* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download A Quantum Mechanical Model for Vibration and Rotation of Molecules
Renormalization wikipedia , lookup
Bohr–Einstein debates wikipedia , lookup
Schrödinger equation wikipedia , lookup
Noether's theorem wikipedia , lookup
Renormalization group wikipedia , lookup
Wave function wikipedia , lookup
Scalar field theory wikipedia , lookup
Tight binding wikipedia , lookup
Atomic theory wikipedia , lookup
Franck–Condon principle wikipedia , lookup
Canonical quantization wikipedia , lookup
Wave–particle duality wikipedia , lookup
Rigid rotor wikipedia , lookup
Relativistic quantum mechanics wikipedia , lookup
Particle in a box wikipedia , lookup
Hydrogen atom wikipedia , lookup
Matter wave wikipedia , lookup
Rotational spectroscopy wikipedia , lookup
Symmetry in quantum mechanics wikipedia , lookup
Rotational–vibrational spectroscopy wikipedia , lookup
Molecular Hamiltonian wikipedia , lookup
Theoretical and experimental justification for the Schrödinger equation wikipedia , lookup
3/19/2017 Translational Quantum Mechanical Models of Vibration and Rotation of Molecules Chapter 18 Vibrational Molecular Energy Molecular Motions Rotational Electronic … Vibrations of Molecules: Model approximates molecules to atoms joined by springs. A vibration (one type of – a normal mode of vibration) of a CH2 moiety would look like; Frequency of vibration – classical approach Water (3) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1uE2lvVkKW0 CO2 (4) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W5gimZlFY6I O2 (1) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5QC4OVadKHs http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Molecular_vibration The motions are considered as harmonic oscillators. For a molecule of N atoms there are 3N-6 normal modes (nonlinear) or 3N-5 (linear). 1 3/19/2017 During a molecular vibration the motion of the atoms are with respect to the center of mass, and the center of mass is stationary as far as the vibration is concerned. Vibrational motion - harmonic oscillator, KE and PE – classical approach Center of mass, does not move. Diatomics: This concept is true for all normal modes of vibrations of molecules. Force constant of spring = k Working with center of mass coordinates simplifies the solution. Center of mass coordinates Whether pulled apart or pushed together from the equilibrium position, the spring resists the motion by an opposing force. Second Law reduced mass, µ; Solutions (general) of the DE will be of the form; ∼ Use Euler’s Formula µ Spring extension of a mass µ from it’s equilibrium position. The physical picture changes from masses (m1 and m2) connected by a spring (force constant k) to a reduced mass, µ, connected by a spring (same k) to an immovable wall. where b1 = c1 + c2 and b2 = i (c1 − c2 ) 2 3/19/2017 Amplitudes are real numbers, b1 and b2 are real or = 0. and to find T period: Applying the BC, at t = 0; x(0) = 0, v(0) = v0. =1 ⇒ Frequency; ν = 1 T a v=0 Therefore: x=0 = -a v = v0 v=0 angular velocity =ω = k µ where ν = frequency = 2πν α = phase angle General equation; Energy terms (KE, PE) are; 1 1 KE = µ v 2 PE = kx 2 2 2 where v and x are velocity and position (displacement from equilibrium). α =π / 2 α ≠0 No restriction on E values, classically. Study Example Problem 18.1 3 3/19/2017 4 3/19/2017 Harmonic oscillator potential function http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5QC4OVadKHs Harmonic oscillator potential function Morse curve Similar for low energy situations ~ ground state https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3RqEIr8NtMI Our interest is to model the oscillatory motion of the diatomic molecule (relative motions of atoms). Also – of interest kinetic and potential energy of the diatomic molecule during the oscillatory motion. Not necessarily the energies of individual atoms of the molecule. The ultimate goal is to find the (eigen) energies and the eigen functions (wavefunction) of the vibrational states of the diatomic by solving the Schrödinger equation; At room temperature the potential function very closely follow the quadratic function. Vibrational motion is equivalent to a particle of mass µ, vibrating about its equilibrium distance, r0. How can a particle like that be described by a set of wave functions. x ,x r0 Recipe to Construct the Schrodinger equation 1. Expression for total energy (classical) 2. Construct the total energy Operator, the Hamiltonian, by expressing KE in terms of momentum operator and mass, PE in terms of position operator. 3. Setup the Schrodinger equation, eigenequation ψ = Eψ . H 5 3/19/2017 1. Expression for total vibrational energy, Etot ,vib = KE + PE = = 1 2 1 2 µ v + kx 2 2 3. Set the Schrodinger equation, eigenequation ψ = Eψ H p2 1 2 + kx 2µ 2 2. Construct the total energy Operator, the Hamiltonian Solutions (i.e. normalized wavefunctions, eigenfunctions) of which are; 2 = 1 p 2 + 1 k ɵx 2 = 1 iℏ d + 1 kx 2 H 2µ 2 2 µ dx 2 With the normalization constant The first six Hermite polynomials H n (α 1/ 2 x ) = Hermite polynomials n = vibrational quantum number Hermite polynomials : H n ( z ) = ( −1)n e z 2 d n − z2 e dz n 6 3/19/2017 The first few wavefunctions, ψ n (n = 0,..4) The first few wavefunctions (n = 0,..3) The respective eigen energies are; Note: the resemblance to 1D box non-infinite potential well results. zpe Equal energy gaps are equal in contrast to 1D box case. The first few wavefunctions, ψ n2 (n = 0,..4) The constraint imposed on the particle by a spring results in zero point energy. The energy values of vibrational states are precisely known, but the position of the particles (as described by the amplitude) is imprecise, only a probability ] ≠ 0. density ψ2(x) of x can be stated, [ɵx, H Note the resemblance to 1D box. Note: the overflow of the wave function (forbidden) of the wavefunction beyond the potential barrier wall. 7 3/19/2017 At high quantum numbers n (high energy limit) the system gets closer to a classical system (red - probability of x in q.m. oscillator, blue - probability of x classical oscillator). n = 12 n >>0 high high low high low high Blue to black, a particle in a barrel classical model. Rotational energies of a classical rigid rotor (diatomic). In vibrational motion, velocity, acceleration and momentum are parallel to the direction of motion. In the center of mass coordinate system, rigid rotor motion equivalent to a mass of µ moving in a circle of radius r0 (= bond length, constant) with an angular velocity ω and a tangential velocity v. Rotation in 2D (on a plane) y r0 No opposing force to rotation – no PE (stored of energy) term. All energy = KE. ∼ x r0 8 3/19/2017 p = linear momentum Acceleration in the radial direction Angular velocity vector Angular velocity ω and angular acceleration α, r0 Mass with constant ω makes α = 0. RHR Tangential linear velocity, Angular velocity (~ momentum) vector normal to the plane of motion. (coming out of the plane) QM Angular momentum (2D): p ω= l=r×p angular momentum Magnitude of l = l = I, moment of inertia The rotation on the x,y plane (2D) occurs freely. Equivalently the particle of mass µ= moves on the circle (constant radius r = r0) freely; Epot = V(x,y) = 0 φ = 90o Etot , rot = KE + PE = KE = r ⇒ p= Energy Rotational: 2E I l r p2 2µ p 2 ℏ2 ∂2 ∂2 H= =− 2+ 2 2µ 2µ ∂x ∂y SE: Classical rotor - no restriction on l (or E. 9 3/19/2017 l 0 < φ < 2π 0 <θ <π r2sinθ dθ dφ dr r p µ r l In polar coordinates (variable is φ): BC: Φ(φ ) = Φ(φ + 2π ) BC: Φ(φ ) = Φ(φ + 2π ) Rotational eigenfunction. e iml φ = e iml (φ + 2π ) e iml φ = e iml (φ + 2π ) = e imlφ e iml 2 π General solution for DE), wavefunctions: i.e. e iml 2π = 1 Using the Euler’s Formula ml = integer clockwise counter-clockwise rotation rotation ml = rotational quantum number, quantization, next page Now; cos( 2π ml ) + i sin( 2π ml ) = 1 cos( 2π ml ) = 1 real number Therefore ml = 0 , ±1, ±2,.. . Note: One boundary condition leads to one q.n., ml. 10 3/19/2017 Normalization constant A +φ; 2π ∫Φ BC: Φ(φ ) = Φ(φ + 2π ) e =e i.e. e − iml ( φ + 2 π ) − iml 2 π =e − i ml φ e (φ )Φ ml (φ )dφ = 1 0 2π Normalization condition e − imlφ = e − iml (φ + 2 π ) − iml φ * ml − iml 2 π A+2φ ∫e − imlφ + imlφ e dφ = 1 0 2π =1 A+2φ ∫ dφ = 1 A+2φ ( 2π ) = 1 0 Now; cos( − 2π ml ) + i sin( − 2π ml ) = 1 thus cos( 2π ml ) = 1 A+φ = real num ber 1 2π Therefore ml = 0, ±1, ±2 ,... Normalization constant A ±φ; Φ ± (φ ) = 2π Normalization condition * ∫ Φ ml (φ )Φ ml (φ )dφ = 1 1 2π e± imlφ Rotational wave function 0 2π A±2φ ∓ im φ ± im φ ∫ e l e l dφ = 1 ml is an integer. 0 2π A±2φ ∫ dφ = 1 0 A±φ 1 = 2π real part A±2φ ( 2π ) = 1 Φ + (φ ) = 1 2π e + imlφ = 1 2π ( cos mlφ + i sin mlφ ) Stationary state - exist Same regardless of ml value. 11 3/19/2017 Φ ± (φ ) = 1 2π 1 e± imlφ 2π 1 2π 1 Non-stationary state - Unacceptable wavefunction, annihilates Energy of rotational states: Φ ± (φ ) = 1 2π 2π 2π 1 cos 3φ 2π 1 cos 5φ 2π e ± imlφ E= ω= ω= Note; No non-zero ZPE. ZPE appears if the potential energy confinement exists, not here ( V(φ)=0) 1 cos φ Degenerate states - two fold degenerate (of equal energy) l 2 2µ r02 = l 2 2I = cos 2φ cos 4φ cos 6φ 1 2 Iω 2 2E and angular momentum l = I ω I 2 Eml I = 2 2 ℏ 2 ml2 ℏml Eml = = I I 2I I ml being an integer, rotational frequency ω will take finite values. – discrete set of rotational frequencies !! For 2D rotor, l = lz. 12 3/19/2017 The wavefunctions, …. of a rigid rotor are similar to the wavefunctions of a free particle restricted to a circle (particle in a ring)! For a rigid rotor, angular momentum lies in the z direction. Angular momentum z component operator; y ɵl z = −iℏ ∂ ∂φ z x ,ɵl z ] = 0 Note: for 2D rigid rotor [ H Angular Momentum – 2D rigid rotor. Operator: p ɵl z = −iℏ ∂ ∂φ Both operators has the same eigenfunctions. angular analogue of momentum Φ ± (φ ) = 1 2π e ± imlφ wave functions r Hence angular momentum (z component) for this case can be precisely measured. But the position, here represented by φ, cannot be measured precisely; the probability for any interval of dφ is the same, [φɵ,ɵl z ] ≠ 0 Angular momentum (in z direction) is quantized!! ,ɵl z ] = 0 , ɵl z have same Φ, [ H Note: for 2D rigid rotor both H 13 3/19/2017 QM Angular momentum (3D): Particle on a circle (2D). r r0 l r0 2D ≡ r 3D Classical 3D rotor Particle on the surface of a sphere (3D). PE confinement – none; V(θ,φ) = 0 Set PE operator set to zero. E = KE + PE = KE Particle of mass µ on the surface of a sphere of radius r. Just the steps in solving the SE for rigid rotor a. collect the constants: KE (energy) operator for rotor in polar coordinates: note b. multiply by sin2θ, rearrange to get rot = H SE: rot Note the form of H Differentiation only w.r.t.; θ Therefore Wavefunction; φ ;separation of variables possible. spherical harmonic functions 14 3/19/2017 c. substitute for Y(θ,φ) divide by Θ(θ)Φ(φ), we get solutions ⇓ Because each side of the equation depends only one of the variables and the equality exists for all values of the variables, both sides must be equal to a constant. BC leads to q.n.; spherical harmonic functions written in more detail would take the form: solutions ⇓ BC leads to more q.n.; Energy of degenerate states of q. n. l : For a given q.n. l there are (2l +1), ml values. That is the state described by a l quantum number is comprised of (2l+1) sub-states of equal energy. β= 2 µ r02 E 2 I = 2 E = l (l + 1) ℏ2 ℏ El = ℏ2 l (l + 1) 2I quantization of rotational energy Degeneracy of state with q. n. l, is 2l+1. 15 3/19/2017 Eigen-energy: El = ℏ2 l (l + 1) 2I Quantization of Angular Momentum As will be seen later, the shapes, directional properties and degeneracy of atomic orbitals are dependent on the q.n. l and ml vales associated with these orbitals. Verifiable in SE: rot H Spherical harmonics are eigen functions of the total rotational energy operator. All ml states of a 3D rotor has the same energy, El ! (degenerate) ɵl 2 l2 For 3D rotor; Etot = ⇒ H= 2I 2I Constant for rotor. Therefore both operators have a common set of eigenfunctions. The operators should commute! the quantum number ml determines the z-component of the angular momentum vector l. ,ɵl 2 ] = 0 [H Components of the angular momentum in x, y and z. Now; The respective operators are (Cartesian coordinates): and therefore Note that the above operators differ only by the multiplication constant (1/2I), thus the eigen values differ ɵ2 by (1/2I). = l H 2I Also note the calculated (and measurable) angular momentum quantity (of precise (eigen) value) is that of | l2 | (therefore |l|). l = ℏ l (l + 1) 16 3/19/2017 The following commutator relationships exist. The respective operators are in spherical coordinates would be: ≠0 = f (θ , φ ) The component operators do not commute with one another = f (φ ) As a result the direction of vector l cannot be specified (known) ‘precisely’ for rotations in 3D in QM systems as opposed to classical 2D rigid rotors. Need to know all vectors at the same time to specify direction of vector l. However, angular momentum wavefunction is an eigenfunction of the Hamiltonian too and therefore, ɵ2 = l H 2I Conclusion – Spherical harmonics are eigenfunctions of l2 and lz . Magnitudes of both |l| and lz can be known simultaneously and precisely, but not the x and the z component values of the angular momentum vector, l . Examining lz; 2 Note/ [ɵl , ɵl z ] = 0 show explicitly: !!! l z = ml ℏ 17 3/19/2017 The Picture: Vector model of angular momentum , l2 and l commute and l , l and l do not commute. H z x y z Example l = 2 case. l = ℏ with one another. Example l = 2 case. | l |= l (l + 1)ℏ lz = ml ℏ 2ℏ ℏ ml = +2 18 3/19/2017 Spatial quantization ml = +2 Vector model of angular momentum Spherical harmonic wavefunctions and their shapes: l=0 l=1 l=2 Complex functions - visualization – not possible. 19