharm. Sci. 97: 9 –21.
35. Schlievert, P. M., M. Y. Kotb, and D. L. Stevens. 2000. Streptococcal superantigens: streptococcal toxic shock syndrome. In Effects of Microbes on the Immune
Downloaded from http://www.jimmunol.org/ by guest on May 9, 2017
mucosa. This is important, because in streptococcal TSS Str. pyogenes is often found in the bloodstream compared with mTSS in
which Sta. aureus remains localized on the vaginal surface. The
lack of inflammatory response to SLO may provide a way for the
Str. pyogenes to rapidly traverse the superficial mucosal barrier
before an appropriate immune response can be mounted against
the bacteria.
We showed that the majority of radiolabeled SPE A remains in
the uppermost layers of the mucosa, which may act as a reservoir
for additional superantigen during infection. Other work done in
our laboratory has implicated that superantigens may be “sequestered” in the mucosa through interactions with a receptor on epithelial cells (45, 80). Significant interaction between the superantigen and epithelial cells may be required to induce an immune
response sufficient to initiate the cascade of events that leads to
TSS. Therefore, it is possible that cytolysins are only secreted at
the mucosal surface to create an initial disruption of the barrier that
subsequently allows superantigens to gain access to the more active epithelial cells in the lower layers of the mucosa. There, the
interaction between superantigens and epithelium leads to production of chemokines required to recruit an ample number of adaptive immune cells to the site of infection. At this point, the superantigens are able to cross-bridge the TCR of T cells and the MHC
II of APCs so as to induce massive cytokine production, which
eventually will lead to TSS.
In sum, these studies have demonstrated the ability of staphylococcal and streptococcal cytolysins to augment penetration of
superantigens through porcine vaginal tissue in an ex vivo model
of superantigen penetration. The cytolysins were shown to cause
damage to the mucosa, particularly the outermost layers of tissue.
In vitro human cell studies demonstrated that while both superantigens (TSST-1 and SPE A) were capable of inducing cytokine and
chemokine production from HVECs, only the cytolysin ␣-toxin
was proinflammatory when incubated with the cells. SLO acted
quickly to damage the cells, and we believe that only preformed
IL-1␤ was released. A high concentration of ␣-toxin killed the
cells; however this process was slow enough to allow for production and secretion of various cytokines and chemokines before cell
death. Finally, we proposed two distinct models of superantigen
penetration for Sta. aureus and Str. pyogenes that involved disruption of the mucosal tissue through an inflammatory reaction to
␣-toxin and through direct cellular damage by SLO, both of which
lead to enhanced superantigen penetration.
SUPERANTIGEN PENETRATION
The Journal of Immunology
36.
37.
38.
39.
40.
41.
42.
44.
45.
46.
47.
48.
49.
50.
51.
52.
53.
54.
55.
56.
57.
58. Yang, P. C., T. Liu, C. S. Wang, N. Z. Zhang, and Z. D. Tao. 2000. Active ion
secretion and permeability of rabbit maxillary sinus epithelium, impact of staphylococcal enterotoxin B. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 123: 120 –123.
59. O’Brien, G. J., G. Riddell, J. S. Elborn, M. Ennis, and G. Skibinski. 2006. Staphylococcus aureus enterotoxins induce IL-8 secretion by human nasal epithelial
cells. Respir. Res. 7: 115.
60. Herz, U., R. Ruckert, K. Wollenhaupt, T. Tschernig, U. Neuhaus-Steinmetz,
R. Pabst, and H. Renz. 1999. Airway exposure to bacterial superantigen (SEB)
induces lymphocyte-dependent airway inflammation associated with increased
airway responsiveness: a model for non-allergic asthma. Eur. J. Immunol. 29:
1021–1031.
61. Rajagopalan, G., M. K. Smart, R. Patel, and C. S. David. 2006. Acute systemic
immune activation following conjunctival exposure to staphylococcal enterotoxin
B. Infect. Immun. 74: 6016 – 6019.
62. Rajagopalan, G., M. K. Smart, N. Murali, R. Patel, and C. S. David. 2007. Acute
systemic immune activation following vaginal exposure to staphylococcal enterotoxin B: implications for menstrual shock. J. Reprod. Immunol. 73: 51–59.
63. Rajagopalan, G., M. M. Sen, M. Singh, N. S. Murali, K. A. Nath, K. Iijima,
H. Kita, A. A. Leontovich, U. Gopinathan, R. Patel, and C. S. David. 2006.
Intranasal exposure to staphylococcal enterotoxin B elicits an acute systemic
inflammatory response. Shock 25: 647– 656.
64. Rajagopalan, G., K. Iijima, M. Singh, H. Kita, R. Patel, and C. S. David. 2006.
Intranasal exposure to bacterial superantigens induces airway inflammation in
HLA class II transgenic mice. Infect. Immun. 74: 1284 –1296.
65. Schlievert, P. M. 1982. Enhancement of host susceptibility to lethal endotoxin
shock by staphylococcal pyrogenic exotoxin type C. Infect. Immun. 36: 123–128.
66. Wannamaker, L. W., and P. M. Schlievert 1988. Exotoxins of group A streptococci. In Handbook of Natural Toxins: Bacterial Toxins, Vol. 4.
M. C. Hardegree and A. T. Tu, eds. Marcel Dekker, New York, pp. 267–295.
67. Kreiswirth, B. N., J. P. Handley, P. M. Schlievert, and R. P. Novick. 1987.
Cloning and expression of streptococcal pyrogenic exotoxin A and staphylococcal toxic shock syndrome toxin-1 in Bacillus subtilis. Mol. Gen. Genet. 208:
84 – 87.
68. Nauciel, C., J. Blass, R. Mangalo, and M. Raynaud. 1969. Evidence for two
molecular forms of streptococcal erythrogenic toxin: conversion to a single form
by 2-mercaptoethanol. Eur. J. Biochem. 11: 160 –164.
69. Schlievert, P. M. 1988. Immunochemical assays for toxic shock syndrome toxin-1. Methods Enzymol. 165: 339 –344.
70. Bhakdi, S., and J. Tranum-Jensen. 1991. ␣ toxin of Staphylococcus aureus. Microbiol. Rev. 55: 733–751.
71. Halbert, C. L., G. W. Demers, and D. A. Galloway. 1992. The E6 and E7 genes
of human papillomavirus type 6 have weak immortalizing activity in human
epithelial cells. J. Virol. 66: 2125–2134.
72. Kiyono, T., S. A. Foster, J. I. Koop, J. K. McDougall, D. A. Galloway, and
A. J. Klingelhutz. 1998. Both Rb/p16INK4a inactivation and telomerase activity
are required to immortalize human epithelial cells. Nature 396: 84 – 88.
73. Giantonio, B. J., R. K. Alpaugh, J. Schultz, C. McAleer, D. W. Newton,
B. Shannon, Y. Guedez, M. Kotb, L. Vitek, R. Persson, et al. 1997. Superantigenbased immunotherapy: a phase I trial of PNU-214565, a monoclonal antibodystaphylococcal enterotoxin A recombinant fusion protein, in advanced pancreatic
and colorectal cancer. J. Clin. Oncol. 15: 1994 –2007.
74. Shi, Y., J. E. Evans, and K. L. Rock. 2003. Molecular identification of a danger
signal that alerts the immune system to dying cells. Nature 425: 516 –521.
75. Nyberg, S. L., P. M. Schlievert, W. Saul, J. R. Johnson, P. Ferrieri, and
V. S. Watkins. 1995. Successful management of a serious group A streptococcal
infection during the third trimester of pregnancy. Clin. Infect. Dis. 21:
1058 –1059.
76. Squier, C. A., M. J. Kremer, A. Bruskin, A. Rose, and J. D. Haley. 1999. Oral
mucosal permeability and stability of transforming growth factor ␤-3 in vitro.
Pharm. Res. 16: 1557–1563.
77. Ceciliani, F., A. Giordano, and V. Spagnolo. 2002. The systemic reaction during
inflammation: the acute-phase proteins. Protein Pept. Lett. 9: 211–223.
78. Schutyser, E., S. Struyf, and J. Van Damme. 2003. The CC chemokine CCL20
and its receptor CCR6. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 14: 409 – 426.
79. Bromley, S. K., T. R. Mempel, and A. D. Luster. 2008. Orchestrating the orchestrators: chemokines in control of T cell traffic. Nat. Immunol. 9: 970 –980.
80. Brosnahan, A. J., M. M. Schaefers, W. H. Amundson, M. L. Peterson, and
P. M. Schlievert. 2008. Toxic shock syndrome-toxin-1 (TSST-1) amino acid residues required for interaction with human vaginal epithelial cells (HVECs). In
American Society of Microbiology 108th General Meeting Abstracts Book, June
1–5, Boston, MA, pp. 62– 63. ASM Press, Herndon, VA.
Downloaded from http://www.jimmunol.org/ by guest on May 9, 2017
43.
System. M. W. Cunningham and R. S. Fujinami, eds. Lippincott Williams &
Wilkins, Philadelphia, pp. 25–39.
Schlievert, P. M., L. M. Jablonski, M. Roggiani, I. Sadler, S. Callantine,
D. T. Mitchell, D. H. Ohlendorf, and G. A. Bohach. 2000. Pyrogenic toxin superantigen site specificity in toxic shock syndrome and food poisoning in animals. Infect. Immun. 68: 3630 –3634.
Eschenbach, D. A., S. S. Thwin, D. L. Patton, T. M. Hooton, A. E. Stapleton,
K. Agnew, C. Winter, A. Meier, and W. E. Stamm. 2000. Influence of the normal
menstrual cycle on vaginal tissue, discharge, and microflora. Clin. Infect. Dis. 30:
901–907.
Law, S., P. W. Wertz, D. C. Swartzendruber, and C. A. Squier. 1995. Regional
variation in content, composition and organization of porcine epithelial barrier
lipids revealed by thin-layer chromatography and transmission electron microscopy. Arch. Oral Biol. 40: 1085–1091.
Patton, D. L., S. S. Thwin, A. Meier, T. M. Hooton, A. E. Stapleton, and
D. A. Eschenbach. 2000. Epithelial cell layer thickness and immune cell populations in the normal human vagina at different stages of the menstrual cycle.
Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 183: 967–973.
Squier, C. A., and M. J. Kremer. 2001. Biology of oral mucosa and esophagus.
J. Natl. Cancer Inst. Monogr. 7–15.
van der Bijl, P., I. O. Thompson, and C. A. Squier. 1997. Comparative permeability of human vaginal and buccal mucosa to water. Eur. J. Oral Sci. 105:
571–575.
Wertz, P. W., and B. van den Bergh. 1998. The physical, chemical and functional
properties of lipids in the skin and other biological barriers. Chem. Phys. Lipids
91: 85–96.
Thompson, I. O., P. van der Bijl, C. W. van Wyk, and A. D. van Eyk. 2001. A
comparative light-microscopic, electron-microscopic and chemical study of human vaginal and buccal epithelium. Arch. Oral Biol. 46: 1091–1098.
Davis, C. C., M. J. Kremer, P. M. Schlievert, and C. A. Squier. 2003. Penetration
of toxic shock syndrome toxin-1 across porcine vaginal mucosa ex vivo: permeability characteristics, toxin distribution, and tissue damage. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 189: 1785–1791.
Peterson, M. L., K. Ault, M. J. Kremer, A. J. Klingelhutz, C. C. Davis,
C. A. Squier, and P. M. Schlievert. 2005. The innate immune system is activated
by stimulation of vaginal epithelial cells with Staphylococcus aureus and toxic
shock syndrome toxin 1. Infect. Immun. 73: 2164 –2174.
Palmer, M. 2001. The family of thiol-activated, cholesterol-binding cytolysins.
Toxicon 39: 1681–1689.
Bhakdi, S., J. Tranum-Jensen, and A. Sziegoleit. 1985. Mechanism of membrane
damage by streptolysin-O. Infect. Immun. 47: 52– 60.
Palmer, M. 2004. Cholesterol and the activity of bacterial toxins. FEMS Microb.
Lett. 238: 281–289.
Song, L., M. R. Hobaugh, C. Shustak, S. Cheley, H. Bayley, and J. E. Gouaux.
1996. Structure of staphylococcal ␣-hemolysin, a heptameric transmembrane
pore. Science 274: 1859 –1866.
Dragneva, Y., C. D. Anuradha, A. Valeva, A. Hoffmann, S. Bhakdi, and
M. Husmann. 2001. Subcytocidal attack by staphylococcal ␣ toxin activates
NF-␬B and induces interleukin-8 production. Infect. Immun. 69: 2630 –2635.
Ruiz, N., B. Wang, A. Pentland, and M. Caparon. 1998. Streptolysin O and
adherence synergistically modulate proinflammatory responses of keratinocytes
to group A streptococci. Mol. Microbiol. 27: 337–346.
Walev, I., M. Hombach, W. Bobkiewicz, D. Fenske, S. Bhakdi, and M. Husmann.
2002. Resealing of large transmembrane pores produced by streptolysin O in
nucleated cells is accompanied by NF-␬B activation and downstream events.
FASEB J. 16: 237–239.
Kushnaryov, V. M., H. S. MacDonald, R. F. Reiser, and M. S. Bergdoll. 1989.
Reaction of toxic shock syndrome toxin 1 with endothelium of human umbilical
cord vein. Rev Infect. Dis. 11(Suppl 1): S282–S287; discussion S287–S288.
Kushnaryov, V. M., M. S. Bergdoll, H. S. MacDonald, J. Vellinga, and R. Reiser.
1984. Study of staphylococcal toxic shock syndrome toxin in human epithelial
cell culture. J. Infect. Dis. 150: 535–545.
Kushnaryov, V. M., H. S. MacDonald, R. Reiser, and M. S. Bergdoll. 1984.
Staphylococcal toxic shock toxin specifically binds to cultured human epithelial
cells and is rapidly internalized. Infect. Immun. 45: 566 –571.
Lee, P. K., G. M. Vercellotti, J. R. Deringer, and P. M. Schlievert. 1991. Effects
of staphylococcal toxic shock syndrome toxin 1 on aortic endothelial cells. J. Infect. Dis. 164: 711–719.
Aubert, V., D. Schneeberger, A. Sauty, J. Winter, P. Sperisen, J. D. Aubert, and
F. Spertini. 2000. Induction of tumor necrosis factor ␣ and interleukin-8 gene
expression in bronchial epithelial cells by toxic shock syndrome toxin 1. Infect.
Immun. 68: 120 –124.
2373