* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download “A Study on Advertising Credibility and Skepticism in Five Different
Survey
Document related concepts
Aerial advertising wikipedia , lookup
Ambush marketing wikipedia , lookup
Youth marketing wikipedia , lookup
Social media and television wikipedia , lookup
Neuromarketing wikipedia , lookup
Ad blocking wikipedia , lookup
Advertising campaign wikipedia , lookup
Elaboration likelihood model wikipedia , lookup
Television advertisement wikipedia , lookup
Audience measurement wikipedia , lookup
Advertising management wikipedia , lookup
Online advertising wikipedia , lookup
Transcript
“A Study on Advertising Credibility and Skepticis m in Five Different Media Using the Persuasion Knowledge Model” Management Research Project -II Submitted In the partial fulfillment of the Degree of Master of Business Administration Semester-IV By Gaganpreet Singh Multani 11044311050 Hemang Rawat 11044311126 Vashishth Vaishnav 11044311143 Krushangi Shah 11044311130 Shivani Shah 10044311147 Under the Guidance of: Prof. (Dr.) Mahendra Sharma Prof. & Head, V. M. Patel Institute of Management. & Jayesh D. Patel Assistant Professor, V. M. Patel Institute of Management. Dipesh Dasani Assistant Professor, V. M. Patel Institute of Management. Submitted To: V. M. Patel Institute of Management (April, 2013) CERTIFICATE BY THE GUIDE This is to certify that the contents of this report entitled “A Study on Adve rtising Credibility and Skepticism in Five Different Media Using the Persuasion Knowledge Model” submitted to V. M. Patel Institute of Management for the Award of Master of Business Administration (MBA Semester-IV) is original research work carried out by him/her/them under my supervision. This report has not been submitted either partly or fully to any other University or Institute for award of any degree or diploma. Name Exam number Gaganpreet Singh Multani 11044311050 Hemang Rawat 11044311126 Vashishth Vaishnav 11044311143 Krushangi Shah 11044311130 Shivani Shah 10044311147 Professor & Head, V. M. Patel Institute Of Management, Ganpat University. Kherva. Date: Place: Kherva i CANDIDATE’S STATEMENT We hereby declare that the work incorporated in this report entitled “A Study on Adve rtising Credibility and Skepticism in Five Different Media Using the Persuasion Knowledge Model” in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the award of Master of Business Administration (Sem.-IV) is the outcome of original study undertaken by us and it has not been submitted earlier to any other University or Institution for the award of any Degree or Diploma. Name Exam number Gaganpreet Singh Multani 11044311050 Hemang Rawat 11044311126 Vashishth Vaishnav 11044311143 Krushangi Shah 11044311130 Shivani Shah 10044311147 Date: Place: Kherva ii Sign PREFACE The project report refers to the study which is relevant to professional development as an essential component in the development of the practical and professional skill required of a manager and an aid to prospective employment. As a part of the MBA curriculum and in order to gain practical knowledge in the field of managemant, we are required to make a project report on the topic which the respcted faculty provides for research. The basic objective behind doing this project is to gain knowledge about the market conditions and the different market strategies accuired to survive the compition exisisting in the market and to interpret its various implications. Doing this project helped us to enhance our knowledge regarding the different strategies adopted and the through out work Through this report we come to know about importance of team work and role of devotion towards the work. I am thankful to our institute and all the respected faculty members. This project report is an outline of what we have learnt during our project report. iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENT We can achieve success as per our potential when we get the right guidance from experts in that field & I got the right guidance at each & every time whenever I needed in this project report. First of all, I am thankful to Dr. Mahendra Sharma, Professor and Head, V. M. Patel Institute of Management for giving me an opportunity to experience the corporate field experience. I thank my guide and Professor Prof. Jayesh Patel, Recpected faculty of V.M. Patel Institute of Management for their wholehearted support and valuable guidance with which my project has been complete. I am also thankful to all my faculty members who guided me throughout the project. We are very thankful to them for their help and advice throughout our project. Their gentleness, availability and readiness to provide all the type of guidance, for understanding the technical things made this project successfully completed well within the timeframe. iv List of Table Chapter-3 3.1 Reliability Test 28 Chapter-4 4.1 Multiple Regression 30 4.1(a) Anova 30 4.1(b) Model Summary 30 4.1(c) Coefficients 31 4.2 32 Analysis of Variance 4.2(a) Descriptives 33 4.2(b) Anova 33 4.2(c) Multiple Comparisons 33 4.2(d) Descriptives 37 4.2(e) Anova 38 4.2(f) 39 Multiple Comparisons v CONTENTS Chapter-1 Certificate by the Guide I Candidate’s Statement II Preface III Acknowledgments IV List of Tables V 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Advertising 2 1.2 Skepticism 13 1.3 Credibility 14 1.4 Persuasion Knowledge Model 15 Chapter-2 2 Literature Review 16 Chapter-3 3 Research Methodology 24 3.1 Research Design 25 3.2 Objectives of the study 25 3.3 Sampling Technique 25 3.4 Sampling Method 25 3.5 Sample Size 26 3.6 Sampling unit 26 3.7 Data Collection 27 3.8 Tool for Data Collection 27 3.9 Data Collection Method 27 3.10 Hypothesis of the Study 27 3.11 Reliability Test 28 Data Analysis 29 4.1 Multiple Regression 30 4.2 ANOVA 32 Chapter-5 5 Findings 41 Chapter-6 6 Conclusion 43 Chapter-7 7 Implications & Recommendations of the Study 45 Chapter-8 8 Limitations And Directions For Future Research 47 Bibliography 49 Annexure 51 Chapter-4 4 Chapter 1 Introduction of Topic 1 “Advertising credibility and skepticism in five different media using the persuasion knowledge model” the research topic is selected to examine differences in consumers' perceptions of advertising credibility for five media — newspapers, television, radio, magazines and the Internet — and the moderating role of persuasion knowledge in those perceptions. And taking to the advertising skepticism, skepticism is the process of applying reason and critical thinking to determine validity. It's the process of finding a supported conclusion, not the justification of a preconceived conclusion. The purpose of this research is to examine differences in consumers' perceptions of advertising credibility for five media. A growing body of research has indicated that credibility is one of the most important components of a persuasive message and can often influence the outcome of persuasive messages (Perloff 1993; Choi and Rifon 2002). Advertisements that lack credibility are often ignored or avoided by consumers, which is why advertisers have long maintained that to affect attitude change or formation leading to purchase behavior the advertisement must be seen as credible by the consumer. Thus, credibility of advertising messages plays an important role in the formation of attitudes and, ultimately, purchase behavior, as dictated by the hierarchy of effects models (Thorson 1996). However, persuasion knowledge, defined as what consumers know about advertisers and advertisers' tactics, can disrupt this process by making additiona l advertiser information available to help consumers "cope" with persuasion messages often negatively by disrupting the flow of advertising information from one stage to the next (Friestad and Wright 1994). The purpose of this research is to examine the role of persuasion knowledge in influencing individuals' perceptions of advertising credibility and skepticism in five different media newspapers, magazines, radio, television and the Internet. Although previous research in this area has focused on source credibility, this study attempts to examine advertising credibility across media types. Moreover, the concept of skepticism as a set of attitudes regarding both general and vehicle specific advertising is addressed. The need to investigate the credibility of and skepticism toward advertisements among different media is important because it will help advertisers and scholars. 2 1.1 Adve rtising:Advertising is nothing but a paid form of non-personal presentation or promotion of ideas, goods or services by an identified sponsor with a view to disseminate information concerning an idea, product or service. The message which is presented or disseminated is called advertisement. In the present day marketing activities hardly is there any business in the modern world which does not advertise. However, the form of advertisement differs from business to business. Advertisement has been defined differently by different persons. A few definitions are being reproduced below: According to Wood, "Advertising is causing to know to remember, to do." According to Wheeler, "Advertising is any form of paid non-personal presentation of ideas, goods or services for the purpose of inducting people to buy." According to Richard Buskirk, "Advertising is a paid form of non-personal presentation of ideas, goods or services by an identified sponsor." According to William J. Stanton, "Advertising consists of all the activities involves in presenting to a group, a non-personal, oral or visual, openly sponsored message regarding disseminated through one or more media and is paid for by an identified sponsor." The above definitions clearly reveal the nature of advertisement. This is a powerful element of the promotion mix. Essentially advertising means spreading of information about the characteristics of the product to the prospective customers with a view to sell the product or increase the sale volume. The main features of advertise are as under: • It is directed towards increasing the sales of business. • Advertising is a paid form of publicity. • It is non-personal. They are directed at a mass audience and nor at the individual as is in the case of personal selling. 3 • Advertisements are identifiable with their sponsor of originator which is not always the case with publicity or propaganda. Various media for Advertising:Advertising media are the means to transmit the message of the advertiser to the desired class of people. Channels or vehicle by which an advertising message is brought to the notice of the prospective buyer. Types of Media:There is no dearth of media today. It may be direct or indirect. Direct method of advertising refers to such methods used by the advertiser with which he could establish a direct contact with the prospective hand involve the use of a hired agency for spreading the information. Most of the media are indirect in nature, e.g., press publicity, cinema, etc. The various media that are commonly used are being explained here under: Newspapers:Newspaper (Hindi or English) (morning or evening editions) are bought largely for their news value as such they are most appropriate for announcing new products and new development of existing products. The choice of a particular news paper for advertising depends upon many factors i.e., circulation of the newspaper, the type of readers it serves, the geographical region in which it is popular, the costs of space and general reputation of the paper etc. Magazines:Another medium under press publicity is magazines and journals. They also offer good facility because magazine are read leisurely when the reader is mentally prepared to receive advertisements. 4 Types of Advertising:An advertisement for a diner. Such signs are common on storefronts. Paying people to hold signs is one of the oldest forms of advertising, as with this human billboard pictured above. A bus with an advertisement for GAP in Singapore. Buses and other vehicles are popular media for advertisers. A DBAG Class 101 with UNICEF ads at Ingolstadt main railway station Virtually any medium can be used for advertising. Commercial advertising media can include wall paintings, billboards,street furniture components, printed flyers and rack 5 cards, radio, cinema and television adverts, web banners, mobile telephone screens, shopping carts, web popups, skywriting, bus stop benches, human billboards and forehead advertising, magazines, newspapers, town criers, sides of buses, banners attached to or sides of airplanes ("logojets"), in- flight advertisements on seatback tray tables or overhead storage bins, taxicab doors, roof mounts and passenger screens, musical stage shows, subway platforms and trains, elastic bands on disposable diapers, doors of bathroom stalls, stickers on apples in supermarkets, shopping cart handles (grabertising), the opening section of streaming audio and video, posters, and the backs of event tickets and supermarket receipts. Any place an "identified" sponsor pays to deliver their message through a medium is advertising. Television advertising / Music in adve rtising:- The TV commercial is generally considered the most effective mass- market advertising format, as is reflected by the high prices TV networks charge for commercial airtime during popular TV events. The annual Super Bowl football game in the United States is known as the most prominent advertising event on television. The average cost of a single thirty-second TV spot during this game has reached US$3.5 million (as of 2012). Some television commercials feature a song or jingle that listeners soon relate to the product. Virtual advertisements may be inserted into regular television programming through computer graphics. It is typically inserted into otherwise blank backdrops or used to replace local billboards that are not relevant to the remote broadcast audience. More controversially, virtual billboards may be inserted into the background where none exist in real- life. This technique is especially used in televised sporting events. Virtual product placement is also possible. 6 Infome rcials :- An infomercial is a long- format television commercial, typically five minutes or longer. The word "infomercial" is a portmanteau of the words "information" & "commercial". The main objective in an infomercial is to create an impulse purchase, so that the consumer sees the presentation and then immediately buys the product through the advertised toll- free telephone number or website. Infomercials describe, display, and often demonstrate products and their features, and commonly have testimonials from consumers and industry professionals. Radio advertising:- Radio advertising is a form of advertising via the medium of radio. Radio advertisements are broadcast as radio waves to the air from a transmitter to an antenna and a thus to a receiving device. Airtime is purchased from a station or network in exchange for airing the commercials. While radio has the limitation of being restricted to sound, proponents of radio advertising often cite this as an advantage. Radio is an expanding medium that can be found not only on air, but also online. According to Arbitron, radio has approximately 241.6 million weekly listeners, or more than 93 percent of the U.S. population. Online advertising:- Online advertising is a form of promotion that uses the Internet and World Wide Web for the expressed purpose of delivering marketing messages to attract customers. Online ads are delivered by an ad server. Examples of online advertising include contextual ads that appear on search engine results pages, banner ads, in text ads, Rich Media Ads, Social network advertising, online classified advertising, advertising networks and e- mail marketing, including e- mail spam. 7 New media:- Technological development and economic globalization favors the emergence of new and new communication channels and new techniques of commercial messaging. Product placements:- Covert advertising, is when a product or brand is embedded in entertainment and media. For example, in a film, the main character can use an item or other of a definite brand, as in the movie Minority Report, where Tom Cruise's character John Anderton owns a phone with the Nokia logo clearly written in the top corner, or his watch engraved with the Bulgari logo. Another example of advertising in film is in I, Robot, where main character played by Will Smith mentions his Converse shoes several times, calling them "classics," because the film is set far in the future. I, Robot and Spaceballs also showcase futuristic cars with the Audi andMercedes-Benz logos clearly displayed on the front of the vehicles. Cadillac chose to advertise in the movie The Matrix Reloaded, which as a result contained many scenes in which Cadillac cars were used. Similarly, product placement for Omega Watches, Ford,VAIO, BMW and Aston Martin cars are featured in recent James Bond films, most notably Casino Royale. In "Fantastic Four: Rise of the Silver Surfer", the main transport vehicle shows a large Dodge logo on the front. Blade Runner includes some of the most obvious product placement; the whole film stops to show a Coca-Cola billboard. Press advertising:- Press advertising describes advertising in a printed medium such as a newspaper, magazine, or trade journal. This encompasses everything from media with a very broad readership base, such as a major national newspaper or magazine, to more narrowly targeted media such as local newspapers and trade journals on very specialized topics. A form of press advertising is classified advertising, which allows private individuals or companies to purchase a small, narrowly targeted ad for a low fee 8 advertising a product or service. Another form of press advertising is the Display Ad, which is a larger ad (can include art) that typically run in an article section of a newspaper. Billboard advertising:- Billboards are large structures located in public places which display advertisements to passing pedestrians and motorists. Most often, they are located on main roads with a large amount of passing motor and pedestrian traffic; however, they can be placed in any location with large amounts of viewers, such as on mass transit vehicles and in stations, in shopping malls or office buildings, and in stadiums. The RedEye newspaper advertised to its target market at North Avenue Beach with a sailboat billboard on Lake Michigan. 9 Mobile billboard advertising:- Mobile billboards are generally vehicle mounted billboards or digital screens. These can be on dedicated vehicles built solely for carrying advertisements along routes preselected by clients, they can also be specially equipped cargo trucks or, in some cases, large banners strewn from planes. The billboards are often lighted; some being backlit, and others employing spotlights. Some billboard displays are static, while others change; for example, continuously or periodically rotating among a set of advertisements. Mobile displays are used for various situations in metropolitan areas throughout the world, including: Target advertising, One-day, and long-term campaigns, Conventions, Sporting events, Store openings and similar promotional events, and Big advertisements from smaller companies. In-store advertising:- In-store advertising is any advertisement placed in a retail store. It includes placement of a product in visible locations in a store, such as at eye level, at the ends of aisles and near checkout counters (aka POP—Point Of Purchase display), eye-catching displays promoting a specific product, and advertisements in such places as shopping carts and instore video displays. Coffee cup advertising:- Coffee cup advertising is any advertisement placed upon a coffee cup that is distributed out of an office, café, or drive-through coffee shop. This form of advertising was first popularized in Australia, and has begun growing in popularity in the United States, India, and parts of the Middle East. 10 Street advertising:- This type of advertising first came to prominence in the UK by Street Advertising Services to create outdoor advertising on street furniture and pavements. Working with products such as Reverse Graffiti, air dancer's and 3D pavement advertising, the media became an affordable and effective tool for getting brand messages out into public spaces. Sheltered Outdoor Advertising:- This type of advertising opens the possibility of combining outdoor with indoor advertisement by placing large mobile, structures (tents) in public places on temporary bases. The large outer advertising space exerts a strong pull on the observer, the product is promoted indoor, where the creative decor can intensify the impression. Celebrity branding:- This type of advertising focuses upon using celebrity power, fame, money, popularity to gain recognition for their products and promote specific stores or products. Advertisers often advertise their products, for example, when celebrities share their favorite products or wear clothes by specific brands or designers. Celebrities are often involved in advertising campaigns such as television or print adverts to advertise specific or general products. The use of celebrities to endorse a brand can have its downsides, however. One mistake by a celebrity can be detrimental to the public relations of a brand. For example, following his performance of eight gold medals at the 2008 Olympic Games in Beijing, China, swimmer Michael Phelps' contract with Kellogg's was terminated, as Kellogg's did not want to associate with him after he was photographed smoking marijuana. Celebrities such as Britney Spears have advertised for multiple products including Pepsi, Candies from Kohl's, Twister, NASCAR, Toyota and many more. 11 Cons umer-gene rated advertising:- This involves getting consumers to generate advertising through blogs, websites, wikis and forums, for some kind of payment. Aerial advertising:- Using aircraft, balloons or airships to create or display advertising media. Skywriting is a notable example. 12 1.2 Skepticism:Skepticism or Scepticism is generally any questioning attitude towards knowledge, facts, or opinions/beliefs stated as facts, or doubt regarding claims that are taken for granted elsewhere. The popular misconception is that skeptics, or critical thinkers, are people who disbelieve things. And indeed, the common usage of the word skeptical supports this: "He was skeptical of the numbers in the spreadsheet", meaning he doubted their validity. To be skeptical, therefore, is to be negative about things and doubt or disbelieve them. The true meaning of the word skepticism has nothing to do with doubt, disbelief, or negativity. Skepticis m is the process of applying reason and critical thinking to determine validity. It's the process of finding a supported conclusion, not the justification of a preconceived conclusion. It's thus inaccurate to say "Skeptics don't believe in ghosts." Some do. Many skeptics are deeply religious, and are satisfied with the reasoning process that led them there. Skeptics apply critical thinking to different aspects of their lives in their own individual way. Everyone is a skeptic to some degree. Skepticism is, or should be, an extraordinarily powerful and positive influence on the world. Skepticism is not simply about "debunking" as is commonly charged. Skepticism is about redirecting attention, influence, and funding away from worthless superstitions and toward projects and ideas that are evidenced to be beneficial to humanity and to the world. The scientific method is central to skepticism. The scientific method requires evidence, preferably derived from validated testing. Anecdotal evidence and personal testimonies generally don't meet the qualifications for scientific evidence, and thus won't often be accepted by a responsible skeptic; which often explains why skeptics get such a bad rap for being negative or disbelieving people. They're simply following the scientific method. 13 Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence, particularly in claims that are farfetched or that violate physical laws. Skepticism is an essential, and meaningful, component of the search for truth. 1.3 Credibility:Refers to the objective and subjective components of the believability of a source or message. Ad credibility is the degree to which the consumer perceives claims made about the brand in the ad to be truthful and believable (Lutz, 1985). It has a positive influence on attitude towards the brand, which then affects the intention to purchase the brand (MacKenzie et al.,1986). Ads for different kinds of products and services differ in their level of credibility. Ads sponsored by weight-loss products or services, for instance, have received much criticism for their allegedly deceptive content. For such products, Cleland et al (2002) go so far as to suggest that “most of the programs and products advertised are at best unproven and at worst unsafe” (p v). In the same report it was suggested that of 300 weight- loss advertisements sampled from broadcast and cable TV, radio, magazines, supermarket tabloids, direct mailings, commercial e- mails and web sites, 40% made at least one false claim, while 55% ad unsubstantiated claims. Traditionally, modern, credibility has two key components: trustworthiness and expertise, which both have objective and subjective components. Trustworthiness is based more on subjective factors, but can include objective measurements such as established reliability. Expertise can be similarly subjectively perceived, but also includes relatively objective characteristics of the source or message (e.g., credentials, certification or information quality). Secondary components of credibility include source dynamism (charisma) and physical attractiveness. It has become human nature to distrust advertising. Claims need to be real and credible. Roy H. Williams, best-selling author of the "Wizard of Ads" says, "Any claim made in your advertising which your customer does not perceive as the truth is a horrible waste of ad dollars." . 14 1.5 Persuasion Knowledge Model:The Persuasion Knowledge Model (PKM, Friestad and Wright 1994) outlines a theory of persuasion that acknowledges an active, thinking consumer whose overall goal is not necessarily to reject ads, or accept them, but to maintain control of the choice of how to respond to persuasion attempts. Consumer knowledge and inferences about the product or brand in the ad (topic knowledge), the sponsor of the ad (agent knowledge) and the tactics used in the ad (persuasion knowledge) are the three critical knowledge structures in this theory of persuasion. The relative influence of each of the three knowledge structures will vary across persuasion attempts (Friestad and Wright 1994; Meline 1996). These knowledge structures develop over time and so are not limited to one ad or one point in time consumers can access their cumulative persuasion knowledge as they face each new persuasion attempt. This idea of cumulative knowledge is consistent with Scott’s (1994) reader response approach to advertising, "Collective wisdom about persuasive tactics in general and past experience with the advertising genre in particular directly informs the process of reading ads" Persuasion knowledge, as one of the three knowledge structures, is a system of beliefs. This system includes beliefs about psychological mediators in ads (like emotional appeals), beliefs about marketer tactics ("agent action psychological event connections;" see also Boush, Friestad and Rose 1994), beliefs about one’s own coping tactics (including rejecting by ignoring, etc.), beliefs about the appropriateness and effectiveness of the marketer’s tactics ("Is it fair/ manipulative?" and "Will it work?"), and finally, beliefs about the marketer’s persuasion goals and one’s own coping goals. Friestad and Wright maintain that in some situations persuasion knowledge can be more extensive and accessible than topic or agent attitudes (for example, when you see an ad for a new unknown company, with a new, unknown product, but the ad uses a "well-known" type of tactic or appeal). 15 Chapter 2 Literature Review 16 Lite rature Review: Credibility:- Scholars have used varying definitions of the concept of credibility, primarily including believability, fairness, completeness, and trustworthiness of the message. Research on source credibility has also examined expertise, bias, trustworthiness, and accuracy (Gaziano and McGrath 1986; Rimmer and Weaver 1994; Shaw 1994; Flanagin and Metzger 2000) as characteristics of the message sender or "speaker" — most often an actor or spokesperson. Media credibility has been examined separate from source or content, relying instead on perceptions of the believability or trustworthiness of the medium (Kiousis 2001). Advertiser credibility is defined as the perception of whether an advertiser/advertisement can perform according to stated information (Herbig and Milewicz 1995), as well as the truthfulness or honesty of the advertisement's sponsor (MacKenzie and Lutz 1989). For the present study, we adopted Herbig and Milewicz's (1995) definition of credibility. The landmark social psychology study by Hovland and Weiss (1951) suggested that message effectiveness depends on the credibility of the source. Likewise, research by Kelman (1961) and McGuire (1969) suggests that the more credible the source, the more effective the appeal and the more likely attitude change will take place. Thus, although most of the literature on credibility deals with source - individual, organization, or media - throughout credibility studies, there is an emphasis on experience with perceived trustworthiness, or attitude toward the message provider (Hovland et. al. 1953; McCrosky 1969; Freidman and Freidman 1979; Freiden 1982; Freiclen 1984; McCracken 1989; Kamins 1990; Ohanian 1990; Kamins and Gupta 1994; Lynch 1994; Lafferty and Goldsmith 1999; Goldsmith et. al. 2000; and Newell and Goldsmith 2001). In other attitudinal studies on credibility, print advertisements have consistently been more interesting, useful, and believable as well as less excessive, offensive, and annoying 17 (Haller 1974; Somasundaran and Light 1991; Magazine Publishers of America 1991) than their broadcast counterparts. Notably, Lafferty and Goldsmith (1999) argue that regardless of media type, advertising credibility is a key influence for attitude formation and resulting behaviors. However, when media are treated as the source of information, previous research regarding credibility has not produced consistent findings. For example, Johnson and Kaye (1998) found that Internet sources were more credible than traditional media, whereas Mashek (2000) reported that traditional media sources were more credible than non-traditional media. Likewise, Newhagen and Nass (1989) found that television was perceived as more credible than newspapers, whereas Flanagin and Metzger (2000) stated that while print newspaper information was the most credible, Internet information was as credible as the other media compared. Based on these studies, we expect to find that advertising messages — although decidedly less credible than informative messages such as news or politics simply due to the fact that they are persuasive in nature — will have varying levels of credibility across media types. However, the inconsistent and contradictory nature of previous findings led us to propose the following research question: RQ1A: Which of the five media yield the highest level — and alternatively the lowest level - of advertisement credibility? 18 Skepticism:- A number of studies (e.g., Andrews, 1989; Alwitt & Prabhaker, 1992; Mittal, 1994; Shavitt et al., 1998) indicate that consumers generally tend to have distrustful attitudes towards advertising. Mohr, et al. (1998) defines skepticism toward advertising as “a cognitive response that varies depending on the contest and content of the communication”. In particular, consumers’ skepticism towards advertising has been defined as consumer’s negatively valued attitudes towards the motives of advertisement claims made by advertisers (Boush et al., 1994). As noted by Batra (1986), skepticism can be defined as a feeling of distrust and doubt evoked by stimuli that appears to be unrealistic, exaggerated, and phony. Obermiller & Spangenber (1998) define skepticism toward advertising as “the tendency to disbelieve the informational claims of advertising.” Boush, Friestad & Rose (1994), Boush et al., (1993), and Mangleburg & Bristol (1998) consider that skepticism toward advertising alludes to consumers’ lack of trust in advertising. Subsequently, Tan (2002) identifies that skepticism towards advertising is disbelief, and mistrust towards advertising. Based on above discussion, this study adopts Obermiller & Spangenber’s (1998) definition of skepticism toward advertising. We must introduce the theory of persuasion knowledge before deducing the relationship between gender and skepticism toward advertising. The persuasion knowledge has been an important theoretical framework underlying the examination of a number of phenomena in consumer behavior (Friestand & Wright, 1994). And persuasion knowledge refers to how and why consumers are persuaded and trust what advertising claims. That is to say, people who are persuaded easily would tend to trust the advertising claims. And Boush et al. (1993) indicate trust may influence consumers’ attitude toward advertising. Other researches also find that gender difference might cause different persuasability. Bakan (1966) and Meyers-Levy (1988) proposed that males possess selffocused perspective marked by self-assertive concern. By contrast, females tend to be a communal role and concern about both individual self and others. Myers-Levy & Sternthal (1991) find that females give greater consideration to advertising cues than 19 men. Thus, we propose that females tend to believe what advertisement claims, they would be persuaded more easily. The social role theory also indicates that gender might influence customers’ attitude, behavior, and sense of self (Visser & Irene, 2002). In addition, females are more agreeable and concerned for others than males (Egaly & Steffen, 1984). Based on the above discussions, this study offers the following hypothesis. H0: Skepticism toward advertising would not be influenced by gender. H1: Skepticism toward advertising would be influenced by gender. Research comparing attitudes about advertising across media suggests that different media elicit different attitudes and perceptions. One of the most common attitudes when talking about advertising is that of skepticism (Friestand and Wright 1995). The concept of skepticism has been developed in consumer research as an individual predisposition to doubt persuasive messages (Oberrniller and Spangenberg 1998). Skepticism often forms when individuals create cognitive "categories" of incoming information and treat all information according to a set of stereotypes or beliefs regarding what they feel a particular message is trying to accomplish (Friestad and Wright 1999). This set of beliefs can be general (i.e. all advertising) or context specific (i.e. Internet advertising). Furthering this line of research, Gunther (1992) posited that individuals develop different attitudes toward media based on messages, including skepticism toward media information. Based on this information, we can assume that not only would individuals have different levels of skepticism in regard to advertising in general, but also toward advertising in specific media vehicles. RQ1B: Which of the five media yield the highest level — and alternatively the lowest level - of skepticism? In addition, we would venture that the skepticism displayed by individuals will be similar 20 to their level of credibility. Specifically, that if skepticism is high, credibility will be low. This leads us to our first hypothesis. H0 : There will be a Positive relationship between advertising skepticism and credibility across media types. H1 : There will be a negative relationship between advertising skepticism and credibility across media types. Persuasion Knowledge:- Media literacy suggests that individuals learn to approach different types of information through experience — applying knowledge of one medium to information in another medium and forming new knowledge and attitudes based on that experience (Flanagin and Metzger 2000). In much the same way, the Persuasion Knowledge Model developed by Friestad and Wright (1994) suggests that experience with different persuasive messages creates perceptions of advertiser intention. This perception — or knowledge — of what advertisers are attempting to do through their messages often shapes individual responses to future persuasion attempts. Friestad and Wright (1994) proposed that individuals possess different knowledge structures about persuasive messages. The authors designated these persuasion knowledge, agent knowledge, and topic knowledge. For the purposes of this study, we deal only with persuasion knowledge in the form of suspicion (distrust of advertising in general) and agent knowledge. Agent knowledge consists of beliefs about the intention of advertisers and advertising. It assumes that advertisers are trying to sell products/services and expect persuasive messages that try to do so. Consequently, consumer responses to advertising are based on perceptions of trustworthiness, believability, and dependability of the advertising message. As such, there is a direct relationship between agent knowledge and advertising credibility. It is therefore expected that individuals who 21 recognize that the intention of advertisers is to sell products or services are more likely to doubt or be suspicious of the information presented in different types of advertisements. We suggest that knowledge regarding persuasive intent on the part of advertisers will reduce credibility, thus leading to the hypothesis that: H0 : Lower agent knowledge results in higher advertising credibility and higher levels of advertising skepticism. H2 : Higher agent knowledge results in lower advertising credibility and higher levels of advertising skepticism. Persuasion knowledge is an individual- level concept, which enables consumers to access attitudes or information retained from past persuasion experiences. These attitudes often are the basis of understanding persuasive messages and provide a means for thinking about future messages (Friestad and Wright, 1994). Individual advertising suspicion then is an attitude based on past experience with persuasion, which helps to understand and interpret new messages. Thus, there appears to be a direct relationship between persuasion knowledge in the form of individual advertising suspicion and advertising credibility and skepticism. Note that in this study advertising suspicion is treated as an overall belief about advertising in general while skepticism is treated (and measured) as applied to advertising in specific media. It is our belief that individuals who are generally suspicious and skeptical of advertisements will be less likely to believe in or depend on the information presented in different types of advertisements. Based on this explanation, we hypothesized that: H0 : Lower individual advertising suspicion results in higher advertising credibility and lower advertising skepticism. H3 : Higher individual advertising suspicion results in lower advertising credibility and higher advertising skepticism. 22 Interpretations of persuasive messages based on agent knowledge and individual skepticism are likely to cause similar actions in consumers. Friestad and Wright (1994) term this "coping behaviors," which includes actions such as selection or resistance resulting from attitudes toward persuasion often vary from one experience to the next as consumers constantly update their persuasion knowledge — specifically consumers' persuasion and agent knowledge. Because of the similarity of persuasion knowledge based on experience seen in these two concepts, we expect that there will be a relationship between agent knowledge and individual advertising skepticism, although it is unclear in which direction — positive or negative. Thus, the following hypothesis was posed: H0 : There is no co-relation between agent knowledge and individual advertising suspicion. H4 : There is a co-relation between agent knowledge and individual advertising suspicion. 23 Chapter 3 Research Methodology 24 3.1 Research Design:Exploratory research is conducted into an issue or problem where there are few or no earlier studies to refer to. The focus is on gaining insights and familiarity for later investigation. Secondly, descriptive research describes phenomena as they exist. Here data is often quantitative and statistics applied. It is used to identify and obtain information on a particular problem or issue. Finally causal or predictive research seeks to explain what is happening in a particular situation. It aims to generalise from an analysis by predicting certain phenomena on the basis of hypothesised general relationships. That’s why we had applied descriptive research as our research methodology. 3.2 Objectives of the study:• To study the relationship between independent variables as Advertisement Credibility, Skepticism. • To study the difference of opinion among various media types along advertisement credibility & skepticism. • To study the difference of opinion among various age groups along advertisement credibility & skepticism. 3.3 Sampling Technique:“Non-Probability Sampling”. Non-probability sampling is a sampling technique they do not use chance selection procedure they rely on personal judgment of researcher. 3.4 Sampling Method:“Judgmental Sampling”. Judgmental sampling is a form of convenience sampling in which the population elements are selected based on the judgment of the researcher. 25 3.5 Sample Size :Take a view from statistics, Levin & Rubin has examined the sample size determination calculations and provided guidelines for acceptable tolerance limit, significance level with respect to the means/proportions of population. With the help of following equations, the calculated sample size was 500 with 95% confidence level and 4.4% tolerance error. Tolerance error (d) = Z Here z = 95% confidence level. So, from z table its’ value is 1.96. Here, I have taken p = 0.5, q = 0.5, d= 0.044 n = z²pq d² n = (1.96)² (0.5) (0.5) (0.044)² N=500. (Appox.) 3.6 Sampling unit:Sampling unit is taken as people who has a watch on media advertising on different medium like newspaper, magazine, radio, TV, internet, so in general we can say that it’s a household’s they are going to be the sampling unit for the research. 26 3.7 Data Collection:a) Primary data The study undertaken there to be mainly based on the primary data i.e. closed ended structured questionnaire is designed. A survey technique is used for the primary data collection for the topic. b) Secondary data The study also contains secondary data i.e. data from authenticated websites, Newspapers, Internet, Magazine. 3.8 Tool for Data Collection:Structured Questionnaire also known as closed questionnaire is a quantitative method of research. 3.9 Data Collection Method: - Personal Interviews 3.10 Hypothesis of the Study: H 0 : There is no relationship among persuasion knowledge model and advertisement credibility & skepticism. H 1 : There is relationship among persuasion knowledge model and advertisement credibility & skepticism. H 0 : There is no difference among persuasion knowledge model and media types. H 1 : There is difference among persuasion knowledge model and media types. H 0 : There no difference among age and advertisement credibility, skepticism and Persuasion Knowledge Model. H 1 : There difference among age and advertisement credibility, skepticism and Persuasion Knowledge Model. 27 Software Used:The collected data is coded in the SPSS 16.0 software to make the things presentable and more effective. Data will analyzed with the help of different tests in this software like Regression test, ANOVA test, frequency analysis and many other tests. The results are shown in SPSS file which helps me in easy and effective presentation and hence results are being obtained. Microsoft Excel is also used to effective data presentation via graph. 3.11 Reliability Test:To test the reliability of various constructs of the questionnaire, the Cronbach coefficient alpha (equivalent to the average of all the split half correlation coefficients) is used. In this study, it was found 0.884. That is the above of 0.6 that is set by the researcher. So we can say that the data is consistent in nature and we can rely on it. Reliability Statistics Cronbach's Al pha N of Items .645 11 (Table 3.1) 28 Chapter 4 Data Analysis & Interpretation 29 Tests Conducted:4.1 Multiple Regression:More than one independent variable to estimate the dependent variable and it determines both the nature and the strength of a relationship between two variables. Why Regression..? • Independent factor affecting Dependent factors. • Check correlation among variables. • What proportion or extent to which Dependent variable is measured. • Among all variables which one is more significant. H 0 : There is no relationship among persuasion knowledge model and advertisement credibility & skepticism. H 1 : There is relationship among persuasion knowledge model and advertisement credibility & skepticism. ANOVA Sum of Model Squares df Mean Square F Sig. 1Regression 15.878 2 7.939 30.288 0.000 Residual 130.274 497 .262 Total 146.152 499 Table 4.1(a) Model Summary Model 1 R R Square Adjusted R Square 0.330 0.109 0.105 Std. Error of the Estimate 0.51198 Table 4.1(b) 30 Coefficients Unstandardized Coefficients B Std. Error (Constant) 2.415 0.092 AC 0.173 0.029 AS 0.047 0.033 Model 1 Standardized Coefficients Beta t Sig. 26.382 0.000 0.290 6.032 0.000 0.070 1.454 0.146 Table 4.1(c) Inte rpretation: Model is fit to 0.05 hence it is best fitted. 0.105% of variance in dependent variable is explained by Independent variable. DV (PK) is 0.105 in proportion to IV (AC, AS). Advertisement Credibility carries positive relationship with Persuasion Knowledge Model and we can say that higher the credibility higher is the persuasion. Beta value of AC is higher (i.e., 0.290) showing that it carries higher weight than other variable. 31 4.2 ANOVA(Analysis of Variance) It enables us to test for the significance of the differences among more than two sample means. Using ANOVA we will be able to make inferences about whether our samples are drawn from populations having the same mean. ANOVA is useful in such situations as comparing the mileage achieved by five different brands of gasoline, testing which of four different training methods produces the fastest learning record, or comparing the first- year earnings of the graduates of half a dozen different business schools. Here, in this research we are comparing advertisement credibility, scepticism and Persuasion of respondents across media types. H 0 : There is no difference among persuasion knowledge model and media types. H 1 : There is difference among persuasion knowledge model and media types. Descriptives 95% Confidence Interval for Mean N AC AS PK Mean Std. Deviation Std. Error Lower Bound Upper Bound Minimum Ma ximum Newspaper 115 2.6841 .96209 .08972 2.5063 2.8618 1.00 5.00 Television 210 2.8016 1.07818 .07440 2.6549 2.9483 1.00 5.00 Magazine 17 3.0000 .97895 .23743 2.4967 3.5033 1.33 4.33 Radio 18 3.0370 .99600 .23476 2.5417 3.5323 1.33 4.33 Internet 140 2.7643 .95251 .08050 2.6051 2.9235 1.00 5.00 Total 500 2.7793 1.01095 .04521 2.6905 2.8682 1.00 5.00 Newspaper 115 2.8029 .71859 .06701 2.6702 2.9356 1.67 5.00 Television 210 2.7492 .96431 .06654 2.6180 2.8804 1.00 5.00 Magazine 17 2.5490 .79879 .19374 2.1383 2.9597 2.00 5.00 Radio 18 2.4815 .64900 .15297 2.1587 2.8042 1.33 4.33 Internet 140 2.7048 .77644 .06562 2.5750 2.8345 1.00 5.00 Total 500 2.7327 .84562 .03782 2.6584 2.8070 1.00 5.00 Newspaper 115 3.2696 .55253 .05152 3.1675 3.3716 2.00 4.40 Television 210 3.3314 .56047 .03868 3.2552 3.4077 2.00 4.40 Magazine 17 3.4588 .35189 .08534 3.2779 3.6397 3.00 4.20 32 Radio 18 3.4667 .43925 .10353 3.2482 3.6851 2.40 4.00 Internet 140 3.1529 .60578 .05120 3.0516 3.2541 1.60 4.80 Total 500 3.2764 .56753 .02538 Table 4.2(a) 3.2265 3.3263 1.60 4.80 ANOVA AC AS PK Sum of Squares Df Mean Square F Sig. 3.203 4 .801 .782 .537 Within Groups 506.784 495 1.024 Total 509.986 499 2.443 4 .611 .853 .492 Within Groups 354.379 495 .716 Total 356.822 499 3.995 4 .999 3.155 .014 Within Groups 156.726 495 .317 Total 160.722 499 Between Groups Between Groups Between Groups Table 4.2(b) Multiple Comparisons LSD Depen (I) Source dent of (J) Source of 95% Confidence Interval Mean Variab Information Information Difference (Ile AC Collection Collection J) Std. Error Sig. -.11753 .11738 .317 -.3482 .1131 Magazine -.31594 .26292 .230 -.8325 .2006 Radio -.35298 .25648 .169 -.8569 .1509 Internet -.08023 .12734 .529 -.3304 .1700 Newspaper .11753 .11738 .317 -.1131 .3482 Magazine -.19841 .25515 .437 -.6997 .3029 Radio -.23545 .24850 .344 -.7237 .2528 Internet .03730 .11040 .736 -.1796 .2542 Newspaper Television Television Lower Bound Upper Bound 33 Magazine Radio Internet AS Newspaper .31594 .26292 .230 -.2006 .8325 Television .19841 .25515 .437 -.3029 .6997 Radio -.03704 .34220 .914 -.7094 .6353 Internet .23571 .25988 .365 -.2749 .7463 Newspaper .35298 .25648 .169 -.1509 .8569 Television .23545 .24850 .344 -.2528 .7237 Magazine .03704 .34220 .914 -.6353 .7094 Internet .27275 .25336 .282 -.2250 .7705 Newspaper .08023 .12734 .529 -.1700 .3304 Television -.03730 .11040 .736 -.2542 .1796 Magazine -.23571 .25988 .365 -.7463 .2749 Radio -.27275 .25336 .282 -.7705 .2250 .05369 .09816 .585 -.1392 .2465 Magazine .25388 .21986 .249 -.1781 .6859 Radio .32142 .21447 .135 -.1000 .7428 Internet .09814 .10649 .357 -.1111 .3074 Newspaper -.05369 .09816 .585 -.2465 .1392 Magazine .20019 .21336 .349 -.2190 .6194 Radio .26772 .20780 .198 -.1406 .6760 Internet .04444 .09232 .630 -.1369 .2258 Newspaper -.25388 .21986 .249 -.6859 .1781 Television -.20019 .21336 .349 -.6194 .2190 Radio .06754 .28616 .814 -.4947 .6298 Internet -.15574 .21732 .474 -.5827 .2712 Newspaper -.32142 .21447 .135 -.7428 .1000 Television -.26772 .20780 .198 -.6760 .1406 Newspaper Television Television Magazine Radio 34 Internet PK Magazine -.06754 .28616 .814 -.6298 .4947 Internet -.22328 .21187 .292 -.6395 .1930 Newspaper -.09814 .10649 .357 -.3074 .1111 Television -.04444 .09232 .630 -.2258 .1369 Magazine .15574 .21732 .474 -.2712 .5827 Radio .22328 .21187 .292 -.1930 .6395 -.06186 .06528 .344 -.1901 .0664 Magazine -.18926 .14621 .196 -.4765 .0980 Radio -.19710 .14263 .168 -.4773 .0831 Internet .11671 .07081 .100 -.0224 .2558 Newspaper .06186 .06528 .344 -.0664 .1901 Magazine -.12739 .14189 .370 -.4062 .1514 Radio -.13524 .13819 .328 -.4068 .1363 Internet .17857* .06139 .004 .0579 .2992 Newspaper .18926 .14621 .196 -.0980 .4765 Television .12739 .14189 .370 -.1514 .4062 Radio -.00784 .19030 .967 -.3817 .3661 Internet .30597* .14452 .035 .0220 .5899 Newspaper .19710 .14263 .168 -.0831 .4773 Television .13524 .13819 .328 -.1363 .4068 Magazine .00784 .19030 .967 -.3661 .3817 Internet .31381* .14090 .026 .0370 .5906 Newspaper -.11671 .07081 .100 -.2558 .0224 Television -.17857* .06139 .004 -.2992 -.0579 Magazine -.30597* .14452 .035 -.5899 -.0220 Radio -.31381* .14090 .026 -.5906 -.0370 Newspaper Television Television Magazine Radio Internet Table 4.2(c) 35 Inte rpretation:From the ANOVA table we can see that significant value is less than 0.05 for PK i.e., Persuasion Knowledge Model so it shows there is a difference among persuasion and media types. 36 H 0 : There no difference among age and advertisement credibility, skepticism and Persuasion Knowledge Model. H 1 : There difference among age and advertisement credibility, skepticism and Persuasion Knowledge Model. Descriptives 95% Confidence Interval for Mean AC AS PK Std. Std. Lower Upper Minimu Maximu Deviation Error Bound Bound m m N Mean 18-25 106 2.7296 .95298 .09256 2.5460 2.9131 1.00 5.00 26-40 193 2.6701 .99535 .07165 2.5288 2.8114 1.00 5.00 41-55 165 3.0040 1.03003 .08019 2.8457 3.1624 1.00 5.00 56 & above 36 2.4815 1.01870 .16978 2.1368 2.8262 1.33 5.00 Total 500 2.7793 1.01095 .04521 2.6905 2.8682 1.00 5.00 18-25 106 2.7264 .77364 .07514 2.5774 2.8754 1.00 5.00 26-40 193 2.8048 .88612 .06378 2.6790 2.9306 1.00 5.00 41-55 165 2.5919 .74020 .05762 2.4781 2.7057 1.00 5.00 56 & above 36 3.0093 1.15053 .19176 2.6200 3.3985 1.00 5.00 Total 500 2.7327 .84562 .03782 2.6584 2.8070 1.00 5.00 18-25 106 3.2170 .57776 .05612 3.1057 3.3283 2.20 4.80 26-40 193 3.2528 .57292 .04124 3.1715 3.3342 1.60 4.40 41-55 165 3.3200 .51552 .04013 3.2408 3.3992 1.80 4.40 56 & above 36 3.3778 .71519 .11920 3.1358 3.6198 2.00 4.40 Total 3.2764 .56753 .02538 3.2265 3.3263 1.60 4.80 500 Table 4.2(d) 37 ANOVA Sum Squares of AC AS PK Df Mean Square F Between Groups 14.090 3 4.697 Within Groups 495.897 496 1.000 Total 509.986 499 Between Groups 7.032 3 2.344 Within Groups 349.790 496 .705 Total 356.822 499 Between Groups 1.165 3 .388 Within Groups 159.557 496 .322 Total 160.722 499 Sig. 4.698 .003 3.324 .020 1.207 .307 Table 4.2(e) 38 Multiple Comparisons LSD Depen 95% Confidence Interval dent Mean Variab Difference (I- le (I) Age (J) Age J) Std. Error Sig. Lower Bound Upper Bound AC 18-25 26-40 .05944 .12088 .623 -.1781 .2969 41-55 -.27448* .12446 .028 -.5190 -.0299 56 and above .24808 .19288 .199 -.1309 .6270 18-25 -.05944 .12088 .623 -.2969 .1781 41-55 -.33392* .10602 .002 -.5422 -.1256 .18153 .299 -.1680 .5453 26-40 56 and above .18864 41-55 AS 18-25 .27448* .12446 .028 .0299 .5190 26-40 .33392* .10602 .002 .1256 .5422 56 and above .52256* .18393 .005 .1612 .8839 56 and above 18-25 -.24808 .19288 .199 -.6270 .1309 26-40 -.18864 .18153 .299 -.5453 .1680 41-55 -.52256* .18393 .005 -.8839 -.1612 26-40 -.07842 .10152 .440 -.2779 .1210 41-55 .13450 .10453 .199 -.0709 .3399 56 and above -.28284 .16200 .081 -.6011 .0354 18-25 .07842 .10152 .440 -.1210 .2779 41-55 .21292* .08904 .017 .0380 .3879 56 and above -.20442 .15246 .181 -.5040 .0951 18-25 -.13450 .10453 .199 -.3399 .0709 26-40 -.21292* .08904 .017 -.3879 -.0380 56 and above -.41734* .15448 .007 -.7209 -.1138 18-25 26-40 41-55 39 PK 56 and above 18-25 .28284 .16200 .081 -.0354 .6011 26-40 .20442 .15246 .181 -.0951 .5040 41-55 .41734* .15448 .007 .1138 .7209 26-40 -.03587 .06857 .601 -.1706 .0989 41-55 -.10302 .07060 .145 -.2417 .0357 56 and above -.16080 .10941 .142 -.3758 .0542 18-25 .03587 .06857 .601 -.0989 .1706 41-55 -.06715 .06014 .265 -.1853 .0510 56 and above -.12493 .10297 .226 -.3272 .0774 18-25 .10302 .07060 .145 -.0357 .2417 26-40 .06715 .06014 .265 -.0510 .1853 .10433 .580 -.2628 .1472 18-25 26-40 41-55 56 and above -.05778 56 and above 18-25 .16080 .10941 .142 -.0542 .3758 26-40 .12493 .10297 .226 -.0774 .3272 41-55 .05778 .10433 .580 -.1472 .2628 Table 4.2(f) Inte rpretation:From ANOVA table we can say that as significant values of Advertisement credibility and scepticism is less than 0.05 there is a difference among age and them. 40 Chapter 5 Findings 41 There is difference between persuasion knowledge model and media types. There is difference between age groups persuasion knowledge model, advertising credibility, skepticism. Advertisement Credibility carries positive relationship with Persuasion Knowledge Model and we can say that higher the credibility higher is the persuasion. Advertisement credibility carries highest weight among the other dependent variables. There is inverse relationship between perceived ad credibility and persuasion knowledge. If the advertisement Skepticism is higher, than the trust is low and so does the persuasion knowledge which leads to the low credibility. 42 Chapter 6 Conclusions 43 We can conclude that there is difference of opinion among various media types along advertisement credibility & skepticism. There is relationship between independent variables as Advertisement Credibility, Skepticism. A negative relationship between unintended emotions and intention to take action. Advertisement credibility is a consumer’s evaluation of the truth and believability of the advertisement. This study has contributed by providing a better understanding of the mediacredibility perceptions of gender consumers. 44 Chapter 7 Implications & Recommendations of the Study 45 In one of the first reported findings, the mean ranking values indicate that print media are considered to be more credible than broadcast media. If an organization contemplates using broadcast media, such as television or radio (versus print media) as a means of advertising, they should take into account whether or not the perceived credibility by the target audience is a factor in the advertising campaign. The results suggest that the old-fashioned printed word (newspapers and magazines) seems to be more credible when it comes to advertising. However, if few young consumers read print media, they may not be exposed to the marketer’s ‘credible’ advertising message at all. Based on the literature discussion, it was expected that respondents with higher levels of perceived Internet credibility would exhibit higher levels of onlineshopping likelihood. Yet, no strong relationship was found to exist between Internet credibility and the likelihood that these consumers would shop online. It must be noted that the study was conducted among full-time students and many of them may have a relatively low ratio of credit-card ownership, which is a prerequisite when shopping online. It may also be that security concerns are likely to be an influencing factor in online shopping. 46 Chapter 8 LIMITATIONS AND DIRECTIONS FOR FUTURE RESEARCH 47 Since use was made of non-probability sampling, results from this study cannot be generalized to the broader population. In a country that is diversely populated with many different ethnic groups, one could expand this study to also determine whether different ethnic groups or even different cultural groups differ in terms both of their media-credibility perceptions. The sample size was limited and technique used for sampling was convenient based sampling so the results obtained from the study may not be generalized for the whole population and may reflect bias tone. The time period of the study was not sufficient to measure the consumer’s response effectively and reach to a more valid conclusion. Many of the respondents may not have given the correct information due to Personal bias. Sometimes a respondent may feel very tedious task to participate in such opinion pool. The geographical boundaries focused for research was pre-defined i.e. Ahmadabad, hence the result drawn out can’t be assumed for other locations. 48 Bibliography 49 Books: Birks, N. K. (2003). Marketing Research. Prentice Hall. Rubin, R. I. (1988). Statistics for Management. Prentice Hall. Websites: (n.d.). Retrieved January 2013, from http://www.google.co.in/search?hl=en&sclient=psyab&q=research+paper+on+accessories+counterfeit&pbx=1&oq=research+paper+on+ accessories+counterfeit&aq=f&aqi=&aql=&gs_sm=e&gs_upl=465076l471255l0l472 333l24l14l0l0l0l0l0l0ll0l0&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.r_qf.,cf.o (n.d.). Retrieved February 2013, from http://skeptoid.com/skeptic.php (n.d.). Retrieved January 2013, from http://www.inma.org/blogs/research/advertisment (n.d.). Retrieved January 2013, from http://www.proquest.com/researchpaper/skeptisium 50 Annexures 51 QUESTIONNAIRE Dear Sir/ Madam, We are the student of V. M. Patel Institute of Management, Ganpat University, Kherva. We are conducting survey under our Management Research Project-2 with the topic of “A study On Advertising Credibility and Skepticism in Five Different Media Using the Persuasion Knowledge Model” for the fulfillment of our MBA. Hence, data provided by you will be kept confidential and exclusively used for academic purpose only. PART- A (Personal Detail) 1. Gende r: [ ] Male [ ] Female 2. Age: [ ] 18- 25 [ ] 26-40 [ ] 41-55 [ ] 56 & Above [ ] Businessmen/women [ ] Student [ ] Part Time Employee [ ] Full Time Employee 3. Occupation: [ ] Professional [ ] Other. Please Specify: ____________________________________ 4. Education Level: [ ] S.S.C [ ] H.S.C [ ] Post Graduation 5. Monthly Family Income: [ ] Less than 30,000 [ ] 60,001 to 90,000 [ ] Graduation [ ] Other [ ] 30,001 to 60,000 [ ] 90,001 to 1,20,000 [ ] 1, 20,001 & Above 52 6. Marital Status: [ ] Married [ ] Unmarried [ ] Widow [ ] Divorced 7. What me dium of media do you use maximum to collect information? [ ] Newspaper [ ] Television [ ] Magazine [ ] Radio [ ] Internet PART- B: Adve rtisement Credibility Please give your opinion regarding the statements mentioned below in the following table. 1-Strongly 2-Disagree 3-Neutral 4-Agree 5-Strongly disagree agree Please place a tick-mark (√) in appropriate boxes Sr.No 1 Parameters 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 Advertisements generally tell the truth . You can usually believe what you read in 2 advertisements . I usually find advertisements to be quite 3 credible. PART-C: Advertisement Skepticis m Please place a tick-mark (√) in appropriate boxes Sr.No Parameters I generally cannot depend on getting the 1 truth from advertisements. 2 I tend to doubt ads. Advertisements tend to make me 3 suspicious for each different media. 53 PART-D: Persuasion knowledge Please give your opinion regarding the statements mentioned below in the following table. 1-Strongly 2-Disagree 3-Neutral 4-Agree 5-Strongly disagree agree Please place a tick-mark (√) in appropriate boxes Sr.No Parameters 1 2 3 4 5 Radio Magazine Inte rnet Advertisers care more about getting you to 1 buy things. I notice tricks advertisers use to promote a 2 product. 3 Advertisers try to get you to buy things. 4 Advertisements are meant to sell products. 5 I generally don't trust ads. Parameters Newspaper Television Which media would provide the highest level of advertisement credibility. Which media would provide the highest level of advertisement skepticism.. Thank you very much for giving your precious time. Have a wonderful day!!! 54