* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download aproaches-revision-book
Father absence wikipedia , lookup
Psychometrics wikipedia , lookup
Cyberpsychology wikipedia , lookup
Cognitive science wikipedia , lookup
Buddhism and psychology wikipedia , lookup
Classical conditioning wikipedia , lookup
Index of psychology articles wikipedia , lookup
Psychological injury wikipedia , lookup
Psychological behaviorism wikipedia , lookup
Theoretical psychology wikipedia , lookup
Cultural psychology wikipedia , lookup
Social psychology wikipedia , lookup
Operant conditioning wikipedia , lookup
Behaviorism wikipedia , lookup
Educational psychology wikipedia , lookup
Abnormal psychology wikipedia , lookup
Developmental psychology wikipedia , lookup
International psychology wikipedia , lookup
Behaviour therapy wikipedia , lookup
Conservation psychology wikipedia , lookup
Humanistic psychology wikipedia , lookup
Vladimir J. Konečni wikipedia , lookup
Subfields of psychology wikipedia , lookup
Music psychology wikipedia , lookup
Cross-cultural psychology wikipedia , lookup
Freud's psychoanalytic theories wikipedia , lookup
Experimental psychology wikipedia , lookup
PYB1 Approaches in Psychology Revision Booklet AS Level A Brief History Of Psychology The word psychology originates from 2 Greek words: Psyche meaning soul/mind (there was no distinction between the two) Logos meaning study of. The most common explanation of what psychology is was put forward by Atkinson et al (1991). He suggested that psychology is ‘The scientific study of behaviour and mental processes.’ Psychology was born out of Philosophy. In ancient Greece two forms of philosophy were invented: Empiricism- Concerned with observation and experience Logical Deductive Methods- Concerned with gaining knowledge by reasoned thinking. 1530 The word psychology first used by a German theologian called Philipp Melanchton. 17th Century Hobbes maintained that all impressions originated from sensory experience. Lock described the infant mind as a blank slate and ideas and images entered the mind through perception. Descartes influenced psychology by maintaining that the mind and the body were separate entities. 19th Century Weber, Muller, Fechner and Helmholtz began using experimental methods to study sensory experience and reaction times. In 1879 Wundt set up an experimental lab, he attempted to study the structure of the mind through a process called introspection. (See next section) 20th Century A number of different schools of psychology developed. Psychodynamic – Freud, Jung and Erickson Behaviourism – Watson, Pavlov, Skinner Cognitive – The Gestalt psychologists Humanistic – Rogers and Maslow The Beginning of Modern Psychology The Key Influences Wilhelm Wundt (1832-1920) Structuralism Wundt was a pioneer in the late 1870’s, inspired by the work of Weber, Fechner and Helmholtz he adapted scientific methods to study psychology. In 1879 he opened the first psychology lab in Leipzig, Germany. This event heralded the beginning of psychology, as a science in it’s own right. Prior to this it was a branch of philosophy. Introspection Wundt claimed that the only person who can study experience is the person that is having the experience. The method must involve introspection (internal perception). He trained his psychologists to report on their own mental processes as they experience an object or event, by following the 4 rules below. 1. Observers must be able to determine when a process is to be introduced. 2. Observers must be in a state of readiness. 3. It must be possible to repeat the observation. 4. Experimental conditions must be capable of variation. Wundt tested various elements of experience by stimulating the senses. He categorised 4 senses. Visual Auditory Tactile Taste and Olfactory Criticisms of Structuralism Self-report cannot be trusted because many people have disturbed minds. Much behaviour is not consciously driven (so not measurable) Not generalisable as it is based on ideographic analysis. Even though his ideas and methods have not stood the test of time much progress was made as a result of people challenging his ideas. Without Wundt we psychology may not be a science. Charles Darwin (1809-1882) Functionalism Functionalists were concerned with the purposes or functions of mental processes. Darwin’s main theory was that of natural selection. He claims that organisms that are most suited to their environment survive and those that are not are eliminated. He proved that this accounted for the variations in species from the same origin. All variability is inherited from parents. Darwin talked of a continuous struggle that was happening in nature. Survival must be the driving force in nature. Another of Darwin’s theories of interest to psychologists was that of humans developing from lower order mammals such as apes. This emphasised the similarities between animal and human processes. Darwin paved the way for animal research being generalised to humans. The Influence of Darwin on Psychology The similarity between human and animal functioning led scientists to investigate animal mental functioning. Which introduced a new subject into the psych lab- Animal psychology. Psychology became more concerned with the effect of the environment. Darwin’s theory broadened psychological methodology by introducing animal observation. This had never been done before. Because of the differences in species identified by Darwin, psychologists began to study individual differences. Sigmund Freud (1856-1939) Psychoanalysis He started to develop his theory around 1900. Freud was interested in the relationship between childhood development and aspects of adult functioning. For him, the unconscious mind is central, and he believed hat much of our behaviour is influenced by material deep in our unconscious. Freud developed the therapy of psychoanalysis. The theory and approach was based on information provided by patients who came to see him. Freud’s theory is known as a very grand theory as it covers a lot of different aspects of human experience and behaviour. He has something to say about personality, aggression, moral behaviour, mental disorders, memory – the list is virtually endless. The key influence is that the approach covers such an extensive range of areas, and therefore is still talked about today. (See Psychodynamic approach later on) Carl Rogers (1902-1987) Humanism Rogers created the third force in psychology. He introduced the humanistic approach as a direct response to the ideas of Skinner and Freud. He thought that Freud’s ideas on human nature were very pessimistic, with people being seen as at the mercy of unconscious forces over which they have no control, and with there developmental pathway already laid down after childhood. Skinner’s belief that all behaviour was determined by environmental events also seemed both pessimistic and mechanistic. In contrast to these two theories, he suggested that people have the capacity to think about their lives, decide how they would like to develop, and are capable of making positive changes. Development arises from choices made by the individual. The focus of the psychologist should therefore be on the individual and his or her experiences. The main influence is that Rogers challenged the big guns of the time (Freud, Skinner) with a more person centred approach. Focussing on the conscious individual. (See humanistic approach later on) Psychology as a science Psychology is often described as the science of mind and behaviour, For something to be defined as a science it has to have A definable subject matter Hypothesis testing Objectivity Some would say that psychology was no more that common sense. Psychology vs. Common sense It may seem questionable whether psychology has much to tell us which is not just a matter of common sense. After all, we all observe people and draw conclusions about what people are like from what we see. We seem to understand people quite well without the aid of psychology. The difference being that psychology can be thought of as organised common sense. It can provide evidence of common sense theories, and can take a wider perspective than the individual. Also the findings of psychologists can contradict common sense ideas. For example common sense would say, if you punish someone they would not do it again. We know this in spite of prisons being full of reoffenders. Common sense is Subjective Opinion is based on values, attitudes, feelings and interpretation. Scientific approach is Objective It relies on a collection of data without feelings, values or attitudes being involved. From this there will be a formulation of Hypotheses Formal Psychology Professional Scientific Informal Psychology Amateur Non scientific The Psychodynamic Approach Key Figures- Sigmund Freud, Carl Jung Main assumptions All psychology is pre-determined The unconscious plays a very important role in motivating our behaviour Childhood plays an important role in determining adult behaviour Psychological determinism- all behaviour is motivated, and the reasons we behave in certain ways are unconscious. The unconscious- this was not a new idea, but before Freud, it was looked at as a dumping ground for experiences that were no longer important. Freud saw the unconscious as an active force, motivating much of our behaviour. He included this in his concept of the structure of the mind. Childhood- Freud saw instinctual needs such as hunger, thirst and sex as being very important sources of motivation; at the same time; however, he thought that the social environment, which constrains the gratification of these instincts, was crucial to a child’s development. The structure of the mind Freud separated the mind into 3 areas: The ID- The id is present at birth. It is the seat of our instincts, and is unconscious. It operates on the pleasure principle, in that it tries to get immediate gratification and to avoid pain. It is the source of psychic energy, the libido. EGO- This develops in childhood out of the id, as children learn that immediate gratification is not always possible and that pain cannot always be avoided. The ego works on the reality principle. It decides what actions are appropriate, and which id impulses will be satisfied and how. The ego tries to balance the demands of the id, the realities of life, and the demands of the superego. Many ego processes are conscious, but some are preconscious and others, especially the ego defences we shall come to later, are unconscious. Superego-This consists of the values and morals of the child, and develops around the age of five. It is the child’s conscience and ego ideal, a model of what the child would be like to be. The forces of the superego are often in conflict with the id. The ego has the job of balancing the two forces. This is not always possible. When conflict arises the mind uses defence mechanisms to avoid anxiety and pain. Defence Mechanisms Displacement- When we can’t express our feelings at the intended target, we substitute objects on which feelings can be taken out. Denial- When something is so painful it is not consciously acknowledged. (I.e. life threatening illness is not accepted) Repression- This is motivated forgetting, we forget things that are too painful to remember. Regression- Involves a symbolic return to an earlier stage of development, for example, sucking your thumb to comfort yourself. Psychosexual development This is how Freud described childhood development. Everyone goes through these stages in the same order, and their experience of them is crucial not only in childhood but in adulthood. Interest is focussed on pleasure gained from particular areas. Oral Stage- Birth to 1 year Source of pleasure is the mouth. Anal Stage- 1 year to 3 years Source of pleasure is from the expulsion and retention of faeces Phallic Stage- 3 years to 5 years Source of pleasure centres on the genitals This is where the Oedipus and Electra complex can arise. Latency Stage- 5 years to Puberty Children turn aside from their sexuality and focus on social and intellectual development. Genital Stage- Puberty onwards Recognisably adult sexual desires become apparent and mature feelings of love come about. If the child experiences frustration or gratification during any of these stages Fixation can occur, this can show itself in adult life. E.g. anal stage fixation can lead to being an anally retentive person, unusually tidy and organised. Critical Evaluation Freud’s theories inspired more research and allowed psychology to move on. Freud has got evidence that psychoanalysis works as a therapy (little Hans case study) Freud only worked from case study this lacks experimental validity and so cannot be replicated or proved under scientific conditions. It could be argued that Freud looked to prove his own theory because he was the only person performing the research. This termed experimenter bias. Some psychologists such as Rogers would argue that psychological predetermination is a little cold. It doesn’t give the person control over own actions. Human beings are always at the mercy of the past. Freud was not objective so the research cannot be generalised. The Behaviourist Approach Key Figures- John Watson, Ivan Pavlov, B.F.Skinner Main Assumptions Psychology is viewed, as an objective natural science therefore the only factor worth studying is measurable observable behaviour. There is no distinction between animals and humans therefore animals can be tested on and the results generalised to humans. All behaviour can be learned through conditioning. Emphasis on how environmental factors affect behaviour. Classical Conditioning This was first mentioned in 1927 by the Russian physiologist Pavlov; he was studying the salivatory reactions in dogs. He was mainly interested in the process of stimulus and response. Experimentation with the dog led to the discovery of classical conditioning. Pavlov’s Dog Experiment Stage 1 Before learning Stage 2 During Learning Stage 3 After Learning Food Unconditioned stimulus Bell Conditioned stimulus Food UCS Bell Conditioned Stimulus Salivation Unconditioned Response Salivation Unconditioned Response Salivation Conditioned Response Pavlov found that the dog learned an association between the bell and the food. Therefore when the bell rang in stage three the dog assumed food was on the way and salivation was induced. Watson’s Little Albert Case Study Watson and Raynor conditioned a fear in a young baby using classical conditioning. Albert was a placid baby and he had a pet white rat that he was very fond of, whenever he played with the rat Watson made a loud noise behind the child. This produced a fear reaction (crying). This process was repeated over and over until Albert associated the fear response with the rat. Operant Conditioning According to operant conditioning we learn because of the consequences of our actions, if we do something that brings pleasant consequences then we are more likely to do it again. On the other hand if we do something that brings about unpleasant consequences then we are less likely to do it again. Thorndike (1874-1949) began studying reinforcement with a puzzle box for cats. He found that if the cat was reinforced then it was quicker to escape. This research was continued by Skinner (1904-1990), who devised the Skinner box. An animal would show typical behaviour in that it tried to escape. Whilst escaping it may accidentally push a lever and would be rewarded with a pellet of food. This action would bring about positive reinforcement. 3 Types of consequences for behaviour Positive reinforcement- strengthens behaviour by presenting something pleasurable as a reward e.g. food. Negative reinforcement- strengthens behaviour that avoids something unpleasant (avoidance learning) Punishment – weakens behaviour by presenting something unpleasant e.g. electric shock. Differences between classical and operant conditioning Classical Conditioning Operant Conditioning Deals with involuntary behaviour Deals with voluntary behaviour. Reinforcement strengthens conditioned response but is neutralit works whether the human/animal likes it or not. Reinforcement strengthens the conditioned response and is either positive or negative. The stimulus comes before the conditioned response in each case. Reinforcement is always given after the voluntary behaviour has been performed- and either strengthens or weakens behaviour. A stimulus can only ever trigger one type of behaviour. A reinforcer can be used to strengthen many different types of behaviour using different behaviour shaping techniques. Shows generalisation, discrimination, extinction and spontaneous recovery. Same as classical conditioning. Relies on the linking or association of stimuli and response. Same as classical conditioning. Critical evaluation Highly experimental, research can be generalised, as it is free from bias. The approach explains a lot of aspects of human behaviour using only a few basic principles. Behaviourism has produced many practical applications, especially in the treatment of phobias. Behaviourism is reductionist (it reduces very complex human behaviour to a simple set of stimulus-response links) Behaviourism is deterministic; we are completely at the mercy of our environment. (Contrast with humanism) Behaviourism ignores mental processes assuming all behaviour is down to experience. (Contrast with cognitive) It can be seen as too scientific, it de-humanises the subject and the results can sometimes only demonstrate artificial rather than natural learning. The Humanistic Approach Key Figures- Carl Rogers Main Assumptions The main point of importance is the experiences of the being human. With the focus on subjective experiences of the world. It is a holistic approach. Meaning we should look at the person as a whole and not as a series of psychological functions and processes. We all have Personal agency. In most situations we are aware of having a choice. The approach centres on personal growth. The personal growth is identified in Maslow’s hierarchy of needs shown below. He suggested there is a range of human needs and these had to be satisfied before progression can take place. Humanistic psychology is considered the third force in psychology as it developed in direct competition with previous approaches. Humanists question the pessimistic view that humans are at the mercy of the environment claiming that we all have choices and as humans we are consciously aware of them. Humanists disagree with structured scientific testing arguing that the experience of being human is the important measure. Like Freud humanistic psychologists use case studies and introspective data. Client Centred Therapy Carl Rogers developed this therapy; this is a talking therapy and is nondirective, as the therapist does not suggest how the client may wish to change, but by listening an mirroring back what the client tells them, helps them to explore these possibilities for themselves, and decide what kinds of changes they would like to make. Rogers believed that people are generally good, and had a generally optimistic view of human nature, he was aware that we all have the capacity for more negative behaviour. However he believed in the recognition of choice. These choices depend on social conditioning. The presence of social conditioning suggests that choices are not entirely free. Negative elements brought about by social conditioning cause people to become neurotic and what Rogers calls incongruent, in that the self that has developed and is shown in behaviour is not the true self. Rogers believed that if a child only receives conditional positive regard (behaviour is praised according to expectations of others) self esteem is affected and there is conflict between the child’s idea of self-concept and ideal self. Rather unconditional positive regard should be present (parents love their child regardless of behaviour) in order for the ideal self to be reached. If anxiety or depression is present it must be due to a conflict between selfconcept and ideal self. Through CCT Roger’s claimed that this conflict can be resolved by helping the client to recognise choice and to make those changes. Critical Evaluation (Add this to evaluation on Humanism Sheet) Humanistic Psychology has been criticised for overemphasising the possibilities for change. It downplays social and cultural constraints that affect everyone’s behaviour. The Cognitive Approach Key players- Any memory, perception or attention psychologist Main Assumptions People are like machines (parallels can be drawn between computer processors and the brain). All memory processes can and should be investigated scientifically. Models of psychological functions can be proposed and tested by observable behaviour and conscious report. Humans are not passive responders to their environment, there has to be some process between stimulus and response. The Information Processing Approach The development of the computer in the 50’s and 60’s allowed psychologists a metaphor to which they could compare human mental processes. The computer codes info, stores info, uses info and then produces and output. Cog psychologists adopted this as a model of how human thought worked. E.G. Eye receives visual info and codes that info into neural activity, which is fed back to the brain in an area called the visual cortex. The info can be used by other parts of the brain that relates to memory, perception and attention. The output might be what you see on a printed page. Critical Evaluation The approach is over simplistic; it ignores the complexity of human function. Lacks ecological validity. It can be regarded, as a cold approach humans are not really machines. It ignores biology. Cog psychologists are criticised for tending to ignore the physical and social environment in which we live. The focus of thinking may be regarded as remote and not take account of family situations, employment, social conditions and the experience of the person. (Contrast with Freud and Rogers) The approach has been very successful in generalising. The approach is nomothetic not ideographic. Investigates many areas that are ignored by behaviourism, using more rigorous scientific methods than psychoanalysis and humanism. Finally read the computer vs. the human brain sheet on the back of your cognitive handout. Summarising Perspectives For revision draw up a table for the 4 perspectives stating What are the aims Their view of what people are like The extent of science in the approach The extent to which they see people as having control of their lives (free will) or being at the mercy of forces beyond their control (determinism). What do they aim to explain, e.g. behaviour Possible applications Strengths Criticisms The easiest way to get AO2 marks is to compare the approaches. Now see the past paper questions.