* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Abigail Rousseau
No-SCAR (Scarless Cas9 Assisted Recombineering) Genome Editing wikipedia , lookup
Gene therapy of the human retina wikipedia , lookup
Cancer epigenetics wikipedia , lookup
Therapeutic gene modulation wikipedia , lookup
Genetic testing wikipedia , lookup
Genome evolution wikipedia , lookup
Gene therapy wikipedia , lookup
Behavioural genetics wikipedia , lookup
Vectors in gene therapy wikipedia , lookup
Neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis wikipedia , lookup
Nutriepigenomics wikipedia , lookup
Polycomb Group Proteins and Cancer wikipedia , lookup
History of genetic engineering wikipedia , lookup
Genetic engineering wikipedia , lookup
Site-specific recombinase technology wikipedia , lookup
Designer baby wikipedia , lookup
Microevolution wikipedia , lookup
Medical genetics wikipedia , lookup
Genome editing wikipedia , lookup
Oncogenomics wikipedia , lookup
A Study of Genetic Susceptibility to Hodgkin’s Lymphoma in a Cohort of Families Abi Rousseau Cheshire and Merseyside Regional Molecular Genetics Laboratory Lymphoma Cancer of the lymphatic system Broadly subdivided into non-Hodgkin’s and Hodgkin’s Hodgkin’s defined by: Reed-Sternberg cells Hodgkin cells Lymphoma Cancer of the lymphatic system Broadly subdivided into non-Hodgkin’s and Hodgkin’s Hodgkin’s defined by: Reed-Sternberg cells Hodgkin cells Lymphoma Cancer of the lymphatic system Broadly subdivided into non-Hodgkin’s and Hodgkin’s Hodgkin’s defined by: Reed-Sternberg cells Hodgkin cells Clinical Features Lymphodenopathy Other symptoms: Significant weight loss Itchy skin Recurrent fevers Drenching night sweats Fatigue Increased sensitivity to alcohol Incidence Rare – accounts for 5% of all cancers diagnosed in UK Cancer Research UK figures for 2006: 1611 new cases – incidence 2.7/100,000 Bimodal age distribution Causes Environmental Developed countries show higher incidence than developing countries Study of incidence trends among Chinese immigrants to British Columbia supports an environmental influence (Au et al, 2004) Impact of environmental risk factors such as smoking and diet – weak and inconsistent evidence Clustering 31 cases connected by common contacts in Albany, New York (Vianna et al, 1971 & 1972) Lacked control group and results not replicated in similar studies Causes continued Viral Epstein-Barr Virus (EBV) infection in ~50% of cases Localised to HRS cells HRS cells arise from B cells that have acquired disadvantageous mutations – rescued from apoptosis by EBV infection 3 viral proteins expressed: EBNA1, LMP1 and LMP2A Causes continued Genetic Reports of familial HL (Robertson et al, 1987) Risk of HL higher in individuals with a family history of the condition (Razis et al, 1959) Risk of developing HL higher in gender concordant siblings (Grufferman et al, 1977) Increased risk in monozygotic twins (Mack et al, 1995) HL co-occurring with congenital genetic disorders, e.g. LWD 3 families with multiple cases Family 1 Family 2 MP HD116 CP HD141.2 SP HD141 EW HD141.1 JP HD105 Family 3 IC KK746.1 JC KK746.2 HL JC KK746 PL HD115 Aims of this study Analyse affected members of each family for copy number variation using oligo arrayCGH BlueGnome Cytochip Oligo 4x44K and 2x105K 4x44K – 350Kb genome wide backbone 2x105K – 150Kb genome wide backbone Investigate any shared regions of copy number variation for potential candidate genes or regulatory elements for Hodgkin’s lymphoma susceptibility Family 1 results – 1p21.2 deletion Disrupts 3’ end of OLFM3 Family 1 - Discussion OLFM3 Encodes olfactomedin 3, expressed in ocular tissues, brain, kidney and lung May play a role in pathogenesis of glaucoma and other ocular disorders Does an ocular disorder co-segregate with Hodgkin’s in this family? More clinical information and DNA from further family members required to investigate significance Family 2 results 4q28.1 duplication 18p11.31 duplication Family 2 - Discussion 4q28.1 No genes disrupted 2 predicted CTCF binding sites 18p11.31 1 predicted CTCF binding site TGIF – transforming growth interacting factor Represses transcription of EBNA1 (essential for replication of EBV genome) EBV- related genetic susceptibility?? Further work required to elucidate targets of the CTCF binding sites Family 3 results – 7q36.3 deletion Discussion – Family 3 CNPY1 Interacts with FGFR1 and ACTRII FGFR1 upregulated in various cancers Reduction of canopy1 would lead to downregulation of FGFR1 ACTRII loss of function mutations – colorectal cancer More clinical information and DNA from further family members required to investigate significance Summary HL is rare and familial HL accounts for only a small proportion of cases Familial HL may be genetic, viral, environmental or a combination Hodgkin’s likely to be heterogeneous In each family disruption of a gene or CTCF binding site has been identified Findings need to be confirmed by another method Further studies required Acknowledgments Liverpool Molecular Genetics David Gokhale Vicky Stinton Roger Mountford Kym Spencer Katrina Smith Anna Topping Una Maye G Malcolm Taylor Adiba Hussain BlueGnome Ltd William Ferguson Cancer Immunogenetics Group, Manchester Liverpool Cytogenetics NGRL, Manchester David Chrimes Sheffield Cytogenetics Simon Webster References Au W.Y. et al. (2004). Hodgkin’s lymphoma in Chinese migrants to British Columbia: a 25 year survey. Annals of Oncology 15: 626-630 Vianna N.J. et al (1972). Hodgkin’s disease: Cases with features of a community outbreak. Annals of Internal Medicine, 77(2): 169-180 Küppers R (2009). The biology of hodgkin’s lymphoma. Nature Reviews Cancer 9(1): 15-27 Robertson S.J. et al (1987. Familial Hodgkin’s Disease. Cancer 59: 1314-1319 Razis D.V. et al (1959). Familial Hodgkin’s disease: its significance and implications. Annals of Internal Medicine 51: 933-971 Grufferman S. et al (1977). Hodgkin’s disease in siblings. NEJM 296: 248-250 Mack T.M. et al (1995). Concordance for Hodgkin’s disease in identical twins suggesting genetic susceptibility to the youngadult form of the disease. NEJM 332: 413-418 Gokhale D.A. et al (1995). Molecular genetic analysis of a family with a history of Hodgkin’s disease and dyschrondrosteosis. Leukemia 9: 826-833 Bao L. et al (2007). CTCFBSDB: a CTCF-binding site database for characterisation of vertebrate genomic insulators. Nucleic Acids Research 36: D83-D87 Goldin L.R. et al (2005). A genome screen of families at high risk for Hodgkin lymphoma: evidence for a susceptibility gene on chromosome 4. Journal of Medical Genetics 42: 595-601 Joos S. et al (2000). Genomic imbalances including amplification of the tyrosine kinase gene JAK2 in CD30+ Hodgkin cells. Cancer Research 60: 549-552 Torrado M. et al (2002). Optimedin: a novel olfactomedin-related protein that interacts with myocilin. Human Molecular Genetics 11: 1291-1301 Liang C.L. et al (2000). Transcription of Epstein-Barr virus-encoded nuclear antigen 1 promoter Qp is repressed by transforming growth factor-beta via Smad4 binding element in human BL cells. Virology 277(1): 184-192 Hirate Y. et al (2006). Canopy1, a novel regulator of FGF signalling around the midbrain-hindbrain boundary in zebrafish. Current Biology 16: 421-427 Olaru A. et al (2003). Loss of heterozygosity and mutational analyses of the ACTRII gene locus in human colorectal tumors. Laboratory Investigation 83(12): 1867-1871